TERRE THAEMLITZ

MATT MULLICAN

JOSEF DABERNIG

Guillaume Robert

Alexander Gutke

Benoît Maire

Roberto Pugliese

Pratchaya Phinthong

Pier Paolo Pasolini

Christodoulos Panayiotou

Antoine Nessi

Isidoro Valcárcel Medina

VINCENT VERLÉ

1:1PROJECTS

JACOPO MILIANI

Marcus Geiger

Adrienne Drake

Rometti Costales

Jérémy Laffon

FRANCISCO TROPA

Goldschmied & Chiari

LORRAINE CHATEAUX

ELAINE STURTEVANT

Silvano Agosti

MATHIEU KLEYEBE ABONNENC

LUCY SKAER

RETO PULFER

ENRICO BOCCIOLETTI

RON TRAN

GUSTAV ANDREAS WOLFGANG

Hans Schabus

CLÉMENCE SEILLES

Emilio Prini

Valérie Mazouin

Rä di Martino

ANDREA VILIANI

Rainer Oldendorf

Alberto Garutti

Félix González-Torres

ILARIA BONACOSSA

Leander Schwazer

Gianni Pettena & PIERRE BAL-BLANC

Sandra Patron

SIMONE FRANGI

Éric Mangion

PIERRE BAL-BLANC

Allan Sekula

Hou Hanru

Marie Cool Fabio Balducci

ANICKA YI

MARIE VOIGNIER

MICHAEL E. SMITH

LEONARDO BIGAZZI

Sanja Iveković

Letizia Ragaglia

CAPC – PHILIPPE THOMAS

VALERIO DEHÒ

Claire Le Restif

Nina Fiocco

Deimantas NARKEVIČIUS

Jochen Lempert

Carlo Scarpa

ETIENNE BERNARD

CARLO GABRIELE TRIBBIOLI

Matthieu Saladin

KEREN DETTON

CHIARA AGNELLO

JULIETTE BLIGHTMAN

Bernhard Rüdiger

Roman Ondák

PATRICK BERNATCHEZ

Walter Pichler

NINA CANELL

LOIS WEINBERGER

Rosalind Nashashibi

BECKY BEASLEY

JULIE PELLEGRIN

KP BREHMER

ALESSANDRO DI PIETRO

SIMON FRAVEGA

Marlie Mul

Gianluca d’Incà Levis

ERIC DE CHASSEY

Nathalie Ergino

ACHILLE CASTIGLIONI

EMANUELE GUIDI

Martine Michard

THOMAS TEURLAI

Julia Frank

LAWRENCE WEINER

LORENZO BENEDETTI

GIORGIO DE CHIRICO

Émilie Parendeau/BERNHARD RÜDIGER

MARIE COZETTE

Tony Fiorentino

Marta Minujín

Vivien Roubaud

Ann Veronica Janssens

MARCEL BROODTHAERS

Lili Reynaud-Dewar

Prinz Gholam

Stefania Meazza

PETER BUGGENHOUT

SANTIAGO SIERRA

Mandla Reuter

Jean-Marie Perdrix

SLAVEN TOLJ

Daniele Pezzi

Lise Lacombe and Jean-Baptiste Alazard

R&Sie(n) François Roche, Stéphanie Lavaux, Jean Navarro

ANDY WARHOL

Cécile Poblon

ROBERT BREER

Chris Sharp

RAIMUND ABRAHAM

MARYAM JAFRI

JOHN CAGE

Dan Graham

Alessandro Rabottini

CLEMENS VON WEDEMEYER

Mattin

SYLVIE BOULANGER

Marianne Maric

VIRGINIE BOBIN

Marcello Maloberti

Sonia Leimer

MICHAEL DEAN

Mauricio Guillén

DANIELE BALIT

ANNIE VIGIER & FRANCK APERTET (LES GENS D’UTERPAN)

Jean-Luc Moulène

MÉLANIE BOUTELOUP

DIANE BLONDEAU

EMILIE PARENDEAU

MARIA ALICATA

GIANNI PETTENA

QUENTIN DEROUET

Isa Genzken

en

Nathalie Ergino

Since January, 2006, Nathalie Ergino is the director of the Institut d‘art contemporain. Former director of the School / FRAC Champagne-Ardenne (1994-2000), and of the Museum of contemporary art [mac] of Marseille (2001-2005), she has curated large monographic exhibitions (Jimmie Durham, Rodney Graham, Raymond Hains, Ann Veronica Janssens, Carsten Höller) as well as collective exhibitions (Maisons-Cerveaux, Subréel).

Focus: Prepared Piano – Model for a New Institutionalism
Partner: IAC

close
en

Prepared Piano – Model for a new Institutionalism

Round table discussion moderated by Pierre Bal-Blanc
organized in the frame of PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art – France-Italie 2014-2015

Villa Medici
Viale Trinità dei Monti, 1 – 00187 Roma
Friday May 9, 2014
10 – 12 am

The panel discussion Prepared Piano: Model for a New Institutionalism presents artists, curators, as well as the managers of places where various projects have been produced over the past few years in Europe. These projects have in common that they make novel use of cultural exchange instruments, while giving their activities both a local and international scope.

Various case studies will be presented during this panel discussion to bring back into play notions of crossdisciplinarity (Théâtre des expositions at Villa Medici), process (Per_formare una collezione at the MADRE in Naples), and plasticity of relations (Laboratoire Espace Cerveau at the IAC in Villeurbanne). The discussions as a whole will echo the desire to found “a new institutionalism”, which has developed over the past few years through initiatives coming from both artists and curators. The desire to reconfigure the institution based on the model of a community centre, laboratory, open school, and other places that are not mainly governed by market laws, is linked with the creative momentum that led to Prepared Piano. The proposed discussion aims to demonstrate that PIANO, as well as Salon Light, dedicated to independent publishing, and Vdrome, a distribution network for artist films, are today all tangible initiatives.

Pierre Bal-Blanc is the director of the CAC Brétigny. He is also an independent curator and the vice-president of the d.c.a / French association for the development of centres d’art. Since 2003, in resonance with the social thought of Charles Fourrier, he has been developing the “Phalanstère Project” within a centre d’art. This is a series of specific offerings that critically rework the principles of artwork accumulation.
His exhibition series “Living Currency” and “Draft Score for an Exhibition” negotiate the historical and contemporary analysis of the body and of strategies linked to performance in the visual arts. “The Death of the Audience “ and “Reversibility” are reflections on the consequences that the materiality of art objects has on the configuration of art-world protagonists, the role and form of cultural institutions today.

Interdisciplinary stage
Theater of Exhibitions / Villa Medici, Rome / presentation by Eric de Chassey

Conceived by the director Éric de Chassey and organised by the French Academy in Rome – Villa Medici every year since 2010, the Theatre of Exhibitions has been devised as a moment of encounter between the fellows in residence and the public, as well as one of dialogue and confrontation among the artists and scholars in residence. The different spaces of Villa Medici become ephemeral stages for installations, performances, projections, readings. The concept of openness, a predisposition to dialogue and confrontation among different disciplines is the characteristic that unites the projects, which are presented. The Theatre of Exhibitions has been designed as a “multiform laboratory” which displays the diversity of artistic practices and research, thus confirming the centrality of the French Academy in Rome in contemporary creation.

Éric de Chassey is the Director of the French Academy in Rome – Villa Medici since 2009. He is also Professor of Contemporary Art History at the École Normale Supérieure in Lyon. Since the beginning, his scientific activities have focused on the US and abstract art. He has published books and essays on XXth and XXIst century art. He has also curated numerous exhibitions, accompanied by publications such as Soulages XXIth century (Rome, Villa Medici, 2013) or Simon Hantaï (Rome, Villa Medici, 2014).

Thought’s spatialization
Space Brain Laboratory / IAC, Villeurbanne / presentation by Nathalie Ergino and Ann Veronica Janssens

Initiated in 2009 by the artist Ann Veronica Janssens and Nathalie Ergino, director of the Institut d’art contemporain, the project aims at starting from experiments in art to explore practical and theoretical research linking space and the brain. This interdisciplinary laboratory brings together the reflections and experiments of artists and scientists and also philosophers, anthropologists, art historians and theoreticians, thus providing as much coverage by neuroscience, physics and astrophysics as by hypnosis, telepathy and shamanism.

Since January, 2006, Nathalie Ergino is the director of the Institut d‘art contemporain. Former director of the School / FRAC Champagne-Ardenne (1994-2000), and of the museum of contemporary art [mac] of Marseille (2001-2005), she has curated big monographic exhibitions (Jimmie Durham, Rodney Graham, Raymond Hains, Ann Veronica Janssens, Carsten Höller) as well as collective exhibitions (Maisons-Cerveaux, Subréel).

Born in 1956 in Folkestone (UK), Ann Veronica Janssens lives and works in Brussels (BE). Her work has been the subject of numerous solo exhibitions. Since 1985, she has also participated in important group exhibitions, as well as various international biennials and in 1999 Venice where she represented Belgium with Michel François. She regularly collaborates with choreographers (Drouler Pierre and Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker). Her work has been presented recently within the exhibition Passion Fruit at the Centre Pompidou, Paris and within Dynamo, A century of light in art, 1913 – 2013 at the Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais.

Organizing the perceptible
Vdrome / Mousse, Milano / presentation by Enrico Boccioletti

Vdrome is an online platform that offers regular, high quality screenings of films and videos directed by visual artists and filmmakers, whose production lies in-between contemporary art and cinema. Each screening is presented during a limited period, as in a movie theatre. Vdrome makes available a program of exceptional artists’ films and videos that are selected due to their importance, quality and innovative strength, many of which are only shown in the context of film festivals, exhibitions or specific surveys, being therefore of very limited access. Vdrome is an initiative conceived and promoted by Mousse, curated by Edoardo Bonaspetti, Jens Hoffmann, Andrea Lissoni and Filipa Ramos, and maintained by Enrico Boccioletti.

Enrico Boccioletti is an artist and musician active under multiple names – Death in Plains, 4SICSX, spcnvdr and Enrico B – in the fields of postconceptual, new vernacular, performance and sound, interested into incompleteness and circularity, duplication and accumulation, waste, layering, forgery, faux-real. He also works for Mousse Magazine and Vdrome.

Incarnation of the collection
Per_formare una collezione / Madre, Naples / presentation by Andrea Viliani and Alessandro Rabottini

Per_forming a collection is an on-going project designed to develop the formation of the Museo MADRE’s permanent collection in Naples. It focuses on artists of different generations whose works have been conceived as physical and mental instruments that bring together thought and action in every possible media, linking visual arts to theatre and literature. The project aims to shape a collection that is articulated over time, combining archival research with commissions for new works taking into account the role of the museum as a place of memory and preservation as well as a continuing research and production laboratory. All the works presented have a relation with the city and its history: works conceived or exhibited here, from artist who happened to exhibit in Naples or works belonging to private or public local collections.

Since 2013 Andrea Viliani is the director of the Fondazione Donnaregina per le arti contemporanee – Madre, Napoli. He previously worked from 2009 to 2012 as Director of Fondazione Galleria Civica – Centro di Ricerca sulla Contemporaneità in Trento. In 2012 he was a member of the Core Agents Group of dOCUMENTA(13) and he co-curated the related position in Kabul and Bamiyan (Afghanistan). From 2005 to 2009, Viliani was curator at the MAMbo – Museo d’Arte Moderna di Bologna. Among the 60 “players” of the 2007 Biennale de Lyon, he is a frequent contributor to FROG, Mousse, Kaleidoscope and Flash Art.

Alessandro Rabottini is an art critic and curator based in London. He is Curator at Large at the Madre Museum in Naples (where he recently curated a mid-career retrospective of Padraig Timoney and the survey show of Ettore Spalletti) and served as guest curator for several international institutions. In his capacity of Curator at Large at the GAMeC in Bergamo he curated solo exhibitions of artists such as Robert Overby, Mircea Cantor, Latifa Echakhch, Victor Man, Pratchaya Phinthong, Pietro Roccasalva, Tim Rollins & K.O.S, Sterling Ruby, Tris Vonna-Michell and Jordan Wolfson.

Praising uncertainty
Salon light / cneai =, Chatou / presentation by Sylvie Boulanger

Founded in 2004 by Cneai, Salon Light became over a few years an unmissable rendez-vous for micro-publishers and artist’s publication in Paris. After exporting the concept at Vermelho gallery in Sao Paulo and the great success of Salon Light 9 at Palais de Tokyo in 2012, Salon Light keeps uniting a moving scene of artists, authors, independent publishers or composers. Books, magazines, objects, LP’s, catalogues or artist’s book, the publications are often limited editions, sometimes impossible to find in Paris, and are breaking new grounds while creating new networks in the art and publishing worlds. Performances and meetings with professionals and artists are also a key part of the event. Free for the publishers and the public, it’s accessible to all and offers visibility to a still somehow unknown field.

Sylvie Boulanger is founder and curator of Salon Light since its creation in 2004. She directs Cneai since 1997. She curated over a hundred exhibitions, published more than seventy books (artist’s books, journals, catalogues) and produced as few documentaries. She is a member of several research labs, she also contributes to academic reviews like Multitudes and lectures in art schools and universities. She was the founder of the production agency APC (Art Public Contemporain) that she directed for ten years (1990-1997) after occupying the position of associate director «exhibition and communication» within the Ministry of Culture visual arts delegation (1987-1990).

The round table discussion will be followed by a
Concert for Prepared Piano by Laurent Durupt, composer and fellow at the Villa Medici

More information at
www.pianoproject.org
info@pianoproject.org

Round table discussion organized in the frame of PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art, France-Italie 2014-2015

PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art, France–Italy 2014-2015, initiated by d.c.a / French association for the development of centres d’art, in partnership with the Institut français in Italy, the French Embassy in Italy and the Institut français, with the support of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development, the French Ministry of Culture and Communication and Fondazione Nuovi Mecenati.

close
en

Rosalind Nashashibi

PLE-TPOMPT-056

Born 1973, Croydon, United Kingdom
Lives and works in Liverpool, United Kingdom

Image:
Rosalind Nashashibi, The Prisoner, 2008, 16 mm film, 5 minutes. © Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

JOSEF DABERNIG

Born 1956, Kötschach-Mauthen, Austria
Lives and works in Vienna, Austria

Having studied sculpture in Vienna, Josef Dabernig subsequently developed an artistic practice in a wide variety of media. Using conceptual tools, Dabernig investigates the ways in which knowledge and rationality are categorized through conventional forms and behavioral norms. He has copied entire books by hand in response to the discipline present during his years at boarding school, made lists, and built sculptures from found materials or according to mathematical rules. His films favor a structured storyline and an open end, introducing systems of order where confusing and implausible parameters create discrepancies. The absent subject of his photographs, which represent empty spaces on the outskirts of large cities, nevertheless offers a sense of narrative and traces of economic and social change.
His “not further developed” proposal for a new art center takes a documentary form, made up of images and texts. More a discursive construct than a project for construction, ironic in the way it portrays the potential “innovative” qualities of the future art center, the work focuses on different architectural details through a series of found photographs: an eclectic choice of building façades, a dilapidated restaurant, an underground forum, a guest room, shelves of archives (including those of the artist), suburban homes’ emergency exits, and spectacular annexes.

Nato a Kötschach-Mauthen, Austria, nel 1956
Vive e lavora a Vienna, Austria

Dopo gli studi in scultura a Vienna, la pratica di Josef Dabernig si diffonde in diversi campi. Utilizzando strumenti concettuali, l’artista s’interessa alla categorizzazione del sapere e alla razionalità, alle forme organizzate e ai comportamenti normati. Ricopia interi libri a mano come reazione all’eccessiva disciplina dei suoi anni di collegio, compila delle liste, realizza delle sculture a partire da materiali di recupero e secondo regole matematiche. I suoi film privilegiano una sceneggiatura strutturata e un finale aperto, introducendo dei sistemi d’ordine i cui parametri confusi e insensati finiscono per provocare degli iati. Il soggetto assente delle sue fotografie, che rappresentano luoghi deserti nei dintorni delle grandi città, lascia spazio a una narrazione in filigrana e alle tracce dei cambiamenti economici e sociali.
La sua proposta “non perseguita” per un nuovo centro d’arte è presentata sotto forma di un insieme documentario, composto di immagini e di testi. Più una costruzione discorsiva che un vero e proprio progetto edilizio, con un punto di vista ironico sul possibile carattere “nuovo” di questa ipotetica istituzione, l’opera mostra nello specifico differenti elementi architettonici in una serie di fotografie ritrovate: una scelta eclettica di facciate, un ristorante decadente, un luogo d’incontro in un sotterraneo, una camera in affitto, dei ripiani di archivio (tra cui quelli dell’artista), delle porte sul retro di villette e degli allegati particolarmente scenografici.

Né à Kötschach-Mauthen, Autriche, en 1956
Vit et travaille à Vienne, Autriche

À la suite d’études de sculpture à Vienne, la pratique de Josef Dabernig se dissémine en divers médiums. À travers des outils conceptuels, il s’intéresse à la catégorisation du savoir et à la rationalité, aux formes planifiées et aux comportements normés. Il copie des livres entiers à la main en réaction à ses années de pensionnat à la discipline prononcée, dresse des listes, réalise des sculptures à partir de matériaux trouvés et selon des règles mathématiques. Ses films privilégient un scénario structuré et une fin ouverte, introduisant des systèmes d’ordre dont les paramètres confus et déraisonnables finissent par provoquer des hiatus. Le sujet absent de ses photographies, représentant des espaces vides aux alentours des grandes villes, laisse place à une narration en filigrane et aux traces des changements économiques et sociaux.
Sa proposition « non poursuivie » pour un nouveau centre d’art est présentée sous la forme d’un ensemble documentaire comportant des images et des textes. Davantage construction discursive plutôt que projet de construction, ironique sur le possible caractère « nouveau » de cette hypothétique institution, l’œuvre détaille différents éléments architecturaux au fil d’une série de photographies trouvées : un choix éclectique de façades, un restaurant défraichi, un espace de discussion en souterrain, une chambre d’hôtes, des rangements d’archives (dont celles de l’artiste), des sorties de secours pavillonnaires et des annexes spectaculaires.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it

Pratchaya Phinthong

Born 1974, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
Lives and works in Bangkok, Thailand

Pratchaya Phinthong’s works bring together remote situations that would otherwise remain extraneous. The physical and semantic connections and shifts that he forges reveal new angles on social, geographic, and economic scenarios. The viewer is invited to bridge the apparent distance between the elements chosen by Phinthong, as happens in the piece Broken Hill, in which a copy of the skull of the first human found in Africa, together with other related materials, become the elements of a performance. When the skull was discovered, in 1921, in Broken Hill (now Kabwe, Zambia) the English colonial authorities had it taken to the Natural History Museum in London. The skull kept in the Lusaka National Museum in Zambia is a copy of the original find. The first version of the performance, presented in London in 2013, involved the guide from the Lusaka museum, Kamfwa Chishala, who recounted the finding and removal of the skull, as he normally does during his museum tours in Zambia. Phinthong asked the African museum to lend him its copy of the skull and purchased another copy on the internet to display in Lusaka for the duration of the loan. The installation on show here comprises a skull bought online, a series of photographs documenting Kamfwa Chishala’s experiences in London, and a case that is a reproduction of the one in the London museum containing the original skull.

Nato a Ubon Ratchathani, Thailandia, nel 1974
Vive e lavora a Bangkok, Thailandia

Le opere di Pratchaya Phinthong mettono in relazione situazioni agli antipodi, che, altrimenti, resterebbero lontane. Le connessioni e gli spostamenti, sia semantici sia fisici, che l’artista stabilisce in questo modo fanno emergere nuovi punti di vista su contesti sociali, geografici ed economici. Lo spettatore è invitato a colmare la distanza apparente tra gli elementi selezionati da Phinthong nei propri lavori. È il caso di Broken Hill, in cui una copia del teschio del primo essere umano trovato in Africa, insieme ad altri materiali correlati, diventa la scenografia per una performance. Quando il teschio fu scoperto, nel 1921, nella località allora chiamata Broken Hill (oggi Kabwe, Zambia), le autorità coloniali inglesi lo trasferirono presso il Natural History Museum di Londra. Il museo nazionale di Lusaka, in Zambia, ne espone invece una copia. Nella prima versione della performance presentata nel 2013 a Londra, è stato coinvolto Kamfwa Chishala, guida del museo di Lusaka, per spiegare ai visitatori la storia del teschio, del ritrovamento e della sostituzione, ciò che fa normalmente nei suoi tour in Zambia. Phinthong ha chiesto in prestito la copia del teschio al museo africano e ha acquistato su Internet un’altra copia, da esporre a Lusaka per tutto il periodo del prestito. L’installazione qui esposta è costituita da un teschio acquistato online, da una serie di fotografie che raccontano l’esperienza di Kamfwa Chishala a Londra, e da una cassa che riproduce quella contenente il teschio originale nel museo londinese.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en

Mandla Reuter

SONY DSC

Mandla Reuter, The Agreement, Vienna 2011

Born 1975, Nqutu, South Africa
Lives and works in Berlin, Germany and Basel, Switzerland

Image:
Mandla Reuter, The Agreement, Vienna 2011, Installation view Galerie Mezzanin, 2011. Courtesy the artist and Galerie Mezzanin. Photo: Karl Kühn

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

Sanja Iveković

Born 1949, Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Lives and works in Zagreb, Croatia

Sanja Iveković is associated with the “Nova Umjetnička Praksa” (New Art Practice), a generation of Croatian artists who emerged in the 1960s and sought to renew artistic practice and assert its place in society. Using collaborative strategies, she has produced performances, collages, sculptures, and installations that privilege themes of gender, identity, and memory. In a patriarchal culture, her politically inspired work challenges the stereotypical construction of female identity and its substantial political role in history. The figure of Rosa Luxemburg, assassinated for her radical political position in 1919, is a major inspiration for the artist. In 2001, at the Casino Luxembourg, Iveković appropriated the Gëlle Fra (The Golden Woman), a monument dedicated to Luxembourgish volunteers who fought in the 20th Century wars. The statue became a pregnant Lady Rosa of Luxembourg, her pedestal inscribed with the words “Resistance,” “Kultur,” “Kapital,” “Virgin,” “Madonna,” and “Bitch.”
In response to an invitation to produce a work for the city of Aalborg in Denmark, Sanja Iveković proposed rebuilding a monument designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe in memory of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht. Inaugurated in Berlin in 1926, the monument was destroyed by the Nazis in 1935. For the new version of the anti-Fascist memorial, the artist plans to gather the bricks needed to rebuild it with the help of international donations. During the exhibition Soleil politique, Iveković will launch the project with a public appeal.

 

Nata a Zagabria, Yugoslavia, nel 1949
Vive e lavora a Zagabria, Croazia

Sanja Iveković fa parte della “Nova Umjetnička Praksa” (Nuova Pratica Artistica), generazione di artisti croati che vuole rinnovare la pratica dell’arte e rivendicare la propria iscrizione nella società. Attraverso delle strategie collaborative, l’artista realizza performance, collage, sculture o installazioni legate ai temi che predilige: le questioni di genere, l’identità e la memoria. In una cultura patriarcale, il lavoro impegnato di Iveković mette a confronto la costruzione identitaria e stereotipata della donna a quello che è il suo autentico ruolo politico nella storia. La figura di Rosa Luxemburg, assassinata a causa delle sue idee politiche, è un punto di riferimento per l’artista. Nel 2001, al Casino Luxembourg, Lussemburgo, Iveković trasforma la scultura della Gëlle Fra (Donna dorata), monumento in onore dei soldati lussemburghesi. La statua diventa Lady Rosa of Luxembourg, e questa volta è incinta: sulla base del nuovo monumento l’artista iscrive le parole “Résistance”, “Kultur”, “Kapital”, “Virgin” e “Madonna”.
Invitata a eseguire un’opera per la città di Aalborg, in Danimarca, Sanja Iveković propone di ricostruire un monumento ideato da Mies van der Rohe in omaggio a Rosa Luxemburg e Karl Liebknecht (Berlino, 1926), distrutto dai nazisti nel 1935. Per la nuova versione del memoriale antifascista, l’artista desidera riunire i mattoni necessari alla riedificazione attraverso una colletta internazionale. In Soleil Politique, Sanja Iveković inaugura questo progetto con il lancio di un annuncio pubblico.

Née à Zagreb, Yugoslavie, en 194

9
Vit et travaille à Zagreb, Croatie

Sanja Iveković est associée à la « Nova Umjetnička Praksa » (Nouvelle Pratique Artistique), génération d’artistes croates qui vise à renouveler la pratique de l’art et revendique son inscription dans la société. À travers des stratégies collaboratives, elle réalise des performances, collages, sculptures ou installations liées à ses thématiques de prédilection : le genre, l’identité et la mémoire. Dans une culture patriarcale, son travail de nature engagée confronte la construction identitaire et stéréotypée de la femme et son véritable rôle politique dans l’histoire.
Rosa Luxemburg, assassinée à cause de ses positions politiques, est une référence majeure pour l’artiste. En 2001, au Casino Luxembourg, Iveković réinvestit la Gëlle Fra (femme dorée), monument dédié aux soldats luxembourgeois. La statue devient Lady Rosa of Luxembourg, cette fois en gestation. Sur son socle sont inscris les mots « Résistance », « Kultur », « Kapital », « Virgin » et « Madonna ».
Suite à l’invitation à produire une œuvre pour la ville d’Aalborg au Danemark, Sanja Iveković propose de rebâtir un monument conçu par Mies van der Rohe en hommage à Rosa Luxemburg et Karl Liebknecht (Berlin, 1926) et détruit par les nazis en 1935. Pour la nouvelle itération du mémorial antifasciste, l’artiste souhaite rassembler les briques nécessaires à sa réédification par une collecte internationale. Dans le cadre de Soleil Politique, Sanja Iveković inaugure ce processus par le lancement d’un appel public.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

KEREN DETTON

Keren Detton is curator and director of Le Quartier, contemporary art centre in Quimper (Brittany, France) since 2009. She works with artists from different generations and develops exhibition projects and publications on a national and international scale. Her programme includes monographic exhibitions (Guy de Cointet, Ann Veronica Janssens, Claude Closky, Carey Young, Adva Zakai, Fayçal Baghriche…) and collective exhibitions, which focus on forms and languages, perception of images and the construction of identities. From 2004 to 2009, she worked in Air de Paris gallery and conducted a prospective programme titled La Planck. She held the position of president of the association C-E-A (French association of curators) from 2007 to 2009, and is still involved as a board member.

Keren Detton è curatore e direttore dal 2009 del centro d’arte contemporanea Le Quartier a Quimper (Francia). Ha lavorato con artisti di varie generazioni e sviluppato progetti espositivi su scala nazionale e internazionale. Il suo programma include mostre monografiche (Guy de Cointet, Ann Veronica Janssens, Claude Closky, Carey Young, Adva Zakai, Fayçal Baghriche…) e collettive che indagano i diversi linguaggi formali, la percezione delle immagini e la costruzione dell’identità. Dal 2004 al 2009 ha lavorato alla galleria Air de Paris dove ha portato avanti un programma chiamato La Planck. Dal 2007 al 2009 è stata presidente dell’Associazione dei Curatori Francesi (C-E-A) di cui è tutt’oggi membro del consiglio.

Keren Detton est commissaire d’exposition et dirige Le Quartier, centre d’art contemporain de Quimper depuis 2009. Elle s’attache à porter un regard sur plusieurs générations d’artistes et à développer des projets d’exposition et d’édition dans une dynamique nationale et internationale. Sa programmation comprend des expositions monographiques (Guy de Cointet, Ann Veronica Janssens, Claude Closky, Carey Young, Adva Zakai, Fayçal Baghriche…) et des expositions collectives qui révèlent un intérêt pour le langage et ses formes, la perception des images et la construction des identités. De 2004 à 2009, elle a travaillé à la galerie Air de Paris et mené un programme prospectif intitulé La Planck. Elle est membre de l’association C-E-A (commissaires d’exposition associés) qu’elle a présidé de 2007 à 2009.

Space: Le Quartier CAC
Project: Alfred Jarry Archipelago

close
en - it - fr

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH KEREN DETTON, LE QUARTIER CAC, QUIMPER

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH KEREN DETTON, LE QUARTIER CAC, QUIMPER

Vincent Honoré When was Le Quartier Contemporary Art Center created, and what were the factors that brought it into being?
Keren Detton Le Quartier was founded in 1990 on the initiative of the former director of the Quimper art school, Michel Pagnoux. Its underpinnings were the intense competition in art, literature and film in Quimper and the implementation of the decentralisation policies initiated by Jack Lange in the mid-1980s. A series of preview exhibitions with international artists convinced municipal decision-makers to support the creation of a centre d’art. Le Quartier was set up in the same building as the art school but operated autonomously, enabling it to be part of a professional network to which students had special access. Subsequently, the implementation of a contract with the state, region and department guaranteed that it would be possible to work with the public in a sustained way, particularly through the assistance they provided for the production of works and for mediation activities.

Project room

2. Project room, Le Quartier CAC

V.H. Charles Esche described his ideal museum as fundamentally uncertain: simultaneously and fully a community centre, laboratory, institute and gallery. A place where production is not necessarily “productive”, a place that is always being reconfigured, an open form with an incomplete architecture. How did you structure the centre’s curatorial approach when you took up the director’s post?
K.D. A centre d’art is by definition a place of reconfigurations and reconsiderations. In 2010, I suggested reviewing the allocation of the spaces in Le Quartier so that we could create a Project Room, an artistic experimentation zone serving as a counterpoint to the exhibitions, reactive to artists’ ideas and able to accommodate works in progress or works stemming from collective creative processes. The idea was to shake up the annual programme, introduce different rhythms, play on synchronic or diachronic effects, while preserving an artistic research space over the long term and continuing to do creative work with publications (catalogues, anthologies of texts, artist books). I also wanted to work on the porosity between the inside and outside in order to shatter the military aspect of this former barracks and highlight the seeing conditions. The fact of opening the exhibition rooms to the light of day had an effect on the centre d’art’s regulars. It was as if visitors were both surprised and relieved to see the works integrated into their day-to-day life. This pleased me, because I think a centre d’art should be able to bring itself into play just as much as it presents things, favouring encounters and questioning disparities. Recently, artist and architect Catherine Rannou offered a visit to the worksite of an exhibition setup tackling architecture through language and imagination, radically transforming the institution. I find it very stimulating when works speak to visitors on the level of their relationship to the body and to language.

05 Pierre Labat

3. Pierre Labat, Mr. Anderson, 2012

V.H. What is the role of the director of a contemporary centre d’art in 2015 ?
K.D. Le Quartier will be celebrating its 25th anniversary in a shaken political, economic and media context. The state is withdrawing, the map of regions is changing and the status of centres d’art is very weakened. As we speak, Le Quartier is being threatened by drastic budget cuts, and yet its balance sheet has been unanimously praised by all of its public partners. It runs an untimely programme alongside artists, investigates our visual cultures through images and language, and merrily crosses the boundaries between disciplines. Yet it is being told to justify its legitimacy. If mobility is greater today, what can a centre d’art offer in the provinces? Le Quartier is in a prime position between the art school, to which it offers genuine professional springboards, and the fine art museum, with which it collaborates regularly. But above all it is a place of emerging forms and ideas, passions and questions. It is rooted in its territory and resonates with places elsewhere, and keeps up a dialogue with artists and visitors. The director’s role is to keep this relationship with art and artists alive.

Ante Timmermans, Der Souffleur des ICHTS, 2014-2015

4. Ante Timmermans, Der Souffleur des ICHTS, 2014-2015

V.H. PIANO wants to create a forum for exchange and dialogue between Italian and French art centres. Why did you wish to participate and what programme are you proposing?
K.D. It’s a chance, through an association like d.c.a, to be able to connect with an art scene in another country, develop a better knowledge of its network of institutions and independents, exchange ideas and build things in with several others. It’s even essential, because a centre d’art feeds on alterity. Alfred Jarry Archipelago was born of the desire to understand artistic creation today through Alfred Jarry, the father of pataphysics. The project has turned into an open curatorial platform, which apprehends the legacy of the author of Ubu Roi not historically but speculatively. Since he was a well-informed observer of the artists of his time, we decided to make way for Alfred Jarry the curator! With Julie Pellegrin, director of the centre d’art La Ferme du Buisson in Noisiel, we are presenting a two-part exhibition, La valse des pantins – Act I and II. Leonardo Bigazzi, curator at the Museo Marino Marini in Florence, is presenting a programme of performances. Eva Wittocx, curator at M – Museum and for the Playground Festival in Leuven (Belgium) is joining us by linking monographic exhibitions and performances. The project framework is open enough to incorporate different points of view on this subversive figure full of contrasts, and to more closely examine his relationship to theatre, his projection of bodies and desire, his use of codes and absurdity, and the mixing of genres and identities. A publication in the form of an almanac will be the receptacle of this multiplicity of perspectives, with supplements provided by new contributors, authors and artists.

Nadashi

5. Shelly Nadashi, Poupée épouvantail avec pots et sac à dos, 2011-2014

Pauline Curnier Jardin   Blutbad Parade, 2014-2015

6. Pauline Curnier Jardin, Blutbad Parade, 2014-2015

Project: Alfred Jarry Archipelago
Space: Le Quartier CAC
Protagonist: Keren Detton

Vincent Honoré Quand a été créé Le Quartier, centre d’art contemporain et qu’est-ce qui a présidé à sa création ?
Keren Detton Le Quartier a été fondé en 1990 à l’initiative de l’ancien directeur de l’école d’art de Quimper, Michel Pagnoux. Les prémisses étaient ceux d’une forte émulation artistique, littéraire et cinématographique à Quimper et la mise en place des politiques de décentralisation initiées par Jack Lang au début des années 80. Une série d’expositions de préfiguration avec des artistes internationaux a convaincu les décideurs municipaux de soutenir la création d’un centre d’art. Le Quartier a pris place dans le même bâtiment que l’école d’art mais avec un fonctionnement autonome qui lui permet de s’inscrire dans un réseau professionnel auquel les étudiants ont un accès privilégié. Par la suite, la mise en place d’un conventionnement avec l’Etat, la région et le département a pu garantir la possibilité de travailler de manière soutenue avec les publics, notamment par leur aide à la production d’œuvres et aux actions de médiation.

V.H. Charles Esche a décrit son musée idéal comme étant fondamentalement incertain : a la fois, simultanément, et intégralement, centre communautaire, laboratoire, institut, galerie. Un lieu où la production n’est pas obligatoirement “productive”, un lieu en permanente reconfiguration, une forme ouverte à l’architecture incomplète. Comment avez-vous structuré l’approche curatoriale du lieu quand vous en avez pris la direction ?
K.D. Le centre d’art est par définition un espace de reconfigurations et de remises en question. En 2010, j’ai proposé de revoir l’affectation des espaces du Quartier de manière à créer un Project Room, une zone d’expérimentations artistiques en contrepoint des expositions, réactif aux idées des artistes et pouvant accueillir des œuvres en train de se faire ou bien issues de processus de création collectifs. L’idée était de bousculer le programme annuel, d’introduire des rythmes différents, de jouer sur des effets synchroniques ou diachroniques, tout en préservant un espace de recherche artistique dans la durée et un travail critique avec les éditions (catalogues, anthologies de textes, livres d’artistes). Je voulais aussi travailler sur la porosité entre le dedans et le dehors pour casser le côté militaire de cette ancienne caserne et mettre en exergue les conditions du regard. Le fait d’ouvrir les salles d’exposition à la lumière du jour a marqué les habitués du centre d’art, c’est comme si les visiteurs avaient été, à la fois, surpris et soulagés de voir les œuvres inscrites dans leur quotidien. Cela m’a plu, car je pense qu’un centre d’art doit pouvoir se mettre en jeu autant qu’il met en scène, favoriser les rencontres et questionner les écarts. Récemment, Catherine Rannou, artiste et architecte, a proposé une visite sur le chantier d’un montage d’exposition attaquant l’architecture par le verbe et par l’imaginaire, transformant l’institution de manière radicale. Je trouve très stimulant quand les œuvres interpellent le visiteur dans son rapport au corps et au langage.

V.H. Quel est le rôle d’un directeur de centre d’art contemporain en 2015 ?
K.D. Le Quartier fêtera ses 25 ans cette année dans un contexte politique, économique et médiatique bouleversé. L’Etat se retire, la carte des régions se modifie et le statut des centres d’art est très fragilisé. A l’heure où je vous réponds, Le Quartier est menacé de coupes drastiques dans son budget, pourtant son bilan est unanimement salué par tous ses partenaires publics. Il porte une programmation intempestive avec des artistes, investigue nos cultures visuelles à travers l’image et le langage, et franchit allègrement les frontières entre les disciplines. Pourtant, on le somme de justifier sa légitimité. Si la mobilité est plus grande aujourd’hui, que peut apporter un centre d’art en région ? Le Quartier occupe une place de choix entre l’école d’art, pour laquelle il offre de véritables tremplins professionnels, et le musée des beaux-arts avec lequel il collabore régulièrement. Mais c’est avant tout un lieu d’émergence de formes et d’idées, de passions et de questions. Il est ancré dans son territoire et résonne avec l’ailleurs, entretient un dialogue avec les artistes et les visiteurs. Le rôle du directeur est de garder vivante cette relation à l’art et aux artistes.

V.H. PIANO veut créer un espace d’échanges et de dialogues entre des lieux d’art italiens et français. Pourquoi avez-vous souhaité participer et quel programme proposez-vous ?
K.D. C’est une chance, à travers une association comme d.c.a, de pouvoir se relier à une scène artistique étrangère, développer une meilleure connaissance de son réseau institutionnel et indépendant, échanger des idées et construire à plusieurs. C’est même essentiel car un centre d’art se nourrit de l’altérité. Alfred Jarry Archipelago est né de la volonté de comprendre la création artistique d’aujourd’hui à travers Alfred Jarry, père de la pataphysique. Le projet s’est transformé en une plateforme curatoriale ouverte, qui appréhende l’héritage de l’auteur d’UbuRoi non pas de manière historique mais spéculative. Puisqu’il était un observateur averti des artistes de son temps, il s’agissait pour nous de céder la place à Alfred Jarry commissaire ! Avec Julie Pellegrin, directrice du centre d’art de la Ferme du Buisson à Noisiel, nous présentons une exposition en deux volets, La valse des pantins – Acte I et II. Leonardo Bigazzi, curateur au Museo Marino Marini à Florence, propose un programme de performances. Par ailleurs, Eva Wittocx, curatrice au Museum M et pour le Playground Festival à Louvain (Belgique) nous a rejoints en associant des expositions monographiques et des performances. Le cadre du projet est suffisamment ouvert pour croiser les points de vue sur cette figure contrastée et subversive, examiner de plus près son rapport au théâtre, sa projection des corps et du désir, son usage des codes et de l’absurde, le mélange des genres et des identités. Une publication sous la forme d’un Almanach sera le réceptacle de cette pluralité de regards avec des prolongements apportés par de nouveaux contributeurs, auteurs et artistes.

Images:
1. Façade, Le Quartier CAC. © Le Quartier
2. Project room, Le Quartier CAC. Exhibition view, Variations autour de Bruno Munari – Posters d’artistes, Le Quartier CAC, 2013. Photo:  © Dieter Kik
3. Pierre Labat, Mr. Anderson, 2012. Exhibition view, Armer les toboggans, Le Quartier CAC, 2012. Photo: © Dieter Kik
4. Ante Timmermans, Der Souffleur des ICHTS, 2014-2015. Exhibition view, Alfred Jarry Archipelago – The Waltz of the Puppets – Act I, Le Quartier CAC, 2015. Photo: Emile Ouroumov
5. Shelly Nadashi, Poupée épouvantail avec  pots et sac à dos, 2011-2014. Exhibition view, Alfred Jarry Archipelago – The Waltz of the Puppets – Act ILe Quartier CAC, 2015. Photo: Emile Ouroumov
6. Pauline Curnier Jardin, Blutbad Parade, 2014-2015. Exhibition view, Alfred Jarry Archipelago – The Waltz of the Puppets – Act ILe Quartier CAC, 2015. Photo: Emile Ouroumov

close
en - it

GIORGIO DE CHIRICO

Born 1888, Volos, Greece
† 1978, Rome, Italy

One of the most complex and enigmatic artists of the twentieth century, Giorgio de Chirico invented a new mode of artistic expression based on his explorations of the potential meanings of objects. For de Chirico, all forms draw meaning from the associations and memories they arouse in our consciousness. A scholar of classical culture and traditions, during his career he lived in various places before settling in Rome, where he lived until his death. His home now hosts a museum devoted to his life.
1910 saw the work that marked the debut of metaphysical art, the current that brought de Chirico international renown. Metaphysical paintings stand out for their clarity of composition, depicting recognizable objects and forms set in architecturally defined, deserted spaces. In the series entitled Piazze d’Italia, which he began around 1914 and returned to in the 1930s, time seems to be standing still. The surfaces and volumes, and the empty spaces and shadows on the buildings, are carefully outlined. Although the scenes initially appear realistic and rational, they never fail to create a sense of unease in the observer. After making an in-depth study of the rules of perspective, de Chirico reinterprets and subverts them, combining incompatible spatial systems to give rise to his signature settings. For the artist, the architecture of these squares originated in classical Greek culture and offered concrete inspiration for the Italian architecture of the early twentieth century.

Nato a Volos, Grecia, nel 1888
† 1978, Roma, Italia

Tra gli artisti più complessi ed enigmatici del Novecento, Giorgio de Chirico ha gettato le basi di un nuovo modello di espressione artistica, fondato sulle possibilità di significato dell’oggetto. Per de Chirico non esiste forma, il cui valore non scaturisca dalle associazioni e dai ricordi generati dalla nostra coscienza. Attento studioso della tradizione e della cultura classica, nel corso della sua carriera ha vissuto in varie città, per tornare infine a Roma, dove è rimasto fino alla sua morte. La sua casa ospita oggi un museo a lui dedicato. È datato 1910 il primo lavoro con cui de Chirico inaugura la pittura metafisica, corrente che darà fama internazionale all’artista. I dipinti metafisici si distinguono per la loro chiarezza compositiva: raffigurano oggetti e forme riconoscibili, inseriti in spazi architettonicamente definiti e deserti.
La serie intitolata Piazze d’Italia, iniziata intorno al 1914 e poi ripresa negli anni ‘30, è costituita da dipinti in cui il tempo sembra essersi fermato. Masse e superfici, così come l’articolazione dei vuoti e delle ombre degli edifici, sono delimitate con cura. Le ambientazioni, a un primo sguardo realistiche e coerenti, suscitano però nello spettatore un senso di disagio. Le regole prospettiche, attentamente studiate da de Chirico, vengono reinterpretate, e sistemi spaziali incompatibili tra loro sono messi in relazione, dando così vita a luoghi che sono diventati caratteristici della pittura dell’artista. Per de Chirico l’architettura di queste piazze ha origine nel pensiero greco, e si inserisce concretamente nella ricerca architettonica italiana del primo Novecento.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

Sonia Leimer

Sonia Leimer, Platzhalter, 2013

Sonia Leimer, Platzhalter, 2013

Born 1977, Merano, Italy
Lives and works in Vienna, Austria
She studied at the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna. Her installations and videos express a certain contrast between space and time, and through them she wonders about the meaning of using materials in relation to their conceptual manipulation. Her interest in materials and contents – usually fragile, in a state of continuous transition – is one ­­­­of the most important aspects of her art. She explores the nature of our perception, the basis of our medial, historic and individual experience as well as changes between fiction and reality. She has won several international awards: the Paul Flora Prize in 2011, the Audi Award for New Positions Cologne in 2010, the Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky Grant in 2005. In 2009 she was shortlisted for the Premio Cairo. Her major solo exhibitions are: Series of successive instants, Galerie Nächst St. Stephan, Login, Vienna (2009); No Site to Fall in, Salzburger Kunstverein, Salzburg (2010); Träger, Artothek Köln (2012); Space Holder, Gallery Nächst St. Stephan, Vienna (2012); Undefiniertes Bauvorhaben, BIG, Salzburg (2013); Bend a Bow, MAK Center Garage Space, Los Angeles (2012); Along those lines, Museion, Bolzano (2013). She has taken part in important group shows at: Parachute Pavilion, New York (2005); MAK Center for Art and Architecture, Los Angeles (2006); Kunsthalle Exnergasse, Vienna (2008); Galerie ar/ge Kunst, Bolzano (2008); Museum for Art, Pori, Finland (2010); and Freies Museum Berlin (2012).

Project: From & To

 

Sonia Leimer nasce a Merano nel 1977. Studia all’Accademia di Belle Arti di Vienna. I suoi lavori, basati su materie e contenuti fondamentalmente fragili, esprimono il contrasto tra spazio e tempo, interrogandosi sull’entità della percezione, le fondamenta che costituiscono l’esperienza mediale, storica, individuale. Ha vinto vari riconoscimenti internazionali, tra cui il Paul Flora Prize nel 2011, l’Audi Award for New Positions a Colonia nel 2010. Tra le recenti mostre personali: Träger, Artotek Köln, Colonia (2012); Undefiniertes Bauvorhaben, BIG, Salisburgo (2013); Bend a bow, MAK Center Garage Space, Los Angeles (2012); Lungo quelle linee, Museion, Bolzano (2013). Ha partecipato a varie mostre collettive: al Parachute Pavilion di New York (2005), alla Galerie ar/ge Kunst di Bolzano, al Museum for Art di Pori, Finlandia (2010) e al Freies Museum di Berlino (2012). Vive e lavora a Vienna.

 

Née à Merano en 1977, vit et travaille à Vienne. Elle a étudié à l’Académie des Beaux-Arts de Vienne. Son travail, basé sur les matériaux et leur teneur fondamentalement fragile, exprime le contraste entre l’espace et le temps et questionne la mesure de la perception, base qui compose l’expérience médiatique, historique et individuelle. Elle a remporté plusieurs prix internationaux, dont le Prix Paul Flora en 2011, l’Audi Award for New Positions a Cologne en 2010. Expositions récentes : Träger, Artotek Köln, Cologne (2012) ; Undefiniertes Bauvorhaben, BIG, Salzbourg (2013) ; Bend a bow, MAK Center Garage Space, Los Angeles (2012) ; Lungo quelle linee, Museion, Bolzano (2013). Expositions collectives au Parachute Pavilion, New York (2005), à la Galerie ar/ge Kunst, Bolzano, au Museum for Art, Pori, Finlande (2010) et au Freies Museum, Berlin (2012).

Image:
Sonia Leimer, Platzhalter, 2013

close
en - it - fr

QUENTIN DEROUET

Quentin Derouet, Encore un geste d’amour, 2013

Quentin Derouet, Encore un geste d’amour, 2013

Born 1988, Grenoble, France
Lives and works in Nice, France
A romantic image clings to the surface of Quentin Derouet’s works, the way it would cling to the skin: natural flowers become brushes for wall paintings covering a whole room with graffiti –J’aime bien jouer avec les fleurs, et vous? –, poems are written on other walls – Le feu qui me brûle et celui qui m’éclaire –, a gentle and engaging melody fills a whole room – Une valse pour rien (hommage à Allain Leprest). Language is totally poetry, as if life were just a song, but there is no naivety in his work. This language seeks to join up with the affective dimension of the objects which punctuate his installations with burnt photographs. Without focusing on any specific practice, he precisely defines his own based on installation and exhibition. Involved is a spectacular presentation of an atmosphere which steps out as much through the tongue, the furniture, the colors, and the sets of photographs and drawings. Nothing spontaneous, however. The works are conceived, thought out, sometimes written and even planned in a more or less near future, such as 7 plans de vol / 7 Flight plans. Encounters are still essential to such an œuvre in the making, but they could not happen by chance.

Jean-Marc Avrilla

Project: From & To

 

Questo artista, nato nel 1988 a Grenoble, non è legato a una pratica particolare e definisce precisamente la sua partendo dall’istallazione e dalla mostra. È una messa in spettacolo di un’atmosfera che trasuda attraverso la lingua, l’arredo, i colori, i gruppi di fotografie o i disegni. Eppure, non vi è nulla di spontaneo. Le opere sono pensate, ponderate, talvolta scritte, se non pianificate in un futuro più o meno prossimo, come 7 plans de vol, prima di essere realizzate. Gli incontri sono ancora essenziali per quest’opera in divenire, ma di sicuro non potranno capitare per caso.

 

Né en 1988 à Grenoble. Sans s’attacher à une pratique singulière, il définit précisément la sienne à partir de l’installation et de l’exposition. C’est une mise en spectacle d’une atmosphère qui transpire autant par la langue, le mobilier, les couleurs, les ensembles de photographies ou les dessins. Cependant, rien de spontané. Les œuvres sont pensées, réfléchies, écrites parfois – voire planifiées dans un futur plus ou moins proche, comme 7 plans de vol, avant d’être exécutées. Les rencontres sont encore essentielles à une telle œuvre en devenir, mais elles ne sauraient arriver au hasard.

Image:
Quentin Derouet, Encore un geste d’amour, 2013

close
en - it - fr

MARIE VOIGNIER

Born 1974, Ris-Orangis, France
Lives and works in Paris, France

After studying science, Marie Voignier entered the École des Beaux-Arts de Lyon, where she produced her first video works. The various subjects of her videos are inspired by reality and play on different cinematographic levels that highlight the reversibility of genres and the multiple viewpoints possible of a given situation. Tourisme International bears witness to a spectacle on a national scale: North Korea. Moving constantly from one place to another, this tourist trip stops at monuments, museums, and institutions presented by North Korean tourist guides. North Korean cinema is shot in 16mm silent film and is entirely overdubbed. Practically no sound, other than speech and music, accompanies the images. All other intermediary, “ephemeral” sounds are missing: the sound of wind in the trees, the distant voices of other characters, the rustling of clothes and bodies, and off-screen noises.
The recreated soundtrack of Tourisme International, on the contrary, includes all the sounds excluded from North Korean cinema, which give matter and depth to space. This rearrangement of sound, however, excludes all voices. All commentary by the tourist guides or by Marie Voignier herself remains silent; all speech is eliminated and the voices shift off-screen, to the titles that punctuate the film and give the spectator a minimum of information in order to identify the places and context shown.

Nata a Ris-Orangis, Francia, nel 1974
Vive e lavora a Parigi, Francia

Dopo gli studi scientifici, Marie Voignier entra all’École des Beaux-arts di Lione, dove realizza i suoi primi video: soggetti diversi, che attingono alla realtà e giocano con differenti gradi di lettura filmica, sottolineando così la reversibilità del genere e dei molteplici punti di vista su una situazione.
Tourisme International (Turismo internazionale) è stato girato come la registrazione di uno spettacolo su scala nazionale, dove la nazione implicata è la Corea del Nord. Nell’urgenza dello spostamento continuo, questo viaggio turistico percorre monumenti, musei e istituzioni, presentati dalle guide nordcoreane. Il cinema nordcoreano, girato in 16 mm, è muto; i film stranieri sono interamente doppiati, ma, oltre alle voci degli attori e alla musica, nessun altro suono accompagna le immagini. Tutti i suoni intermedi, o “secondari”, sono assenti: il rumore del vento tra gli alberi, il brusio delle comparse in lontananza, il fruscio dei vestiti o dei corpi in movimento, e in generale tutti i fuori campo sono eliminati. La colonna sonora ricreata per Tourisme International, invece, è fatta di tutti questi suoni, che conferiscono una materia e uno spessore allo spazio. Dalla ricomposizione sonora sono state però escluse le voci. I commenti delle guide e di Marie Voignier sono muti. Tutti i discorsi tacciono e le voci si spostano fuori dalle immagini, dentro i sottotitoli che punteggiano il film, dando allo spettatore elementi indispensabili per situare i luoghi e un contesto dove orientarsi.

Née à Ris-Orangis, France, en 1974
Vit et travaille à Paris, France

Après des études scientifiques, Marie Voignier entre à l’École des Beaux-arts de Lyon où elle réalise ses premières vidéos. Leurs sujets variés sont puisés dans la réalité et jouent sur différents registres filmiques, soulignant ainsi la réversibilité des genres et des points de vue sur une situation.
Tourisme International a été tourné comme la captation d’un spectacle à l’échelle d’un pays, la Corée du Nord. Dans l’urgence du perpétuel déplacement, ce voyage touristique parcourt monuments, musées, institutions, présentés par des guides nord-coréens.
Le cinéma nord-coréen est tourné en 16 mm muet et les films sont entièrement doublés. En dehors des voix et de la musique, il n’y a pratiquement aucun son qui accompagne les images. Tous les sons intermédiaires, « secondaires » sont absents : le bruit du vent dans les arbres, les voix au loin des autres personnages, les frôlements des vêtements, le bruissement des corps et le hors champ restent muets.
La bande son reconstituée de Tourisme International a contrario est faite de tous ces sons-là, qui donnent une matière et une épaisseur à l’espace. De cette recomposition sonore ont cependant été exclues les voix. Les commentaires des guides et de Marie Voignier sont restés muets. Tous les discours se taisent et les paroles se déplacent hors des images, dans des intertitres qui ponctuent le film en donnant un minimum d’éléments pour situer les lieux ou le contexte dans lequel nous nous trouvons.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it

SLAVEN TOLJ

Born 1964, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia
Lives and works in Dubrovnik and Rijeka, Croatia

Slaven Tolj is one of the leading exponents of the art scene in Croatia. His radical minimalist practice, which includes performance, photography, actions, and ready-mades, explores social situations and historic events. In the 1990s, Tolj focused on the situation in his country, namely the break-up of Yugoslavia and in particular the siege of Dubrovnik, his home town. Also known for his curatorial work, in 1988 he founded the Lazareti Art Workshop in Dubrovnik, one of Croatia’s busiest art hubs. In his solo show Low Season, hosted by the Dubrovnik Museum of Modern Art in 2007, Slaven Tolj recreated a stylized version of the city inside the museum, linking the areas of the building with various neighborhoods of Dubrovnik. The title of the exhibition refers to the tourist season and is a clear indication that the project was mainly destined for the local population.
The show also featured the work Map of the City of Dubrovnik, a city plan reworked by the artist. After the conflict, a map showing where the city was bombed after the siege in 1991-92 was placed by the road going into the city. Tolj used the same map, but in his version the key refers to the bars, fast food outlets, souvenir shops, etc. that are steadily taking over those parts of Dubrovnik, a new kind of siege. It is a vision of a city that is being emptied and turned into a holiday destination: memories of the horrors of war are gradually being replaced by the invasion of tourism.

Nato a Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, nel 1964
Vive e lavora a Dubrovnik e Rijeka, Croazia

Slaven Tolj è uno dei più importanti esponenti della scena artistica croata. La sua pratica radicale e minimalista, che comprende performance, fotografie, azioni e oggetti ready-made, si focalizza su fatti sociali ed eventi storici. Negli anni ‘90 Tolj ha concentrato il suo lavoro sulla situazione del proprio Paese, ovvero sulla disintegrazione della Jugoslavia e, in particolare, sull’assedio di Dubrovnik, sua città natale. L’artista, inoltre, si è sempre dedicato alla pratica curatoriale, che lo ha visto fondare nel 1988 l’Art Workshop Lazareti di Dubrovnik, uno dei centri d’arte più attivi in Croazia. Nella personale Low Season (Bassa stagione), tenutasi al Museum of Modern Art di Dubrovnik nel 2007, Slaven Tolj ha stilizzato la città all’interno del museo, collegando gli spazi dell’istituzione alle varie aree di Dubrovnik. Il titolo della mostra si riferisce a quei periodi dell’anno in cui il fenomeno del turismo di massa è assente o quasi, e indica come il progetto fosse principalmente destinato alla popolazione locale.
In mostra era presente anche l’opera Map of the City of Dubrovnik (Piantina della città di Ragusa), una piantina della città rielaborata dall’artista. Al termine del conflitto all’entrata di Dubrovnik è stata collocata una mappa con legenda informativa, che segnala dove ebbero luogo i bombardamenti seguiti all’assedio del 1991-’92. Tolj ha usato la stessa mappa, ma nella sua versione la legenda evidenzia i bar, i fast-food, i negozi di souvenir ecc., che di anno in anno aprono in quelle zone della città. Si ha quindi la visione di una Dubrovnik progressivamente assediata da spazi di ricezione turistica: una città sempre più vuota e trasformata in destinazione di vacanza, dove i disastri della guerra sono stati sostituiti dall’invasione dell’industria del turismo. In mostra sono presenti due piantine: quella originale della città, e quella elaborata e aggiornata dall’artista.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

Leander Schwazer

4- Leander Schwazer, Globe, 2014 Foto Augustin Ochsenreiter

Leander Schwazer, Globe, 2014

Born 1982 Sterzing/Vipiteno, Italy
Lives and works in Los Angeles, CA, USA
He studied at the University of the Arts, Zurich, the Central Academy of Fine Art, Beijing and at the California Institute of the Arts, Los Angeles. His work comes from different kinds of influences, which at first sight recall art tendencies such that of minimal and pop art. At the same time it explores in its own way philosophical questions, social themes and universal concepts which are very different from each other, and always connected to a specific artistic formal development, expressed through the use of a wide range of materials. He has been the recipient of many awards, including that of Raiffeisen Foundation, Bolzano in 2014, of California Institute of the Arts in 2012 and 2014. He won the Travel Grant of the Autonomous Province of Alto Adige / Trentino in 2013 and the Austrian Graphic Award in 2011. His recent solo exhibitions include: Bikini, Museion for contemporary art, Bolzano (2014); Cross Spikes Club, California Institute of the Arts, Valencia (2013); The Rape of Europe, ar/ge Kunst, Bolzano (2012); The Alphabet I Got Dry with, Kunstraum B, Kiel, Germany (2012); A Symbol of Freedom, Placentia Arte, Piacenza (2012). His works have been shown at several group exhibitions: Bad Gallery, Zurich (2007); Book Museum, Lodz, Poland (2008); Galerie im Taxispalais, Innsbruck (2011); Public Gallery Klagenfurt, Austria (2012); Frankfurter Kunstverein, Frankfurt (Performance) and Brother McNally Gallery, Singapore (2013).

Project: From & To

 

Leander A. Schwazer nasce nel 1982 a Vipiteno. Studia all’Università delle Arti di Zurigo, alla Central Academy of Fine Arts di Pechino e al California Institute of the Arts, Los Angeles. Il suo lavoro richiama principalmente la minimal e la pop art, allo stesso tempo esplora in maniera singolare questioni filosofiche e temi sociali associandovi sviluppi formali del tutto specifici. Nel 2012 e 2014 vince il premio del California Institute of the Arts. Tra le recenti mostre personali: Bikini, Museion, Bolzano (2014); Cross Spikes Club, California Institute of the Arts, Valencia (2013); The Rape of Europe, ar/ge Kunst, Bolzano e The Alphabet I Got Dry with, Kunstraum B, Kiel, Germania (2012). Ha partecipato a varie mostre collettive, tra cui al Book Museum di Lodz, Polonia, al Kunstverein di Francoforte e alla Brother McNally Gallery di Singapore. Vive e lavora a Los Angeles.

 

Né en 1982 à Vipiteno, vit et travaille à Los Angeles. Il a étudié à l’Université des Arts de Zürich, à l’Académie des Beaux-arts de Pékin et au California Institute of the Arts à Los Angeles. Son travail s’inspire principalement du pop art et de l’art minimaliste. Parallèlement, il explore de manière singulière les questions philosophiques et sociales en impliquant des développements formels tout à fait spécifiques. En 2012 et 2014, il a remporté le prix du California Institute of the Arts. Expositions récentes : Bikini, Museion, Bolzano (2014), Cross Spikes Club, California Institute of the Arts, Valencia (2013), The Rape of Europe, ar/ge Kunst, Bolzano et The Alphabet I Got Dry with, Kunstraum B, Kiel, Germania (2012). Il a participé a plusieurs expositions collectives : au Book Museum à Lodz (Pologne), au Kunstverein de Francfort et à la Brother McNally Gallery de Singapour.

Image:
Leander Schwazer, Globe, 2014, lightbulb, acrylic, 16,5 x 12,5 cm. Photo: Augustin Ochsenreiter

close
en - it - fr

COSTANZA PAISSAN IN CONVERSATION WITH LEANDER SCHWAZER

COSTANZA PAISSAN IN CONVERSATION WITH LEANDER SCHWAZER

Costanza Paissan Your artistic research focuses on issues related to pop culture, geopolitics, capitalism, industrial economy and craft production in the global world. These ideas are transferred into pieces whose forms are essential, often tinged with irony and lightheartedness, poised between mass production and slow craftsmanship, mechanicity and organicity. I am thinking, for example, of the 2012 work The Rape of Europe, in which the threads of the Jacquard weaving recall the myth of Arachne but also the evolution of textile production in the history of the world economy. Or the punched cards of Kapital, which transfer the text of Marx’s Capital into a musical mechanism. Could you tell us about the process through which you transform your thoughts into form?
Leander Schwazer I have a special penchant for time in general. Exploring dormant stories in everyday objects is my obsession. I use techniques like détournement, alterations, the reversing or flipping of things: to make visible what is normally invisible to the everyday eye. I guess this is a reason for my interest in cracks and fractures: frailty is what seems to hold the world together. Art walks on a thin path between past and future.

C.P. In spring 2014, your work was exhibited at the Museion in Bolzano, in the exhibition Bikini. An operation of “archeology of the future” in which past, present and future intertwine to give shape to a complex trans-temporal universe consisting of photographic, pictorial and installation elements. Where does this work fit in your research?
L.S.Bikini was a meditation on certain connections between popular culture and war. Compared to the power of war machines, any artistic discipline looks weak. In a way, it becomes necessary to use as many as possible. When you start to dig deep into history, an “archeology of the future” is an attempt to break free from the spell of the past and start creating, without repressing but rather depicting history. However, it is impossible to predict the course of history. Only when seen from the future, the past becomes such.

C.P. Your participation in PIANO project was carried out during a residency at the Villa Arson in Nice, within the From & To exchange program, in which Italian artists worked in France and French artists in Italy. In addition to being an exhibition space, Villa Arson is also a place of education, in which dialogue with other artists is normal practice. Can you tell us about your experience?
L.S.I was happy to be in close contact with Sonia Leimer over the last year.  Although we were working independently, I consider the setting we worked with at Villa Arson as a collaboration. The space will be one of crisis, misunderstandings, big and small stories, subjectivity and objectivity. I am happy to present another montage piece from my longtime exploration of junk, how it is produced and circulates. The piece is inspired by a document which mentioned the word ‘junk’ in a western document for the very first time: the Mappa Mundi, made by the venetian monk Fra Mauro in the 15th century. Fra Mauro wrote a fascinating story of junks (Asian ships) rounding the Cape of Good Hope, arriving in Europe and then sailing back. Today my email inbox asked me what I wanted to do with my junk mail – electronic messages received from unknown senders. But of course history does not repeat itself.

Costanza Paissan La tua ricerca artistica si interessa ai temi legati alla cultura pop, alla geopolitica, al capitalismo, all’economia industriale e alla produzione artigianale nel mondo globale. Queste idee sono trasferite in lavori formalmente essenziali, spesso venati di sottile ironia e di leggerezza, sempre in bilico tra produzione seriale e lenta manualità, meccanismo e organicità. Penso per esempio al lavoro del 2012 The Rape of Europe in cui i fili della tessitura Jacquard richiamano il mito di Aracne così come le evoluzioni della produzione tessile nella storia dell’economia mondiale. O alle schede perforate di Kapital, che trasferiscono il testo del Capitale di Marx in un meccanismo musicale.Puoi spiegare attraverso quale processo metti in forma le tue riflessioni?
Leander Schwazer Quello che mi interessa in maniera particolare è il tempo in generale. Esplorare le storie dormienti negli oggetti quotidiani è la mia ossessione. Mi servo di tecniche come il détournement, le alterazioni, il ribaltamento o il rovesciamento delle cose: rendere visibile ciò che è invisibile allo sguardo di ogni giorno. Penso che sia questa la ragione del mio interesse nei confronti delle crepe e delle fratture: la fragilità tiene insieme il mondo. L’arte si muove sul sottile confine tra passato e futuro.

C.P. Nella primavera 2014 il tuo lavoro è stato esposto al Museion di Bolzano, nella mostra Bikini. Un’operazione di “archeologia del futuro” in cui passato, presente e avvenire si intrecciano per dare forma a un complesso universo trans-temporale composto di elementi installativi, fotografici e pittorici. Come si inserisce questo lavoro nella tua ricerca?
L.S. Bikini è una meditazione sui collegamenti tra la cultura popolare e la Guerra.. A confronto con la potenza delle macchine da guerra tutte le discipline artistiche appaiono deboli. Per così dire diventa necessario usarne il più possibile. Quando si inizia a scavare nella storia, l’“archeologia del futuro” è un tentativo per liberarsi dall’incantesimo del passato e iniziare a creare senza soffocare, anzi immaginando la storia. In ogni caso, è impossibile predire il corso della storia. Essa diventa passato solo se vista dal futuro.

C.P. La tua partecipazione al progetto PIANO si è realizzata nell’ambito di una residenza presso la Villa Arson di Nizza, all’interno del programma di scambio From & To in cui artisti di origine italiana hanno lavorato in Francia e artisti francesi in Italia. Villa Arson, oltre a essere uno spazio espositivo, è anche un luogo di formazione, in cui il dialogo con altri artisti rappresenta la quotidianità. Puoi raccontare la tua esperienza?
L.S. Sono stato felice di lavorare in stretto contatto con Sonia Leimer nel corso dell’anno passato. Anche se abbiamo portato avanti il nostro lavoro in maniera indipendente considero lo spazio che abbiamo immaginato aVilla Arson come il risultato di una collaborazione. Lo spazio sarà uno spazio di crisi, equivoci, grandi e piccole storie, soggettività e oggettività. Sono contento di poter presentare un altro lavoro a mosaico parte della mia lunga indagine sul Junk, la sua presenza e distribuzione. È ispirato dal documento in cui la parola Junk venne usata per la prima volta in un documento occidentale: la Mappa Mundi del frate veneziano Fra Mauro, risalente al XV secolo. Fra Mauro scrisse una favola affascinante: barche provenienti dall’Asia (Junks) che navigavano intorno al Capo di Buona Speranza, arrivavano in Europa e tornavano indietro. Oggi la mia posta in arrivo mi chiedeva cosa volevo fare del Junk, le e-mail ricevute da mittenti sconosciuti. Ma ovviamente la storia non si ripete.

Image:
Leander Schwazer, Globe, 2014. Photo: Augustin Ochsenreiter

close
en

Hans Schabus

2502-02-tagliata

Born 1970, Watschig, Austria
Lives and works in Vienna, Austria

Image:
Hans Schabus, Konstruktion des Himmels, 1994. View of the exhibition The Promise of Moving Things (curator: Chris Sharp), Centre d’art contemporain d’Ivry – le Crédac, 2014. Photo: André Morin / le Crédac. Courtesy of the artist et ZERO…

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

Roberto Pugliese

Roberto Pugliese, Risuonanti pressioni materiche, 2014

Roberto Pugliese, Risuonanti pressioni materiche, 2014

Born 1982, Naples, Italy
Lives and works in Bologna, Italy
Roberto Pugliese was born in Naples in 1982. He earned his Master degree in Electronic Music at the Conservatorio San Pietro in Majella, Naples. He teaches at the same institution (Music Systems, Sound Art and Laboratory for Electro-acoustic and Informatics), he creates sound installations, plays and composes music. His research is inspired by two artistic movements: sound art and kinetic and programmed art. By using mechanical tools controlled by a software that interact one with the other, as well as with the environment and the observer, he investigates sound phenomena and analyzes the processes of the human psyche. His art explores the relationship between man and technology, and at the same time he keeps a particular focus on its visual quality and aesthetics. His works in permanent collections are to be found at ZKM Museum, Karlsruhe, Germany. He was awarded the Honorary mention for sound art and music, Ars electronica Linz (2013). Selected solo shows: Concerto per natura morta, Studio la Città, Verona (2014); Echi liquidi, TRA, Treviso ricerca arte, Treviso (2013); Gervasuti Mix, omaggio a Cage, Gervasuti Foundation, Venice (2012); Unexpected Machines, Galerie Mario Mazzoli, Berlin (2011). Selected group shows: Noise, 55. Venice Biennale, collateral event, Venice (2013); Ghostbusters, Charlottenburg Museum, Copenhagen, Oscillator, Science Gallery, Trinity college, Dublin (2013); Data Deluge, Ballroom Marfa, Marfa, Texas (2012).

Project: From & To

 

Roberto Pugliese nasce a Napoli nel 1982. Consegue la laurea in Musica Elettronica presso il Conservatorio San Pietro a Majella di Napoli, dove oggi insegna. La sua ricerca trae energia essenzialmente da due correnti, la sound art e l’arte cinetica e programmata. Servendosi di apparecchiature meccaniche pilotate da software, esplora nuove prospettive di ricerca sui fenomeni legati al suono e alla psiche umana. Opere in collezione permanente: ZKM Museum, Karlsruhe, Germania. Tra le principali mostre personali: Concerto per natura morta, Studio la città, Verona (2014); Gervasuti Mix, omaggio a Cage, Fondazione Gervasuti, Venezia (2012). Tra le recenti mostre collettive: Noise, 55a Biennale di Venezia, evento collaterale; Oscillator, Science Gallery, Trinity College, Dublino (2013); Data Deluge, Ballroom Marfa, Marfa, Texas (2012). Vive e lavora a Bologna.

 

Né à Naples en 1982. Vit et travaille à Bologne. Diplômé de musique électronique au Conservatoire de San Pietro a Majella de Naples, ou il enseigne maintenant. Ses travaux de recherche tirent leur énergie principalement de deux courants : l’art sonore et l’art cinétique et programmé. En utilisant des équipements mécaniques pilotés par logiciel, il explore de nouvelles pistes de recherche sur les phénomènes liés au son et la psyché humaine. Œuvres dans la collection permanente du ZKM Museum, Karlsruhe, Allemagne. Principales expositions personnelles : Concerto pour nature morte, Studio la città, Vérone (2014), Gervasuti Mix, hommage a Cage, Fondation Gervasuti, Venise (2012). Expositions récentes : Noise, 55e Biennale de Venise, Oscillator, Science Gallery, Trinity College, Dublin (2013), Data Deluge, Ballroom Marfa, Marfa, Texas (2012).

Image:
Roberto Pugliese, Risuonanti pressioni materiche, 2014. Photo: Michele Alberto Sereni. Courtesy Studio la Città, Verona

close
en

Alessandro Rabottini

Alessandro Rabottini is an art critic and curator based in London. He is Curator at Large at the Madre Museum in Naples (where he recently curated a mid-career retrospective of Padraig Timoney and the survey show of Ettore Spalletti) and served as guest curator for several international institutions. In his capacity as Curator at Large at GAMeC in Bergamo he curated solo exhibitions of artists such as Robert Overby, Mircea Cantor, Latifa Echakhch, Victor Man, Pratchaya Phinthong, Pietro Roccasalva, Tim Rollins & K.O.S, Sterling Ruby, Tris Vonna-Michell and Jordan Wolfson.

Focus: Prepared Piano – Model for a New Institutionalism
Partner: MADRE

close
en - it - fr

ETIENNE BERNARD

SONY DSC

Etienne Bernard is art director at Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain in Brest, France. Since April 2013, he has been a member of the acquisition committee for French National Funds for Contemporary Art. He was granted an MA in Aesthetics from the University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne in 2004. His academic research was focused on American landscape documentary photography. From 2007 to 2009, he was director of the International Poster and Graphic Design Festival of Chaumont as well as guest curator at the CAPC Museum of Contemporary Art in Bordeaux. As an art critic, he has been a regular contributor to French magazine 02 among others. As an independent curator, he has led various projects in institutions in France and abroad, including at the Krabbesholm Højskole in Skive, Denmark (2009-2010); at Parc Saint Léger in Pougues-les-Eaux (2010); at the Musée de l’Objet, contemporary art collection in Blois (2011); and at JAUS Art Space in Los Angeles (2011). Etienne Bernard has also taught art theory at the University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne and at Ecole Supérieure des Beaux-arts in Nantes. From 2010 to 2012, he coordinated Fieldwork Marfa, an international research-in-residency program in Marfa, Texas.

Project: La démocratie est illusion
Space: Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain
Focus: Vincent Honoré in conversation with Etienne Bernard, Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain

 

Etienne Bernard è direttore artistico del Centro d’Arte Contemporanea Passerelle, Brest. Dal 2013 è membro del comitato d’acquisizioni del Fondo Nazionale di Arte Contemporanea. Dal 2007 al 2009 ha diretto il Festival International de l’Affiche et du Graphisme de Chaumont e un programma di mostre al CAPC Musée d’Art Contemporain di Bordeaux. Ha curato numerose mostre in vari spazi, tra cui la Krabbesholm Hojskole in Danimarca nel 2009-2010, il Parc Saint Léger a Pougues-les-Eaux nel 2010, il Musée de l’Objet a Blois nel 2011 e il JAUS Art Space di Los Angeles nel 2011. Etienne Bernard ha insegnato all’Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne e all’Ecole Supérieure des Beaux-arts di Nantes, dove ha coordinato dal 2010 al 2012 il programma di ricerca e di residenza Fieldwork: Marfa negli Stati Uniti

 

Etienne Bernard est directeur artistique de Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain, Brest. Depuis avril 2013, il est membre du comité d’acquisition du Fonds National d’Art Contemporain. De 2007 à 2009, il a dirigé le Festival International de l’Affiche et du Graphisme de Chaumont ainsi qu’un programme d’expositions au CAPC Musée d’Art Contemporain de Bordeaux. Il a organisé de nombreuses expositions notamment à la Krabbesholm Hojskole au Danemark en 2009-2010, au Parc Saint Léger à Pougues-les-Eaux en 2010, au Musée de l’Objet à Blois en 2011 ou au JAUS Art Space à Los Angeles en 2011. Etienne Bernard a également enseigné à l’Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne et à l’Ecole Supérieure des Beaux-arts de Nantes pour laquelle il a coordonné de 2010 à 2012 le programme de recherche et de résidence Fieldwork : Marfa aux États-Unis.

close
en - it - fr

Vincent Honoré in conversation with Etienne Bernard, Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain

Vincent Honoré Since 2013 you have directed the public art centrePasserelle Centre d’art contemporain that opened in 1988. Its main objective is to be “a forum for dialogue between artistic production and the public.” Can you describe in more detail the intellectual and artistic project upon which the structure is based, and what essentially differentiates it from other art centres?

Etienne Bernard As a centre for contemporary art, the core function of Passerelle is to support artists (notably in the realm of production, exhibition and publication) and the public in their discovery of what the artists have to offer. The project called Situations, which I have now been working on for a year, suggests that these two missions should not be separated or prioritized. On the contrary, I think that a centre for contemporary art is a place for shared elaboration of meaning in which artists and the public meet and discuss. In order to reflect reality it must occur naturally in my view. It is based on a mutual desire between local audiences and artists, the majority of which have come a long way, to take the time to discuss ideas.
We must not forget that we are in Brest, at the far reaches of Brittany, at the heart of an area that is very rich in cultural proposals but also peripheral to the main thrust of the art circuit. I am convinced that its social as well as geographical position presents an opportunity rather than a pitfall. Indeed, Brest is not on the beaten track, so it is up to us to make it a destination. We therefore have the necessary resources in place to welcome and provide hospitality for operational artists and we systematically offer them an opportunity to enjoy a work temporality that they will not necessarily find anywhere else. Notably we have ‘neutralised’ 400 m2 situated at the heart of the art centre, previously allotted to exhibition space, to accommodate production facilities. Artists can thus work in peace, with the help of technicians, and the public is invited in to exchange views on art in the making. Art centres are thus used as a living, lived-in and open space.
And so far, I am delighted to observe that the system works. Artists like Wilfrid Almendra, Florian Fouché, Goldschmied & Chiari and Ernesto Sartori have already used this new facility to the full. Other artists like Fredrik Vaerslev, Koki Tanaka and Stéphane Calais are also planning to use it over the forthcoming months. In addition, we have noticed that the public reacts well to the freedom to converse directly with the artist. Habits form. As the development of an artistic project progresses, people observe, come back and talk. In my view this positive perspective reflects our institutional action supporting creation that the public is sometimes oblivious to. 

Wilfrid Almendra. L’intranquillité, 2013

2. Wilfrid Almendra. L’intranquillité, 2013

V.H. The institution is intended as “an interdisciplinary venue that explores other fields of contemporary creation, from graphic design to dance, from music to design.” Did you inherit this mission or did you on becoming director of the art centre want to redefine its prerogatives?

E.B. It is more than just a mission. I would say that opening up the space to forms of creation that fall outside the strict field of contemporary art is rather an assertive approach to the programme in line with the history of the place. Originally, in the 1980s, the name ‘Passerelle’ conjured up the notion of interdisciplinary. The collective that opened the venue welcomed music, dance and theatre as well as art. Subsequently, the field of research was progressively oriented more clearly towards contemporary art as the structure became more institutionalized. When I became director of the art centre, I wanted to reconnect with this historic initiative for two main reasons. The first is that I think an ambitious project can be constructed on this wealth of history with the professional facilities provided by Passerelle. Thanks to the tremendous task of structuring and the professional development undertaken by the previous director Ulrike Kremeier, the art centre evidently no longer resembles its initial association gathering amateurs, but has now become an operable infrastructure able to accommodate artistic proposals from all walks of life. The second is that Brest is a fantastic pool of top quality partners who in their respective disciplinary fields share our high standards. Indeed, we are working hand in hand with local but internationally renowned initiatives of course, like the electronic music festival Astropolis, the contemporary dance festival DansFabrik run by Scène nationale Le Quartz, and the contemporary music ensemble Sillages, with whom we launched a festival in 2014. Thus, it is not a question of hosting a theatrical play or a dance show to bring the venue to life or ‘to cause a stir’ but to work long-term on the exchange programme to highlight our complementary qualities and our ambitions. We presented a fine example with the choreographic performance by Goldschmied & Chiari and Lotta Melin, which initiated the current exhibition and integrated the official programme of the DansFabrik Festival 2014.

V.H. “A museum director’s first task is to create a public, not just to do great shows, but to create an audience that trusts the institution.” (Pontus Hultén) The public, in the Centre’s declaration of intent, has an important position. However, the ‘public’ remains an abstract, almost conceptual entity. What is your view of the public and what type of relationship do you wish to enjoy with this public? 

E.B. In an area like Brittany and Brest, the public is not an abstract entity. The centre for contemporary art constitutes both a tool at the service of the local public (the facilities provided by Passerelle are at the heart of a clearly identified district) and aimed at a national and international public (professionals of course, but also seasonal holidaymakers.) Thus, our actions and operations must appeal to all without ranking or pandering. We know our different audiences well, their specificities, their desires as well as their reticence, but I think that everyone can identify, in their own way, to an artistic proposal that when sound can be approached from different perspectives.

Tania Mouraud. J.I.T. just in time, 2008

3. Tania Mouraud. J.I.T. just in time, 2008

V.H. What are the tools and programmes that structure the art centre and strike a chord with its public? For example, what are the Augmentation Zones and how do they integrate with your vision of the public? 

E.B. We offer a large number of programmes aimed at the public from hands-on workshops with the youngest, to series of lectures or guided visits. A year ago we also implemented a specific section that I called Augmentation Zones. The notion of augmentation is defined here in the digital meaning of the term. On the Internet, augmented reality is the sum of data, links and references that complement a subject. At Passerelle, the Augmentation Zones constitute a physical and digital cultural programme developed by the public service department whose content is determined through discussion with the guest artists. In the large central Patio at the Passerelle leading to the different areas, there is a zone devoted to displaying artistic and/or documentary material to pursue and put into perspective the questions addressed by the artistic proposals exhibited. They are also accessible on the Internet with a digital space for content accompanying the exhibitions.

V.H. Passerelle proposes monographic exhibitions as well as group exhibitions and attempts to articulate different disciplines. More specifically, how do you view the mission and the responsibilities of an art centre director in 2014?

E.B.  I chose to take over as director of a contemporary art centre as I am passionate about linking a critical and curatorial approach with a regional context. Indeed, the global logic that governs the world of art that we work in finds, in my opinion, its meaning and opportunities for development in specific situations from which concrete proposals emerge. I find my role as producer stimulating, that is as an art critic who gathers the intellectual, material and human resources to generate artistic proposals in an identified geographical, social and political situation, to work in the permanent and constructive coming and going between local and global.

Stephen Willats. Talking city, 2011

4. Stephen Willats. Talking city, 2011

V.H. PIANO wishes to create a space for exchange and dialogue between French and Italian art venues. Why did you want to participate and what programme did you propose? 

E.B. I think that PIANO is an excellent example of structuring collaboration and sharing means of production and communication. In the context of the concerning budget and institutional crisis at large in France, Italy and elsewhere, it is essential to completely rethink methods for funding and bringing projects to fruition. And beyond the simple financial consideration, it is now no longer pertinent to plan a project with an artist in a single venue. PIANO, like other production networks such as Cluster or How to work together, design new art maps and offer alternative solutions to the challenges that drive today’s system of art.

Space: Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain
Protagonists: Etienne Bernard, Goldschmied & Chiari
Project: La démocratie est illusion

 

Vincent Honoré Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain a été inauguré en 1988. Il s’agit d’un centre d’art public que vous dirigez depuis 2013. Sa mission première est d’être « une plateforme de dialogue entre productions artistiques et publics ». Pouvez-vous décrire plus précisément le projet intellectuel et artistique qui fonde lastructure, et ce qui fondamentalement la démarque des autres centres d’art ?

Etienne Bernard En qualité de centre d’art contemporain, Passerelle a comme missions fondamentales d’accompagner les artistes (dans la production, l’exposition et l’édition notamment) et les publics dans leur découverte des propositions de ces premiers. Le projet intitulé des Situations que je développe depuis une année maintenant postule l’idée que ces deux missions ne doivent pas être séparées ni hiérarchisées. Au contraire, je pense que le centre d’art contemporain est le lieu de l’élaboration partagée de sens au sein duquel artistes et publics se rencontrent et échangent. Afin de prendre réalité, cette rencontre doit, à mon sens, se construire assez naturellement. Elle se fonde sur une volonté partagée entre les audiences locales et les artistes, pour la plupart venus de loin, de prendre le temps d’échanger.
Il ne faut pas oublier que nous sommes à Brest, au bout de la Bretagne, au cœur d’un territoire très riche en propositions culturelles mais aussi en marge des principaux axes de circulation de l’art. Je suis convaincu que sa situation géographique comme sociale constitue une opportunité bien avant d’être un écueil. En effet, si Brest n’est pas un point de passage, charge à nous d’en faire une destination. Ainsi, nous avons mis en place les outils nécessaires à l’accueil et au séjour des artistes en production et nous leur proposons systématiquement de profiter d’une temporalité de travail qu’ils ne trouvent pas nécessairement ailleurs. Nous avons notamment « neutralisé » un espace de 400 m2, précédemment dévolu à l’exposition, situé au cœur du centre d’art pour y installer un atelier de production. Les artistes peuvent ainsi travailler tranquillement, avec l’aide des régisseurs, et les publics sont invités à y entrer pour échanger sur l’art en train de se faire. Le centre d’art est ainsi revendiqué comme lieu vivant, habité et ouvert.
Et jusqu’ici, je suis très heureux d’observer que le système fonctionne. Des artistes comme Wilfrid Almendra, Florian Fouché, Goldschmied & Chiari ou Ernesto Sartori ont déjà pleinement utilisé ce nouvel outil. D’autres artistes comme Fredrik Vaerslev, Koki Tanaka ou Stéphane Calais ont également prévus de l’activer dans les mois à venir. Nous observons, par ailleurs, que les publics réagissent bien au fait de pouvoir entrer en dialogue directement avec l’artiste. Il se construit des habitudes. Au fur et à mesure de la construction d’un projet artistique, les gens observent, reviennent, dialoguent. Ceci constitue à mes yeux une perspective positive qui assoie notre action institutionnelle de soutien à la création dont les publics ne sont pas toujours conscients. 

V.H. L’institution se veut « le lieu du décloisonnement disciplinaire qui explore les autres champs de la création contemporaine, du graphisme à la danse, de la musique au design ». Cette mission est-elle un héritage direct, ou avez-vous désiré, en prenant la direction du centre d’art, d’en redéfinir les prérogatives ?

E.B. Plus qu’une mission, je dirais que l’ouverture du lieu à des formes de création qui débordent du champ strict de l’art contemporain constitue plutôt un axe affirmé de programmation qui s’inscrit dans une histoire du lieu. A l’origine, dans les années 1980, le nom « Passerelle » se voulait évocateur de transdiciplinarité. Le collectif qui a ouvert le lieu accueillait alors aussi bien de l’art que de la musique, de la danse ou du théâtre. Par la suite, le champ de recherche a progressivement été orienté plus clairement vers l’art contemporain à mesure que la structure s’institutionnalisait. En arrivant à la direction du centre d’art, j’ai souhaité renouer avec cette initiative historique et ce pour deux raisons principales. La première est que je pense que cette histoire est une richesse sur laquelle il est possible de construire un projet ambitieux avec l’outil désormais professionnalisé qu’est Passerelle. Grâce à l’immense travail de structuration et d’inscription professionnelle mené par la précédente directrice Ulrike Kremeier, le centre d’art ne ressemble à l’évidence plus à l’association d’amateurs qu’il était à l’origine mais constitue aujourd’hui un équipement opérant pouvant accueillir des propositions artistiques de tous horizons. La seconde est que Brest est un vivier fantastique de partenaires de très grande qualité qui dans leurs champs disciplinaires respectifs nous ressemblent dans l’exigence. En effet, nous travaillons main dans la main avec des initiatives locales certes mais de renommée internationale, comme le festival de musique électronique Astropolis, le festival de dance contemporaine DansFabrik porté par la Scène nationale Le Quartz ou encore l’ensemble de musique contemporaine Sillages, avec qui nous venons de lancer un festival en 2014. Ainsi, il ne s’agit pas d’accueillir une pièce de théâtre ou un spectacle de danse pour animer le lieu ou « faire évènement », mais bien de travailler sur le long terme dans l’échange programmatique pour souligner nos complémentarités et nos ambitions. Nous en avons d’ailleurs présenté un très bel exemple avec la performance chorégraphique de Goldschmied & Chiari et Lotta Melin, qui a activée l’exposition en cours et intégrée le programme officiel du festival DansFabrik 2014.

V.H. « A museum director’s first task is to create a public, not just to do great shows, but to create an audience that trusts the institution. » (Pontus Hultén) [La première tâche d’un directeur de musée c’est de créer un public, pas seulement de faire des belles expositions, mais de créer un public qui ait confiance en l’institution]. Le public, dans la déclaration d’intention du Centre, tient une place importante. Cependant, le « public » reste une entité abstraite, quasi conceptuelle. Quelle est votre conception du public et quels rapport souhaitez vous entretenir avec ce public ? 

E.B. Dans un territoire comme celui de la Bretagne et de Brest, le public n’est en rien une entité abstraite. Le centre d’art contemporain constitue à la fois un outil au service de publics de proximité (Passerelle est un équipement inscrit dans un quartier avec une sociologie bien identifiée) et s’adresse à un public national et international (des professionnels évidemment, mais également un public saisonnier de vacanciers). Ainsi, nos actions et opérations doivent s’adresser à tous sans pour autant faire de hiérarchie ou de clientélisme. Nous connaissons bien nos différents publics, leurs spécificités, leurs envies et leurs réticences aussi, mais je pense que chacun peut se retrouver, à sa manière, dans une proposition artistique qui si elle est solide peut être appréhendée sous différentes perspectives.

V.H. Quels sont les outils et les programmes qui structurent le centre d’art et établissent un dialogue avec son public ? Par exemple, que sont les Zones d’augmentation et comment s’articulent-elles avec votre vision du public ? 

E.B. Nous proposons un grand nombre de programmes en direction des publics. Ceux-ci vont de l’atelier de pratique avec les plus jeunes aux cycles de conférence ou autres visites accompagnées. Nous avons également mis en place depuis une année un dispositif spécifique que j’ai appelé les Zones d’augmentation. La notion d’augmentation s’entend ici au sens numérique du terme. Sur internet, la réalité augmentée correspond à la somme de données, de liens, de références qui viennent enrichir un sujet. A Passerelle, les Zones d’augmentation constituent un programme culturel physique et numérique développé par le service des publics dont les contenus sont déterminés en discussion avec les artistes invités. Dans le grand Patio central de Passerelle qui dessert les différents espaces est installée une zone dédié à la présentation de matériel artistique et/ou documentaire pour poursuivre et mettre en perspective les questionnements abordés par les propositions artistiques exposées. Elles se déploient également sur internet avec un espace numérique de contenus pour accompagner les expositions.

V.H. Passerelle propose des expositions monographiques ainsi que des expositions de groupe et tente d’articuler différentes disciplines. Plus précisément, comment concevez-vous la mission et les responsabilités d’un directeur de centre d’art en 2014 ?

E.B. J’ai choisi de prendre la direction d’un centre d’art contemporain car je pense passionnant le fait d’articuler une approche critique et curatoriale à un contexte territorial. En effet, les logiques globalisées qui régissent le monde de l’art que nous travaillons tous trouvent, à mon avis, leur sens et leurs opportunités de développement dans des situations précises à partir desquelles émergent des propositions concrètes. Je trouve stimulant mon rôle de producteur c’est-à-dire de critique d’art qui réunit les moyens intellectuels, matériels et humains de faire émerger des propositions artistiques dans une situation géographique, sociale et politique identifiée. De travailler dans l’aller et retour permanent et constructif entre local et global.

V.H. PIANO veut créer un espace d’échange et de dialogues entre des lieux d’art italiens et français. Pourquoi avez vous souhaité participer et quel programme proposez-vous ? 

E.B. Je pense que PIANO est un excellent exemple de structuration dans la collaboration et la mutualisation des moyens de production et de communication. Dans le contexte de crise budgétaire et institutionnelle préoccupant que nous connaissons en France, en Italie et partout ailleurs, il est primordial de repenser en profondeur les modes de financement et d’apparition des projets. Et au delà de la simple considération financière, il n’est plus pertinent aujourd’hui de penser un projet avec un artiste dans un seul lieu. PIANO comme les autres réseaux de production comme Cluster ou How to work together dessinent de nouvelles cartographies de l’art et proposent des solutions alternatives aux enjeux qui animent le système de l’art aujourd’hui.

Images:

1. Katinka Bock. Volumes en extensions, 2007 , exhibition view at Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain, Brest. Photo: Sébastien Durand
2. Wilfrid Almendra. L’intranquillité, 2013, exhibition view at Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain, Brest. Photo: Nicolas Ollier
3. Tania Mouraud, La curée, 2003 – Borderland, 2007. Exhibition Tania Mouraud. J.I.T. just in time, 2008. Photo: Nicolas Ollier
4. Stephen Willats, Free Expression, série Multiple Clothing,  1992. Exhibition Stephen Willats. Talking city, 2011. Courtesy FRAC Languedoc-Roussillon, FRAC Nord-Pas-de-Calais. Photo: Nicolas Ollier

 

close
en - it - fr

Tony Fiorentino

Tony Fiorentino, Do you remember, 2013

Tony Fiorentino, Do you remember, 2013

Born 1987, Barletta, Italy
Lives and works in Milan, Italy
Tony Fiorentino was born in Barletta in 1987. After his studies, he moved to Carrara where he attended the Academy of Fine Arts and founded a space for young rising artists’ solo and collective exhibits. The work of Tony Fiorentino is characterized by a continuous search for expression and experimentation through several materials and practices. Objects, thoughts and actions turn into compositions that display a narrative and poetic impact, by which he comments visually on our human condition with all our troubles as well as our social and existential issues. In 2007 he won a scholarship that allowed him to attend the Anotati Skoli Kalon Tecknon in Athens for a year. He then moved to Amsterdam and London. In 2013, he was invited to the CSAV Artist Research Laboratory at Antonio Ratti’s Foundation, with the visiting professor Matt Mullican. He won several awards as an emerging artist, among which the Talent Prize-Meta Energia at the MACRO Museum, Rome (2012). He was invited to take part in several exhibitions in Italy and abroad, among which are: Concrete Ghost – Cinque Mostre, American Academy in Rome (2014); Contemporary locus 5, Domus Lucina, Bergamo (2013), Dominium melancholiae, Spazio Salenbauch, Venice (2013); Ragazze, Viafarini, Milan (2013); Off site / Not in place #3, Museum of Contemporary Art, Lissone (2013); Underneath the Street, the Beach, Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Turin (2012); Open House, Reappropriation & Possession, Salon Flux, London (2012); Officine dell’Arte, Viafarini/Careof/DOCVA, Milan (2010). He currently lives and works in Milan.

Project: From & To

 

Tony Fiorentino nasce a Barletta nel 1987. Studia presso l’Accademia di Belle Arti di Carrara, dove fonda uno spazio espositivo per giovani artisti emergenti. Nel 2007 grazie a una borsa di studio frequenta per un anno l’Anotati Skoli Kalon Tecknon di Atene. Successivamente si trasferisce a Amsterdam e a Londra. Nel 2012 vince il Talent Prize – Meta Energia, Museo Macro Pelanda, Roma (2012). Tra le principali mostre in Italia e all’estero: Concrete Ghost – Cinque Mostre, American Academy in Rome (2014); Dominium melancholiae, Spazio Salenbauch, Venezia (2013); Off site / Not in place #3, Underneath the Street, the Beach, Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Torino (2012); Open House, reappropriation & possession, Salon Flux, Londra (2012); Officine dell’Arte, Viafarini/Careof/Docva, Milano (2010). Vive e lavora a Milano.

 

Né à Barletta en 1987. Vit et travaille à Milan. Il a étudié à l’Académie des Beaux-arts de Carrara ou il a fondé un espace d’exposition pour les jeunes artistes émergents. En 2017, grâce à une bourse d’études, il fréquente l’Anotati Skoli Kalon Tecknon d’Athènes. Il s’installe ensuite à Amsterdam puis à Londres. En 2012 il remporte le Prix Talent – Energie Voyage, Musée MACRO Pelanda, Rome (2012). Principales expositions en Italie et à l’étranger : Concrete Ghost ‘Cinque Mostre’, American Academy, Rome (2014), Dominium melancholiae, Spazio Salenbauch, Venise (2013), Off site / Not in place #3, Underneath the Street, the Beach, Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Turin (2012); Open House, reappropriation & possession, Salon Flux, Londres (2012), Officine dell’Arte, Viafarini/Careof/Docva, Milan (2010).

Image:
Tony Fiorentino, Do you remember, 2013

close
en - it

Allan Sekula

Allan Sekula, Meat Mass, 1972

Allan Sekula, Meat Mass, 1972

Born 1951, Erie, PA, USA
† 2013, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Photographer and filmmaker Allan Sekula was committed to a vision of art as a tool for critiquing and exposing reality. As a creator, historian, theoretician, and critic, for almost half a century he explored and challenged the traditional canons of photographic representation. His work took him around the world, tracing the routes of global commerce, and shipping in particular. Having grown up near the port of Los Angeles, Sekula was profoundly struck by the lifestyles of the dockers and the dynamics governing international flows of goods. His first photographic works of the 1970s reveal his interest in systems of representation and his political and social activism, as can be seen in the work Meat Mass. The work consists of black-and-white photographic documentation, a series of shots of the performance the artist staged in January 1972. Over a few weeks, Sekula stole packets of meat from various supermarkets and stored them in a freezer. He then threw the frozen steaks onto a busy road, where they were crushed by passing vehicles, symbolically interrupting the capitalist circulation of luxury goods by means of theft and waste. Rather than focusing on single shots, reminiscent of the tradition of painting, Sekula always preferred serial photographic projects that enabled him to create narrative sequences closer to film and theater than to pure photography.

Nato a Erie, PA, USA, nel 1951
† 2013, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Allan Sekula, fotografo e film-maker, si è sempre battuto affinché l’arte fosse strumento di critica attiva e di denuncia, radicata nel confronto con la realtà. Per quasi mezzo secolo, l’artista ha indagato e sfidato la rappresentazione fotografica tradizionale in qualità di creatore, storico, teorico e critico. Ha viaggiato molto per tracciare le rotte del commercio globale, in particolare del trasporto marittimo delle merci. Cresciuto nel contesto del porto di Los Angeles, Sekula è stato profondamente influenzato dai destini di chi lavora nel settore delle operazioni portuali, e dalle dinamiche che regolano il traffico di merci, soprattutto internazionale. Nei primi lavori fotografici degli anni ’70 emerge il suo interesse per i sistemi di rappresentazione, e il suo impegno in questioni politiche e sociali, come dimostra Meat Mass (Massa di carne). L’opera consiste nella documentazione fotografica in bianco e nero, presentata come una sequenza di scatti, di una performance che l’artista realizzò nel gennaio del 1972. Per alcune settimane, Sekula rubò delle confezioni di carne da vari supermercati, conservandole in un congelatore e lanciando poi le bistecche surgelate al centro di una strada trafficata, così che fossero schiacciate dai veicoli in transito. L’azione dell’artista mirava a interrompere il sistema di circolazione capitalistica dei beni di lusso, attraverso il furto e lo spreco. Invece di privilegiare il singolo scatto, più legato alla tradizione pittorica, Sekula ha sempre prediletto progetti fotografici seriali, che gli consentivano di creare una sequenza narrativa più vicina al cinema o al teatro, che non alla fotografia tout court.

Image:
Allan Sekula, Meat Mass, 1972. Photo: Allan Sekula and David Alward. © Generali Foundation

Project: Soleil politique

close
en

MICHAEL E. SMITH

2487-18

Born 1977, Detroit, MI, USA
Lives and works in Detroit, MI, USA

Image:
Michael E. Smith, Untitled, 2014. Wire harness; variable dimensions. View of the exhibition The Promise of Moving Things (curator: Chris Sharp), Centre d’art contemporain d’Ivry – le Crédac, 2014. Photo: André Morin / le Crédac. Courtesy of the artist, Clifton Benevento, New York & Michael Benevento, Los Angeles.

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en

Marlie Mul

Marlie Mul, Puddle (Black Disposable), 2013

Marlie Mul, Puddle (Black Disposable), 2013

Born 1980, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Lives and works in Berlin, Germany and London, United Kingdom
Mul studied Textiles at the Academy for Visual Arts St. Joost in Breda and Sculpture at the ABKM in Maastricht, Netherlands. In 2009 she obtained an MFA from the Architectural Association in London. Her work has been exhibited at Croy Nielsen Gallery in Berlin (2013), Fluxia Gallery (2013) as well as the project spaces Oslo10 in Basel (2012) and Space in London (2012). She is currently in residency at KunstZeitRaum in Munich.

Image:
Marlie Mul, Puddle (Black Disposable), 2013, sand, stones, resin, object, 78 x 76 cm. Courtesy Fluxia, Milan. Photo: Andrea Rossetti

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it

Emilio Prini

Emilio Prini, Stampa di un consumo - Monaco '71 Il caffè del Kunstverein, 1971

Emilio Prini, Stampa di un consumo – Monaco ’71 Il caffè del Kunstverein, 1971

Born 1943, Stresa, Italy
Lives and works in Rome, Italy

A leading exponent of Arte Povera, Emilio Prini works with a variety of media, including light, photography, sound, drawing, and the written word, exploring the connections between reality, reproduction, and perception. He often focuses on the camera, the photographic process, and the limitations of this form of expression.
Perimetro – Misura a Studio Stanza was exhibited for the first time in 1967 at the La Bertesca Gallery in Genoa, on the occasion of the show marking the debut of Arte Povera. The work consists of a neon tube wound tightly around a cylinder to resemble a reel of cable. When the tube is switched off, it has a conceptual dimension, but when it is switched on, it acquires more of a poetic, visionary effect. The sculpture becomes an allegorical representation of the perimeter of a space and a metaphor for an abstract system of measurement. The outline and real size of the room hosting it are revealed by and perceived through the light emanating from the tube itself. Perimetro is an example of how Prini’s works spring from an artistic process that combines everyday objects and materials to forge new experiences. Stampa di un consumo originates from a detail of a photograph that Claudio Abate took on occasion of the exhibition Arte Povera held at the Kunstverein in Munich in 1971 during an action which involved taking apart a technological device. Prini has manipulated the photograph to highlight the star formed by the fingers of a smoker holding a cigarette to his lips. There is a similar effect in the self-portrait entitled Da Goya, where the artist’s eye is framed by a detail from one of his sculptures.

Nato a Stresa, Italia, nel 1943
Vive e lavora a Roma, Italia

Emilio Prini, una delle figure chiave dell’Arte Povera, lavora con diversi media, come luce, fotografia, suono, disegno e testo scritto, indagando i legami che intercorrono tra realtà, riproduzione e percezione. La macchina fotografica e il processo del fotografare, nonché i limiti di questa forma espressiva, sono spesso oggetto della sua ricerca.
Perimetro – Misura a Studio Stanza è stato esposto per la prima volta nel 1967, in occasione della mostra che segnò il debutto dell’Arte Povera alla galleria La Bertesca di Genova. Si tratta di un tubo al neon, talmente arrotolato intorno a un cilindro da sembrare una bobina. Quando il tubo è spento, ha una dimensione concettuale; quando è acceso, invece, assume una forza più immaginifica e poetica. La scultura diventa la rappresentazione allegorica del perimetro di uno spazio e metafora di un sistema di misure astratto. Il profilo e le dimensioni reali della stanza in cui si trova sono piuttosto dati e percepiti attraverso la luce, che è emanata dal tubo stesso. Perimetro è un esempio di come le opere create da Prini nascano da un processo artistico che combina tra loro oggetti e materiali del quotidiano, per evocare nuove esperienze.
Stampa di un consumo trae origine dalla ripresa di un particolare di una fotografia, che Claudio Abate scattò in occasione della mostra Arte Povera, organizzata nel 1971 al museo Kunstverein di Monaco di Baviera durante un’azione che prevedeva lo smontaggio di un apparecchio tecnologico. Prini ha manipolato la fotografia, mettendo in evidenza il dettaglio di una stella formata dalle dita di un fumatore che tiene una sigaretta tra le labbra. Accade così anche nel suo autoritratto, intitolato Da Goya, dove l’occhio dell’artista è sottolineato dal dettaglio di una scultura dello stesso Prini.

Image:
Emilio Prini, Stampa di un consumo – Monaco ’71 Il caffè del Kunstverein, 1971. Courtesy Galleria Pio Monti, Rome

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it

KP BREHMER

Born 1938, Berlin, Germany
† 1997, Hamburg, Germany
Klaus Peter Brehmer, who went by the name of KP Brehmer as a reference to DKP, the German Communist Party, was one of the leading exponents of the German art movement Capitalist Realism. Interested in giving art a more dynamic role in everyday life and society, Brehmer analyzes in his works the growing presence of the media and media language in Western consumerist society. His oeuvre spans painting, graphics, books, films, musical arrangements, and installations. The famous series Korrektur der Nationalfarben, gemessen an der Vermögensverteilung (Correction of national colors according to distribution of wealth) uses recognizable graphic elements such as colors, charts, and diagrams to elicit a reflection on the way in which society’s visual systems influence the individual. The two crossed flags form a portrait of German society, its social changes and political tendencies. The colors are proportioned to convey various statistics on the distribution of wealth in the country. The left-hand flag interprets data from 1970, dividing German families into three income brackets represented by the national colors: red for those earning less than 1500 marks, black for those earning between 1500 and 3000 marks, and yellow for those taking home more than 3000 marks. The right-hand flag uses the same colors to represent the increase in per capita earnings between 1950 and 1969 according to occupation: black for white-collar workers, red for bluecollar workers and pensioners, and yellow for professionals. The fact that the two flags are crossed over represents the inextricable link between social class and distribution of wealth.

Nato a Berlino, Germania, nel 1938
† 1997, Amburgo, Germania
Klaus Peter Brehmer, diventato KP Brehmer in riferimento all’acronimo del partito comunista tedesco, DKP, è stato uno dei maggiori esponenti della corrente tedesca denominata “Realismo capitalista”. Interessato a rendere più dinamico il ruolo dell’arte nella vita quotidiana e nella società, Brehmer analizza nelle sue opere la crescente presenza dei media e del loro linguaggio nella società consumistica occidentale. Le sue ricerche trovano forma in lavori pittorici e grafici, in pubblicazioni, film, arrangiamenti musicali e installazioni. Korrektur der Nationalfarben, gemessen an der Vermögensverteilung (Correzione dei colori nazionali, in rapporto alla distribuzione del reddito) è una serie di opere nelle quali, attraverso codici grafici riconoscibili come colori, didascalie e diagrammi, l’artista invita lo spettatore a riflettere sul modo in cui i sistemi visivi della società influenzino l’individuo. Due bandiere incrociate diventano il ritratto della società tedesca e, al contempo, l’interpretazione degli sviluppi sociali e delle tendenze politiche al suo interno. I colori e la superficie delle bandiere veicolano una serie di informazioni statistiche sulla distribuzione del reddito in Germania. Nella bandiera di sinistra, che fa riferimento al 1970, le famiglie tedesche sono suddivise in base al loro reddito in tre fasce, identificate dai tre colori nazionali: rosso per chi guadagna meno di 1500 marchi, nero per redditi compresi tra i 1500 e i 3000 marchi, giallo per oltre i 3000 marchi. La bandiera di destra, utilizzando gli stessi tre colori, indica la crescita del reddito pro capite tra il1950eil1969inbasealtipodi attività svolta: nero per gli impiegati, rosso per gli operai e i pensionati, giallo per i lavoratori autonomi. L’intersecarsi delle due bandiere vuole rappresentare la stretta relazione che esiste tra la distribuzione della ricchezza e l’appartenenza a una determinata classe sociale.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

RON TRAN

Born 1972, Saigon, Vietnam
Lives and works in Vancouver, Canada

Ron Tran works in various media, including performance, sculpture, photography, video, and installation. His artistic practice involves interpersonal actions and gestures, at once benevolent and ironic, that challenge the way we view everyday relations, notably those that involve strangers.
In Walking Strangers Home, for example, Tran approaches passersby late at night, offering to accompany them to their homes. Establishing a relationship between art and the public sphere, the artist thus explores cultural rituals and anxieties as well as relations of power in society. Documentation plays an important role in conveying his work as a performer.
For Apartment #201, Tran removed the front door of his apartment and exhibited it for five weeks at Western Front, an artist-run art space in Vancouver, while he continued to live in the apartment.
Through this objectaction, which combines aesthetics and the intimate realm, his private life was exposed and made vulnerable. The apartment functioned as an extension of the object exhibited in the art space. At the end of the exhibition, the door, once returned to its original location and use, lost its artistic status.
The work offered itself neither as a metaphorical representation, nor a ready-made, but rather as a living and tangible intervention inscribed in the present and inseparable from real life. For the exhibition Soleil politique, the artist explores the means to reenact this experience.

Nato a Saigon, Vietnam, nel 1972
Vive e lavora Vancouver, Canada

Ron Tran lavora con diversi media: performance, scultura, fotografia, video e installazione. La sua pratica comprende azioni e gesti interpersonali, allo stesso tempo ridondanti e ironici, che introducono un senso di malessere nel nostro sguardo sui rapporti quotidiani, in particolare quelli con le persone sconosciute. In Walking Strangers Home, per esempio, Tran avvicina dei passanti a tarda ora, e si offre di accompagnarli fino a casa. Costruendo dei legami tra l’arte e la sfera pubblica, l’artista esplora l’ansia e i rituali culturali, così come i rapporti di potere nella società. Il problema della documentazione occupa un posto importante nell’accesso alle sue performance. In Apartment #201, Ron Tran ha smontato la porta d’ingresso del suo appartamento e l’ha esposta per cinque settimane nello spazio artistico Western Front a Vancouver, continuando a vivere a casa propria. Attraverso questo gesto-oggetto, che collega l’estetico all’intimo, la vita privata dell’artista si è ritrovata a essere esibita e vulnerabile. L’appartamento di Tran vive un’attivazione, in quanto estensione dell’oggetto presentato nello spazio artistico. Alla fine della mostra, e una volta rimontata la porta sui cardini, essa ritrova la propria funzione di utilità e perde ogni valore artistico.
L’opera che ne risulta non è né una rappresentazione metaforica, né un ready-made, ma un intervento vivo e tangibile, iscritto in un presente indissociabile dalla vita reale.
Per Soleil politique, l’artista propone una riproduzione di questa esperienza.

Né à Saïgon, Vietnam, en 1972
Vit et travaille à Vancouver, Canada

Ron Tran travaille avec divers média : performance, sculpture, photographie, vidéo et installation. Sa pratique convoque des actions et gestes interpersonnels, à la fois généreux et ironiques, qui introduisent un malaise dans notre regard sur les rapports quotidiens, en particulier ceux impliquant des personnes inconnues. Avec Walking Strangers Home, par exemple, Ron Tran abordait des passants tard dans la soirée, leur offrant de les accompagner jusqu’à leur domicile. Établissant ainsi des liens entre l’art et la sphère publique, l’artiste explore les rituels et l’anxiété culturels, ainsi que les rapports de pouvoir dans la société. La question de la documentation occupe une place importante dans l’accès à son travail performatif.
Pour Apartment #201, Ron Tran a démonté la porte d’entrée de son appartement afin de l’exposer pendant cinq semaines dans un lieu d’art (Western Front, Vancouver), tout en continuant de vivre dans le logement. Par ce geste-objet qui lie l’esthétique avec l’intime, sa vie privée s’est trouvée exposée et vulnérable. L’appartement est activé en tant qu’extension de l’objet présenté dans l’espace artistique. À la fin de l’exposition, une fois remise à son emplacement d’origine, la porte retrouve sa fonction utilitaire et perd toute valeur artistique. L’œuvre qui en résulte n’est ni une représentation métaphorique, ni un ready-made, mais une intervention vivante et tangible, inscrite dans un présent indissociable de la vie réelle. Pour Soleil politique, l’artiste expérimente une restitution de cette expérience.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it

Dan Graham

Born 1942, Urbana, IL, USA
Lives and works in New York, NY, USA

Dan Graham’s career spans various artistic genres: performance, film, video, photography, installations, architecture, and music. He has always tried to include the viewer in his works, with varying levels of participation being essential to complete each piece. Given that viewers do not approach works from one direction alone, in his architectural projects and video installations Graham challenges and deconstructs the Renaissance theory of perspective.
In 1984, in collaboration with the architect Marie-Paule MacDonald, he presented his proposal for a museum devoted to the French-American artist Gordon Matta-Clark.
It includes a memorial honoring the artist, a museum, and a research center. The model features a series of houses of the same size, one of which plays host to the museum. The design for the latter drew inspiration from one of Matta-Clark’s projects, Splitting, created in New Jersey in 1974, in a working-class neighborhood featuring the typical suburban housing built after the war. In his proposal, Graham both underlines how Gordon Matta-Clark’s project highlights the system of division and distribution of residential buildings in space, and sets out to “rematerialize” Matta-Clark’s conceptual work and equate urban planning and conceptual art.
Homes for America reveals another area that Dan Graham has been interested in since the 1960s: postmodern architecture and models of urban life. This work, in the style of a photographic reportage, explores the American suburbs and their rows of identical homes.

Nato a Urbana, IL, USA, 1942
Vive e lavora a New York, NY, USA

La carriera artistica di Dan Graham attraversa diversi linguaggi: performance, cinema, video, fotografia, installazioni, architettura e musica. L’artista ha sempre cercato di includere nei suoi lavori lo spettatore, con vari livelli di partecipazione, in quanto indispensabile alla realizzazione dell’opera. Dato che il punto di vista dello spettatore non è unico né unidirezionale, nei suoi progetti architettonici e nelle sue installazioni video Graham decostruisce la teoria della prospettiva rinascimentale. Nel 1984 Dan Graham, in collaborazione con l’architetto Marie-Paule MacDonald, presenta la proposta per un museo dedicato all’artista franco- americano Gordon Matta-Clark. La proposta comprende un memoriale in onore dell’artista, un museo e un centro di ricerca sull’urbanistica. Il modellino consiste in una serie di case della medesima dimensione, una delle quali ospita il museo. Il design di quest’ultimo si ispira a uno dei progetti di Matta-Clark, Splitting (Spaccature), realizzato nel 1974 in New Jersey, in un quartiere di case operaie tipiche dei sobborghi americani del dopoguerra. Nella sua proposta, Graham da una parte sottolinea come il progetto di Gordon Matta Clark evidenzi il sistema di divisione e distribuzione degli edifici abitativi nello spazio; dall’altra, rimaterializza il lavoro concettuale di Matta-Clark e crea una forte relazione tra urbanistica e arte concettuale. Homes for America (Case per l’America) è un altro esempio dell’interesse dell’artista, manifestato già negli anni ’60, per l’architettura e per i modelli di vita urbana proposti nella cultura quotidiana del postmodernismo. Si tratta di una serie di fotografie di taglio giornalistico, dedicate agli spazi della periferia americana e alla serialità delle sue abitazioni.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

Chris Sharp

Chris_Sharp

Born 1974, USA
Lives and works in Mexico City, Mexico
Chris Sharp is a writer and independent curator currently based in Mexico City. Exhibitions and projects include Stay in Love, a two part exhibition, Lisa Cooley gallery and Laurel Gitlen gallery, New York (2014); Notes on Neo-Camp, Office Baroque gallery, Antwerp (2013), which traveled to Studio Voltaire, London (2013); Seeing is Believing, a solo exhibition of Jochen Lempert, Norma Mangione gallery, Turin (2013); Mexico City Blues, Shanaynay, Paris (2012); Smeared with the Gold of the Opulent Sun, Nomas Foundation, Rome (2012); Bouvard and Pécuchet’s Compendious Quest for Beauty, co-curated with Simone Menegoi, David Roberts Art Foundation, London (2012); Antic Measures, Galerija Gregor Podnar, Berlin (2011); Under Destruction, co-curated with Gianni Jetzer, Museum Tinguely, Basel (2010), which traveled to The Swiss Institute, New York (2011).
He is currently preparing the 12th Swiss Sculpture Exhibition in Biel/Bienne (2014), which he will co-curate with Gianni Jetzer. Sharp also co-directs, with the artist Martin Soto Climent, the Mexico City project space, Lulu.
He is editor-at-large of Kaleidoscope magazine, a contributing editor of Art Review, and his writing has appeared in many magazines and online publications including Artforum, Fillip, Afterall, Mousse, Metropolis M, Spike, Camera Austria, artpress, and Art-Agenda. He has contributed critical texts to publications on the work of artists such as Jean-Luc Moulène, Simon Dybbroe Møller, Dane Mitchell, Roman Ondák, Michael Dean, Ian Kiaer, Nina Canell, Nina Beier and Owen Land among others for such institutions as Moderna Museet, Malmö, Hamburg Kunstverein, Kunsthalle Bern, The Sculpture Center, New York, Nouveau Musée National de Monaco, MACRO, Rome, and La Biennale de Rennes.

Project: The Registry of Promise

 

Chris Sharp (1974, USA) è uno scrittore e un curatore indipendente, attualmente di base a Città del Messico. Sta preparando come co-curatore la 12a edizione della Swiss Sculpture Exhibition a Bienne (2014) con Gianni Jetzer e dirige insieme all’artista Martin Soto Climent il project space Lulu a Città del Messico. Fa parte della redazione della rivista Kaleidoscope e collabora regolarmente con Art Review; i suoi articoli sono pubblicati inoltre su siti internet e numerose riviste come Artforum, Fillip, Afterall, Mousse, Metropolis M, Spike, Camera Austria, artpress e Art-Agenda. Ha realizzato saggi critici per pubblicazioni e cataloghi sul lavoro di molti artisti e nell’ambito di progetti promossi da istituzioni come il Moderna Museet Malmö, La Kunstverein di Amburgo, La Kunsthalle di Berna, The Sculpture Center a New York, il Nouveau Musée National a Monaco, il MACRO a Roma e La Biennale de Rennes, Francia.

 

Chris Sharp (1974, USA) est un critique et commissaire indépendant, actuellement basé à Mexico. Il prépare actuellement, en tant que co-commissaire, la 12ème édition de l’exposition suisse de sculpture de Bienne (2014) avec Gianni Jetzer, et dirige depuis avril 2013 l’espace d’exposition Lulu à Mexico, avec l’artiste Martin Soto Climent. Il fait partie de la rédaction de Kaleidoscope et collabore régulièrement avec Art Review. Ses articles sont également publiés sur de nombreux médias tels Artforum, Fillip, Afterall, Mousse, Metropolis M, Spike, Camera Austria, artpress et Art-Agenda. Il a contribué comme auteur à des publications consacrées entre autres à Simon Dybbroe Møller, Dane Mitchell, Roman Ondák, Michael Dean, Christian Andersson, Ian Kiaer, Nina Canell, Lara Favaretto, Nina Beier et Owen Land, et pour des institutions comme le Moderna Museet (Malmö), le Kunstverein de Hambourg, la Kunsthalle de Bern, le Sculpture Center (New York), le Nouveau Musée National de Monaco, le MACRO (Rome) et La Biennale de Rennes.

close
en - it - fr

ILARIA MAROTTA IN CONVERSATION WITH CHRIS SHARP

ILARIA MAROTTA IN CONVERSATION WITH CHRIS SHARP

Ilaria Marotta “In January 1982, thirty-one years ago, Primo Levi was asked to say something about the future, giving voice to the writer of science fiction – or biology fiction, as Calvino said – that was in him,” writes Marco Belpoliti talking about the future in a recent article appeared on doppiozero. “He did it” – he continues – “ in Tuttolibri, together with and next to James G. Ballard, a far more apocalyptic author. Levi simply reiterated the predictions made twenty years earlier by Arthur Clarke, commenting on what had actually come true and what had not. Among the various things that happened, there was the landing on the moon, one year before Clarke’s prediction; Clarke had also envisioned a “personal radio” by 1980: Levi thought this was easy but not convenient to produce: better let it go. Now that we have the Internet and social networks, something similar has happened…”. Here, the author stresses that talking about the future always entails the idea of a bet or a prediction. We can only speak of the future in the present. And similarly, your project The Registry of Promise, whose first event has been presented at the Fondazione Giuliani in Rome, investigates not so much your vision of the future as an aspiration for the future, or rather a promise for the future. What is the future that artists seem to promise?

5_FG_Buggenhout_Gorgo-#33_3

2. Peter Buggenhout, Gorgo #33, 2013

Chris Sharp It is indeed true that the future can only speculated about from the position of the present. As for what you say about The Registry of Promise and the proprietorship of visions (mine or the artists’), I hadn’t thought about that before, but now that I do, I think it is actually shared – that it, this vision, is something that we produce, or maybe better yet, experience together, curator and artist, as if we coincide and enter in a kind of complicity. In fact, it is this kind of ideal complicity that prevents, I believe, a show from being about ideas as opposed to art (i.e., using art to illustrate ideas) and which is why I never feel comfortable with term “research,” and why I feel like I don’t really do any, properly speaking, nor do any of the artists with whom I have the great privilege to work. If I am not mistaken, the term presupposes a quantifiable scientific method (hypothesis, proof) which, contrary to recent popular opinion, has very little, if anything, to do with the fundamental, insuperable and incommensurable (unquantifiable) sense of uncertainty and mystery intrinsic to art.

Jochen Lempert, Untitled (from: Symmetry and the Architecture of the Body), 1997

3. Jochen Lempert, Untitled, 1997

As for the question of the future and promise, the relationship of the artists in this overall exhibition with time, is, I hope, much more complex. It has as much to do with the past and the present as with future. It’s more a question of the ambiguity at the heart of the notion of promise – its ultimate lack of allegiance to a given or specific temporality.
I am not sure what kind of future artists can offer us. Part of me wants to believe in this utopian relic of the avant-garde, and another part believes that it is, to a certain extent, responsible for some of the least interesting art being made today, whether it be through the predominantly affirmative, non-critical embrace of the internet and technology among the majority of what is commonly referred to as “post-internet art” or through the positivistic instrumentalization of art in “social practice.” This much I can unoriginally say, great art usually allows me to perceive things in a way I would have never perceived them before, that which in turn inevitably opens up new perspectives. I can also say that I believe that there is a lot of compassion in the work I am showing – something I am coming to value more and more in art (as well as in literature), which is rare and which probably has more to do with the future than we might initially think, even if it is essentially timeless.

Marlie Mul, Puddle (Faint Blue), 2014

4. Marlie Mul, Puddle (Faint Blue), 2014

I.M. In that same article, the writer supports the idea of a return to primitivism, the need to recover deep roots, the reassertion of basic needs to address the advancement of new technologies, social networking, a virtual context. If we look at historical determinism, we know that every action is the result of a previous one. So the future is actually in progress. In this perspective, the prediction of a future action is no longer something abstract, but rather something that we build day by day in the present. In an exhibition that I recently curated, called The Time Machine (The Survivors), there was a clear reference to the in-progress perception of the future. What is the aspect that most attracts you about the future? The new languages, new aesthetics, or specific issues (ecology, the legacy of history, nature…)? Which of these areas have you explored or will explore in your four exhibition projects, and in what order was the general design of the exhibition envisioned? 

Jean-Marie Perdrix, Cheval, bronze à la chair perdue 3, 2013

5. Jean-Marie Perdrix, Cheval, bronze à la chair perdue 3, 2013

C.S. I suppose that the aspect that most attracts me about the future is its ability to generate if not narrative, then form (which is always a kind of narrative, or way to prevent the story from yielding up its contents, once and for all, and ending) – which is one of the primary points of this show. To what extent can the future generate narrative and form? Or rather, to what extent is our western perspective of the future capable of generating it? If that perspective has been exhausted (the dominant western narrative/mythology seems to be not just the end of the world, but how it will end) then how can we imagine other perspectives, other forms? By shedding the old one (melancholy); abandoning a linear conception of time and embracing a multiplicity of times (multiple times); accepting the impossibility of a non-human narrative (moving things); and lastly, by stretching literature and language itself to new limits. But all of that makes the exhibitions that compose The Registry of Promise sound more prescriptive and idea-based than they actually are. Their relationship to ideas is probably closer to poetry’s relationship to ideas, which is one of form, at least where Wallace Stevens is concerned, when he writes: “The poem must resist the intelligence almost successfully.”

Jochen Lempert, Fire, 2008

6. Jochen Lempert, Fire, 2008

I.M. I found the first event of the project at the Giuliani really well arranged, sophisticated, almost metaphysical in the choice of the large voids between each work. Such an arrangement of space is a curatorial choice, but can it also be interpreted as your own personal reading of an imaginary future? Rarefaction, order, or entropy?

8_FG_Lempert_Martha_2

7. Jochen Lempert, Martha, 2005

C.S. Thank you very much. Metaphysical is not a term I would have ever selected to describe it, but now that you mention it, de Chirico does come to mind, as well as a corresponding sense of deliberateness, meaning (or lack thereof), crisis, and even desolation. The latter probably has more to do with my spatial decisions in the Giuliani show than anything. I wanted to create a potent, yet understated sense of drama. All the work in the show is very powerful and I wanted to emphasize that power, even if I did so toward non-specific narrative ends – for instance, it seems like something has happened in The Promise of Melancholy and Ecology, which is very much of the order of aftermath, but whatever has happened has less to do with an event than, say, a psychological condition: melancholy (a condition, which, predicated on loss, inwardly leans more toward emptying out the world than filling it up).
I also think that some, if not all the works really deserved the space. Jean-Marie Perdrix’s amalgamated, bronze horse head, for instance – an object as beautiful as it is harrowing – needed a room all to itself, I believe, in order to fully realize itself. But then again, to speak generally, I think all great art deserves a lot of space in order to be properly seen, and that, reversing the same logic, all the space in Giuliani can be gleaned as a measure of not only how powerful the art in it is, but also, by extension, how fortunate I am to be able to work with it.

Images:
1. Jochen Lempert, Untitled, 2005, silver gelatin print; 37 x 28 cm. Courtesy ProjecteSD, Barcelona.
2. Peter Buggenhout, Gorgo #33, 2013, mixed media: wax, plastic, blood, horse hair, cardboard, PU-foam, polyester; 48 x 72 x 49 cm; vitrine and pedestal 147 x 80 x 60 cm. Courtesy Galerie Laurent Godin, Paris
3. Jochen Lempert, Untitled (from: Symmetry and the Architecture of the Body), 1997, 2 silver gelatin prints; 18 x 24 cm each. Courtesy ProjecteSD, Barcelona
4. Marlie Mul, Puddle (Faint Blue), 2014, sand, stones, resin, objects; 95 x 88 cm. Courtesy Fluxia, Milan
5. Jean-Marie Perdrix, Cheval, bronze à la chair perdue 3, 2013, cast of copper alloy, carbon and ash; 25 x 77 x 33 cm. Courtesy Desiré Saint Phalle, Mexico City
6. Jochen Lempert, Fire, 2008, 6 silver gelatin prints; 18 x 24 cm each. Courtesy ProjecteSD, Barcelona
7. Jochen Lempert, Martha, 2005, silver gelatin print; 30 x 28 cm. Courtesy ProjecteSD, Barcelona

Photos: Giorgio Benni

Project: The Registry of Promise
Spaces: Fondazione Giuliani, Parc Saint Léger, Centre d’art contemporain d’Ivry – le Crédac, De Vleeshal
Protagonists: Chris SharpPeter Buggenhout, Jochen Lempert, Marlie Mul, Jean-Marie Perdrix, Patrick Bernatchez, Juliette BlightmanRosalind Nashashibi, Francisco Tropa, Andy Warhol, Anicka Yi, Nina Canell, Alexander Gutke, Mandla Reuter, Hans Schabus, Michael E. Smith, Antoine Nessi

close
en - it - fr

Benoît Maire

Born 1978, Pessac, France
Lives and works in Paris, France

Since 2008, Benoît Maire has been writing a manual of aesthetics, a compilation of objects and texts that cover some of the major issues in contemporary aesthetics. Beginning with the insurmountable conflict between saying and seeing, Maire works in the interstices where art and philosophy come together to serve practical purposes and where the forms expand in space and surpass each other.
For the film Spiaggia (Beach), the artist continues research he began for the exhibition Spiaggia di menzogne (Beach of Lies), which he presented at the Fondazione Giuliani from October 4 to December 14, 2013. The film thus makes use of various sculptural elements and tools he had previously exhibited. By staging four characters in ordinary situations, with a narrative made up of extracts from philosophical texts by authors such as Ludwig Wittgenstein, Quentin Meillassoux, Alain Badiou, and Jacques Lacan, Maire explores a new cosmogony inspired by David Hume’s theory of the origin of ideas. In the film, man is both the subject and object of his inquiry into the origins of cause and effect. Spiaggia explores a system of passions, describing their mechanisms in order to explain the causality of the characters’ actions and to determine how their passions give existential meaning to the empirical world, limited by time and space.

Nato a Pessac, Francia, nel 1978
Vive e lavora a Parigi, Francia

Nel 2008 Benoît Maire ha iniziato a scrivere un manuale di estetica, in cui le immagini, gli oggetti e i testi prendono forma. Il fine è quello di presentare i punti cruciali dell’estetica contemporanea. Prendendo come punto di partenza il contrasto (ovvero, il conflitto insormontabile) tra dire e vedere, Maire lavora in uno spazio di mezzo, dove l’arte e la filosofia si fondono in un uso pratico, e dove le forme si distribuiscono nello spazio, superandosi l’una con l’altra. Con il film Spiaggia l’artista continua le ricerche iniziate nella mostra Spiaggia di menzogne, presentata alla Fondazione Giuliani dal 4 ottobre al 14 dicembre 2013, in particolare sull’uso di differenti strumenti ed elementi scultorei. Attraverso la messa in scena di quattro personaggi colti in situazioni quotidiane, e tramite il ritmo di una narrazione costruita a partire da brani di testi di filosofi come Ludwig Wittgenstein, Quentin Meillasoux, Alain Badiou o Jacques Lacan, Benoît Maire indaga una nuova cosmogonia, ispirata dalla teoria humiana della genesi delle idee. Nel suo film l’uomo è sia il soggetto sia l’oggetto di un’inchiesta sulla natura della relazione tra causa ed effetto. Spiaggia sperimenta un sistema delle passioni che descrive la loro meccanica, per spiegare la causalità delle azioni dei personaggi e stabilire come le passioni conferiscano un senso esistenziale al mondo empirico, limitato nello spazio e nel tempo.

Né à Pessac, France, en 1978
Vit et travaille à Paris, France

Depuis 2008, Benoît Maire a entamé l’écriture d’un manuel d’esthétique où les images, objets et textes prennent forme dans le but de présenter quelques enjeux majeurs issus de l’esthétique contemporaine. Ayant pour point de départ le différend (le conflit insurmontable) entre dire et voir, Benoît Maire travaille dans un entre-deux où l’art et la philosophie fusionnent dans une utilisation pratique où les formes se répartissent dans l’espace et se surpassent entre elles.
Avec le film Spiaggia, l’artiste continue ses recherches initiées avec l’exposition [Plage des mensonges] présentée à la Fondazione Giuliani du 4 octobre au 14 décembre 2013, notamment avec l’utilisation dans le film de différents éléments sculpturaux et outils précédemment montrés. À travers la mise en scène de quatre personnages dans des situations du quotidien et la récurrence d’une narration construite à partir d’extraits de textes de philosophes comme Ludwig Wittgenstein, Quentin Meillasoux, Alain Badiou ou Jacques Lacan, Benoît Maire interroge une nouvelle cosmogonie inspirée par la théorie humienne de la genèse des idées. Dans son film, l’homme est à la fois le sujet et l’objet de son enquête sur la nature de la relation de la cause à effet. Spiaggia expérimente un système des passions décrivant leur mécanique, pour expliquer la causalité des actions des personnages et établir comment les passions donnent un sens existentiel au monde empirique, limité par l’espace et le temps.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

Adrienne Drake

Adrienne_Drake

Adrienne Drake is Director and Curator of the Fondazione Giuliani, Rome. Since 2011 she is also an Arts and Humanities Advisor at the American Academy in Rome.
She is a founding member of the non-profit curatorial platform 1:1projects, and also curates independently, favoring a working methodology of collaboration and participatory practice.
She is a contributing curator for Open Video Projects, a Rome based video archive that organizes screenings of video art, short films, experimental cinema, documentaries and video installations.

Project: Ephemera
Space: Fondazione Giuliani
Focus: Vincent Honoré in conversation with Adrienne Drake, artistic director at Fondazione Giuliani, Rome

 

Direttrice e curatrice della Fondazione Giuliani per l’Arte Contemporanea a Roma. Dal 2011 è Arts and Humanieties Advisor per l’Accademia Americana a Roma. È tra i soci fondatori della piattaforma curatoriale 1:1projects. Nei suoi progetti favorisce una metodologia di lavoro partecipativa e collaborativa. È inoltre contributing curator per Open Video Project, un archivio video a Roma che organizza proiezioni di video d’arte, cortometraggi, cinema sperimentale, documentari e video installazioni.

 

Adrienne Drake est directrice et commissaire d’expositions de la Fondazione Giuliani à Rome. Depuis 2011, elle est également conseillère en arts et humanités auprès de l’American Academy à Rome. Elle est membre fondateur de 1:1projects, et aussi commissaire indépendante, encourageant une méthodologie du travail collaboratif et une pratique participative. Elle est commissaire d’expositions auprès de l’Open Video Projects, un lieu d’archives vidéos à Rome, qui organise des projections de films expérimentaux, de courts métrages, de documentaires et d’installations.

close
en - it - fr

Vincent Honoré in conversation with Adrienne Drake, Fondazione Giuliani

Vincent Honoré You are the founding director of Fondazione Giuliani, initiated in Rome in 2010 by collectors Giovanni and Valeria Giuliani. What is the core mission of the Foundation and how would you describe its DNA? What makes it different from other spaces in Rome and abroad?

Adrienne Drake As a private, non-profit exhibition space, the Foundation can be flexible, mutable, and our intentions and directives can change over time. Its mission can also shift, as we think about and respond to current trends in contemporary art, but it never strays from the simple objective of creating an accessible space for artists to produce and present new work, developing an arena in which to experiment and collaborate, and engaging the public in artists’ work, focusing on a programme that underscores a perspicacious reflection by artists on contemporary society.
Since the Foundation’s creation in 2010, we have focused primarily on solo exhibitions, with an emphasis on the commissioning and production of new work by artists who have never previously exhibited in Rome, if not Italy. While that focus has not necessarily changed, we’ve recently broadened the programming to include other investigations: the most recent exhibition was a more historical show with works from the 1960s-70s, while the upcoming exhibition will be a group show.

Benoît Maire, Lies on the Beach

2. Benoît Maire, Lies on the Beach, 2013

Scott Burton by Oscar Tuazon

3. Scott Burton by Oscar Tuazon, 2012

V.H. I understand you are also responsible for the Giuliani collection. I am curious to know how much the founder is involved in the Foundation’s curatorial vision, as well as the Foundation’s relation to its collection. 

A.D. The Giulianis and I always discuss the Foundation’s exhibition programme and activities. I envision each exhibition in terms of groupings of loose thematic cycles, which are not necessarily overtly declared, but rather curatorial reflections also on the direction of the Foundation. The collection is a separate entity from the activities of the Foundation, but one can’t help but influence the other. We have exhibited artists whose work was already in the collection, and these exhibitions provide the opportunity to further research and study the working practice of these artists. Since we focus on production, there are also occasions in which we acquire for the collection works that we produced for an exhibition. This is both a testimony to the Foundation’s exhibition history, and also a means of collecting in real time.

V.H. How do you engage with public institutions in Rome?

A.D. As a small foundation, we can act independently from any long-standing traditional structures which public institutions are more obligated to abide by. We tend to be more orientated towards experimentation and niche production, and are freer to take risks, unrestricted by constraints imposed by the rules and parameters of a museum institution.
Public institutions in Rome must navigate between cultural responsibility and different political agendas and are, unfortunately, often entangled in the dynamics of local and national politics. But all institutions share a common agenda: to build an ever-growing community of enthusiasts and supporters of contemporary culture, and to create centres of experience, learning and points of connectedness.

V.H. You invite artists, but also guest curators to engage with the Foundation, its collection and its audience. You open the Foundation to different sensibilities and curatorial methodologies. How do you conceive the mission of a director/curator of a contemporary art space in 2014?

A.D. There are myriad of curatorial methodologies and each of these activate different approaches and sensibilities. My primary point of interest is the investigation of artistic practice, but I’m also interested in exploring curatorial sensibilities, which is why I open the Foundation to guest curators. Curators are cultural practitioners, facilitators, researchers, questioners, and together with artists can create forums for discussion on contemporary socio-political and cultural issues, and new modes of production.

Mutiny Seemed a Probability

4. Mutiny Seemed a Probability, 2010

Benoît Maire, Lies on the Beach

5. Benoît Maire, Lies on the Beach, 2013

V.H. PIANO intends to create a network of art spaces working together, exchanging and interacting. Why did you decide to join the project and how are you participating in it?

A.D. The premise of your question underlines three essential motivations for why the Foundation is participating in the project: the possibility of working collaboratively, exchanging, and interacting with a diverse group of art spaces to broaden aesthetic networks. This type of initiative stimulates dialogue, engagement and participation, while contextualising the Foundation’s local activities with artists, curators and institutions internationally.
Specifically, Fondazione Giuliani is hosting a four-person show, The Promise of Melancholy and Ecology, the first chapter in a series of exhibitions entitled The Registry of Promise. The overall project is guest curated by Chris Sharp, whose curatorial approach I respect and admire, in collaboration with Parc Saint Léger Centre d’art contemporain, Centre d’art contemporain d’Ivry – le Crédac, and SBKM/De Vleeshal, all institutions with whom the Foundation feels a certain kinship and common ground in their research and programming.

Gianni Piacentino 1965-2000

6. Gianni Piacentino 1965-2000, 2014

Giulia Piscitelli, Neopolitan Windows

7. Giulia Piscitelli, Neopolitan Windows, 2010

Carl Andre, 3rd Steel Triangle, 2008

8. Carl Andre, 3rd Steel Triangle, 2008

Seb Patane, Movement (featuring Rose Kallal), 2013

9. Seb Patane, Movement (featuring Rose Kallal), 2013

Space: Fondazione Giuliani
Protagonists: Adrienne Drake, Chris Sharp
Project: The Registry of Promise

 

Vincent Honoré Sei direttore e fondatore della Fondazione Giuliani, creata a Roma nel 2010 dai collezionisti Giovanni e Valeria Giuliani. Qual è la mission primaria della Fondazione e come descriveresti il suo DNA? Cosa rende questo spazio diverso da altri a Roma o all’estero?

Adrienne Drake In quanto spazio espositivo privato e non-profit, la Fondazione può essere flessibile, variabile e le nostre intenzioni e direttive possono mutare nel tempo. Anche la sua mission può subire delle trasformazioni, poiché la nostra riflessione e attività rispondono alle dinamiche attuali dell’arte contemporanea. Tuttavia non ci allontaniamo mai dal semplice obiettivo di creare uno spazio accessibile nel quale gli artisti possano produrre e presentare i propri nuovi lavori, di sviluppare un’arena in cui sperimentare e collaborare, di coinvolgere il pubblico nella produzione artistica, concentrandoci su un programma che stimola la riflessione approfondita degli artisti sulla società contemporanea. Sin dalla creazione della Fondazione, avvenuta nel 2010, ci siamo concentrati principalmente su mostre personali, con un’attenzione particolare alla committenza e alla produzione di opere inedite di artisti che non hanno mai esposto a Roma e spesso nemmeno in Italia. Se da una parte non abbiamo rinunciato a questo interesse, dall’altra abbiamo recentemente ampliato i confini della nostra programmazione per includere altri tipi di ricerca: il progetto più recente è stata una mostra storica con opere degli anni ’60 e ’70, mentre il prossimo evento sarà una collettiva.

V.H. So che sei anche responsabile della collezione Giuliani. Sono curioso di sapere quanto il fondatore sia coinvolto nella visione curatoriale della Fondazione e di conoscere quale sia la relazione tra la Fondazione e la sua collezione. 

A.D. Io e i Giuliani discutiamo sempre del programma espositivo e delle attività della Fondazione. Progetto ogni mostra all’interno di ampi cicli tematici, non necessariamente dichiarati in maniera esplicita, ma piuttosto riconducibili a riflessioni generali sulla direzione della Fondazione. La collezione rappresenta un’entità separata dalle attività della Fondazione, anche se l’una può influenzare l’altra. Abbiamo esposto artisti il cui lavoro è presente nella collezione e queste mostre hanno fornito l’opportunità di portare avanti una ricerca e uno studio più approfonditi sulla pratica di queste figure. Vista la forte concentrazione sulla produzione, ci sono state anche occasioni in cui abbiamo acquisito per la collezione opere prodotte per una mostra. Si tratta allo stesso tempo di una testimonianza della storia espositiva della Fondazione e di una pratica collezionistica in tempo reale.

V.H. Come vi rapportate con le istituzioni pubbliche di Roma?

A.D. Essendo una fondazione di dimensioni ridotte, possiamo agire indipendentemente da tutte le tradizionali regole cui le istituzioni pubbliche sono obbligate a rispondere. Siamo più orientati verso la sperimentazione e la produzione di nicchia, e siamo più liberi di assumere rischi, non essendo limitati dai vincoli imposti dalle norme e dai parametri di una realtà museale.
Le istituzioni pubbliche romane sono costrette a muoversi tra la responsabilità culturale e diversi programmi politici e sono spesso, purtroppo, imbrigliate dalle dinamiche della politica locale e nazionale. Ma tutte le realtà condividono un intento comune: costruire una comunità crescente di appassionati e sostenitori della cultura contemporanea e creare luoghi di esperienza, apprendimento e dialogo.

V.H. Inviti artisti, ma anche curatori a lavorare con la Fondazione, la sua collezione e il suo pubblico. In questo modo apri la Fondazione a sensibilità e metodologie curatoriali diverse. Come concepisci il ruolo del direttore/curatore di uno spazio espositivo d’arte contemporanea nel 2014?

A.D. Ci sono moltissime metodologie curatoriali e ognuna di esse attiva diversi approcci e sensibilità. Il mio interesse principale ruota intorno alla ricerca sulla pratica artistica, ma sono attratta anche dall’esplorazione delle sensibilità curatoriali, motivo per cui apro la Fondazione ai guest curators. Essi sono professionisti della cultura, facilitatori, ricercatori, studiosi e insieme agli artisti possono creare occasioni di discussione su temi socio-politici e culturali della contemporaneità e generare nuove modalità di produzione.

V.H. PIANO aspira a creare un network di spazi espositivi basato sulla collaborazione, lo scambio e l’interazione. Perché hai deciso di unirti al progetto e in cosa consiste la tua  partecipazione?

A.D. La prima parte della tua domanda contiene già in sé i tre motive principali per i quali la Fondazione partecipa al progetto: la possibilità di lavorare in collaborazione, di attivare uno scambio e di interagire con un esteso gruppo di spazi espositivi al fine di ampliare le reti estetiche. Questo genere di iniziative stimola il dialogo, l’impegno e la partecipazione, inserendo le attività locali della Fondazione con gli artisti, i curatori e le istituzioni in un contesto internazionale.
Nello specifico la Fondazione Giuliani ospiterà una mostra collettiva con quattro artisti, The Promise of Melancholy and Ecology, primo capitolo di una serie di mostre intitolata The Registry of Promise. L’intero progetto è curato dal guest curator Chris Sharp, di cui ammiro e rispetto la pratica curatoriale, in collaborazione con Parc Saint Léger Centre d’art contemporain, Centre d’art contemporain d’Ivry – le Crédac e SBKM/De Vleeshal, tutte istituzioni con cui la Fondazione ha un’affinità e con le quali condivide un comune terreno di ricerca e programmazione.

Images:
1. Simon Dybbroe Møller, Hello, 2011-2012. Photo: Francesco De Michelis
2. Benoît Maire, Lies on the Beach, 2013. Photo: Giorgio Benni
3. Scott Burton by Oscar Tuazon, 2012. Photo: Giorgio Benni
4. Mutiny Seemed a Probability, 2010. Photo: Claudio Abate
5. Benoît Maire, Lies on the Beach, 2013, mixed media, dimensions variable. Photo: Giorgio Benni
6. Gianni Piacentino 1965-2000, 2014. Photo: Giorgio Benni
7. Giulia Piscitelli, Neopolitan Windows, 2010, adhesive paper on satined plexiglass, ink, 45 x 33 cm each. Photo: Gilda Aloisi
8. Carl Andre, 3rd Steel Triangle, 2008, hot rolled steel, 1 x 150 x 150 cm. Ahmet Öğüt, Intervento n.1:, 2 tape measures. Photo: Gilda Aloisi
9. Seb Patane, Movement (featuring Rose Kallal), 2013, video, 11’14’’. Photo: Giorgio Benni
All images installation views at Fondazione Giuliani, Rome

close
en

NINA CANELL

2487-10

Born 1979, Växjö, Sweden
Lives and works in Berlin, Germany

Image:
Nina Canell, Treetops, Hillsides and Ditches, 2011. Mastic gum, logs; variable dimensions. View of the exhibition The Promise of Moving Things (curator: Chris Sharp), Centre d’art contemporain d’Ivry – le Crédac, 2014. Photo: André Morin / le Crédac. Courtesy Konrad Fischer Galerie, Berlin and Private collection, Belgium. © Nina Canell / Adagp, 2014.

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

MATHIEU KLEYEBE ABONNENC

Born 1977, Paris, France
Lives and works in Metz, France
Mathieu Kleyebe Abonnenc seeks to question the cultural hegemony on which the evolution of contemporary societies is based. He examines the principles of dominant representation by appropriating preexisting elements and events, notably those associated with the imperial and colonial history of “developed” countries.
For Soleil politique, Abonnenc interrogates the origins of modern scientific knowledge as it is intimately associated with and facilitated by colonial domination and the destiny of the relationship between “primitive people” and their colonizers. The installation comprises documents and archives from ethnographic and entomological collections that the artist’s grandfather Émile Abonnenc gathered in Gabon and French Guyana in 1931 while working as a sanitary worker. His collection of living insects includes a mosquito that now bears his name.
The installation also presents rushes from the film in progress Secteur IX B de Prophylaxie de la Maladie du Sommeil (Section IX B Prophylaxis of Sleeping Sickness). The film explores, in fictional form, a historical event and space, using a narrative structure inspired by Michel Leiris’s travelogue L’Afrique fantôme (Phantom Africa). Narrated by two female figures whose personalities are revealed as the story unfolds, the plot takes place in several museums in France and Africa, disconnected from the dimensions of time and the outside world, and serves as a pretext for a reflection on historical collective and personal perception.

 

Nato a Parigi, Francia, nel 1977
Vive e lavora a Metz, Francia
Mathieu Kleyebe Abonnenc è particolarmente interessato a indagare le forme di egemonia culturale su cui si è fondata l’evoluzione delle società contemporanee, esplorando i principi di rappresentazione dominanti, e appropriandosi degli elementi e degli eventi preesistenti, principalmente legati alla storia imperiale e coloniale dei Paesi cosiddetti “sviluppati”.
Per Soleil politique l’artista s’interroga sulle origini della conoscenza scientifica moderna, legata a filo doppio alla dominazione coloniale, e sul destino delle relazioni tra i popoli “primitivi” e i loro colonizzatori. L’installazione si compone di documenti d’archivio, provenienti dalle collezioni etnografiche ed entomologiche di reperti che il nonno di Kleyebe, Émile Abonnenc, aveva raccolto in Gabon e in Guyana francese nel 1931, quando lavorava come operatore sanitario. Si tratta di differenti esemplari di insetti, tra cui una zanzara che porta il nome di Abonnenc, insieme a una presentazione del materiale già girato di Secteur IX B de Prophylaxie de la Maladie du Sommeil (Settore IX B di Profilassi della Malattia del Sonno), il film sul quale l’artista sta lavorando. Questo è un film di finzione, sotto forma di esplorazione di un fatto storico e di un luogo, la cui struttura narrativa si ispira a quella impiegata da Michel Leiris nel suo diario di viaggio L’Afrique Fantôme (L’Africa fantasma). Attraverso il punto di vista di due figure femminili, delineate man mano che la sceneggiatura avanza, la trama si sviluppa in diversi spazi museali tra la Francia e l’Africa, fuori dal tempo e dal mondo, e serve da pretesto per una riflessione sulla percezione storica, collettiva e personale.

Né à Paris, France, en 1977
Vit e travaille à Metz, France
Mathieu Kleyebe Abonnenc s’attache à interroger les formes d’hégémonie culturelle sur lesquelles s’est appuyée l’évolution de nos sociétés contemporaines. Il explore les principes de représentation dominants en s’appropriant des éléments et des événements préexistants, principalement liés à l’histoire impériale et coloniale des pays dits développés.
Pour Soleil Politique, l’artiste interroge les origines de la connaissance scientifique moderne, étroitement liée et facilitée par la domination coloniale et le destin des relations entre les peuples « primitifs » et leurs colonisateurs.
L’installation se compose de documents et d’archives issus des collections ethnographiques et entomologiques que son grand-père Émile Abonnenc avait réunies au Gabon et en Guyane française en 1931 alors qu’il travaillait comme agent sanitaire, de différents spécimens d’insectes vivants dont un moustique qui porte le nom de ce grand-père, ainsi qu’une présentation des rushes de Secteur IX B de Prophylaxie de la Maladie du Sommeil, un film en cours de réalisation. Ce dernier est une fiction sous forme d’exploration d’un fait historique et d’un espace dont la structure narrative s’inspire de celle employée par Michel Leiris dans son journal de voyage L’Afrique fantôme. Révélée à travers deux figures féminines, dont on découvre les personnages au fil du scénario, l’intrigue se déroule dans plusieurs institutions muséales entre la France et l’Afrique, en dehors du temps et du monde, et sert de prétexte à une réflexion sur les modalités collectives ou personnelles de perception de l’histoire.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

R&Sie(n) François Roche, Stéphanie Lavaux, Jean Navarro

Architectural collective founded in 1993 by François Roche,Stéphanie Lavaux, and Jean Navarro

François Roche is cofounder of the R&Sie(n) agency. Sensitive to the conflicts of the urban environment, he advocates a form of architecture built in successive stages as a means of recreating zones of exchange between the individual and the collective. Such an approach privileges physical and climatic factors and focuses on the “hyperlocal” in order to generate singularity in opposition to contemporary architecture’s abstract “signals” and “flagships.”
One of the award-winning projects for a building to house the Fond regional d’art contemporain de la région Centre in Orléans, France, Olzweg stems from a flexible method of urban research, employing processes of self-determination in the form of building algorithms that combine as stimuli fragments of individual and collective physiological data. The project entails a glass envelope progressively added to the building’s façade and positioned according to an algorithm generated by a robot that reprograms its shape during construction.
The resulting translucent accumulations add to the building’s circulation, providing multiple passageways. Visitors are equipped with pocket computers that enable them to interact with information on the art center’s collection and to locate their position in the building throughout their visit. Locally recycled glass is used in the construction, thus creating a link to an art space and architecture on the basis of exchange. The building program takes place over a time span of ten years or more, with emphasis on the public character of a “working process.”

Collettivo di architetti fondato nel 1993 da François Roche, Stephanie Lavaux e Jean Navarro

François Roche è il fondatore dell’agenzia R&Sie(n). In empatia con un contesto urbano conflittuale, difende un’architettura che si costruisce per aggregazioni successive, con il fine di ricreare delle zone di scambio tra individuo e collettività. Il suo approccio privilegia i fatti fisici e climatici, e si orienta verso l’“iperlocale”, per far emergere la singolarità dei progetti, in contrasto con l’architettura contemporanea e la sua produzione di “segnali” e di “navi ammiraglie” astratti.
Uno dei progetti che ha partecipato al concorso per il Fonds régional d’art contemporain Centre (Orléans, Francia), Olzweg persegue una ricerca di urbanistica adattiva, utilizzando dei processi di autodeterminazione attraverso degli algoritmi di costruzione che integrano, come degli stimoli, dei frammenti di dati psicologici individuali e collettivi. Il progetto mostra un rivestimento di vetro unito nelle facciate, disposto secondo un algoritmo generato da un robot che riprogramma le forme durante la costruzione. Gli accumuli traslucidi servono alla circolazione dell’edificio, così da permettere molteplici sviluppi.
Il visitatore è dotato di un computer portatile, che gli permette di interagire con i dati sulla collezione e di riposizionarsi nel circuito. Il vetro proviene dal riciclo locale, ciò che unisce l’arte e l’architettura attraverso delle nozioni di scambio. La durata del cantiere si protrae per più di dieci anni, insistendo sul carattere pubblico del “working process”.

François Roche, Stephanie Lavaux et Jean Navarro, collectif d’architectes fondé en 1993

François Roche est le cofondateur de l’agence R&Sie(n). En empathie avec un contexte urbain conflictuel, il défend une architecture qui se construit par agrégations successives afin de recréer des zones d’échange entre individu et collectif. L’approche privilégie les faits physiques et climatiques et s’oriente vers l’ « hyperlocal » pour faire émerger la singularité, en opposition avec l’architecture contemporaine et sa production de « signaux » et « vaisseaux amiraux » abstraits.
Un des projets lauréats du concours pour le bâtiment du Fonds régional d’art contemporain Centre (Orléans, France), Olzweg poursuit une recherche d’urbanisme adaptatif, utilisant des processus d’autodétermination à travers des algorithmes de construction qui intègrent, comme des stimuli, des fragments de données physiologiques individuelles et collectives. Le projet propose une enveloppe en verre agrégée sur les façades, déposée selon un algorithme généré par un robot qui reprogramme les formes en cours de construction. Les accumulations translucides servent aux circulations du bâtiment, permettant de multiples cheminements. Le visiteur est muni d’un ordinateur de poche qui lui permet d’interagir avec les données sur la collection et de se retrouver dans son circuit. Le verre utilisé provient du recyclage local, tissant ainsi un lieu d’art et architecture à travers des notions d’échange. La programmation du chantier s’étale sur plus de dix ans, insistant sur le caractère public du « working process ».

Project: Soleil politique

close
en

Antoine Nessi

2487-09

Born 1985, Paris, France
Lives and works in Paris, France

Image:
Antoine Nessi, Unknown Organs, 2014. Stainless steel, aluminium, brass, galvanized steel; variable dimensions. View of the exhibition The Promise of Moving Things (curator: Chris Sharp), Centre d’art contemporain d’Ivry – le Crédac, 2014. Photo: André Morin / le Crédac

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

Marcus Geiger

Marcus Geiger, Sozial, Radikal, Minimal, Kapital, 2007-2010

Marcus Geiger, Sozial, Radikal, Minimal, Kapital, 2007-2010

Born 1957, Muri, Switzerland
Lives and works in Vienna, Austria

In his work, Marcus Geiger often uses domestic materials and painstaking processes that provoke ironic ruptures between the conceptual precision with which they are treated and the stereotypical image of a comfortable interior that they convey. He explores and demystifies the meaning of the artwork as a concept, disrupting the ways in which the art market attributes value. Geiger is also interested in the “confrontation between space and art,” in which space is considered broadly to include its social, cultural, and political ramifications. In 1998, for example, he repainted the Vienna Secession red, thus transforming an architectural monument into a pictorial medium. The artist deployed the same concepts in his project for Erste Campus, the future home of the Erste Bank in Vienna.
In the context of Raumwahrnehmung (Perception of Space), a call for art projects to accompany the conversion of an abandoned brewery in Vienna into a housing complex, Geiger submitted Sozial Radikal Minimal Kapital, a minimalist proposal with decisive material and symbolic import. In the context of a social housing complex, which tends, for rational and economic reasons, to limit the living space of its inhabitants to a minimal floor area, the artist revealed the processes at work by introducing a conspicuous rupture within the project’s main layout. He removed one of the 123 planned apartments, thus leaving a gaping hole in both sides of the building, left in unfinished state and abandoned to birds and weeds. The proposal also carried concrete and financial consequences, rendering commercially unviable one of the housing development’s 123 units. Geiger thus responded in a critical way to the project brief, which raises questions concerning the current integration of art and architecture in the context of social housing and its economic conditions: “What can art provide for social housing?” How “to give access to light, air and sun?”
For the work Untitled, presented for the first time at the Haus der Kulturen der Welt in Berlin, Marcus Geiger covered the floors of the exhibition space with material used to protect building sites, blurring the distinction between areas of the building devoted to different activities such as corridors, the project room, restaurant, entrance hall, and bookshop. His project thus confronted the desire for clarity, openness, and transparency in the modernist project. During the exhibition, this was made all the more apparent as the surfaces became dirty and worn. The project thus reflected on the sanitizing dictates of museum conservation, which, as such, isolate the work from its host environment. Paradoxically, his intervention criticized the ideology of conservation at the same time as it prevented the project from leaving its trace or interfering with the building itself.

Nato a Muri, Svizzera, nel 1957
Vive e lavora a Vienna, Austria

Le opere di Marcus Geiger utilizzano spesso materiali comuni e processi laboriosi, provocando delle rotture ironiche tra la precisione concettuale del loro trattamento e l’immagine stereotipata di un arredamento confortevole che veicolano. L’artista esplora e demistifica i significati del concetto di opera d’arte, scompigliando i meccanismi di attribuzione di valore del mercato. Geiger s’interessa al “confronto dello spazio con l’arte”, estendendo la nozione di spazio alle sue implicazioni sociali, culturali e politiche. È il caso, per esempio, di quando nel 1998 ridipinge di rosso il palazzo della Secessione di Vienna, che da monumento diventa supporto pittorico. Gli stessi principi torneranno nel suo progetto per Erste Campus, futura sede di una banca eponima a Vienna.
In occasione di Percezione dello spazio, una “call for proposal” per la trasformazione di un vecchio ristorante di Vienna in immobile destinato a uso residenziale, Geiger ha presentato Sozial Radikal Minimal Kapital (Sociale, radicale, minimale, capitale), una proposta minimalista, con una forte portata materiale e simbolica. In un contesto di edilizia popolare, istituzione economica razionale che cerca di concentrare gli abitanti nella minor superficie possibile, l’artista rivela i processi all’opera con un gesto che introduce una vistosa spaccatura nell’organizzazione dello schema guida. Geiger lascia allo stato grezzo uno dei centoventitre appartamenti previsti, creando così una grande lacuna su entrambi i lati dell’edificio, e in preda agli uccelli e alle piante selvatiche. Questo atto contiene anche una denuncia economica concreta: uno dei centoventitre elementi che rappresentano un utile finanziario nel progetto immobiliare è divenuto improduttivo. Geiger risponde così in maniera critica alla call for proposal, che si proponeva di indagare “nuove modalità di unire l’arte e l’architettura nei termini economici dell’edilizia popolare”, “che cosa possa fare l’arte per l’edilizia popolare”, e come “fare in modo che i residenti abbiano accesso a luce, aria e sole”.
Per l’opera Ohne Titel, inizialmente presentata alla Haus der Kulturen der Welt a Berlino, Marcus Geiger ricopre i pavimenti della sede della mostra con un materiale specifico per proteggere le aree di lavoro, rendendo uniformi i diversi spazi destinati ad attività differenti, come i luoghi di passaggio, la Project room, il ristorante, la reception e la libreria. Entra così in conflitto con la volontà di chiarezza, apertura e trasparenza del progetto modernista, tanto più che, per tutta la durata della mostra, la superficie si sporca e si deteriora. Il progetto è quindi una riflessione sulle sterili regolamentazioni della conservazione museale, che di fatto isolano l’opera dal suo luogo-ospite. Paradossalmente, l’intervento dell’artista critica l’ideologia della conservazione, preservando l’edificio da ogni traccia e interferenza con il progetto che accoglie.

Né à Muri, Suisse, en 1957
Vit et travaille à Vienne, Autriche

Les œuvres de Marcus Geiger utilisent souvent des matériaux domestiques et des processus laborieux, provoquant des ruptures ironiques entre la précision conceptuelle de leur traitement et l’image stéréotypée d’un intérieur confortable qu’elles véhiculent. Il explore et démystifie les significations du concept d’œuvre d’art, brouillant les mécanismes d’attribution de valeur du marché artistique. Geiger s’intéresse aussi à « la confrontation de l’espace avec l’art », la notion d’espace étant étendue à ses implications sociales, culturelles et politiques, par exemple lorsqu’en 1998 il repeint le bâtiment de la Sécession de Vienne en rouge, qui de monument devient alors support pictural. Ces principes seront reconduits dans son projet pour Erste Campus, le futur siège de banque éponyme à Vienne.
Dans le cadre de « Perception de l’espace », un appel à projets artistiques qui accompagnait la reconversion d’une ancienne brasserie à Vienne en immeuble d’habitation, Geiger a réalisé une proposition minimale avec une forte portée matérielle et symbolique. Dans un contexte de logement social, organisation économique rationnelle qui tend à concentrer les habitants sur un minimum de surface, l’artiste révèle les processus à l’œuvre avec un geste qui introduit une fissure flagrante dans l’ordonnancement du schéma directeur. Il retire un des 123 appartements prévus, laissant un trou béant des deux côtés de l’immeuble, à l’état de chantier et en proie aux oiseaux et plantes sauvages. Cet acte a aussi une portée financière concrète : un des 123 éléments de revenu de cette promotion immobilière est rendu inopérant. Geiger répond ainsi de manière critique à cet appel qui questionne les « nouvelles façons de combiner l’art et l’architecture dans les conditions économiques du logement social », « ce que peut l’art pour le logement social », comment « donner accès à la lumière, l’air et le soleil ».
Pour cette œuvre, initialement présentée au Haus der Kulturen der Welt à Berlin, Marcus Geiger recouvre les sols du lieu d’exposition avec une matière servant à protéger les zones en travaux, uniformisant les espaces spécialisés et dédiés aux différentes activités, telles que les passages, le Project room, le restaurant, le hall d’accueil et la librairie. Il entre ainsi en conflit avec la volonté de clarté, ouverture et transparence du projet moderniste, d’autant plus que, pendant la durée de l’exposition, la surface se salit et se délabre. Le projet est aussi une réflexion sur les réglementations stérilisantes de la conservation muséale, qui de fait isolent l’œuvre de son lieu-hôte. Paradoxalement, son intervention critique l’idéologie de la conservation, tout en préservant le bâtiment de toute trace et interférence avec le projet accueilli.

Image:
Marcus Geiger, Sozial, Radikal, Minimal, Kapital, 2007-2010, Soleil politique, Museion 2014. Photo: Luca Meneghel

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - fr

MARYAM JAFRI

1. Maryam Jafri, Independence Day 1934-1975, 2009-ongoing (deatil)

1. Maryam Jafri, Independence Day 1934-1975, 2009-ongoing (detail)

Born 1972, Karachi, Pakistan Lives and works in New York, NY, USA and Copenhagen, Denmark Maryam Jafri is an artist working in video, performance and photography, with a specific interest in questioning the cultural and visual representation of history, politics and economy. Over the last years, she notably investigated the connections between food production and the production of desire (Avalon, 2011); the elaboration of historical narratives through a post-colonial perspective (Siege of Khartoum, 1884, 2006); the effects of globalization on working conditions (Global Slum, 2012) or the political stakes of food networks (Mouthfeel, 2014). Solo exhibitions include Mouthfeel (Gasworks, London, 2014); Backdrop (Bielefelder Kunstverein, Bielefeld, 2013);  Headlines and Small Print (Galerie Nova/WHW, Zagreb, 2012), Global Slum (Beirut, Cairo, 2012). In 2015, she will be part of the Belgian Pavilion at the 56th Venice Biennial.

Née à Karachi, Pakistan, en 1972
Vit e travaille à New York, NY, USA et Copenhague, Danemark

Maryam Jafri développe son travail artistique autour des représentations visuelles et culturelles de l’histoire politique et économique, à travers la photographie, la vidéo, mais aussi la performance. Ces dernières années, elle s’est notamment intéressée aux liens entre la production des biens de consommation et celle du désir (Avalon, 2011) ; à la construction de récits historiques dans une perspective postcoloniale (Siege of Khartoum, 1884, 2006) ; aux effets de la mondialisation sur les conditions de travail (Global Slum, 2012) ou encore aux enjeux politiques des circuits alimentaires (Mouthfeel, 2014). Parmi ses expositions les plus récentes : Mouthfeel (Gasworks, London, 2014) ; Backdrop (Bielefelder Kunstverein, Bielefeld, 2013) ; Headlines and Small Print (Galerie Nova/WHW, Zagreb, 2012) ou encore Global Slum (Beirut, Cairo, 2012). En 2015, elle participera au Pavillon Belge de la 56ème Biennale de Venise.

Project: Exercizing Doubt: On Exhibition as Research

close
en - fr

ROBERT LECKIE IN CONVERSATION WITH MARYAM JAFRI

ROBERT LECKIE IN CONVERSATION WITH MARYAM JAFRI

Robert Leckie Your current exhibition The Day After at Bétonsalon focuses on the ongoing project Independence Day 1934-1975, initiated in 2009. Please could you describe the work and what is specific to this iteration in Paris?
Maryam Jafri The photo series Independence Day1934-1975 consists of archival photographs mainly from the first independence days of various Asian, Middle Eastern, and African countries. A key concept of the work is that the images come from archives, usually official archives, located in the countries themselves. In its current iteration at Bétonsalon, I have sixty images from twenty-nine archives. A great deal of artistic and academic research has been done on both the colonial and post-colonial eras but my project looks specifically at that moment of transformation – that twenty-four hour period during which a set of rituals, ceremonies and speeches herald the transformation of a territory into a nation state. When Mélanie Bouteloup (the director of Bétonsalon) approached me to show the work in Paris, she asked if I was interested in giving the research behind the work a visible form within the exhibition space. Hence along with the wall-based photo series, I have also conceived, in dialogue with Bétonsalon and designer Hadrien Gerenton, an architectural display system made up of various research modules that give different views into the process and ideas related to Independence Day 1934-1975. For example, some modules contain personal contributions by historians and others who helped me in my research such as Helihanta Rajaonarison, a historian from Madagascar, and Franck Ogou, archives manager at École du Patromoine Africain in Benin. Still others contain fictional materials that inspired me in different ways, such as my personal copy of Jean Genet’s play The Screens about the Algerian War and Sadat Hasan Manto’s famed short story about the 1947 partition of India and Pakistan, Toba Tek Singh. We also have some modules in the space which are the result of workshops by students who responded or in some way related to the themes of Independence Day 1934-1975,since Bétonsalon is located on the campus of University Paris Diderot and collaborations with the students and scholars from the university are an important aspect of its programme.

2. Maryam Jafri, Independence Day 1934-1975, 2009-ongoing

2. Exhibition view, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche

R.L. I have the impression that the workis more about dependence than independence, as it highlights the similarities between the political aesthetics adopted by newly independent nations and those of former colonial powers that, more often than not, had a coercive hand in the independence process.

M.J. The images reveal a specific set of ceremonies and rituals whereby the nation state comes into being, an odd mix of theatricality and bureaucracy, a “civic religion” to borrow Ariella Azoulay’s term. These rituals and ceremonies are Western in origin as would be expected since they are bound up with the nation state, but what makes the images in Independence Day 1934-1975 so unsettling is that the displacement from centre to periphery results in a hybridization of those political aesthetics as it comes into contact with local traditions and histories. Thus the images look both familiar and estranged – a repetition with a difference.

3. Exhibition view, Le jour d'après, Bétonsalon - Centre d'art et de recherche

3. Exhibition view, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche

R.L. To what extent does this inform how the work is presented? How do the display strategies you use, for example, relate to these ‘repetitions’, as you call them?
M.J. In this piece form and content cannot be easily separated. The content is the form and the form is the content. At first glance one sees a typology, a strategy long associated with photography from Aby Warburg to the photo-conceptualists. But what is it that the photos in Independence Day 1934-1975 actually reveal? They reveal the serialization of modernity’s ultimate political form –the nation state – throughout large parts of the world.

4. Exhibition view, Le jour d'après, Bétonsalon - Centre d'art et de recherche

4. Exhibition view, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche

R.L. What about questions of access and copyright? How key are these issues to your thinking?
M.J. When I first started this work a lot of people were surprised by my decision to bypass Western archives and look for the images in the countries themselves. I was interested in seeing how each country was preserving images of itself coming into being. Furthermore, at a time when most people, including myself, get their visual information from Google, I felt it important to render visible these archives, official but often unknown even within the countries themselves. In terms of copyright, it’s usually quite straightforward: one pays what is usually a modest licensing fee from the archive in question, which is also credited in the work – and so it should be, since this work is partly about making visible these analogue, often fragile archives.

5. Exhibition view, Le jour d'après, Bétonsalon - Centre d'art et de recherche

5. Exhibition view, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche

Project: Exercizing Doubt: Exhibition as Research
Space: Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche
Protagonist: Maryam Jafri

6. Exhibition view, Le jour d'après, Bétonsalon - Centre d'art et de recherche

6. Exhibition view, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche

Images:
1. Maryam Jafri, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche, 2015. Exhibition view with Getty vs Ghana, Maryam Jafri, 2012
2. Maryam Jafri, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche, 2015. View of Independence Day 1934-1975, Maryam Jafri, 2009-ongoing
3. Maryam Jafri, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche, 2015. Exhibition view
4. Maryam Jafri, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche, 2015. Exhibition view with Independence Day 1934-1975, Maryam Jafri, 2009-ongoing, and Flowers for Africa, Kapwani Kiwanga, 2012
5. Maryam Jafri, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche, 2015. Exhibition view
6. Maryam Jafri, Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche, 2015. Exhibition view
Photos: Aurélien Mole

close
en - it - fr

Prinz Gholam

Wolfgang Prinz born 1969, Leutkirch, Germany and Michel Gholam born 1963, Beirut, Lebanon
Live and work in Berlin, Germany

Wolfgang Prinz and Michel Gholam have worked together since 2000 as Prinz Gholam. Together they have developed a performance practice in which objects and bodies are placed in confrontational situations through the interaction of material and dance movements. Their performances focus on the ways in which we envisage the world through images stored in our minds, as well as images derived from art history and the media.
In response to an invitation by the Centre Pompidou Metz (France) to participate in the exhibition Chefs-d’œuvre?, Prinz Gholam staged a performance in the museum’s expansive nave featuring a series of historical poses. One pose consisted of two boys awkwardly dancing a waltz, from the final scene of Pier Paolo Pasolini’s feature film Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom, a free adaptation of the Marquis de Sade’s novel. In choosing the scene from Pasolini’s film, the artists thus commented on the context of the invitation. Pasolini shot the scene in the interior of a villa that contained a collection of Cubist and Futurist artworks, whose owners in the film, the Duke, the Bishop, the Judge, and the President, represent four distinct figures of power. In Metz, Prinz Gholam replaced Pasolini’s chosen film set with the French national museum’s collection of modern art, in front of which they reenacted the pose, adding a replica rifle leaning against one of the museum’s walls. In Bolzano, the artists and the curator have restaged the film’s original decor with works from Museion’s collection, thus updating the power relations portrayed in the film.

Wolfgang Prinz nato a Leutkirch, Germania, nel 1969 e Michel Gholam nato a Beirut, Libano, nel 1963
Vivono e lavorano a Berlino, Germania

Wolfgang Prinz e Michel Gholam lavorano insieme dal 2000 sotto il nome di Prinz Gholam. La coppia ha sviluppato una pratica di performance nella quale degli oggetti e dei corpi sono posizionati in situazioni di confronto, attraverso l’interazione tra materia e movimento danzato. Gli artisti s’interessano al modo in cui percepiamo il mondo, sfruttando le associazioni di immagini registrate nelle nostre menti e provenienti dalla storia dell’arte e dei media.
Invitati dal Centre Pompidou di Metz (Francia) in occasione della mostra Chefs-d’œuvre?, sono intervenuti nella grande navata con la performance faces shapes gestures tones acts places (Facce forme gesti toni atti luoghi) articolata in un insieme di pose storiche, tra le quali una riproponeva un celebre film.
Si tratta della scena finale di Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma di Pier Paolo Pasolini, liberamente ispirato a un testo del marchese De Sade, in cui due ragazzi ballano un valzer in modo goffo. La scelta della scena commenta anche il contesto dell’invito, essendo stata filmata in una cornice che rappresenta una collezione di opere cubiste e futuriste, i cui proprietari, il Duca, il Vescovo, il Giudice e il Presidente, sono i rappresentanti di quattro poteri distinti. A Metz, Prinz Gholam sostituiscono la cornice del film con la collezione del museo francese di arte moderna, davanti alla quale riproducono la stessa posa, aggiungendovi un falso fucile appoggiato al muro del museo. A Bolzano, gli artisti e il curatore riprendono il contesto iniziale con delle opere di Museion, rendendo così attuali i rapporti tra i poteri.

Wolfgang Prinz né à Leutkirch, Allemagne, en 1969 et Michel Gholam né à Beyrouth, Liban, en 1963
Vivent et travaillent à Berlin, Allemagne

Wolfgang Prinz et Michel Gholam travaillent ensemble depuis 2000 en tant que Prinz Gholam. Le duo a développé une pratique performative dans laquelle des objets et des corps sont placés en situation de confrontation. À travers l’interaction entre matière et mouvement dansé, ils se penchent sur la manière dont nous envisageons le monde, par des associations d’images présentes dans nos esprits et issues de l’histoire de l’art et des médias.
A l’occasion de leur invitation par le Centre Pompidou Metz (France) dans le cadre de l’exposition Chefs-d’œuvre ?, ils ont réalisé une performance dans la grande nef, articulant un ensemble de poses historiques dont une issue d’un film de cinéma. La pose est celle des deux garçons qui dansent maladroitement une valse, dans la scène finale de Salò ou les 120 Journées de Sodome de Pier Paolo Pasolini, adaptation libre du texte du marquis de Sade. Le choix de cette scène commente le contexte de l’invitation, la séquence du film ayant été filmée dans un décor qui représente une collection d’œuvres cubistes et futuristes, dont les propriétaires, le Duc, l’Évêque, le Juge et le Président, sont les représentants de quatre pouvoirs distincts. À Metz, Prinz Gholam substituent au décor du film la collection du musée national d’art moderne, devant laquelle ils réactivent cette pose en y ajoutant un fusil factice appuyé contre la cimaise. À Bolzano, les artistes et le curateur reconstituent le décor initial avec des œuvres appartenant au Museion, actualisant ainsi les rapports des pouvoirs.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

Marianne Maric

Born 1982, Mulhouse, France
Lives and works in Paris and Mulhouse, France

At the age of ten, after watching François Truffaut’s The Wild Child on television, Marianne Maric escaped from her room through a window in the middle of the night. She was discovered the following day, by a forester who returned her to her parents. In the wake of this event, Maric promised herself she would become an artist in order to act out her fantasies without anyone forcing her to reason. Since 2007, she has developed a transdisciplinary practice in which she deconstructs the boundaries of different media, using the body as a sculptural weapon. In her works, art, fashion, design, photography, music, and video merge through the use of the female body as “an extraordinary and fascinating form of architecture.” She deconstructs stereotypes to better re-employ them and plays with symbols to better subvert them. Marianne Maric is currently artist in residence at the Centre d’art contemporain de Brétigny, for which she has prepared several projects that will be shown in Brétigny in the fall of 2014. For Soleil politique, she is presenting a video trailer in several episodes that associate certain elements from the exhibition with her own work. These will be distributed on the Internet before and during the exhibition.

Nata a Mulhouse, Francia, nel 1982
Vive e lavora a Parigi e Mulhouse, Francia

All’età di dieci anni, Marianne Maric scappa in piena notte dalla finestra della sua camera da letto dopo aver visto Il ragazzo selvaggio di François Truffaut in televisione. Il giorno dopo, una  guardia forestale la trova e la riaccompagna a casa. Dopo questo episodio cruciale, Marianne  giura a se stessa che farà di tutto per diventare un’artista, per liberare la propria fantasia senza  che nessuno la riconduca alla ragione. Così, dopo il 2007, sviluppa un lavoro transdisciplinare,  nel quale decostruisce le frontiere tra i mezzi artistici utilizzando il corpo come un’arma  scultorea. Nelle sue creazioni l’arte, la moda, il design, la fotografia, la musica e il video si  fondono attraverso l’uso dei corpi di donne come “una straordinaria e affascinante architettura”. L’artista decostruisce gli stereotipi per poi riutilizzarli meglio, e si diverte a giocare  con i simboli, deformandoli. Marianne Maric è attualmente in residenza al CAC di Brétigny, dove sta preparando vari progetti che saranno presentati a settembre 2014.
Per Soleil politique l’artista propone un trailer in più episodi, realizzati e diffusi su Internet prima e durante la  mostra. Queste sequenze collegano alcuni elementi dell’esposizione con il suo lavoro.

Née à Mulhouse, France, en 1982
Vit et travaille à Paris et Mulhouse, France

À l’âge de dix ans, Marianne Maric s’enfuit en pleine nuit par la fenêtre de sa chambre après avoir vu L’Enfant sauvage de François Truffaut à la télévision. Le lendemain, elle est découverte par un garde forestier qui la raccompagne chez ses parents. Après cet épisode marquant, Marianne se jure de tout faire pour devenir artiste, afin de réaliser ses fantasmes sans que personne ne puisse la ramener à la raison. Ainsi, depuis 2007, elle développe un travail transdisciplinaire, dans lequel elle déconstruit les frontières entre les médiums en utilisant le corps comme une arme sculpturale. Dans ses créations, l’art, la mode, le design, la photographie, la musique et la vidéo fusionnent à travers l’utilisation des corps de femmes comme « une extraordinaire et fascinante architecture ». Elle déconstruit des stéréotypes pour mieux les réemployer, s’amuse à jouer avec les symboles pour mieux les détourner. Marianne Maric est actuellement en résidence au Centre d’art contemporain de Brétigny pour lequel elle prépare plusieurs projets qui seront montrés à la rentrée 2014.
Pour Soleil politique, elle propose une bande-annonce vidéo en plusieurs épisodes, réalisés et diffusés sur Internet avant et pendant l’exposition. Ces séquences associent certains des éléments de l’exposition à son propre travail.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

MARIANNE MARIC, TRAILERS "SOLEIL POLITIQUE", 2014

MARIANNE MARIC, TRAILER SOLEIL POLITIQUE, 2014

Marianne Maric
Trailer « Soleil politique », 2014
Episode I

Marianne Maric
Trailer « Soleil politique », 2014
Episode II

Marianne Maric
Trailer « Soleil politique », 2014
Episode III

For Soleil politique, Marianne Maric is presenting a video trailer in several episodes that associate certain elements from the exhibition with her own work. These will be distributed on the Internet before and during the exhibition.

 

Per Soleil politique Marianne Maric propone un trailer in più episodi, realizzati e diffusi su Internet prima  e durante la mostra. Queste sequenze collegano alcuni elementi dell’esposizione con il  suo lavoro.

Pour « Soleil politique », Marianne Maric propose une bande-annonce vidéo en plusieurs épisodes, réalisés et diffusés sur Internet avant et pendant l’exposition. Ces séquences associent certains des éléments de l’exposition à son propre travail.

 

 

Image:
Le char de Tito, Sarajevo, 2012. Photo © Marianne Maric

close
en - it - fr

EMANUELE GUIDI

Emanuele Guidi (1978) is an independent curator and, since July 2013, the artistic director at the kunstverein ar/ge kunst (Bolzano, Italy). Previous projects include a.o.: How to Tell a Story (DEPO, Istanbul 2013, with C. Larqué); Between Form and Movements (Galleria E. Astuni, Bologna, 2012); Rehearsing Collectivity – Choreography Beyond Dance (Tanzfabrik, Berlin, 2011, with E. Basteri, E. Ricci and A. Giannotti); Collective Body (Liquid Loft, Vienna, 2010, curated with A. Giannotti). Among his edited publications: Negus, Invernomuto, Humboldt Books, Milan, 2014; Rehearsing Collectivity,Argobooks, Berlin, 2012(with E. Basteri, E. Ricci); Between Form and Movements, Bologna, 2012; Urban Makers, Parallel Narratives of Grassroots Practices and Tensions, bbooks, Berlin, 2008.

Emanuele Guidi (1978) è curatore indipendente e dal 2013 direttore artistico del kunstverein ar/ge kunst di Bolzano. Progetti precedenti includono, tra gli altri: How to Tell a Story (DEPO, Istanbul 2013, con C. Larqué); Between Form and Movements (Galleria E. Astuni, Bologna, 2012); Rehearsing Collectivity – Choreography Beyond Dance (Tanzfabrik, Berlino, 2011, con E. Basteri, E. Ricci e A. Giannotti); Collective Body (Liquid Loft, Vienna, 2010, curata con A. Giannotti). Ha editato le seguenti pubblicazioni: Negus, Invernomuto, Humboldt Books, Milano, 2014; Rehearsing Collectivity, Argobooks, Berlino, 2012 (con E. Basteri, E. Ricci); Between Form and Movements, Bologna, 2012; Urban Makers, Parallel Narratives of Grassroots Practices and Tensions, bbooks, Berlino, 2008.

Emanuele Guidi (1978) est commissaire indépendant et, depuis juillet 2013, directeur artistique du centre d’art ar/ge kunst (Bolzano, Italie, www.argekunst.it). Parmi ses projets récents : How to Tell a Story (DEPO, Istanbul 2013, avec C. Larqué) ; Between Form and Movements (Galleria E. Astuni, Bologne, 2012) ; Rehearsing Collectivity – Choreography Beyond Dance (Tanzfabrik, Berlin, 2011, avec E. Basteri, E. Ricci and A. Giannotti) ; Collective Body (Liquid Loft, Vienna, 2010, en co-commissariat avec A. Giannotti). Il a coordonné plusieurs publications, parmi lesquelles : Negus, Invernomuto, Humboldt Books, Milano, 2014 ; Rehearsing Collectivity, Argobooks, Berlin, 2012 (with E. Basteri, E. Ricci) ; Between Form and Movements, Bologne, 2012 ; Urban Makers, Parallel Narratives of Grassroots Practices and Tensions, bbooks, Berlin, 2008.

Space: ar/ge kunst Galerie Museum
Project: Exercizing Doubt: Exhibition as Research

close
en - it - fr

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH EMANUELE GUIDI, AR/GE KUNST, BOLZANO

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH EMANUELE GUIDI, AR/GE KUNST, BOLZANO

Vincent Honoré I read in the mission statement of the institution that “in recent years ar/ge kunst has turned its attention toward the idea of the exhibition as a medium.” Can you define further what do you mean by an exhibition as a medium and how this is implemented in the gallery programme?

Emanuele Guidi Exhibitions have always been the main feature of ar/ge kunst since its foundation. That’s why I think it’s important to work with artists, and not just artists, who deal with exhibitions in their complexity. Exhibitions are multifaceted ‘machines’ where artworks play a central, but not exclusive, role. They are the product of relationships between many agents – artist(s), curator(s), artwork(s), audience(s), display, etc. – that have to find an arrangement in space and time. Making an exhibition is about going public, about communicating and about mediating a message, and therefore all elements that constitute the exhibition have to be taken into consideration as agents of mediation and communication; all aspects that make the exhibition a specific medium for ‘going public’. An exhibition is a designed situation, still open to a lot of various uncontrollable factors, time being the first of those; so I am interested in practices that are aware of how this time can be administered and shared among all those who are part of the exhibition, primarily the audience.

2_Falke Pisano con Archive Books_Constellations of One and Many_installation view_photo by_Ivo corra¦Ç

2. Exhibition view, Falke Pisano/Archive Books, Constellation of One and Many

V.H. Nikolaus Hirsch asked this question: “Who are the authors in the construction of institutional space?”. Who are the authors of ar/ge kunst, which the name is being an abbreviation of the German word ‘Arbeitsgemeinschaft’ (working group)?

E.G. The authors of ar/ge kunst have been and are still ‘many’, although we are a small-scale institution with a small staff. When it was founded in 1985 the name ar/ge kunst was chosen to indicate a collective dimension behind the institution, and a collective working methodology. Various people, mainly from the field of art and architecture, curated and organized exhibitions and activities of different kinds with a quite intense rhythm (up to twelve exhibitions a year). Since I was appointed I’ve found it interesting how the meaning of ‘Arbeitsgemeinschaft’ disappeared behind its own abbreviation (ar/ge) and remains unknown to most people. The 30th anniversary in 2015 seems to be the best occasion to explore the notion of ‘collective work’ that originally inspired the choice of the name. And I am doing this by inviting artists, designers, choreographers, theorists, etc., who put into practice this idea of a working community in their research, especially by using the exhibition as a medium to activate forms of relationships.

Cl+®mence Seilles - argekunst web 05

3. Exhibition view, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert

V.H. The mission of your institution is to produce and present regional, national and international artistic practices and to conduct critical research on the role of art and its relationship with the social and political sphere within which it operates. I would like to ask you what you think is the core responsibility of the institution nowadays, with regard to the artists and the audience.

E.G. I feel it’s extremely important – and a mark of respect towards both artists and audience – to find ways to mediate the artists’ practices for the benefit of the regional context in which we operate. It’s clearly important to avoid the risk of being ‘parochial-minded’, and we try to do so by facilitating practices and approaches that are critical and capable of producing links and connections between local and more widespread issues. And I guess this is possible just by administering resources (first of all, time, as the most precious one) in a savvy way. Working in the South Tyrol, a region at the border between Italy and Austria with an extremely dense historical, political, linguistic profile, and therefore not being in any of the ‘official centers’ of the art world, we are able to understand and use time differently, giving artists the opportunity to undertake longer periods of research that can create interesting fractures in the way the local is perceived by the audience. In these terms it’s very important to mobilize forms of community around the artists’ practice and allow them to influence the research as well as adding layers of meaning to the work.

Cl+®mence Seilles - argekunst web 01

4. Exhibition view, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert

V.H. PIANO intends to create a network of art spaces working together, exchanging and interacting. Why did you decide to join the project and how are you participating in it?

E.G. Since arriving in Bolzano I’ve been trying to activate a number of collaborations and co-productions locally, nationally and internationally. It is a process that takes time, but some good steps have been made in this direction. Pierre Bal-Blanc invited me to look into PIANO and introduced me to Bétonsalon. And with Mélanie Bouteloup and Virginie Bobin, we agreed it was important to go beyond the simple exchange of artists and to look at how both institutions relate to the idea of ‘Exhibition as a Medium for Research’. This relates to our current exhibitions in a number of different ways (ar/ge kunst is showing the work by the French artist and designer Clémence Seilles at the moment). We also discussed this topic at a conference at Bétonsalon on 30 May with the Italian collective Invernomuto and the French curator Rémi Parcollet.

Cl+®mence Seilles - argekunst web 18

5. Exhibition view, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert

Vincent Honoré Ho letto nello statement riguardante la mission dell’istituzione che dirigi, che “negli ultimi anni ar/ge kunst ha concentrato la propria attenzione sull’idea dell’exhibition as a medium”. Puoi precisare cosa intendi per ‘exhibition as a medium’ e come si sviluppa questa nozione all’interno del programma dello spazio?

Emanuele Guidi Le mostre sono sempre state l’attività principale di ar/ge kunst, sin dalla fondazione. È per questo che credo sia importante lavorare con artisti, e non solo, che si interessano all’idea di mostra nella sua complessità. Le esposizioni sono “macchine” complesse, nelle quali le opere svolgono un ruolo centrale ma non esclusivo. Esse sono il risultato di relazioni tra diversi attori – artisti, curatori, opere, pubblico, display ecc. – che devono trovare una sistemazione nello spazio e nel tempo. Fare una mostra significa creare un qualcosa di pubblico, comunicare e mediare un messaggio, perciò tutti gli elementi che concorrono a definirla devono essere considerati quali fattori di mediazione e comunicazione. Sono tutti aspetti che fanno della mostra un medium specifico finalizzato a creare qualcosa di pubblico. Una mostra è una situazione progettata, che rimane tuttavia aperta a diversi fattori incontrollabili, il primo dei quali è il tempo. Per questo motivo mi interessano le pratiche che implicano la consapevolezza che il tempo può essere gestito e condiviso tra tutti coloro che sono parte della mostra, primo tra tutti il pubblico. 

V.H. Nikolaus Hirsch si poneva la seguente domanda: “Chi sono gli autori della costruzione di uno spazio istituzionale?”. Chi sono gli autori di ar/ge kunst, il cui nome è l’abbreviazione del termine tedesco ‘Arbeitsgemeinschaft’ (gruppo di lavoro)?

E.G. Gli autori diar/ge kunst sono stati e sono tuttora ‘molti’, nonostante siamo un’istituzione di piccole dimensioni con uno staff ridotto. Quando lo spazio fu fondato, nel 1985, il nome ar/ge kunst fu scelto per indicare la dimensione collettiva su cui esso si fondava, così come la sua metodologia di lavoro collettiva. Diverse persone, provenienti soprattutto dai campi dell’arte e dell’architettura, hanno curato e organizzato mostre e attività di vario tipo con un ritmo piuttosto intenso (fino al 12 mostre l’anno). Sin da quando sono stato nominato direttore ho trovato interessante come il significato di ‘Arbeitsgemeinschaft’ fosse scomparso dietro la sua abbreviazione (ar/ge) e come fosse sconosciuto ai più. Il 30° anniversario dello spazio, che cade nel 2015, mi è sembrato la migliore occasione per riflettere sulla nozione di “lavoro collettivo” che ha ispirato originariamente la scelta del nome. Sto quindi portando avanti tale riflessione attraverso il coinvolgimento di artisti, designer, coreografi, teorici ecc., che mettono in atto questa idea di comunità di lavoro all’interno della loro ricerca, in particolare usando la mostra come medium al fine di attivare nuove forme di relazione.

V.H. La mission della tua istituzione consiste nel presentare pratiche artistiche provenienti dal contesto regionale, nazione e internazionale e nel condurre una ricerca critica sul ruolo dell’arte e sulla relazione che essa intrattiene con la sfera sociale e politica in cui si realizza. Vorrei chiederti quale credi sia la principale responsabilità di un’istituzione oggi, sia rispetto agli artisti sia in relazione al pubblico.

E.G. Credo sia molto importante – quale segno di rispetto verso gli artisti e il pubblico – trovare il modo di mediare le pratiche degli artisti a beneficio del contesto locale in cui operiamo. Ovviamente è molto importante evitare il rischio di una mentalità troppo ristretta, cosa che tentiamo di fare presentando pratiche e approcci che siano critici e capaci di produrre legami e connessioni tra temi locali e idee più ampie. Credo che ciò sia possibile solo gestendo le risorse (prima tra tutti il tempo, la più preziosa) in modo consapevole.
Lavorando in Sud Tirolo, una regione al confine tra Italia e Austria con un’identità storica, politica e linguistica estremamente densa, e non trovandoci perciò in nessuno dei “centri ufficiali” del mondo dell’arte, siamo in grado di comprendere e usare il tempo diversamente, dando agli artisti l’opportunità di concentrarsi su periodi di ricerca di più lunga durata che possono creare interessanti fratture nel modo in cui il contesto locale viene percepito dal pubblico. In questi termini, è molto importante far sì che si creino forme di comunità intorno alle pratiche degli artisti e permettere che esse ne influenzino la ricerca, aggiungendo stratificazioni nuove al significato del lavoro.

V.H. PIANO intende creare una rete di spazi artistici che lavorano insieme, attraverso le pratiche dello scambio e dell’interazione. Per quale motivo hai deciso di prendere parte al progetto e come si realizza la tua partecipazione?

E.G. Sin da quando sonoarrivato a Bolzano ho cercato di attivare una serie di collaborazioni e coproduzioni a livello locale, nazionale e internazionale. È un processo che richiede tempo, ma abbiamo compiuto importanti passi in questa direzione. Pierre Bal-Blanc mi ha invitato a esaminare il progetto PIANO e mi ha presentato a Bétonsalon. Così, insieme a Mélanie Bouteloup e Virginie Bobin, abbiamo convenuto che era importante andare oltre il semplice scambio di artisti e concentrarsi su come le due istituzioni affrontavano il tema dell’“Exhibition as a Medium for Research”. Esso viene sviluppato all’interno delle nostre mostre attuali in molti modi diversi (ar/ge kunst presenta in questo momento il lavoro dell’artista e designer francese Clémence Seilles). Abbiamo inoltre discusso questo tema in occasione della conferenza tenutasi presso Bétonsalon lo scorso 30 maggio, cui hanno partecipato il collettivo italiano Invernomuto e il curatore francese Rémi Parcollet.

Images:
1. ar/ge Kunst space. Photo: Ivo Corrà
2. Exhibition view, Falke Pisano/Archive Books. Constellation of One and Many, 2014. Photo: Ivo Corrà
3-5. Exhibition views, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert, 2015. Photo: aneres. Courtesy the artist and ar/ge kunst

close
en - it

Carlo Scarpa

Born 1906, Venice, Italy
† 1978, Sendai, Japan

Carlo Scarpa is universally known for his restoration work and the drawings that accompanied his architectural and design projects. For the Venetian architect, drawing was a meditative act, a productive exercise, and a practical way of coming to grips with things.
Scarpa’s drawings for the restoration of the Castelvecchio Museum in Verona are a fine example of his modus operandi, revealing his creative visions and process. The restoration project began in 1956 and was completed in 1964. The architect sought to isolate and bring to light the various historical strata of the museum complex, with the idea of making the building an artefact in its own right. The drawings show how Scarpa’s architecture is based on juxtapositions of different materials, stories that interact with one another. This visual perception is highlighted by his use of color, while he engages with the sense of touch using a series of different papers to create a collage. Scarpa identified the last span of the façade of the museum building, demolished to reveal the hidden strata beneath, as the essence of the castle’s various incarnations, and this was why he chose this position for the statue of Cangrande I della Scala, symbol of the city. Fixed to a concrete base, the statue occupies the part of the building that is most steeped in history. Carlo Scarpa’s approach to display is encapsulated in this gesture of offering the sculpture to the visitor, enabling the work to be discovered gradually from different viewpoints to build up a global vision of it. The statue thus becomes a symbol of how the museum, with its new contents, is restored to the community, representing the changes in perspective leading to the reconstruction of Italian museums after the war.

Nato a Venezia, Italia, nel 1906
† Sendai, Giappone, 1978

Carlo Scarpa è universalmente noto per i suoi restauri e per i disegni che accompagnano le sue architetture e i suoi progetti di design. Per l’architetto veneziano il disegno è pensiero, riflessione produttiva e luogo di ragionamenti e confronti.
I disegni di Scarpa per il restauro del Museo di Castelvecchio, a Verona, sono l’esempio del suo modus operandi, e illustrano come il disegno possa raccontare visioni e processi creativi. Iniziato nel 1956, il restauro si conclude nel 1964. L’architetto cerca di isolare e riportare alla luce i vari strati storici del complesso museale, al fine di rendere l’edificio stesso un unico, grande reperto. I disegni mostrano come l’architettura di Scarpa sia fatta di accostamenti di materiali diversi, e di storie che entrano in dialogo tra loro. Questa percezione visiva è resa evidente dall’uso dei colori, mentre il tatto è sollecitato da una serie di carte differenti, che formano dei collage. L’ultima campata del prospetto dell’edificio museale, demolita per scoprire le stratificazioni nascoste, è identificata da Scarpa come il luogo che sintetizza i cicli di vita del complesso del castello e, per questo motivo, l’architetto vi posiziona la statua di Cangrande I della Scala, emblema del museo e simbolo della città. La statua, fissata su una base di cemento, occupa il punto più carico di storia dell’edificio. L’arte espositiva di Carlo Scarpa si sintetizza nel gesto di porgere la scultura al visitatore, favorendo una scoperta graduale dell’opera, da punti di vista vari e inediti, per consentirne una visione a tutto tondo. La statua diventa così simbolo della restituzione alla memoria collettiva di un museo rinnovato anche nei contenuti, e rappresenta il cambiamento di vedute intercorso con la ricostruzione dei musei italiani nel dopoguerra.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

THOMAS TEURLAI

Thomas Teurlai, Camping sauvage, 2012

Thomas Teurlai, Camping sauvage, 2012

Born 1988, Meaux, France
Lives and works in Vladivostok and Geneva, Switzerland
Graduated from DNAP at Beaux-arts de Nantes and DNSEP (Diplôme National Supérieur d’Expression Plastique) at the Villa Arson in Nice in 2009. Young création of villa de Nice Award with a one year residency. He has entered into many collaborations with Quentin Euverte and Ugo Schiavi. His solo exhibitions include: Chopper Desk, The Fish Factory, Stodvarfjordur (2012); Klaus Nomi auf L.S.D., Picto, Geneva (2011).
Among his group exhibitions: Le trou, Villa Bernasconi, Geneva (2012); Mauvais Coups Pour Trois Fois Rien, Hangar Alstom, Nantes (2011); Le Laboratorium, Arles (2011); 345 Elder, The Broadway Space, New York (2007).
Solo exhibition as part of the Modules – Fondation Pierre Bergé – Yves Saint Laurent at Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2013-2014).

Project: From & To

 

Nato nel 1988, vive e lavora a Vladivostok e a Ginevra. Ottiene il diploma DNSEP alla Villa Arson nel 2009. Tra le sue mostre personali: Chopper Desk, The Fish Factory, Stodvarfjordur (2012); Klaus Nomi auf L.S.D., Picto, Ginevra (2011); Modules – Fondation Pierre Bergé – Yves Saint Laurent, al Palais de Tokyo, Parigi (2013-2014). Fra le mostre collettive, segnaliamo: Le trou, Villa Bernasconi, Ginevra (2012); Mauvais Coups Pour Trois Fois Rien, Hangar Alstom, Nantes (2011); Le Laboratorium, Arles (2011); 345 Elder, The Broadway Space, New York (2007).

 

Né en 1988, vit et travaille à Vladivostok et Genève. Diplômé du DNSEP à la Villa Arson en 2009. Parmi ses expositions personnelles : Chopper Desk, The Fish Factory, Stodvarfjordur (2012); Klaus Nomi auf L.S.D., Picto, Geneve (2011); Modules – Fondation Pierre Bergé – Yves Saint Laurent, au Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2013-2014). Parmi ses expositions collectives : Le trou, Villa Bernasconi, Genève (2012); Mauvais Coups Pour Trois Fois Rien, Hangar Alstom, Nantes (2011); Le Laboratorium, Arles (2011); 345 Elder, The Broadway Space, New York (2007).

Image:
Thomas Teurlai, Camping sauvage, 2012

close
en - it - fr

GUILLAUME MANSART IN CONVERSATION WITH DIANE BLONDEAU, VIVIEN ROUBAUD AND THOMAS TEURLAI

GUILLAUME MANSART IN CONVERSATION WITH DIANE BLONDEAU, VIVIEN ROUBAUD AND THOMAS TEURLAI

A Dystopian Sculpture

Guillaume Mansart It’s the first time you’ve worked together. Here you’re offering a joint production. In what sense was this collective dynamic important?
Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud and Thomas Teurlai The From & To project was based on the idea of a collaborative exchange between young French and Italian artists. The three of us already knew each other. We got along well and lived in more or less the same area. Each of us having been separately involved in several collaborations, we were aware that this presented an advantage in terms of energy, labour power and letting go.

G.M. Beyond the spirit of intellectual competition, one senses that this collective logic is also efficient when it comes to production.  At the work-creation stage, a distinctive organisational logic can already be discerned…
D.B, V.R., T.T. This is something that creeps into our practices and into those of quite a few artists of our generation. Primarily out of pure pragmatism: how can something be created with few resources? By inventing our tools, by making do with whatever we have at our disposal. When it’s finished, the work might appear to “take a stand against traditional principles”, but more than anything else this is because we have no choice! It’s a flaw that becomes a quality. 

G.M. What is the meaning of the title Jambe de botte?
D.B, V.R., T.T. It’s the literal translation of “bootleg”, an English term that designates pirate recordings of concerts or studio albums. The term also designates the art of “turntablism”, which consists in constructing a single piece of music out of several others. Jambe de botte served as a shapeless title, like melted plastic.

G.M. For the creation of this piece, you tested several types of material, ultimately choosing plastic from melted garden chairs. There’s a certain irony in the fact that plastic chairs are turned into a kind of “missile sculpture”. Why did this material stand out?
D.B, V.R., T.T. This brings us back to production circuits and pragmatism. How a combination of gestures can produce an image. We very empirically tested hundreds of combinations. Then we took a deckchair, burned it with a flamethrower, and the result was perfect. We work on the French Riviera, where the dumps are full of this kind of furniture. We were conscious of reflecting the dystopian faults of this strange place that, when you remove the glamour of the sun and palm trees, smells of cheap suntan lotion, melted poodles and social violence.

G.M. How were the forms of the different sculptures created?
D.B, V.R., T.T. We aligned casts found in an abandoned train parts foundry, in such a way that we were able to create cylinders that could be spun like record players. We poured the plastic and suddenly we had Scud missiles.

G.M. Could you explain the “archaeo-acoustic” notion behind your project?
D.B, V.R., T.T. It’s a fairly vague discipline situated between acoustics, archaeology and charlatanism, and its aim is to find pre-Edison sound recordings through sound imprints accidentally recorded on different types of object. Since sound is a vibration, in principle it can be inscribed on the media it comes into contact with.

G.M. The forms of the various sculptures evoke something of a warlike world. Added to these forms is a sound that gives the space a stressful atmosphere. How is this sound produced?
D.B, V.R., T.T. From the outset we planned to create forms that could be “played” in the space. Then everything developed very spontaneously. The day before the exhibition opened, we had to make up our minds to bring the sculptures into the exhibition venue. Once they were set up, we took a playback head and placed it on one of the rotating Scuds and it was Fallujah in the centre dart. The perfect tautology.

G.M. Although object and device diversion and DIY are found in your respective works, I get the impression that the question of sculpture is fairly new. In fact, in your piece one finds “historical” questions liked to sculpture: materiology, volume, casting techniques, a plinth…  Does Jambe de botte enable you to tackle new fields of investigation?
D.B, V.R., T.T. We considered simple questions that are not at all historical. A plinth is practical. It keeps the work at a distance and prevents a Scud from falling on someone. Plastic is more solid than margarine, etc.  Above all, this project confirmed that in the middle of personal practices and trajectories, it’s essential to regularly make time for collective periods and keep making use of resourcefulness.

March 2015

Protagonists: Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud, Thomas Teurlai
Project: From & To

Une sculpture dystopique

Guillaume Mansart C’est la première fois que vous travailliez ensemble. Ici, vous faites une proposition de production partagée. En quoi cette dynamique collective a-t-elle été importante ?
Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud et Thomas Teurlai L’idée à la base du projet From & To, c’était un échange collaboratif entre des jeunes artistes français et italiens. Tous les trois, nous nous connaissions déjà, nous nous entendions bien et nous vivions plus ou moins au même endroit. Après plusieurs collaborations chacun de notre coté, nous étions conscients de l’intérêt que cela représentait en matière d’énergies, de force de travail et de lâcher prise.

G.M. Au-delà de l’émulation intellectuelle, on sent que cette logique collective trouve aussi une efficience dans la question de la production. Dans l’étape de réalisation de l’œuvre on peut déjà lire une logique d’organisation propre…
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est quelque chose qui traine dans nos pratiques comme dans celles de pas mal d’artistes de notre génération. D’abord par pur pragmatisme : comment réalise-t-on quelque chose avec peu de moyen ? En inventant nos outils, en faisant avec ce que l’on a sous la main. À l’arrivée, peut-être que le travail semble « s’affirmer contre les logiques traditionnelles », mais c’est plus par défaut qu’autre chose ! C’est un défaut qui devient une qualité. 

G.M. Que signifie le titre Jambe de botte ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est la traduction littérale de « bootleg », un terme anglais qui désigne les enregistrements pirates de concerts ou de studio. Le terme désigne aussi l’art du « turntablisme » qui consiste à construire un seul morceau de musique à partir de plusieurs. Jambe de botte faisait un titre informe, comme du plastique fondu.

G.M. Pour la réalisation de cette pièce, vous avez testé plusieurs types de matériaux, pour au final vous arrêter sur du plastique provenant de chaises de jardin fondues. Il y a une forme d’ironie dans le fait de transformer des chaises en plastique en sorte « sculpture missile ». Pourquoi ce matériau s’est-il imposé ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. On en revient aux circuits de productions et au pragmatisme. Comment une combinaison de gestes simples peut « faire image ». Nous avons testé de manière très empirique des centaines de combinaisons. Puis nous avons pris un transat, nous l’avons brûlé au lance-flammes, et le résultat était parfait. Nous travaillions sur la Côte d’Azur, les décharges sont pleines de ce type de mobilier. Nous avions conscience de renvoyer les travers dystopiques de cet étrange endroit qui, dégagé du côté glamour du soleil et des palmiers, sent la crème solaire bon marché, le caniche fondu et la violence sociale.

G.M. Comment les formes des différentes sculptures ont-elles été créées ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. Nous avons aligné des moules trouvés dans une fonderie de pièces de trains abandonnées, de manière à pouvoir créer des cylindres que l’on pourrait faire tourner comme des phonographes. Nous avons coulé le plastique et d’un coup nous avions des missiles Scud.

G.M. Pourriez vous expliciter la notion d’ « archéo-acoustique » qui est à l’origine de votre projet ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est une discipline assez obscure qui se situe entre l’acoustique, l’archéologie et le charlatanisme, et qui entend retrouver des enregistrements sonores pré-Edison à travers des empreintes sonores qui auraient été enregistrées accidentellement sur différents types d’objets. Puisque le son est une vibration, il peut censément s’inscrire sur les supports avec lesquels il entre en contact.

G.M. Les formes des différentes sculptures évoquent un univers plutôt guerrier, à ces formes s’ajoute un son qui installe dans l’espace d’exposition une atmosphère anxiogène. Comment se son est-il produit ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. Dès le début nous envisagions de créer des formes que l’on pourrait « jouer » dans l’espace. Ensuite, tout s’est enchainé de manière très spontanée. Nous avons dû nous résoudre, la veille du vernissage, à amener les sculptures dans le lieu d’exposition. Une fois qu’elles étaient installées, nous avons pris une tête de lecture que nous avons posé sur un des SCUD rotatifs et c’était Fallujah dans le centre d’art. Tautologique à souhait.

G.M. Si le détournement d’objets ou de dispositifs et le DIY sont présents dans vos travaux respectifs, j’ai l’impression que la question de la sculpture est assez nouvelle. En effet, on retrouve dans votre pièce des questions « historiques » liées à sculpture : matériologie, volume, techniques de moulage, socle, … Jambe de botte vous permet-elle d’engager de nouveaux champs d’investigation ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. On s’est posé des questions simples qui ne sont en rien historiques. Un socle c’est pratique, ça tient à distance et ça évite qu’un SCUD tombe sur quelqu’un. Le plastique c’est plus solide que la margarine, etc. Ce projet nous a surtout confirmé qu’il était indispensable au sein de pratiques et de trajectoires personnelles d’aménager régulièrement ces temps collectifs et de continuer à jouer de débrouille.

Mars 2015

Image:
1. Diane Blondeau / Vivien Roubaud / Thomas Teurlai, Jambes de bottes, 2014, mixed media. Photo: Villa Arson / Jean Brasille

close
en

LUCY SKAER

Born 1975, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Lives between London and Glasgow, United Kingdom

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en

ANDY WARHOL

PLE-TPOMPT-032

Born 1928, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
† 1987, New York, NY, USA

Image:
Andy Warhol, Sleep, 1963© Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger (Collection of The Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh / Contribution The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.)

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en

Gianluca d’Incà Levis

Gianluca_D_Inca_Levis

Gianluca d’Incà Levis is the creator and curator of Dolomiti Contemporanee, and the director of the New Venue of Casso/Nuovo Spazio Espositivo di Casso.
Since 2010, he has been launching a series of curatorial projects that link contemporary art, recovery of industrial or civil disused sites, and mountains. The idea of producing innovative images is central, working on the natural environment in a critical and projective manner, and rejecting the stereotypical readings. Starting from 2014, he has been carrying out a study at the Cà Foscari University of Venice’s Department of Management, on the following subject: Cultural entrepreneurship and creative industries as factors of local development. Branding of the territories and creative regeneration. Rethinking nature and the industrial landscape through contemporary art.

Project: Piano – alto!
Space: Dolomiti Contemporanee

close
en

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH GIANLUCA D’INCÀ LEVIS, DOLOMITI CONTEMPORANEE

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH GIANLUCA D’INCÀ LEVIS, DOLOMITI CONTEMPORANEE

Vincent Honoré Can you introduce Dolomiti Contemporanee, its history, missions and programmes?
Gianluca d’Incà Levis Dolomiti Contemporanee is a cultural platform which works for the redefining of the meaning and fruition of the physical and mental contexts with which it comes in contact. Art, every kind of art – art in general – is the most performative instrument in the battle for the constant re-definition of the meaning of things and of their raison d’être. This battle is one of the few raison d’être, indeed, that the human possesses should it not content itself with static definitions and approaches based on other people’s experiences. The project was born in 2011, and operates in the context of the UNESCO Dolomites, re-activating great abandoned sites (industrial archaeology compounds, locations symbol of closure and death, which are transformed, through innovative art and culture, in open “constructions sites”).

V.H. How do you think a residency can benefit an artist?
G.D.L. Artists are a sensitive selectors. They seize stimuli, and re-broadcast them. The more the external contest is stimulating, the stronger and profound the resonances created in them may be. The residency project gives the artist a chance to come in contact with new contexts. The dolomitic contexts, made of rock, verticality, environment and nature, thin air, great exhumed architectures, which we reactivate, are exceptionally incentivized in that sense.

2. New Venue of Casso

V.H. How do you foresee the future of an institution like yours in a context in which globalised museums and institutions become such powerful players, absorbing all energies, audiences and funding?
G.D.L. Dolomiti Contemporanee isn’t an institution. It is an experimental project, which questions once again the manner of approach to the territory, the sites, the spaces, the thoughts, the meaning of the artistic endeavour and the curatorial practices, and the relationship between all these things. It  isn’t at all possible for the cultural contexts to be completely cannibalized by the institution, the museums, the “powerful players”. There’s always room for those who want to innovate. Thus, the more the system will become organized, the more space there will be for subversive, or simply critical, projects.

V.H. Is it an advantage to have a nomadic structure, that has to find new space all the time for its projects?
G.D.L. It is not a question of advantages. Changing constantly is hard. But, this way, we’re declaring not to be in search of a “house for the arts”. Art doesn’t need a house. It is pervasive, universal, mobile, liquid. We’re not interested in managing, arranging a structure, and setting up “art exhibits” inside it. We’re interested in taking care of the places, reflecting on the landscape, putting it in motion. Every time we face a new site, we do it because it makes sense, it is necessary, to bring a system of re-activation in that site, which is always a great dead location, that we believe must be exhumed, transformed, regenerated. However, we settle in some sites for at least 3-4 years (Casso, Borca). Thus, we’re not perfectly nomadic either. The format isn’t defined: it changes in relation to the locations, which are always different. But the project is extremely clear, and stable. It opens closed contexts. It assaults inertias, and ideational laziness. It proves that every good idea, when pursued rigorously, can be successful.

3. New Venue of Casso

V.H. PIANO intends to create a network of art spaces working together, exchanging and interacting. Why did you decide to join the project and how are you participating in it?
G.D.L. Dolomiti Contemporanee, as a project, has its founding in the idea of network. In four years (DC was created in 2011), we’ve worked with over 400 public, private, productive, cultural, artistic partners. The basis of our “diet” is relational. Every good network interests us. The project isn’t at all limited to the Dolomites. That is where it started, where we continuously welcome artists and people (Residency), and from where it steps out all the time, through partnerships, relationships, exchanges, in Italy and abroad. PIANO’s plan, the idea of the project, seemed good, stimulating. We’ve gladly decided to take part in it all. The only regret was the complete lack of participation of the public Italian institutions. But in Italy the art system doesn’t work, that is a well known fact. Thus, we’ve taken part in the Piano-Alto! project. A few French artists have been DC’s guests in the residency projects of Casso and Borca. A few Italian artists have worked, instead, in the French art centres that are partners of the project. In the next weeks and months, the results of their research will be presented. Moreover, we’ve included in the PIANO platform one of our projects: “Two calls for Vajont”, a complex and important international artistic contest (www.twocalls.net). We hope that the French artists will decide to take part in it. This would be another marker of the fact that the cultural network really has worked, through the sharing of the platforms.

www.dolomiticontemporanee.netwww.twocalls.netwww.progettoborca.net

Space: Dolomiti Contemporanee
Protagonist: Gianluca D’Incà Levis
Project: Piano – alto!

Vincent Honoré Puoi presentare Dolomiti Contemporanee, la sua storia, la sua mission e il suo programma?
Gianluca d’Incà Levis Dolomiti Contemporanee è una piattaforma culturale che mira alla ridefinizione del significato e della fruizione dei contesti fisici e mentali con cui entra in contatto. L’arte, di ogni genere, l’arte in generale è lo strumento più performativo nella lotta per la costante ridefinizione del significato delle cose e della loro ragion d’essere. Questa lotta è in effetti una delle poche ragioni d’essere che l’uomo possiede per non accontentarsi di definizioni e approcci statici basati sull’esperienza altrui. Il progetto è nato nel 2011 e si colloca nel contesto delle Dolomiti, sito protetto dall’UNESCO, riattivando importanti luoghi abbandonati (siti di archeologia industriale, luoghi simbolo di chiusura e morte, che vengono trasformati attraverso l’innovazione dell’arte e della cultura in “cantieri” aperti).

V.H. In che modo, secondo te, un artista può sfruttare l’esperienza di una residenza?
G.D.L. Gli artisti fanno le loro scelte con sensibilità, colgono gli stimoli e li riproducono. Più è stimolante il contesto esterno, più forti e profonde possono essere le risonanze create in loro. Il progetto di residenza dà all’artista l’occasione di entrare in contatto con spazi nuovi. Il contesto delle Dolomiti, fatto di roccia, verticalità, ambiente e natura, aria fine, grandi architetture riesumate e riattivate, è incredibilmente stimolante in questo senso.

V.H. Come immagini il futuro di un’istituzione come Dolomiti Contemporanee in un contesto in cui musei e istituzioni globalizzati assumono un crescente potere, assorbendo tutte le energie, le categorie di pubblico e le risorse economiche?
G.D.L. Dolomiti Contemporanee non è un’istituzione. È un progetto sperimentale, che mette in discussione ancora una volta l’approccio al territorio, i luoghi, gli spazi, i pensieri, il significato dell’attività artistica e delle pratiche curatoriali, e le relazioni tra tutti questi elementi. Non è possibile che i contesti culturali siano completamente cannibalizzati dalle istituzioni, dai musei, dai player più potenti. C’è sempre spazio per coloro che vogliono innovare. Più il sistema diventerà organizzato, più spazio ci sarà per i progetti sovversivi o semplicemente critici.

V.H. Avere una struttura nomade, che ha bisogno di trovare ogni volta una nuova sede per accogliere i suoi progetti, rappresenta un vantaggio?
G.D.L. Non si tratta di una questione di vantaggi. Cambiare continuamente è difficile. Ma in questo modo affermiamo di non essere in cerca di una “casa per le arti”. L’arte non ha bisogno di una casa. È pervasiva, universale, mobile, liquida. Non ci interessa gestire, organizzare una struttura e allestire “mostre” al suo interno. Ci interessa “prenderci cura dei luoghi”, riflettendo sul paesaggio, mettendolo in moto. Ogni volta che affrontiamo un sito nuovo, lo facciamo perché ha senso, è necessario portare in questo specifico luogo abbandonato, che noi crediamo debba essere riesumato, trasformato, rigenerato, un sistema di riattivazione. Ci stabiliamo in determinati luoghi per periodi di 3-4 anni (Casso, Borca), per cui non siamo esattamente nomadi. Il format non è definito, ma cambia in relazione ai luoghi, sempre diversi. Ma il progetto è estremamente chiaro e stabile e consiste nell’aprire contesti chiusi, aggredire l’inerzia e la pigrizia mentale. Esso testimonia che ogni buona idea, se perseguita con rigore, può avere successo.

V.H. PIANO mira a creare una rete di spazi artistici che lavorino insieme, attraverso processi di scambio e interazione. Perché avete deciso di aderire al progetto e come si realizza la vostra partecipazione?
G.D.L. Il progettoDolomiti Contemporanee si basa sull’idea della rete. In quattro anni (DC è stato creato nel 2011), abbiamo lavorato con oltre 400 partner pubblici, privati, produttivi, culturali e artistici. La base della nostra “dieta” è relazionale. Tutte le buone reti ci interessano. Il progetto non è affatto limitato alle Dolomiti. Parte da qui, dove accoglie con continuità artisti e persone (attraverso il programma di residenza), e da qui si muove costantemente, attraverso partnership, relazioni, scambi sia in Italia sia all’estero. Il programma di PIANO, l’idea del progetto, sembrava buona, stimolante. Abbiamo deciso con piacere di prendervi parte. L’unico dispiacere riguarda la totale mancanza di partecipazione delle istituzioni pubbliche italiane. Ma in Italia il sistema dell’arte non funziona, è un fatto noto. Abbiamo quindi preso parte al progetto Piano – Alto!. Alcuni artisti francesi sono stati ospiti di DC nei progetti di residenza di Casso e di Borca, mentre altri artisti italiani hanno lavorato nei centri d’arte francesi partner del progetto. Nelle settimane e nei mesi che verranno, saranno presentati i risultati delle loro ricerche. Inoltre abbiamo inserito nel progetto PIANO uno dei nostri progetti, Two Calls for Vajont, un importante e complesso concorso artistico internazionale (www.twocalls.net). Speriamo che gli artisti francesi decidano di parteciparvi, perché ciò rappresenterebbe un altro segno del fatto che, attraverso la fusione delle piattaforme, la rete culturale ha funzionato.

www.dolomiticontemporanee.netwww.twocalls.netwww.progettoborca.net

Images:
1-3. New Venue of Casso

close
en - it - fr

Vivien Roubaud

Vivien Roubaud, Système frigorifique, eau, 220v, 2012

Vivien Roubaud, Système frigorifique, eau, 220v, 2012

Born 1986, Vouziers, France
Lives and works in Nice, France
Graduated of DNSEP with distinction at the École Nationale Supérieure d’Art of Villa Arson (Nice) in 2011. Among his recent group exhibitions: Saison 17, Lieu Commun, Toulouse (2013); Sunshine & Precipitation Part 2, Catalyst Arts, Belfast (2012); WATT, La Station, Nice (2012); Young & Restless, Vidéochroniques, Marseille (2012); Demain c’est loin, Galerie de la Marine, Nice (2011). Solo exhibition as part of the Modules Fondation Pierre Bergé – Yves Saint Laurent at the Palais de Tokyo (2013-2014).
I often say that I use “objects that make us live,” in a sense, I try to extract unused qualities or hidden properties from these objects. The active mixtures that I make, bring together and confront, take on a form in precarious, unstable balancing acts. In order to bypass the functions and disorganize the know-how, we have to adopt a distant view in terms of what we know, or think we know, without ever falling into fascination, but instead with the intention of raising questions and inciting curiosity. Freeing an object also means reprogramming it, or handling its side effects. Static objects are set in motion, while those that usually move tend towards petrified states. Some systems come undone, returning to a lost state. They unravel so much that they go back to the “crude”, or heterogeneous pre-production state of an un-elaborated product. By making bridges between disciplines, and by combining or defragmenting fields and categories, it is possible to make one or more frameworks tremble, but without being able to extract ourselves from them completely. The point is then to re-examine and reinterpret the connections and ties that can join together the fragments and abolish the frontier between methods and materials. The game consists in regulating this unruliness.

Project: From & To

 

Nato nel 1989, vive e lavora a Nizza. Ottiene il diploma DNSEP, con il massimo dei voti, alla Villa Arson nel 2011. Fra le sue mostre collettive recenti: Saison 17, Lieu Commun (Tolosa 2013), SUNSHINE & PRECIPITATION Part 2, Catalyst Arts (Belfast, 2012), WATT, La Station (Nizza, 2012), YOUNG &RESTLESS, Vidéochroniques (Marsiglia, 2012), Demain c’est loin, Galerie de la Marine (Nizza, 2011). Mostra personale nell’ ambito di Modules – Fondazione Pierre Bergé – Yves Saint Laurent, al Palais de Tokyo, 2013-2014.

 

Né en 1986, vit et travaille à Nice. Diplômé en 2011 du DNESP, avec félicitation du jury, à l’École nationale supérieure d’art de la Villa Arson. Parmi ses expositions collectives récentes : Saison 17, Lieu Commun (Toulouse, 2013), SUNSHINE & PRECIPITATION Part 2, Catalyst Arts (Belfast, 2012), WATT , La Station (Nice, 2012), YOUNG & RESTLESS, Vidéochroniques (Marseille, 2012), Demain c’est loin, Galerie de la Marine (Nice, 2011). Exposition personnelle dans le cadre des Modules – Fondation Pierre Bergé – Yves Saint Laurent, au Palais de Tokyo, 2013-2014.

Image:
Vivien Roubaud, Système frigorifique, eau, 220v, 2012

close
en - it - fr

GUILLAUME MANSART IN CONVERSATION WITH DIANE BLONDEAU, VIVIEN ROUBAUD AND THOMAS TEURLAI

GUILLAUME MANSART IN CONVERSATION WITH DIANE BLONDEAU, VIVIEN ROUBAUD AND THOMAS TEURLAI

A Dystopian Sculpture

Guillaume Mansart It’s the first time you’ve worked together. Here you’re offering a joint production. In what sense was this collective dynamic important?
Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud and Thomas Teurlai The From & To project was based on the idea of a collaborative exchange between young French and Italian artists. The three of us already knew each other. We got along well and lived in more or less the same area. Each of us having been separately involved in several collaborations, we were aware that this presented an advantage in terms of energy, labour power and letting go.

G.M. Beyond the spirit of intellectual competition, one senses that this collective logic is also efficient when it comes to production.  At the work-creation stage, a distinctive organisational logic can already be discerned…
D.B, V.R., T.T. This is something that creeps into our practices and into those of quite a few artists of our generation. Primarily out of pure pragmatism: how can something be created with few resources? By inventing our tools, by making do with whatever we have at our disposal. When it’s finished, the work might appear to “take a stand against traditional principles”, but more than anything else this is because we have no choice! It’s a flaw that becomes a quality. 

G.M. What is the meaning of the title Jambe de botte?
D.B, V.R., T.T. It’s the literal translation of “bootleg”, an English term that designates pirate recordings of concerts or studio albums. The term also designates the art of “turntablism”, which consists in constructing a single piece of music out of several others. Jambe de botte served as a shapeless title, like melted plastic.

G.M. For the creation of this piece, you tested several types of material, ultimately choosing plastic from melted garden chairs. There’s a certain irony in the fact that plastic chairs are turned into a kind of “missile sculpture”. Why did this material stand out?
D.B, V.R., T.T. This brings us back to production circuits and pragmatism. How a combination of gestures can produce an image. We very empirically tested hundreds of combinations. Then we took a deckchair, burned it with a flamethrower, and the result was perfect. We work on the French Riviera, where the dumps are full of this kind of furniture. We were conscious of reflecting the dystopian faults of this strange place that, when you remove the glamour of the sun and palm trees, smells of cheap suntan lotion, melted poodles and social violence.

G.M. How were the forms of the different sculptures created?
D.B, V.R., T.T. We aligned casts found in an abandoned train parts foundry, in such a way that we were able to create cylinders that could be spun like record players. We poured the plastic and suddenly we had Scud missiles.

G.M. Could you explain the “archaeo-acoustic” notion behind your project?
D.B, V.R., T.T. It’s a fairly vague discipline situated between acoustics, archaeology and charlatanism, and its aim is to find pre-Edison sound recordings through sound imprints accidentally recorded on different types of object. Since sound is a vibration, in principle it can be inscribed on the media it comes into contact with.

G.M. The forms of the various sculptures evoke something of a warlike world. Added to these forms is a sound that gives the space a stressful atmosphere. How is this sound produced?
D.B, V.R., T.T. From the outset we planned to create forms that could be “played” in the space. Then everything developed very spontaneously. The day before the exhibition opened, we had to make up our minds to bring the sculptures into the exhibition venue. Once they were set up, we took a playback head and placed it on one of the rotating Scuds and it was Fallujah in the centre dart. The perfect tautology.

G.M. Although object and device diversion and DIY are found in your respective works, I get the impression that the question of sculpture is fairly new. In fact, in your piece one finds “historical” questions liked to sculpture: materiology, volume, casting techniques, a plinth…  Does Jambe de botte enable you to tackle new fields of investigation?
D.B, V.R., T.T. We considered simple questions that are not at all historical. A plinth is practical. It keeps the work at a distance and prevents a Scud from falling on someone. Plastic is more solid than margarine, etc.  Above all, this project confirmed that in the middle of personal practices and trajectories, it’s essential to regularly make time for collective periods and keep making use of resourcefulness.

March 2015

Protagonists: Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud, Thomas Teurlai
Project: From & To

Une sculpture dystopique

Guillaume Mansart C’est la première fois que vous travailliez ensemble. Ici, vous faites une proposition de production partagée. En quoi cette dynamique collective a-t-elle été importante ?
Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud et Thomas Teurlai L’idée à la base du projet From & To, c’était un échange collaboratif entre des jeunes artistes français et italiens. Tous les trois, nous nous connaissions déjà, nous nous entendions bien et nous vivions plus ou moins au même endroit. Après plusieurs collaborations chacun de notre coté, nous étions conscients de l’intérêt que cela représentait en matière d’énergies, de force de travail et de lâcher prise.

G.M. Au-delà de l’émulation intellectuelle, on sent que cette logique collective trouve aussi une efficience dans la question de la production. Dans l’étape de réalisation de l’œuvre on peut déjà lire une logique d’organisation propre…
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est quelque chose qui traine dans nos pratiques comme dans celles de pas mal d’artistes de notre génération. D’abord par pur pragmatisme : comment réalise-t-on quelque chose avec peu de moyen ? En inventant nos outils, en faisant avec ce que l’on a sous la main. À l’arrivée, peut-être que le travail semble « s’affirmer contre les logiques traditionnelles », mais c’est plus par défaut qu’autre chose ! C’est un défaut qui devient une qualité. 

G.M. Que signifie le titre Jambe de botte ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est la traduction littérale de « bootleg », un terme anglais qui désigne les enregistrements pirates de concerts ou de studio. Le terme désigne aussi l’art du « turntablisme » qui consiste à construire un seul morceau de musique à partir de plusieurs. Jambe de botte faisait un titre informe, comme du plastique fondu.

G.M. Pour la réalisation de cette pièce, vous avez testé plusieurs types de matériaux, pour au final vous arrêter sur du plastique provenant de chaises de jardin fondues. Il y a une forme d’ironie dans le fait de transformer des chaises en plastique en sorte « sculpture missile ». Pourquoi ce matériau s’est-il imposé ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. On en revient aux circuits de productions et au pragmatisme. Comment une combinaison de gestes simples peut « faire image ». Nous avons testé de manière très empirique des centaines de combinaisons. Puis nous avons pris un transat, nous l’avons brûlé au lance-flammes, et le résultat était parfait. Nous travaillions sur la Côte d’Azur, les décharges sont pleines de ce type de mobilier. Nous avions conscience de renvoyer les travers dystopiques de cet étrange endroit qui, dégagé du côté glamour du soleil et des palmiers, sent la crème solaire bon marché, le caniche fondu et la violence sociale.

G.M. Comment les formes des différentes sculptures ont-elles été créées ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. Nous avons aligné des moules trouvés dans une fonderie de pièces de trains abandonnées, de manière à pouvoir créer des cylindres que l’on pourrait faire tourner comme des phonographes. Nous avons coulé le plastique et d’un coup nous avions des missiles Scud.

G.M. Pourriez vous expliciter la notion d’ « archéo-acoustique » qui est à l’origine de votre projet ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est une discipline assez obscure qui se situe entre l’acoustique, l’archéologie et le charlatanisme, et qui entend retrouver des enregistrements sonores pré-Edison à travers des empreintes sonores qui auraient été enregistrées accidentellement sur différents types d’objets. Puisque le son est une vibration, il peut censément s’inscrire sur les supports avec lesquels il entre en contact.

G.M. Les formes des différentes sculptures évoquent un univers plutôt guerrier, à ces formes s’ajoute un son qui installe dans l’espace d’exposition une atmosphère anxiogène. Comment se son est-il produit ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. Dès le début nous envisagions de créer des formes que l’on pourrait « jouer » dans l’espace. Ensuite, tout s’est enchainé de manière très spontanée. Nous avons dû nous résoudre, la veille du vernissage, à amener les sculptures dans le lieu d’exposition. Une fois qu’elles étaient installées, nous avons pris une tête de lecture que nous avons posé sur un des SCUD rotatifs et c’était Fallujah dans le centre d’art. Tautologique à souhait.

G.M. Si le détournement d’objets ou de dispositifs et le DIY sont présents dans vos travaux respectifs, j’ai l’impression que la question de la sculpture est assez nouvelle. En effet, on retrouve dans votre pièce des questions « historiques » liées à sculpture : matériologie, volume, techniques de moulage, socle, … Jambe de botte vous permet-elle d’engager de nouveaux champs d’investigation ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. On s’est posé des questions simples qui ne sont en rien historiques. Un socle c’est pratique, ça tient à distance et ça évite qu’un SCUD tombe sur quelqu’un. Le plastique c’est plus solide que la margarine, etc. Ce projet nous a surtout confirmé qu’il était indispensable au sein de pratiques et de trajectoires personnelles d’aménager régulièrement ces temps collectifs et de continuer à jouer de débrouille.

Mars 2015

Image:
1. Diane Blondeau / Vivien Roubaud / Thomas Teurlai, Jambes de bottes, 2014, mixed media. Photo: Villa Arson / Jean Brasille

close
en - fr

VINCENT VERLÉ

Born 1974, Nancy, France
Lives and works in Grenoble, France

After studying History of Arts and Cultural Engineering in Nancy, Vincent Verlé arrived in Grenoble in 2001 when integrating and administrating the artistic collective “Ici Même (Grenoble)”. He then became art critic for a local cultural weekly (Le Petit Bulletin), while at the same time collaborating as one of the contributors for the Nouvelle Galerie, a contemporary art gallery in Grenoble. In 2006, when the CAB is created, he joins the team as Manager for Public Programmes before becoming the art centre’s Curator. He took on Directorship in 2011, meanwhile continuing the program he had started to develop in 2007, concentrating on “composing and creating coherent approaches and dialogues towards and between the artworks.”

Né à Nancy, France, en 1974
Vit et travaille à Grenoble, France

Après des études en Histoire de l’art et en Ingénierie culturelle à Nancy, Vincent Verlé est arrivé à Grenoble en 2001 pour intégrer le collectif artistique Ici Même (Grenoble). Il devient ensuite critique d’art pour un hebdomadaire culturel grenoblois (Le Petit Bulletin), puis dans le même temps collaborateur à la Nouvelle Galerie, galerie d’art contemporain grenobloise. C’est en 2006, date de création du Centre d’Art Bastille qu’il rejoint l’équipe du centre d’art en devenant chargé des publics, puis commissaire des expositions qui y sont présentées. Il en prend ensuite la direction en 2011 développant la programmation qu’il a mis en place depuis 2007 en s’attachant à «  (…) composer des parcours cohérents, faire dialoguer les œuvres entre elles. Et toujours, raconter une histoire (…) » à travers elles.

Space: Centre d’Art Bastille
Project: Double Cross, from Both Sides of a Mountain

close
en

VALERIO DEHÒ

Valerio_Deho

Valerio Dehò, born in Taranto in 1955, earned his degree in “Philosophy of language” at the University of Bologna. He is Professor of Aesthetics at the Academy of Fine Arts in Bologna. He has worked as a publicist since 1988 in Milan for the publishing house Electa, and for the editorial department of “L’Italia Moderna” directed by Omar Calabrese. From 1997 to 1999 he was the director of the project “Novecento” for the municipality of Reggio Emilia. Since 2001, he has been the Art Director of Kunst Meran Merano Arte. In 2005, he was nominated commissioner of the XVI Quadriennale Nazionale in Rome. He curated the following main exhibitions: Metropolismo, Rome 1993; Carte, segni, segreti, Bologna 1995; Aldo Mondino, Mazel Tov, 1997; Gina Pane, Reggio Emilia 1998; Wolf Vostell, I disastri della pace, Reggio Emilia 1998; 2001, l’immagine della parola, Bologna 2000; DNArt, arte e genetica, Merano 2002; Meta.fisica, arte e filosofia, Merano 2003; + Positive, Merano 2004; Robert Mapplethorpe, Bologna, Merano 2004; Man Ray, Magie, Merano 2005; Sound Zero, Merano 2006; Mimmo Jodice, Light, Bologna 2006; Vespa Arte Italiana, Pietrasanta 2006; Ironica, Milano 2006; Damien Hirst New Religion, Venice 2007; L’occhio di Meret Oppenheim, Merano 2008; Boris Mikhailov, Merano 2008; Moana. Casta diva, Bologna, Milan, Brescia 2010; Tony Cragg, Venice, Merano 2010; Peter Blake, Venice Suite, Venice 2010-2011; Dennis Oppenheim “Electric City”, Merano; Fluxus Jubileum, Treviso 2012; Vito Acconci e Franco Vaccari “Intersection”, Venice 2013.

Project: From & To
Space: Kunst Meran Merano Arte

close
en

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH VALERIO DEHÒ, KUNST MERAN MERANO ARTE

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH VALERIO DEHÒ, KUNST MERAN MERANO ARTE

Vincent Honoré Can you tell us about the origin of Kunst Meran?
Valerio Dehò Kunst Meran Merano Arte was born from an association of art lovers in the mid-’90s. The idea was to give to the town of Merano a relevant role in the local contemporary art scene. In past times some very famous people, such as Kafka, Mahler, Ezra Pound (whose daughter still lives in the castle of Brunnenburg) spent their time here. Even Peggy Guggenheim has organized exhibitions in Merano in the ’50s. Since 2001 the venue is a house in the town center, which was restored and restructured to become a gallery and art museum.

4. Diane Blondeau / Vivien Roubaud / Thomas Teurlai, Jambes de bottes, 2014

2. Diane Blondeau / Vivien Roubaud / Thomas Teurlai, Jambes de bottes, 2014

V.H. What fundamentally makes this institution different from others in Italy and on an international level?
V.D. Merano Arte is a very special museum in Italy, I would say that it’s unique of its kind. We are neither a commercial art gallery nor a municipal venue, even if our role is similar to that of a public space.
Our funds come both from the private and public spheres, but it has to be noticed that the museum management stays free from any political influence. This is an exceptional status in Italy. In Germany you can find art spaces that you can compare with Merano Arte from this point of view.

9. Roberto Pugliese, Emergences acoustiques, 2014. Courtesy: Associazione Culturale Dello Scompigio, Vorno, Capannori (Italy) and Galerie Mario Mazzoli, Berlin

3. Roberto Pugliese, Emergences acoustiques, 2014

V.H. PIANO intends to create a network of art spaces working together, exchanging and interacting. Why did you decide to join the project and how are you participating in it?
V.D. We work following a strong aim which is bringing contemporary art to the attention of common people. The “elite side” of art is not what we really like to consider when we think about a new exhibition project, even if the quality of what we decide to exhibit has certainly be validated by the perspective of a scientific and curatorial analysis.
The project PIANO suits in a very proper way the mission of our museum. We also think that sharing projects with other international contemporary art spaces represents an important occasion of growth. A network is essential to make collaborations happen. Contemporary art is an instrument that Europe can use to connect different national realities and bring them really together. PIANO is a platform for exchanges and relations, that’s what we were looking for.

7. Sonia Leimer, Table ronde, 2014 /  Leander Schwazer, Independance, 2014

4. Sonia Leimer, Table ronde, 2014 / Leander Schwazer, Independance, 2014

V.H. The exhibition has been co-curated with Éric Mangion, director of Villa Arson in Nice. Why this collaboration?
V.D. The idea of working with Éric Mangion and Villa Arson was born one year before the birth of PIANO. Both museums work with contemporary art and aim to value young artists.
My proposal was to develop the format FROM & TO, created by Kunst Meran Merano Arte in 2007 (an exhibition based on the collaboration between artists of different generations). Mangion and I immediately agreed to give life to an exhibition with young selected artists. They have been invited to produce new works and to collaborate for a project. It took a lot of time to plan and coordinate every detail of the project. Young artists are very focused on what they want to express through their art. We pushed them to think about the idea of building an exhibition together on site. The collaboration with Éric Mangion and Villa Arson has been really successful in this sense.

V.H. What are the main responsibilities of a curator and of an art institution in Italy nowadays?
V.D. It’s always the same: be honest with the public and try to give life to significant projects that might show a cultural relevance through time. The temporary exhibitions have an important role in the history of contemporary art, this perspective was introduced during the ’60s and the ’70s thanks to the art critic and curator Harald Szeemann. He actually changed the roles within the art system by inventing the function of the “curator”, who is an intellectual, an art historian and a manager all at once.
In the period of economic uncertainty and confusion between cultural and market’s values we’re living in, the Italian art institutions have a main responsibility to cope with: continue to produce exhibitions and events, but also try to involve and support young worthy Italian artists.

Vincent Honoré Puoi raccontarci come è nato Kunst Meran?
Valerio Dehò Kunst Meran Merano Arte è nato da un’associazione di appassionati di arte alla metà degli anni Novanta. L’idea era quella di dare alla città di Merano un ruolo centrale nel lambito della scena artistica contemporanea locale. Nel passato molti personaggi celebri hanno vissuto a Merano, da Kafka, a Mahler, a Ezra Pound (la cui figlia vive ancora nel castello di Brunnenburg). Anche Peggy Guggenheim ha organizzato mostre a Merano nel corso degli anni Cinquanta. Dal 2001  Kunst Meran Merano Arte ha la sua sede in un edificio del centro città, che è stato restaurato e ristrutturato per diventare una galleria e un museo d’arte.

V.H. Cosa rende questa istituzione diversa da altre in Italia o all’estero?
V.D. Kunst Meran Merano Arte è un museo molto particolare nel contesto italiano, quasi unico nel suo genere. Non siamo né una galleria d’arte commerciale né uno spazio municipale, sebbene il nostro ruolo sia simile a quello di uno spazio pubblico. I nostri fondi provengono sia dalla sfera privata sia da quella pubblica, ma va sottolineato che la gestione del museo è indipendente da ogni influenza politica. Si tratta di una condizione eccezionale in Italia. In Germania esistono spazi comparabili a Merano Arte da questo punto di vista.

V.H. PIANO mira a creare una rete di spazi espositivi che lavorano insieme, attraverso forme di scambio e interazione. Perché avete deciso di aderire al progetto e come si realizza la vostra partecipazione?
V.D. Lavoriamo seguendo l’obiettivo fondamentale di portare l’arte contemporanea all’attenzione della gente comune. L’aspetto elitario dell’arte non ci interessa quando concepiamo un progetto espositivo, per quanto la qualità di ciò che decidiamo di esporre sia sempre avvalorata dalla prospettiva di un’attento studio scientifico e curatoriale.
Il progetto PIANO corrisponde perfettamente alla mission del nostro museo. Pensiamo inoltre che condividere progetti con altri spazi internazionali dediti all’arte contemporanea rappresenti un’importante occasione di crescita. La presenza di un networl è fondamentale perché le collaborazioni abbiano luogo. L’arte contemporanea può essere usata dall’Europa per mettere in relazione le diverse realtà nazionali e unirle davvero. PIANO è una piattaforma di scambi e relazioni, è ciò che stavamo cercando.

V.H. La mostra è co-curata con Éric Mangion, direttore di Villa Arson a Nizza. Perché questa collaborazione?
V.D. L’idea di lavorare con Éric Mangion e Villa Arson è nata un anno prima la nascita di PIANO. Entrambi i musei lavorano con l’arte contemporanea e mirano a valorizzare il lavoro dei giovani artisti.
La mia proposta è stata quella di sviluppare il format FROM & TO, creato da Kunst Meran Merano Arte nel 2007 (una mostra basata sulla collaborazione tra artisti di diverse generazioni). Mangion e io abbiamo immediatamente concordato di dare vita a una mostra con giovani artisti selezionati, che sono stati invitati a produrre opere inedite e a collaborare tra loro per un progetto nuovo. L’organizzazione e il coordinamento di ogni dettaglio del progetto hanno richiesto molto tempo. I giovani artisti sono molto concentrati su ciò che vogliono esprimere attraverso il loro lavoro. Li abbiamo stimolati a riflettere sull’idea della costruzione di una mostra collettiva site-specific. La collaborazione con Éric Mangion e Villa Arson è stata un grande successo in questo senso.

V.H. Quali sono le principali responsabilità di un curatore di un’istituzione artistica in Italia oggi
V.D. Sempre le stesse: essere onesto con il pubblico e cercare di produrre progetti dotati di una rilevanza culturale che resista nel tempo. Le mostre temporanee hanno un ruolo importante nella storia dell’arte contemporanea: questa prospettiva p stata introdotta negli anni Sessanta e Settanta grazie al critico d’arte e curatore Harald Szeemann, che trasformò i ruoli del sistema dell’arte inventando la funzione del curatore, allo stesso tempo intellettuale, storico dell’arte e manager.
Nel periodo di incertezza economica e confusione tra valori culturali e di mercato in cui viviamo, le istituzioni artistiche in Italia hanno una fondamentale responsabilità con cui fare i conti: continuare a produrre mostre ed eventi, ma anche cercare di coinvolgere e sostenere giovani artisti italiani di talento.

Images:
1. Quentin Derouet, Sans titre, 2014
2. Diane Blondeau / Vivien Roubaud / Thomas Teurlai, Jambes de bottes, 2014. Metal, mixed media, sound installation, 543 X 143 x 87 cm
3. Roberto Pugliese, Emergences acoustiques, 2014, environmental sound installation. Courtesy Associazione Culturale Dello Scompigio, Vorno, Capannori (Italy) and Galerie Mario Mazzoli, Berlin
4. Sonia Leimer, Table ronde, 2014, mixed media, 320 x 220 cm / Leander Schwarzer, Independance, 2014, ink-jet print on canvas, 264 x 320 cm
Photos: Villa Arson / Jean Brasille

Project: From & To
Protagonist: Valerio Dehò

close
en

Jochen Lempert

Jochen Lempert, The Skins of Alca Impennis, 1995-2013

1. Jochen Lempert, The Skins of Alca Impennis, 1995-2013

Born 1958, Moers, Germany
Lives and works in Hamburg, Germany
Lempert studied Biology at the Friedrich-Wilhelms University in Bonn as well as Film and Film-Performance with the group Schlezdahim. Hi work has been internationally exhibited in both institutional and commercial venues. He recently had solo exhibitions at the Hamburger Kunsthalle in Hamburg (2013), Midway Contemporary in Minneapolis (2012), and at the Museum Ludwig in Cologne (2010), among others. He was granted the Edwin-Scharff Prize for the City of Hamburg in 2006 and the Ars Viva Prize for Photography in 1996-1997.

2. Jochen Lempert, Martha, 2005

2. Jochen Lempert, Martha, 2005

Images:
1. Jochen Lempert, The Skins of Alca Impennis, 1995-2013, 34 b/w photographs, silver gelatin prints, 18 x 24 cm each. Ed. 5. Courtesy ProjecteSD, Barcelona
2. Jochen Lempert, Martha, 2005, silver gelatin print; 30 x 28 cm. Photo: Giorgio Benni

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it

CAPC – PHILIPPE THOMAS

Born 1951, Nice, France
† 1994, Paris, France

In December 1987, the French artist Philippe Thomas founded the agency readymades belong to everyone® in New York. One year later, he opened another in France, Les Ready Made appartiennent à tout le monde®. The idea sprang from a reflection on the limits of modern art history and the functioning of the market. Thomas’s work examines and redefines the functions and characteristics of the museum institution, the art object, the public, and the creator of the work. The agency enabled anyone to become an artist: just buy a work and you can be credited as its creator. In this way, when the Bordeaux museum of contemporary art, the CAPC, purchased Thomas’s work La Collection de Mr Georges Venzano, it automatically became the creator of the work, as the caption reads. The piece was bought in 1990 on the occasion of the exhibition Feux Pâles. The CAPC commissioned Thomas’s agency to produce and curate the piece and write the texts for the catalogue. La Collection de Mr Georges Venzano consists of an enormous wall-mounted photograph of images of museum façades that Mr. Venzano, an imaginary character invented by Philippe Thomas, has photographed and reviewed, building up a collection. Over 40 years, the collector systematically classified French museums, yet without applying any kind of aesthetic criteria or revealing anything about the collections inside them.

Nato a Nizza, Francia, nel 1951
† 1994, Parigi, Francia

Nel dicembre del 1987 l’artista francese Philippe Thomas fonda a New York l’agenzia readymades belong to everyone® (I ready-made appartengono a tutti). Un anno dopo, ne apre una omonima anche in Francia (Les Ready Made appartiennent à tout le monde®). Questa decisione è il frutto di una riflessione approfondita sui limiti della storia dell’arte moderna e dei meccanismi del mercato. Il lavoro di Thomas analizza e ridefinisce le funzioni e le caratteristiche dell’istituzione museale, dell’oggetto artistico, del pubblico e dello stesso autore dell’opera. L’agenzia, infatti, propone a chiunque di diventare artista: è sufficiente acquistare un’opera, per potersene attribuire la paternità. In tal modo, il museo d’arte contemporanea di Bordeaux, il CAPC, comprando l’opera di Philippe Thomas La Collection de Mr Georges Venzano (La collezione di Mr Georges Venzano), ne è divenuto automaticamente l’autore, come si legge nella didascalia del lavoro. L’opera è stata acquistata nel 1990 in occasione della mostra Feux Pâles. L’agenzia di Thomas, su invito del CAPC, fungeva da realizzatore, curatore e autore dei testi del catalogo. La Collection de Mr Georges Venzano consiste in una enorme fotografia a parete di immagini di facciate di musei, che Mr Venzano, personaggio di fantasia inventato da Philippe Thomas, ha fotografato e recensito, creando così una collezione. In quarant’anni di lavoro, il collezionista ha classificato i musei francesi in maniera sistematica, senza utilizzare alcun criterio estetico e senza far trasparire nulla delle collezioni conservate in ciascuna istituzione.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en

ANDREA VILIANI

Since 2013 Andrea Viliani is the director of the Fondazione Donnaregina per le arti contemporanee – Madre, Naples, where he has been responsible for shows of Thomas Bayrle, Mario Garcia Torres/Alighiero Boetti, Giulia Piscitelli, Vettor Pisani, and Ettore Spalletti. He previously worked from 2009 to 2012 as Director of Fondazione Galleria Civica – Centro di Ricerca sulla Contemporaneità in Trento, where he curated and edited projects by Nedko Solakov, Rosa Barba, Clemens von Wedemeyer, Gustav Metzger, Melvin Moti, Robert Kuśmirowski, The Otolith Group, Dora García, Tris Vonna-Michell, and Alberto Garutti. In 2012 Andrea Viliani was a member of the Core Agents Group of dOCUMENTA(13) and he co-curated the related project in Kabul and Bamiyan (Afghanistan). From 2005 to 2009, Viliani was curator at the MAMbo – Museo d’Arte Moderna di Bologna, where he presented an exhibition program focused on the contemporary legacy of 1960s/1970s institutional critique (including exhibitions by Giovanni Anselmo, Christopher Williams, Jeroen de Rijke-Willem de Rooij, Ryan Gander, Markus Schinwald, Adam Chodzko, Bojan Sarcevic, Natascha Sadr Haghighian, Trisha Donnelly, Guyton\Walker and Seth Price). Among the 60 “players” of the 2007 Biennale de Lyon, he is a frequent contributor to FROG, Mousse, Kaleidoscope and Flash Art.

Partner: MADRE
Focus: Prepared Piano – Model for a New Institutionalism

close
en

Prepared Piano – Model for a new Institutionalism

Round table discussion moderated by Pierre Bal-Blanc
organized in the frame of PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art – France-Italie 2014-2015

Villa Medici
Viale Trinità dei Monti, 1 – 00187 Roma
Friday May 9, 2014
10 – 12 am

The panel discussion Prepared Piano: Model for a New Institutionalism presents artists, curators, as well as the managers of places where various projects have been produced over the past few years in Europe. These projects have in common that they make novel use of cultural exchange instruments, while giving their activities both a local and international scope.

Various case studies will be presented during this panel discussion to bring back into play notions of crossdisciplinarity (Théâtre des expositions at Villa Medici), process (Per_formare una collezione at the MADRE in Naples), and plasticity of relations (Laboratoire Espace Cerveau at the IAC in Villeurbanne). The discussions as a whole will echo the desire to found “a new institutionalism”, which has developed over the past few years through initiatives coming from both artists and curators. The desire to reconfigure the institution based on the model of a community centre, laboratory, open school, and other places that are not mainly governed by market laws, is linked with the creative momentum that led to Prepared Piano. The proposed discussion aims to demonstrate that PIANO, as well as Salon Light, dedicated to independent publishing, and Vdrome, a distribution network for artist films, are today all tangible initiatives.

Pierre Bal-Blanc is the director of the CAC Brétigny. He is also an independent curator and the vice-president of the d.c.a / French association for the development of centres d’art. Since 2003, in resonance with the social thought of Charles Fourrier, he has been developing the “Phalanstère Project” within a centre d’art. This is a series of specific offerings that critically rework the principles of artwork accumulation.
His exhibition series “Living Currency” and “Draft Score for an Exhibition” negotiate the historical and contemporary analysis of the body and of strategies linked to performance in the visual arts. “The Death of the Audience “ and “Reversibility” are reflections on the consequences that the materiality of art objects has on the configuration of art-world protagonists, the role and form of cultural institutions today.

Interdisciplinary stage
Theater of Exhibitions / Villa Medici, Rome / presentation by Eric de Chassey

Conceived by the director Éric de Chassey and organised by the French Academy in Rome – Villa Medici every year since 2010, the Theatre of Exhibitions has been devised as a moment of encounter between the fellows in residence and the public, as well as one of dialogue and confrontation among the artists and scholars in residence. The different spaces of Villa Medici become ephemeral stages for installations, performances, projections, readings. The concept of openness, a predisposition to dialogue and confrontation among different disciplines is the characteristic that unites the projects, which are presented. The Theatre of Exhibitions has been designed as a “multiform laboratory” which displays the diversity of artistic practices and research, thus confirming the centrality of the French Academy in Rome in contemporary creation.

Éric de Chassey is the Director of the French Academy in Rome – Villa Medici since 2009. He is also Professor of Contemporary Art History at the École Normale Supérieure in Lyon. Since the beginning, his scientific activities have focused on the US and abstract art. He has published books and essays on XXth and XXIst century art. He has also curated numerous exhibitions, accompanied by publications such as Soulages XXIth century (Rome, Villa Medici, 2013) or Simon Hantaï (Rome, Villa Medici, 2014).

Thought’s spatialization
Space Brain Laboratory / IAC, Villeurbanne / presentation by Nathalie Ergino and Ann Veronica Janssens

Initiated in 2009 by the artist Ann Veronica Janssens and Nathalie Ergino, director of the Institut d’art contemporain, the project aims at starting from experiments in art to explore practical and theoretical research linking space and the brain. This interdisciplinary laboratory brings together the reflections and experiments of artists and scientists and also philosophers, anthropologists, art historians and theoreticians, thus providing as much coverage by neuroscience, physics and astrophysics as by hypnosis, telepathy and shamanism.

Since January, 2006, Nathalie Ergino is the director of the Institut d‘art contemporain. Former director of the School / FRAC Champagne-Ardenne (1994-2000), and of the museum of contemporary art [mac] of Marseille (2001-2005), she has curated big monographic exhibitions (Jimmie Durham, Rodney Graham, Raymond Hains, Ann Veronica Janssens, Carsten Höller) as well as collective exhibitions (Maisons-Cerveaux, Subréel).

Born in 1956 in Folkestone (UK), Ann Veronica Janssens lives and works in Brussels (BE). Her work has been the subject of numerous solo exhibitions. Since 1985, she has also participated in important group exhibitions, as well as various international biennials and in 1999 Venice where she represented Belgium with Michel François. She regularly collaborates with choreographers (Drouler Pierre and Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker). Her work has been presented recently within the exhibition Passion Fruit at the Centre Pompidou, Paris and within Dynamo, A century of light in art, 1913 – 2013 at the Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais.

Organizing the perceptible
Vdrome / Mousse, Milano / presentation by Enrico Boccioletti

Vdrome is an online platform that offers regular, high quality screenings of films and videos directed by visual artists and filmmakers, whose production lies in-between contemporary art and cinema. Each screening is presented during a limited period, as in a movie theatre. Vdrome makes available a program of exceptional artists’ films and videos that are selected due to their importance, quality and innovative strength, many of which are only shown in the context of film festivals, exhibitions or specific surveys, being therefore of very limited access. Vdrome is an initiative conceived and promoted by Mousse, curated by Edoardo Bonaspetti, Jens Hoffmann, Andrea Lissoni and Filipa Ramos, and maintained by Enrico Boccioletti.

Enrico Boccioletti is an artist and musician active under multiple names – Death in Plains, 4SICSX, spcnvdr and Enrico B – in the fields of postconceptual, new vernacular, performance and sound, interested into incompleteness and circularity, duplication and accumulation, waste, layering, forgery, faux-real. He also works for Mousse Magazine and Vdrome.

Incarnation of the collection
Per_formare una collezione / Madre, Naples / presentation by Andrea Viliani and Alessandro Rabottini

Per_forming a collection is an on-going project designed to develop the formation of the Museo MADRE’s permanent collection in Naples. It focuses on artists of different generations whose works have been conceived as physical and mental instruments that bring together thought and action in every possible media, linking visual arts to theatre and literature. The project aims to shape a collection that is articulated over time, combining archival research with commissions for new works taking into account the role of the museum as a place of memory and preservation as well as a continuing research and production laboratory. All the works presented have a relation with the city and its history: works conceived or exhibited here, from artist who happened to exhibit in Naples or works belonging to private or public local collections.

Since 2013 Andrea Viliani is the director of the Fondazione Donnaregina per le arti contemporanee – Madre, Napoli. He previously worked from 2009 to 2012 as Director of Fondazione Galleria Civica – Centro di Ricerca sulla Contemporaneità in Trento. In 2012 he was a member of the Core Agents Group of dOCUMENTA(13) and he co-curated the related position in Kabul and Bamiyan (Afghanistan). From 2005 to 2009, Viliani was curator at the MAMbo – Museo d’Arte Moderna di Bologna. Among the 60 “players” of the 2007 Biennale de Lyon, he is a frequent contributor to FROG, Mousse, Kaleidoscope and Flash Art.

Alessandro Rabottini is an art critic and curator based in London. He is Curator at Large at the Madre Museum in Naples (where he recently curated a mid-career retrospective of Padraig Timoney and the survey show of Ettore Spalletti) and served as guest curator for several international institutions. In his capacity of Curator at Large at the GAMeC in Bergamo he curated solo exhibitions of artists such as Robert Overby, Mircea Cantor, Latifa Echakhch, Victor Man, Pratchaya Phinthong, Pietro Roccasalva, Tim Rollins & K.O.S, Sterling Ruby, Tris Vonna-Michell and Jordan Wolfson.

Praising uncertainty
Salon light / cneai =, Chatou / presentation by Sylvie Boulanger

Founded in 2004 by Cneai, Salon Light became over a few years an unmissable rendez-vous for micro-publishers and artist’s publication in Paris. After exporting the concept at Vermelho gallery in Sao Paulo and the great success of Salon Light 9 at Palais de Tokyo in 2012, Salon Light keeps uniting a moving scene of artists, authors, independent publishers or composers. Books, magazines, objects, LP’s, catalogues or artist’s book, the publications are often limited editions, sometimes impossible to find in Paris, and are breaking new grounds while creating new networks in the art and publishing worlds. Performances and meetings with professionals and artists are also a key part of the event. Free for the publishers and the public, it’s accessible to all and offers visibility to a still somehow unknown field.

Sylvie Boulanger is founder and curator of Salon Light since its creation in 2004. She directs Cneai since 1997. She curated over a hundred exhibitions, published more than seventy books (artist’s books, journals, catalogues) and produced as few documentaries. She is a member of several research labs, she also contributes to academic reviews like Multitudes and lectures in art schools and universities. She was the founder of the production agency APC (Art Public Contemporain) that she directed for ten years (1990-1997) after occupying the position of associate director «exhibition and communication» within the Ministry of Culture visual arts delegation (1987-1990).

The round table discussion will be followed by a
Concert for Prepared Piano by Laurent Durupt, composer and fellow at the Villa Medici

More information at
www.pianoproject.org
info@pianoproject.org

Round table discussion organized in the frame of PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art, France-Italie 2014-2015

PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art, France–Italy 2014-2015, initiated by d.c.a / French association for the development of centres d’art, in partnership with the Institut français in Italy, the French Embassy in Italy and the Institut français, with the support of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development, the French Ministry of Culture and Communication and Fondazione Nuovi Mecenati.

close
en - it - fr

Lise Lacombe and Jean-Baptiste Alazard

Lise Lacombe, from the series La Tierce des Paumés, 2012

Lise Lacombe, from the series La Tierce des Paumés, 2012

Lise Lacombe grew up in Aveyron (south-west France). During her teenage years, she armed herself with an Olympus 0M30 that would ground her in stock photography. She left for the city Toulouse, where she graduated form art school and got a diploma in Photography-Photo manipulation from the Gobelins School in Paris. During these formative two years, she personified her photographic practice. Using first a Yashika Mat, then a Hasselblad, she stuck to the square format that characterizes her work and turned to photo-reporting. In her professional work, she lived among journalists; the disgust she felt towards the confrontation between the so called “media” and photography moved her towards a more independent and creative work, as an independent reporter.
Alone, she left for various countries: Kosovo, Israel, Palestinian territories, Ethiopia… and Naves, in Aveyron. There, she sharpen her tools, creating series that testify to social events while searching for a deeper, more subjective expression.

Jean-Baptiste Alazard was born in Aveyron to a family of farmers. He grew up in Aubrac and left for Toulouse in 2003 to do a technical diploma in broadcast at Arènes, then Paris to enter the Fémis in 2006 and then became an editor. At the same time, he personalized his practice as a cinematographer through the creation of the documentary Le Cinquième Quartier, and the feature length fiction Moussem Le Morts, selected in the international competition at the Festival de Belfort, 2010. The same year, he began working on trans-media works with Mittlewerk Express. In 2011, he returned to the south of France to direct La Tierce des Paumés, a collaboration with photographer Lise Lacombe. His movie, that comes as a result of this project, La Buissonière was awarded the Prix Georges de Beauregard.

Project: Piano – alto!

 

Lise Lacombe (1985) è nata ed è cresciuta nell’Aveyron (sud ovest della Francia). Dopo la laurea in Arti Visive a Tolosa, ottiene il diploma di Fotografia e Editing dell’Immagine all’École des Gobelins di Parigi. Nel corso di questi due anni, personalizza la sua pratica fotografica. Con una Yashika Mat e poi una Hasselblad, si dedica al formato quadrato, caratteristico del suo lavoro, e si orienta al reportage. La frequentazione dell’ambiente giornalistico la porta verso un lavoro più indipendente e creativo, secondo il registro del reportage d’autore. Affina il suo sguardo grazie ai viaggi, realizzando delle serie che si propongono come testimonianza dei fatti della società ma con uno sguardo personale. La fotografia è uno strumento personale assoluto che dà vita alle sue esperienze.

Jean-Baptiste Alazard, dopo aver ottenuto un diploma di audiovisivo a Tolosa, entra alla Fémis nel 2006 e diventa montatore. In parallelo, sviluppa la sua attività di cineasta attraverso il documentario con Le Cinquième Quartier o il lungometraggio di fiction con Moussem Les Morts, selezionato al Festival di Belfort 2010 nella competizione internazionale. Lo stesso anno, allarga il suo lavoro alle opere trans-media con Mittelwerk Express. Nel 2011, fa ritorno nel sud della Francia per realizzare La Tierce des Paumés, in collaborazione con la fotografa Lise Lacombe. Il film La Buissonière, frutto di questa collaborazione, ottiene il premio Georges de Beauregard.

 

Née en 1985, Lise Lacombe a grandi en Aveyron. Après une licence d’Arts-Plastiques à Toulouse, elle s’oriente vers le reportage. La fréquentation du milieu journalistique la déporte vers un travail plus indépendant et créatif dans le registre de la photographie d’auteur. Elle aiguise son regard en voyageant, créant des séries qui témoignent de faits de société tout en recherchant l’expression profonde du regard subjectif. La photographie est un outil personnel absolu qui donne vie à ses propres expériences.

Né en 1985, Jean-Baptiste Alazard vit en Aveyron. Après l’obtention de son BTS Audiovisuel à Toulouse, il entre à La Fémis en 2006 et devient monteur. Parallèlement, il développe sa pratique de cinéaste à travers le documentaire avec Le Cinquième Quartier ou le long-métrage de fiction avec Moussem Les Morts, sélectionné au Festival de Belfort 2010 en compétition internationale. La même année, il étend son travail aux œuvres transmédias avec Mittelwerk Express. En 2011, il rentre dans le sud de la France pour réaliser La Tierce des Paumés, en collaboration avec la photographe Lise Lacombe. Son film issu de ce projet La Buissonière remporte le prix Georges de Beauregard.

Image:
Lise Lacombe, from the series La Tierce des Paumés, 2012. Courtesy of the artist

close
en - it - fr

MARCEL BROODTHAERS

Marcel Broodthaers, Soleil Politique, 1972

Marcel Broodthaers, Soleil Politique, 1972

Born 1924, Brussels, Belgium
† 1976, Cologne, Germany

Gravitating from the field of literature to the field of art without relinquishing the former’s poetic dimension, Marcel Broodthaers established an important and unique body of work. Having studied chemistry, run a bookshop, written poetry, worked as a photo-journalist and an art critic, and made films, the artist named himself director of his own museum, the Musée d’Art Moderne, Département des Aigles (Museum of Modern Art, Department of Eagles), a fictional entity that transformed both the exhibition and the institution into an art form. An admirer of Magritte and Mallarmé, Broodthaers used language as a visual tool in the context of a critical and ironic analysis of art’s production and reception.
For the work Soleil politique (Political Sun), from which the exhibition borrows its title, Broodthaers took a black-and-white illustration from an encyclopedia depicting the comparative scale of the planets in the solar system. The artist altered the largest circle containing the word “sun” by adding the word “political.” He then completed the work: with a single black dab of his pen he banished the tiny circle representing Earth into the illustration’s dark background. Broodthaers recast the diagram’s “enlightened” universal encyclopedism in favor of a subjective insight, revealing the absolutism and hegemony of all forms of social organization. The work also reveals the ideological role of the museum, oscillating between enlightenment and obscurantism.

Nato a Bruxelles, Belgio, nel 1924
† 1976, Colonia, Germania

Passato dalla letteratura all’arte senza sacrificare una dimensione politica, Marcel Broodthaers ha lasciato un abbondante e originale insieme di opere. Dopo gli studi in chimica, l’attività imprenditoriale come libraio, la scrittura, la fotografia di reportage, la regia di film e la critica d’arte, l’artista ha diretto il proprio museo, il Musée d’Art Moderne Département des Aigles, una struttura affabulatrice che trasforma l’esposizione e l’istituzione in forme artistiche. Grande ammiratore di Magritte e di Mallarmé, Broodthaers utilizza il linguaggio come strumento visivo, nel quadro di un’analisi ironica e critica dei regimi di produzione e ricezione dell’arte.
In Soleil politique (Sole politico), l’opera che dà il titolo alla mostra, Broodthaers si serve di un’immagine del sole tratta da una tavola enciclopedica, che illustra le dimensioni dell’astro rispetto a quelle dei pianeti del sistema solare. L’artista interviene sul grande cerchio che contiene la dicitura “Sole”, aggiungendovi l’aggettivo “politico”. Infine, fa scomparire nel fondo oscuro della pagina il minuscolo cerchio che rappresenta la Terra, sostituendolo con una macchiolina d’inchiostro nero. L’enciclopedismo universalista di questo diagramma delle “luci” devia così verso una lucidità soggettiva, che anela all’assolutismo e all’egemonia in ogni società organizzata. Allo stesso tempo, oscillando tra illuminismo e oscurantismo, vi si trova esposto il ruolo ideologico del museo.

Né à Bruxelles, Belgique, en 1924
† 1976, Cologne, Allemagne

Passant du champ littéraire à celui de l’art sans rien sacrifier de la dimension poétique, Marcel Broodthaers a laissé un corpus d’œuvres à la fois important et singulier. Après des études de chimie, un commerce de librairie, l’écriture, la photographie de reportage, la réalisation de films, la critique d’art, l’artiste se constitue directeur de son propre musée, le Musée d’Art Moderne Département des Aigles, structure affabulatrice qui transforme l’exposition et l’institution en formes artistiques. Admirateur de Magritte et Mallarmé, il se sert du langage comme outil visuel, dans le cadre d’une analyse ironique et critique des régimes de production et réception de l’art.
Pour Soleil politique, œuvre qui donne son titre à l’exposition, Broodthaers utilise une image du soleil tirée d’une planche encyclopédique qui démontre sa taille en comparaison avec les planètes du système solaire. L’artiste intervient sur le grand cercle contentant la mention « Soleil » en y ajoutant le mot « politique ». Vient ensuite le point final : avec sa plume, il fait disparaitre dans le fond obscur de la page le cercle minuscule représentant la Terre, en y apposant une pointe d’encre noire. L’encyclopédisme universaliste de ce diagramme des « lumières » se trouve ainsi détourné au profit d’une lucidité subjective, pointant l’absolutisme et l’hégémonie dans toute organisation sociétale. Le rôle idéologique du musée, oscillant entre éclaircissement et obscurantisme, s’y trouve également exposé.

Image:
Marcel Broodthaers, Soleil Politique, 1972, print and collage on paper and ink, 25,5 x 35,5 cm. Copyright Estate Marcel Broodthaers

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

SYLVIE BOULANGER

 

sylvie_boulanger-(1)

Sylvie Boulanger is founder and curator of Salon Light since its creation in 2004.
She has directed Cneai since 1997. She curated over a hundred exhibitions, published more than seventy books (artist’s books, journals, catalogues) and produced several documentaries. She is a member of several research labs, she also contributes to academic reviews like Multitudes and she lectures in art schools and universities. She was the founder of the production agency APC (Art Public Contemporain) that she directed for ten years (1990-1997) after occupying the position of associate director “exhibition and communication” within the Ministry of Culture visual arts delegation (1987-1990).

Project: Ephemera
Space: Cneai =
Partner: Salon light
Focus: Prepared Piano – Model for a New Institutionalism

 

Dirige il Cneai dal 1997. Ha curato un centinaio di mostre, pubblicato più di settanta opere (tra libri d’artista, cataloghi, riviste) e diretto alcuni documentari. È ricercatrice associata in diversi laboratori di ricerca, collabora con varie riviste scientifiche, come la rivista Multitudes, e tiene conferenze nelle Accademie di Belle Arti e nelle Università. Ha fondato l’agenzia di produzione APC (Art Public Contemporain) che ha diretto per dieci anni (1990-1997), dopo essere stata direttrice aggiunta alla delegazione delle arti plastiche del Ministero della Cultura francese.

 

Sylvie Boulanger dirige le Cneai depuis 1997. Elle a été commissaire d’une centaine d’expositions, a publié plus de 70 ouvrages (livres d’artistes, revues, catalogues) et produit quelques documentaires. Elle est chercheur associée de plusieurs laboratoires de recherche, contribue à des revues scientifiques comme la revue Multitudes, et donne des conférences dans des écoles d’art et des universités. Elle a fondé l’agence de production APC (Art Public Contemporain) qu’elle a dirigé pendant dix ans (1990-1997), après avoir été directrice adjointe « exposition et communication » à la délégation aux arts plastiques du ministère de la Culture (1987-1990).

close
en - it - fr

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH SYLVIE BOULANGER, CNEAI =, CHATOU

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH SYLVIE BOULANGER, CNEAI =, CHATOU

Vincent Honoré When was the Cneai formed and what triggered its creation?
Sylvie Boulanger The history of the place prepared the art centre to adopt the question of art as media. Indeed, it was there that the Fauve artists Maurice de Valminck and André Derain practised the craft of engraving from 1905 for the publication of a young Guillaume Apollinaire’s L’Enchanteur pourrissant (The Rotting Magician) by Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler. When the art centre was created in 1997, the question was whether to make it a place for engraving, but three years of research and production with thirty or so artists including Claude Closky, Robert Morris and Peter Downsbrough, led us to consider engraving as an original form of publication. Historically desktop publishing originated in Dada and Russian Constructivism and developed in the ’60s. A new generation of curators has recently formed, considering space made public as public space and the act of publishing as an artistic act. They adjust to current artistic crises: fluidity, network, complexity of sources and exchanges, sharing of authority, collaborative gestures, nomadic artistic practices, interwoven with creation, quotes and interpretation.
Alongside the exhibition, production and publishing programme, we have therefore created tools at the service of this scene: in 1997 exhibition spaces, in 2000 FMRA research funds (ephemera), in 2007 the Floating House – designed by Erwan and Ronan Bouroullec – which acts as residence, lastly in 2011 the new space designed by Philippe Bona and Elisabeth Lemercier. Other ideas are being finalised …

Cneai’s staircase by Bona-Lemercier

Cneai’s staircase by Bona-Lemercier

V.H. The projects seem quite diverse reading the venue’s statement of intent. How can the first intent, that is its very essence be summed up?
S.B. The subject is redefined every day according to artistic needs: a parallel history of art generated by distribution matters that at once establish distribution as an act of criticism. The definition of artistic activity, wrote Marcel Broodthaers with a certain provocation, ‘is found, above all, in the field of distribution.’
Editorial practice is a field of research that we are passionate about, as it compromises the act of distribution as a critical act and collaborative practice. And if publishing etymologically means to make public, it is recognised that the transmission, distribution and reception of art are three fundamental indices of the work of the Cneai.
It is also a place that we try to keep free from any institutional project, that is open to projects by art protagonists who invent a new function for a decompartmentalised art scene, emancipated from academic categories and therefore extended to sound, writing and performance… as well as collaborative fields.

V.H. The Cneai is responsible for a collection comprising 11,000 pieces. How does the collection initiate the programme, or even the structure of the site? Pontus Hultén declared: ‘A collection isn’t a shelter into which to retreat. It’s a source of energy for the curator as much as for the visitor.’ What about the Cneai collection?
S.B. This quote is new to me and I love it. The energy between the collection and the programme is prolific. The value of an artist’s publication lies in action – reading, listening, exhibition… – so it is both an account but also a tool.
That is exactly why we have had the Cneai redeveloped and expanded by Elisabeth Lemercier and Philippe Bona to enable this exchange of energy between the collection and the programme. In order to be able to offer a new programme model in the form of scenarios from several points of view where the exhibition registers and the presentation of the collections blend with the presentation of an isolated work or a publication.
We use pieces from the collection for their research potential, and we increase the collection according to the needs of the artists and guest curators. This double movement gives meaning to the establishment of the fund, likewise the programme.

Cneai’s Maison Flottante

Cneai’s Maison Flottante

V.H. Since the end of the ’90sthearchitecture of museums and art centres, has become the subject of debates about the mission of museums and art centres: there has been a change, as analysed by Charlotte Klocek, from the ‘educated citizen’ (19th century) to the ‘informed consumer’ (20th century). The spectacular architecture of Gehry, Hadid, Nouvel, and Herzog & de Meuron are visible signs of it. How do you situate the Floating House in this context?
S.B. Surprisingly this architecture by the Bouroullec brothers was very badly received by certain local cultural players! It seems that in small towns journalists, curators and other cultural producers, who are neither educated citizens nor informed consumers, confront us. The Floating House installation traumatised all those who were living on their island, because of their nostalgic for their status as curators from the time of the impressionists.
The art centre and the Floating House are located sufficiently far from the town, from work, but relatively close to housing areas, a little isolated in nature, in the middle of a wooded island, between the two banks of the Seine and near to a park, with walkways and stopping places to eat, picnic and play. The location gives a feeling of privacy and vacuity, a condition necessary for encountering art… The Floating House is both an extremely simple and intuitive to use residential property and an object for contemplation.

V.H. Charles Esche described his ideal museum as fundamentally vague: both, simultaneously, and integrally, a community centre, laboratory, institute and a gallery. It is a place where production is not necessarily ‘productive’ and a place under constant reconfiguration; a form open to incomplete architecture. How did you structure the curatorial approach to the place, to the institution?
S.B. The art centre is in fact for me a place ‘void of project,’ whose artistic project is by definition in a state of perpetual movement triggered by the artists and players themselves. Consequently it is more about creating a context than a place or a programme.
The Cneai therefore proposes a new dynamic model:
- collaborative: artists, curators, editors are invited to share the artistic programme. Currently, Christophe Lemaitre has been invited to share the art direction, for Yona Friedman it is a forum for experimentation, for three years Jef Geys has been an important partner to test the levels of values in art;
- cooperative: the projects are proposed to a network of fellows so that they can also be developed elsewhere and to others. We work on average with about a hundred partners every year;
- cultural: beyond the scope of art is acceptable as a source of work and as such been made visible in the programme: music, cinema, science etc;
- transmissible : each invitation leads to several forms of transmission, from exhibition to performance including publication and research residencies. Festivals and study days have replaced previews…

Cneai’s exhibition space

Cneai’s exhibition space

V.H. What is the role of a contemporary art centre director in 2014?
S.B. To resolve a multitude of paradoxical equations:
- to create a context for creation and research in a venue destined for a wide audience and therefore to have the power to believe in humans;
- to reconcile the often contradictory objectives of the artists and figures in the art scene with those of the financial partners and to be a mediator between them;
- to produce personal research whilst remaining devoted to a team and a programme;
- to enrol the place in a synthetic vision between the history of art, current events and movements taking place;
- and above all, to take sides between figures who seek to gain financially or through the media – and those for whom the pleasure remains in spite of it all, the transmission of the artistic experience.
The M/M (Paris) aptly named the role of art centre director when, at the end of their exhibition at the Cneai, I was treated like a Swiss Army knife… Finally, it means to continually entice first-hand experience at reinventing a place as a desirable space.

V.H. PIANO wishes to create a space for exchange and dialogue between Italian and French art venues. Why did you want to participate and what programme are you offering?
S.B. The first residency in the Floating House by Daniele Balit, Maria Alicata and Adrienne Drake, three Italian curators, fired up passionate discussions about the question of version. We have identified works from the collection that have been considered in reference to other older works, whether from the visual arts, musical, cinematic or any other domain. Now it is a question of inviting these artists to develop or activate their old projects (version 3) here and now, at the MACRO and at the Cneai, during two exhibitions that will take place in October 2014 in Rome and in autumn 2015 at the Cneai.
The project is largely research carried out within two archives, one Italian (1:1projects), the other French (FMRA collection).
Our project will attempt to provide concrete answers to questions about formal frontiers (objects, performances, images); about cultural borders (literary, musical, film, scientific, design…); about derived artistic processes (curatorial, editorial, collection and research); and about hybridization of the figures (artists, editors, curators, collectors, sellers or researchers).

 

Vincent Honoré Quand a été créé le Cneai et qu’est-ce qui a présidé à sa création ?
Sylvie Boulanger L’histoire du lieu prédisposait le centre d’art à se situer sur la question de l’art comme média. En effet, les peintres fauves Maurice de Valminck et André Derain y expérimentent dès 1905 la technique de la gravure pour l’édition de L’Enchanteur pourrissant du jeune Guillaume Apollinaire par Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler. Quand le centre d’art est créé en 1997, la question se pose d’en faire le lieu de la gravure, mais trois années de recherches et de production avec une trentaine d’artistes dont Claude Closky, Robert Morris ou Peter Downsbrough, nous amènent à considérer la gravure comme une forme de publication originale. Historiquement la pratique de la micro-édition prend sa source dans Dada et le Constructivisme russe et se développe dans les années 60. Une nouvelle génération de curateurs s’est constituée récemment, considérant l’espace publié comme un espace public et l’acte de publier comme un acte artistique. Ils s’ajustent aux urgences artistiques actuelles : fluidité, réseau, complexité des sources et des échanges, partage de l’autorité, actes collaboratifs, pratiques artistiques nomades, métissées de création, de citations et d’interprétation.
Aux côtés du programme d’exposition, de production et d’édition, nous avons donc créé les outils au service de cette scène : en 1997 les espaces d’expositions, en 2000 les fonds de recherche FMRA (éphéméras), en 2007 la Maison Flottante – dessinée par Erwan et Ronan Bouroullec – qui nous sert de résidence, enfin en 2011 les nouveaux espaces dessinés par Philippe Bona et Elisabeth Lemercier. D’autres idées sont en cours de définition…

V.H. En lisant la note d’intention du lieu, ses missions semblent assez diverses. Comment en résumer l’intention première, l’essence ?
S.B. Le sujet se redéfinit chaque jour avec les nécessités artistiques : une histoire de l’art parallèlegénérée par des questions de distribution qui instaurent d’emblée la diffusion comme acte critique. La définition de l’activité artistique, écrivait Marcel Broodthaers avec une certaine provocation, « se trouve, avant tout, dans le champ de la distribution ».
La pratique éditoriale est un champ de recherche qui nous passionne, car il met en jeu l’acte de diffusion comme acte critique et pratique collaborative. Et si publier signifie étymologiquement rendre public, on comprendra que la transmission, la diffusion et la réception de l’art sont trois indices fondamentaux de l’activité du Cneai.
C’est aussi un lieu que nous tentons de garder vide de projet institutionnel, c’est à dire ouvert au projet des acteurs de l’art qui inventent un nouveau fonctionnement pour une scène artistique décloisonnée, émancipée des catégories académiques et donc à la fois étendue aux domaines du son, de l’écrit, de la performance… et collaborative.

V.H. Le Cneai est responsable d’une collection de 11.000 pièces. Comment la collection informe le programme, voire la structure du lieu ? Pontus Hultén a pu déclarer : « A collection isn’t a shelter into which to retreat. It’s a source of energy for the curator as much as for the visitor ». Qu’en est-il de la collection au Cneai ?
S.B. Je ne connaissais pas cette citation, elle me ravit. Les liens d’énergie entre la collection et le programme sont prolifiques. Une publication d’artiste tient sa valeur de l’action – lecture, écoute, exposition… – dont elle est à la fois le témoignage mais aussi l’outil.
C’est précisément pour permettre cet échange d’énergie entre la collection et la programmation que nous avons fait agrandir et réaménager le Cneai par Elisabeth Lemercier et Philippe Bona. Afin de pouvoir proposer un nouveau modèle de programmation sous forme de scénarios en plusieurs points de vue où les registres de l’exposition et de la présentation des collections se conjuguent à la présentation d’une œuvre isolée ou d’une publication.
Nous utilisons les pièces de la collection pour leur potentiel de recherche, et nous augmentons la collection en fonction des besoins des artistes et curateurs invités. Ce double mouvement donne tout son sens à la constitution du fonds, comme au programme.

V.H. L’architecture des musées et des centres d’art, depuis la fin des années 90, est devenu l’objet de débats sur la mission des musées et des centres d’art : on est passé, comme l’a analysé Charlotte Klocek, du « citoyen éduqué » (XIXe siècle) au « consommateur informé » (XXe siècle). Les architectures spectaculaires de Gehry, Hadid, Nouvel, ou Herzog & de Meuron en sont les signes évidents. Comment situez-vous la Maison Flottante dans ce contexte ?
S.B. L’architecture des frères Bouroullec a étrangement été très mal accueillie par certains acteurs culturels locaux ! Il semble que nous soyons confrontés, dans les petites villes, à des journalistes, conservateurs et autres producteurs culturels qui ne soient ni citoyens éduqués, ni consommateurs informés. L’installation de la Maison Flottante a provoqué un traumatisme pour tous ceux qui vivaient sur leur île, par leur statut nostalgique de conservateurs du temps des impressionnistes.
Le centre d’art et la Maison Flottante sont situés suffisamment loin de la ville, du travail, mais relativement proche des quartiers d’habitations, plutôt isolé dans la nature, au milieu d’une île arborée, entre les deux berges de la Seine et à proximité d’un parc, avec des chemins de marche et des haltes pour se restaurer, pique-niquer ou jouer. La situation donne une sensation d’intimité et de vacuité, état nécessaire à la rencontre de l’art… La Maison Flottante est à la fois un objet d’habitation d’usage extrêmement simple et intuitif et un objet de contemplation.

V.H. Charles Esche a décrit son musée idéal comme étant fondamentalement incertain : à la fois, simultanément, et intégralement, centre communautaire, laboratoire, institut, galerie. Un lieu ou la production n’est pas obligatoirement « productive », un lieu en permanente reconfiguration, une forme ouverte à l’architecture incomplète. Comment avez-vous structuré l’approche curatoriale du lieu, de l’institution ?
S.B. Le centre d’art est en effet pour moi un lieu « vide de projet », dont le projet artistique est par définition dans un perpétuel mouvement déclenché par les artistes et les acteurs eux-mêmes. Par conséquent il s’agit plus de créer un contexte qu’un lieu ou un programme.
Le Cneai propose donc un nouveau modèle, de type dynamique :
- collaboratif : des artistes, curateurs, éditeurs sont invités à partager le programme artistique. Actuellement, Christophe Lemaitre est invité à partager la direction artistique, Yona Friedman en fait son lieu d’expérimentation, Jef Geys est un partenaire important pour expérimenter depuis trois ans les niveaux de valeurs dans l’art… ;
- coopératif : les projets sont proposés à un réseau de confrères pour qu’ils puissent se développer aussi ailleurs et à plusieurs. Nous travaillons en moyenne avec une centaine de partenaires tous les ans ;
- culturel : le hors-champs de l’art est assumé comme source de travail et à ce titre rendu visible dans les programmations : musique, cinéma, sciences… ;
- transmissible : chaque invitation donne lieu à plusieurs formes de transmission, de l’exposition à la performance en passant par l’édition ou la résidence de recherche. Les festivals et les journées d’études ont remplacé les vernissages…

V.H. Quel est le rôle d’un directeur de centre d’art contemporain en 2014 ?
S.B. Résoudre une multitude d’équations paradoxales :
- créer un contexte de création et de recherche dans un lieu destiné aux publics les plus larges et donc croire absolument en l’humain ;
- concilier les objectifs souvent contradictoires des artistes et acteurs de l’art avec ceux des partenaires financiers et donc être traducteur français/français ;
- produire une recherche personnelle tout en se consacrant à une équipe et un programme ;
- inscrire le lieu dans une vision synthétique entre l’histoire de l’art, l’actualité et les mouvements en train de se faire ;
- et surtout, choisir son camp entre les acteurs qui poursuivent le profit par l’art – financier ou médiatique – et ceux dont le plaisir reste en dépit de tout, la transmission de l’expérience artistique.
Les M/M(Paris) ont bien nommé le rôle d’un directeur de centre d’art quand, à l’issu de leur exposition au Cneai, ils m’ont traitée de couteau suisse… Finalement, il s’agit de tenter éternellement une expérience concrète de réinvention d’un lieu comme espace désirable.

V.H. PIANO veut créer un espace d’échange et de dialogue entre des lieux d’art italiens et français. Pourquoi avez-vous souhaité participer et quel programme proposez-vous ?
S.B. La première résidence sur la Maison Flottante de Daniele Balit, Maria Alicata et Adrienne Drake, les trois curateurs italiens, a généré des discussions passionnantes sur la question de la version. Nous avons identifié des œuvres de la collection qui avaient été pensées en références à d’autres œuvres plus anciennes, qu’elles soient issues du domaine plastique, musicale, cinématographique ou autre. Il est question maintenant d’inviter ces artistes à développer ou activer leurs anciens projets (version 3) ici et maintenant, au MACRO et au Cneai, lors de deux expositions qui auront lieu en octobre 2014 à Rome et à l’automne 2015 au Cneai.
Le projet se résume donc en une recherche effectuée au sein de deux archives, l’une italienne (1:1projects), l’autre française (collection FMRA).
Notre projet tentera d’apporter des réponses concrètes aux questions de frontièresformelles (objets, performances, images) ; de frontières culturelles (littéraire, musicale, filmique, scientifique, design…) ; d’actes artistiques dérivés (curatoriaux, éditoriaux, de collection et de recherche) ; et d’hybridation des acteurs (artistes, éditeurs, curateurs, collectionneurs, vendeurs ou chercheurs).

Images:
1. Jef Geys, Coloring book for adults, 1963-2014. Photo: Steven Decroos. Courtesy Mu.ZEE, Ostend. Exhibition Jef Geys. C’est aujourd’hui dimanche, tiens ma jolie maman voilà des roses blanches, toi qui les aimes tant!, 8 February – 22 June 2014
2. Cneai’s staircase by Bona-Lemercier. Photo: Cneai
3. Cneai’s Maison Flottante. Photo: Sebastien Agnetti
4. Cneai’s exhibition space. Photo: Aurélien Mole

Protagonist: Sylvie Boulanger
Space: Cneai =
Project: Ephemera

close
en

Letizia Ragaglia

Born in Montebelluna in 1969, Letizia Ragaglia majored in museology and contemporary art at the universities of Florence and Bologna as well as at the École du Louvre and the Sorbonne in Paris.
She worked as a freelance curator specializing in projects for public spaces on behalf of various Italian and international institutions. She was a member of the jury for the 54. Venice Biennale and a member of the jury for the Vienna-based project KÖR (Kunst im Öffentlichen Raum / art in public spaces) from 2010 until 2013.
Since 2009, Ragaglia has been director of the Museion in Bolzano, where she has curated solo exhibitions of Monica Bonvicini, Isa Genzken, Andro Wekua, VALIE EXPORT, Carl Andre, Claire Fontaine, Paweł Althamer, Rosemarie Trockel, Danh Vo, Klara Lidén and Ceal Floyer.
She lives and works in Bolzano.

Project: Soleil politique
Space: Museion

close
en

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH LETIZIA RAGAGLIA, MUSEION, BOLZANO

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH LETIZIA RAGAGLIA, MUSEION, BOLZANO

Vincent Honoré In the mission statement of the museum, one reads: “Museion works as an international research laboratory and as a commissioner of works of art […]. The aim is to be interdisciplinary and these efforts can be seen in the fact that not only figurative art finds its place at Museion, but also architecture, music, performance, film and theatre all have a space in the yearly programme.” I am curious to know how structurally interdisciplinarity informs your programme? How do you articulate it? And, importantly, why is it still relevant to be interdisciplinary?
Letizia Ragaglia The fact that visual arts cannot be perceived in isolation from other forms of art is not a new discovery. Reference to such statements can be found in ancient periods as well as in the present. However, I see contemporary art as a hybrid construction – in a positive sense – which not only connects different cultural disciplines, but also integrates disciplines that are far beyond the cultural field. In my opinion, therefore, a museum of contemporary art has to underline and to create different links that move through the present-day cultural scene.
Museion’s “core business” is still visual art, but we want to show that rigid barriers cannot be erected. This Summer, for example, a young Italian artist, Luca Trevisani, was invited to create a video for our media façade: he, in turn, invited MK, a dance company, giving rise to an ensuing fruitful collaboration with the Bolzano dance festival. This Fall, moreover, we will present a show, in which Carol Bove, an American artist, interacts with the well-known architect Carlo Scarpa: how can a museum avoid considering architecture and, more particularly, reflecting on the display of works? In our show When Now Is Minimal. The Unknown Side of the Sammlung Goetz we hosted concerts with minimal music and we also pursue collaborations with designers such as Martino Gamper, who continuously move between art and design. These are just a few examples of how we articulate “interdisciplinarity,” although I must admit I’m not a fan of this word. Regarding the importance of interdisciplinarity: it is a mirror of how contemporary culture moves.

2. Danh Vo, We the people

2. Danh Vo, We the people, Museion, 2013

V.H. There are different models of what a museum should be, of what its missions should be. What is your vision, in 2014, of what a museum should be?
L.R. I can only answer for a museum of contemporary art, a museum which works predominantly with living artists and which, therefore, differs slightly from other museums that deal with artists and objects from the past. Although it is true that these other kinds of museums also constantly re-enact their collections and put them into a dialogue with the present, this process is accentuated in a museum for contemporary art, where the scientific work on the collections is continuously related to collaborations the museum has with the artists invited to create/produce new shows. Is the traditional museum dead? I don’t think so: a museum must constantly question its own role and, even if the years of institutional critique are over, it must remain aware of its public task and try to keep up with the times, providing new inputs to the traditional tasks of conserving, researching, exhibiting and communicating.

3. Klara Lidén, Invalidenstraße

3. Klara Lidén, Invalidenstraße, Museion, 2013

V.H. I particularly appreciate a question asked by Nikolaus Hirsch: “who are the authors in the construction of institutional space?”. Who are the authors of Museion?
L.R. Last year, Museion invited Carol Yinghua Lu and Liu Ding as guest curators and they created a very interesting show, Little Movements. Self-practices in Contemporary Art. The show analyzed different individual practices in the field of contemporary art and pointed out the importance of individual movements/actions. At the same time, the show gave us the chance to go through each different individual practice in our team, from the security guards in the exhibition rooms, to the accountant and the secretary. Each employee made a presentation to the public on a separate occasion and offered a glance into their own, special task within the “Museion machine:” for me, it is all of those people that are the authors of Museion.

4. Paweł Althamer, Polyethylene, Museion, 2012

4. Paweł Althamer, Polyethylene, Museion, 2012

V.H. Who do you speak to? How would you describe the persons visiting Museion: a public, an audience, actors, spectators, clients?
L.R. That’s a tricky question! In 2014, the guest curator of Museion is Pierre Bal-Blanc. We will talk about him further on in relation to the PIANO collaboration. I invited Pierre Bal-Blanc because I saw his show The Death of the Audience at the Secession in Vienna. Among the many inspirations I received from that show, I read between the lines that nowadays there is not one single public, but a number of different ones. At this point, I would also like to quote Félix González-Torres, who once said that one (i.e. the public) cannot look at an artwork without considering his or her political, social, economic and sexual background. I would never use the word “clients” nor “spectators” or “actors”: audience and public is fine, but much more important than the definition itself is the fact that I/we really believe that it is very important to make the museum accessible for everybody. We have high, even “elitist” contents, but we want everybody to share them with us, therefore we offer a large variety of mediation services, that can be accepted or ignored. I think that one should never underestimate his or her public! And if you keep in mind Félix González-Torres you have to go further and consider that your public may also come from non-western cultures or, for example, that elderly people may have different needs than younger ones.
Furthermore, I have a dream: to eliminate the word “comprehension.”. We want to be there for people who want to engage and have an experience. This involves delving much farther beyond our rationality.

5. Museion, Media façade: Michael Fliri, the unseen looks like something you have never seen, 2011

5. Museion, Media façade: Michael Fliri, the unseen looks like something you have never seen, 2011

V.H. PIANO intends to create a network of art spaces working together, exchanging and interacting. Why did you decide to join the project and how are you participating in it?
L.R. I have to be sincere and explain that Museion had already thought about a collaboration with Pierre Bal-Blanc and the CAC Brétigny before the possibility of the PIANO platform arose. Once we heard about that, though, we were obviously enthusiastic about collaborating in a wider network. I strongly believe in exchanges and collaboration with other institutions, especially if the partners share needs and mission-statements. As a guest curator, Pierre Bal-Blanc has done a lot of research on our territory and brought his perspective from outside in order to make us perceive our context in a different way. Thanks to his excellent skills, he has managed to produce a “local” exhibition of international relevance. And I think that the fact that the show is present on the PIANO platform has added value to it.

 

Vincent Honoré Nella mission del museo si legge: “Museion è un laboratorio internazionale di ricerca e un committente di opere d’arte […]. Museion coltiva una vocazione all’interdisciplinarità: non solo l’arte figurativa, ma anche l’architettura, la musica, la performance, il cinema e il teatro trovano espressione nel programma annuale”. Mi interessa sapere in che modo il programma di Museion sia improntato strutturalmente all’interdisciplinarietà. Come viene articolato? E, cosa ancor più rilevante, perché è ancora importante essere interdisciplinari?
Letizia Ragaglia Il fatto che le arti visive non possano essere percepite in maniera isolata rispetto ad altre forme d’arte non è una scoperta. L’applicazione di questa idea può essere rintracciata nell’antichità così come nel presente. In ogni caso, ritengo che l’arte contemporanea sia una costruzione ibrida, in senso positivo, che non solo si ricollega agli altri campi culturali, ma integra in sé discipline anche lontane dalla cultura. A mio avviso un museo d’arte contemporanea deve insistere e creare diversi collegamenti all’interno della scena culturale attuale.
Il “core business” di Museion resta l’arte visiva, ma sentiamo il bisogno di oltrepassare la rigidità dei confini. Quest’estate, per esempio, un giovane artista italiano, Luca Trevisani, è stato invitato a realizzare un video per la nostra facciata mediale: a sua volta, ha invitato MK, una compagnia di danza, dando vita così a una fertile collaborazione con il festival di danza di Bolzano. Quest’autunno, inoltre, presenteremo una mostra, in cui l’artista americana Carol Bove interagirà con il noto architetto Carlo Scarpa: come può un museo esimersi dalla relazione con l’architettura e, in particolare, dalla riflessione sul display delle opere? Nella nostra mostra When Now Is Minimal. The Unknown Side of the Sammlung Goetz, abbiamo ospitato concerti di musica minimale e portato avanti collaborazioni con designer come Martino Gamper, che si muovono continuamente tra l’arte e il design. Sono solo alcuni esempi di come articoliamo l’idea dell’“interdisciplinarietà”, anche se devo ammettere che non amo questo termine. Sempre a proposito dell’importanza dell’interidisciplinarietà: è lo specchio di come si muove la cultura contemporanea.

V.H. Ci sono diversi modelli di cosa dovrebbe essere un museo e di quale debba esserne la mission. Cosa pensi debba essere un museo nel 2014?
L.R. Posso rispondere solodal punto di vista di un museo d’arte contemporanea, ossia un museo che lavora specificamente con artisti viventi e che, per questo, differisce in maniera significativa dagli altri musei che hanno a che fare con artisti e oggetti del passato. Sebbene anche gli altri tipi di museo riallestiscano costantemente le loro collezioni e le facciano dialogare con il presente, questo processo si accentua in un museo d’arte contemporanea, in cui il lavoro scientifico sulle collezioni è sempre legato alle collaborazioni che il museo intesse con gli artisti invitati a realizzare/produrre nuove mostre. Il museo tradizionale è morto? Non credo: un museo deve interrogarsi senza sosta sul proprio ruolo e, anche se gli anni dell’institunional critique sono passati, deve continuare a prestare attenzione al proprio compito pubblico e cercare di tenersi al passo con i tempi, dando nuova vita alle tradizionali funzioni di conservazione, ricerca, esposizione e comunicazione.

V.H. Trovo molto interessante questa domanda formulata da Nikolaus Hirsch: “chi sono gli autori della costruzione di uno spazio istituzionale?”. Chi sono gli autori di Museion?
L.R. Lo scorso anno, Museion ha invitato come guest curators Carol Yinghua Lu e Liu Ding, che hanno realizzato una mostra molto interessante, Little Movements. Self-practices in Contemporary Art. Il progetto prendeva in esame diverse pratiche individuali nel campo dell’arte contemporanea e insisteva sull’importanza dei movimenti/azioni individuali. Allo stesso tempo, la mostra ci ha dato l’opportunità di mettere in luce le pratiche individuali di ciascun membro del nostro staff, dal personale di sicurezza all’interno delle sale espositive al personale amministrativo e della segreteria. Ogni impiegato ha fatto una presentazione personale al pubblico e offerto la possibilità di gettare uno sguardo sul proprio specifico compito all’interno della “macchina Museion”: per me gli autori di Museion sono tutte queste persone.

V.H. A chi ti rivolgi? Come descrivile persone che visitano Museion: un pubblico, un’audience, attori, spettatori, clienti?
L.R. Domanda insidiosa! Nel 2014 il guest curator di Museion è Pierre Bal-Blanc. Ne parleremo più avanti in relazione alla collaborazione di PIANO. Ho invitato Pierre Bal-Blanc dopo aver visto la sua mostra The Death of the Audience alla Secession di Vienna. Tra le molte ispirazioni che ho tratto da quella mostra, mi pare di aver letto tra le righe che oggi non esiste un unico pubblico, ma diversi. A tal proposito vorrei anche citare Félix González-Torres, che una volta ha affermato che il pubblico non può guardare un’opera senza tenere conto del proprio background politico, sociale, economico e sessuale. Non userei mai i termini “clienti” o “spettatori” o “attori”: audience e pubblico funzionano meglio, ma ciò che conta di più, al di là della definizione, è il fatto che credo e crediamo fortemente nell’importanza di rendere il museo accessibile a tutti. Proponiamo contenuti elevati, persino “elitari”, ma desideriamo condividerli con tutti, motivo per cui forniamo una gran varietà di servizi di mediazione, che possono essere utilizzati o meno. Penso che non si debba mai sottovalutare il pubblico! E, tendendo a mente Félix González-Torres, bisogna andare oltre e considerare la possibilità che il pubblico possa essere composto anche da non-occidentali, per esempio, o il fatto che le persone anziane hanno bisogni diversi rispetto a quelle giovani.
E poi, ho un sogno: cancellare la parola “comprensione”. Vogliamo avere a che fare con persone che desiderano essere coinvolte e vivere un’esperienza, andando a fondo e superando i confini della razionalità.

V.H. PIANO intende creare un network di spazi espositivi che lavorano insieme, attraverso lo scambio e l’interazione. Perché hai deciso di aderire al progetto e come si attua la tua partecipazione?
L.R. Devo dire la verità: Museion aveva già pensato di avviare una collaborazione con Pierre Bal-Blanc e il CAC Brétigny prima che si presentasse la possibilità della piattaforma PIANO. Una volta che questa è emersa, abbiamo reagito con entusiasmo alla possibilità di collaborare all’interno di una rete più ampia. Credo fortemente nello scambio e nella collaborazione con altre istituzioni, specialmente se i partner hanno gli stessi bisogni e le stesse mission. Pierre Bal Blanc, in qualità di guest curator, ha portato avanti una approfondita ricerca sul nostro territorio e ha offerto il proprio punto di vista esterno per farci percepire il nostro contesto in maniera diversa. Grazie alle sue eccezionali qualità, è riuscito a produrre una mostra “locale” di rilevanza internazionale [Soleil politique]. E penso che l’inserimento della mostra nella piattaforma PIANO non faccia altro che aggiungere valore all’iniziativa.

Images:
1. Museion. Photo: Ludwig Thalheimer / Lupe
2. Danh Vo, We the people. Exhibition Fabulous Muscles, Museion, 2013. © Danh Vo, courtesy Galerie Chantal Crousel. Photo: Othmar Seehauser
3. Klara Lidén, Invalidenstraße, exhibition view, Museion 2013. Courtesy Galerie Neu, Berlin / Reena Spaulings, NY / the artist. Photo: Othmar Seehauser
4. Paweł Althamer, Polyethylene, Museion, 2012. © Pawel Althamer, courtesy neugerriemschneider, Berlin and Foksal Gallery Foundation, Warsaw. Photo: Othmar Seehauser
5. Museion, Media façade: Michael Fliri, the unseen looks like something you have never seen, 2011, Collection Museion. Photo: Othmar Seehauser

Protagonist: Letizia Ragaglia
Space: Museion
Project: Soleil politique

close
en

Ann Veronica Janssens

Born 1956, Folkestone, United Kingdom
Lives and works in Brussels, Belgium
Her work has been the subject of numerous solo exhibitions such as Serendipity at WIELS Contemporary Art Centre in Brussels, Are you experienced at the Espai d’art contemporani Castelló, the Museum Morsbroich Leverkusen, the Neue Nationalgalerie in Berlin, the Kunstverein München, the Musée d’Orsay in Paris, the CCA Wattis Institute for Contemporary Arts in San Francisco, the Ikon Gallery in Birmingham, the Kunsthalle Bern and [mac] Marseille.
Since 1985 she has also participated in important group exhibitions at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, The Power Plant – Contemporary Art Gallery in Toronto, Ontario, the Generali Foundation in Vienna, the Chisenhale Gallery and Hayward Gallery in London, Witte de With and the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam, the Kröller-Müller Museum in Otterlo, the Kunstverein in Munich as well as various international biennials (Sydney, Istanbul, São Paulo, Seoul, and in 1999 Venice, where she represented Belgium with Michel François).
In 2000, she visited Berlin within the program of the DAAD. She regularly collaborates with choreographers (Drouler Pierre and Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker). Since 2009 she has also initiated with Nathalie Ergino the Laboratory Space Brain IAC Villeurbanne. Her work has been presented within the exhibition Passion Fruit at the Centre Pompidou, Paris and on the occasion of the exhibition Dynamo. A century of light in art, 1913-2013 at the Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais. Ann Veronica Janssens is the author of a public commission for the chapel of St Vincent de Grignan, opened May 25, 2013.

Focus: Prepared Piano – Model for a New Institutionalism
Partner: IAC

close
en

Prepared Piano – Model for a new Institutionalism

Round table discussion moderated by Pierre Bal-Blanc
organized in the frame of PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art – France-Italie 2014-2015

Villa Medici
Viale Trinità dei Monti, 1 – 00187 Roma
Friday May 9, 2014
10 – 12 am

The panel discussion Prepared Piano: Model for a New Institutionalism presents artists, curators, as well as the managers of places where various projects have been produced over the past few years in Europe. These projects have in common that they make novel use of cultural exchange instruments, while giving their activities both a local and international scope.

Various case studies will be presented during this panel discussion to bring back into play notions of crossdisciplinarity (Théâtre des expositions at Villa Medici), process (Per_formare una collezione at the MADRE in Naples), and plasticity of relations (Laboratoire Espace Cerveau at the IAC in Villeurbanne). The discussions as a whole will echo the desire to found “a new institutionalism”, which has developed over the past few years through initiatives coming from both artists and curators. The desire to reconfigure the institution based on the model of a community centre, laboratory, open school, and other places that are not mainly governed by market laws, is linked with the creative momentum that led to Prepared Piano. The proposed discussion aims to demonstrate that PIANO, as well as Salon Light, dedicated to independent publishing, and Vdrome, a distribution network for artist films, are today all tangible initiatives.

Pierre Bal-Blanc is the director of the CAC Brétigny. He is also an independent curator and the vice-president of the d.c.a / French association for the development of centres d’art. Since 2003, in resonance with the social thought of Charles Fourrier, he has been developing the “Phalanstère Project” within a centre d’art. This is a series of specific offerings that critically rework the principles of artwork accumulation.
His exhibition series “Living Currency” and “Draft Score for an Exhibition” negotiate the historical and contemporary analysis of the body and of strategies linked to performance in the visual arts. “The Death of the Audience “ and “Reversibility” are reflections on the consequences that the materiality of art objects has on the configuration of art-world protagonists, the role and form of cultural institutions today.

Interdisciplinary stage
Theater of Exhibitions / Villa Medici, Rome / presentation by Eric de Chassey

Conceived by the director Éric de Chassey and organised by the French Academy in Rome – Villa Medici every year since 2010, the Theatre of Exhibitions has been devised as a moment of encounter between the fellows in residence and the public, as well as one of dialogue and confrontation among the artists and scholars in residence. The different spaces of Villa Medici become ephemeral stages for installations, performances, projections, readings. The concept of openness, a predisposition to dialogue and confrontation among different disciplines is the characteristic that unites the projects, which are presented. The Theatre of Exhibitions has been designed as a “multiform laboratory” which displays the diversity of artistic practices and research, thus confirming the centrality of the French Academy in Rome in contemporary creation.

Éric de Chassey is the Director of the French Academy in Rome – Villa Medici since 2009. He is also Professor of Contemporary Art History at the École Normale Supérieure in Lyon. Since the beginning, his scientific activities have focused on the US and abstract art. He has published books and essays on XXth and XXIst century art. He has also curated numerous exhibitions, accompanied by publications such as Soulages XXIth century (Rome, Villa Medici, 2013) or Simon Hantaï (Rome, Villa Medici, 2014).

Thought’s spatialization
Space Brain Laboratory / IAC, Villeurbanne / presentation by Nathalie Ergino and Ann Veronica Janssens

Initiated in 2009 by the artist Ann Veronica Janssens and Nathalie Ergino, director of the Institut d’art contemporain, the project aims at starting from experiments in art to explore practical and theoretical research linking space and the brain. This interdisciplinary laboratory brings together the reflections and experiments of artists and scientists and also philosophers, anthropologists, art historians and theoreticians, thus providing as much coverage by neuroscience, physics and astrophysics as by hypnosis, telepathy and shamanism.

Since January, 2006, Nathalie Ergino is the director of the Institut d‘art contemporain. Former director of the School / FRAC Champagne-Ardenne (1994-2000), and of the museum of contemporary art [mac] of Marseille (2001-2005), she has curated big monographic exhibitions (Jimmie Durham, Rodney Graham, Raymond Hains, Ann Veronica Janssens, Carsten Höller) as well as collective exhibitions (Maisons-Cerveaux, Subréel).

Born in 1956 in Folkestone (UK), Ann Veronica Janssens lives and works in Brussels (BE). Her work has been the subject of numerous solo exhibitions. Since 1985, she has also participated in important group exhibitions, as well as various international biennials and in 1999 Venice where she represented Belgium with Michel François. She regularly collaborates with choreographers (Drouler Pierre and Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker). Her work has been presented recently within the exhibition Passion Fruit at the Centre Pompidou, Paris and within Dynamo, A century of light in art, 1913 – 2013 at the Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais.

Organizing the perceptible
Vdrome / Mousse, Milano / presentation by Enrico Boccioletti

Vdrome is an online platform that offers regular, high quality screenings of films and videos directed by visual artists and filmmakers, whose production lies in-between contemporary art and cinema. Each screening is presented during a limited period, as in a movie theatre. Vdrome makes available a program of exceptional artists’ films and videos that are selected due to their importance, quality and innovative strength, many of which are only shown in the context of film festivals, exhibitions or specific surveys, being therefore of very limited access. Vdrome is an initiative conceived and promoted by Mousse, curated by Edoardo Bonaspetti, Jens Hoffmann, Andrea Lissoni and Filipa Ramos, and maintained by Enrico Boccioletti.

Enrico Boccioletti is an artist and musician active under multiple names – Death in Plains, 4SICSX, spcnvdr and Enrico B – in the fields of postconceptual, new vernacular, performance and sound, interested into incompleteness and circularity, duplication and accumulation, waste, layering, forgery, faux-real. He also works for Mousse Magazine and Vdrome.

Incarnation of the collection
Per_formare una collezione / Madre, Naples / presentation by Andrea Viliani and Alessandro Rabottini

Per_forming a collection is an on-going project designed to develop the formation of the Museo MADRE’s permanent collection in Naples. It focuses on artists of different generations whose works have been conceived as physical and mental instruments that bring together thought and action in every possible media, linking visual arts to theatre and literature. The project aims to shape a collection that is articulated over time, combining archival research with commissions for new works taking into account the role of the museum as a place of memory and preservation as well as a continuing research and production laboratory. All the works presented have a relation with the city and its history: works conceived or exhibited here, from artist who happened to exhibit in Naples or works belonging to private or public local collections.

Since 2013 Andrea Viliani is the director of the Fondazione Donnaregina per le arti contemporanee – Madre, Napoli. He previously worked from 2009 to 2012 as Director of Fondazione Galleria Civica – Centro di Ricerca sulla Contemporaneità in Trento. In 2012 he was a member of the Core Agents Group of dOCUMENTA(13) and he co-curated the related position in Kabul and Bamiyan (Afghanistan). From 2005 to 2009, Viliani was curator at the MAMbo – Museo d’Arte Moderna di Bologna. Among the 60 “players” of the 2007 Biennale de Lyon, he is a frequent contributor to FROG, Mousse, Kaleidoscope and Flash Art.

Alessandro Rabottini is an art critic and curator based in London. He is Curator at Large at the Madre Museum in Naples (where he recently curated a mid-career retrospective of Padraig Timoney and the survey show of Ettore Spalletti) and served as guest curator for several international institutions. In his capacity of Curator at Large at the GAMeC in Bergamo he curated solo exhibitions of artists such as Robert Overby, Mircea Cantor, Latifa Echakhch, Victor Man, Pratchaya Phinthong, Pietro Roccasalva, Tim Rollins & K.O.S, Sterling Ruby, Tris Vonna-Michell and Jordan Wolfson.

Praising uncertainty
Salon light / cneai =, Chatou / presentation by Sylvie Boulanger

Founded in 2004 by Cneai, Salon Light became over a few years an unmissable rendez-vous for micro-publishers and artist’s publication in Paris. After exporting the concept at Vermelho gallery in Sao Paulo and the great success of Salon Light 9 at Palais de Tokyo in 2012, Salon Light keeps uniting a moving scene of artists, authors, independent publishers or composers. Books, magazines, objects, LP’s, catalogues or artist’s book, the publications are often limited editions, sometimes impossible to find in Paris, and are breaking new grounds while creating new networks in the art and publishing worlds. Performances and meetings with professionals and artists are also a key part of the event. Free for the publishers and the public, it’s accessible to all and offers visibility to a still somehow unknown field.

Sylvie Boulanger is founder and curator of Salon Light since its creation in 2004. She directs Cneai since 1997. She curated over a hundred exhibitions, published more than seventy books (artist’s books, journals, catalogues) and produced as few documentaries. She is a member of several research labs, she also contributes to academic reviews like Multitudes and lectures in art schools and universities. She was the founder of the production agency APC (Art Public Contemporain) that she directed for ten years (1990-1997) after occupying the position of associate director «exhibition and communication» within the Ministry of Culture visual arts delegation (1987-1990).

The round table discussion will be followed by a
Concert for Prepared Piano by Laurent Durupt, composer and fellow at the Villa Medici

More information at
www.pianoproject.org
info@pianoproject.org

Round table discussion organized in the frame of PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art, France-Italie 2014-2015

PIANO, Prepared Platform for Contemporary Art, France–Italy 2014-2015, initiated by d.c.a / French association for the development of centres d’art, in partnership with the Institut français in Italy, the French Embassy in Italy and the Institut français, with the support of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development, the French Ministry of Culture and Communication and Fondazione Nuovi Mecenati.

close
en - it

Marta Minujín

Marta Minujín, El obelisco acostado, 1978

Marta Minujín, El obelisco acostado, 1978

Born 1943, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Lives and works in Buenos Aires, Argentina

A pioneer of happenings and performance art, “soft sculptures” and video art, the Argentine artist Marta Minujín often uses ephemeral materials like cardboard, cloth, and foodstuffs to create works that are both monumental yet fragile. Inspired by Andy Warhol’s Pop Art, Minujín’s works take a satirical approach to consumerism and express a strong critique of the events that shaped Argentina’s history. One example of the latter is El obelisco acostado, presented in the exhibition in the form of documentation. Created for the first São Paulo Biennale, the project consisted of a life-size copy of the obelisk in Plaza de la Republica in Buenos Aires, built at the end of the 1930s and now something of a national symbol. The artist’s version was horizontal rather than vertical, enabling viewers to enter and walk the length of the 64-meter sculpture. Inside, two screens showed video footage of the original obelisk filmed over a 24-hour period, including the celebrations for Argentina’s World Cup victory in 1978. El obelisco acostado was the first in a series of works Minujín conceived as a subversive take on the major monuments of Western tradition.

Nata a Buenos Aires, Argentina, nel 1943
Vive e lavora a Buenos Aires, Argentina

L’artista argentina Marta Minujín è stata una pioniera nei campi dell’happening e della performance art, delle “sculture morbide” e della videoarte. Utilizza spesso materiali effimeri come cartone, tessuto e cibo per creare opere monumentali, ma al contempo fragili. Ispirati alla Pop Art di Andy Warhol, i lavori di Marta Minujín esprimono un approccio satirico verso il consumismo e una forte presa di posizione rispetto alle vicende storiche dell’Argentina: ne è un esempio la sua opera El obelisco acostado (L’obelisco adagiato), presente in mostra sotto forma di documentazione. Creato per la prima Biennale di San Paolo, il progetto consiste nella realizzazione di una copia di uguali dimensioni dell’obelisco che si trova in Plaza de la Republica a Buenos Aires, costruito alla fine degli anni ’30 del Novecento e diventato simbolo nazionale argentino. L’artista cambia l’orientamento del monumento, ponendolo in posizione orizzontale invece che verticale.
In tal modo lo spettatore vi può entrare e percorrerne tutti i sessantaquattro metri di lunghezza. All’interno, due monitor proiettano delle videoregistrazioni realizzate nell’arco di ventiquattr’ore dall’obelisco originale, tra cui spiccano le immagini dei festeggiamenti per la vittoria dell’Argentina ai Mondiali di calcio del ’78. El obelisco acostado è la prima di una serie di opere, nelle quali Marta Minujín si propone di demistificare i grandi monumenti della tradizione occidentale.

Image:
Marta Minujín, El obelisco acostado, 1978. 1st Latin American Biennial of São Paulo. Courtesy of the artist

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

DIANE BLONDEAU

Diane Blondeau, Belle Jar, 2012

Diane Blondeau, Belle Jar, 2012

Born 1987, Nice, France
Lives and works in Nice and Dijon, France
I started by studying Art-History in university in Paris where I gained a BA. I started Art school in Villa Arson, Nice where I graduated in 2012 with the congratulations of the jury.
I actually work and live between Nice and Dijon.
My work starts around the interest I have for the “plasticity of sound”. Through sound’s plasticity, I combine in my work several media: installation, sculpture, photography. Most of my projects start out from the acoustic features of the space I will explore, especially where the exhibition space reveals its own sound signature. I try to redefine some modes of perception through all the factors related to listening. The space is the main element of my visual and sound research, that’s why most of my installations are in situ. By creating “sound images”, I play with the elements that make up the space by amplifying what surrounds us or on the contrary, I completely hide them. I create atmospheres in tension, neurotic places, autarchic places, single machines, areas of memory or danger. The electric cable and its flow of electricity follows the viewer throughout his progress. I create “effects” by manipulating some unstable elements like sound, electricity and psycho-acoustic phenomena.
Picking in the various fields of physics, chemistry and technology, a diversion takes place by twisting or transformation. There is an experience of these invisible forces which redefine the position of the body and its unconscious.

Project: From & To

 

Nata nel 1987 a Nizza, dopo una laurea in storia dell’arte e archeologia, prosegue gli studi alla Villa Arson, dove ottiene il diploma DNSEP nel 2012. Vive e lavora tra Nizza e Digione. Attraverso la plasticità del suono, che unisce diversi mezzi espressivi (istallazioni, sculture, fotografie), l’artista interroga nella maggior parte dei suoi progetti il carattere acustico di uno spazio. Più particolarmente, si interessa al punto in cui un luogo espositivo rivela il proprio marchio sonoro. Diane Blondeau tenta di ridefinire modalità di percezione attraverso tutti i fattori legati all’ascolto.

 

Née en 1987 à Nice. Après une licence d’histoire de l’art et archéologie, elle poursuit ses études à la Villa Arson, ou elle obtient son DNSEP en 2012. Vit et travaille entre Nice et Dijon. A travers une plasticité du son, alliant différents médiums (installations, sculptures, photographies) et dans la majeure partie de ses projets, elle questionne le caractère acoustique qu’offre un espace. Plus particulièrement là ou un lieu d’exposition révèle sa propre signature sonore. Elle cherche à redéfinir des modes de perception par tous les facteurs qui sont liés à l’écoute.

Image:
Diane Blondeau, Belle Jar, 2012

close
en - it - fr

GUILLAUME MANSART IN CONVERSATION WITH DIANE BLONDEAU, VIVIEN ROUBAUD AND THOMAS TEURLAI

GUILLAUME MANSART IN CONVERSATION WITH DIANE BLONDEAU, VIVIEN ROUBAUD AND THOMAS TEURLAI

A Dystopian Sculpture

Guillaume Mansart It’s the first time you’ve worked together. Here you’re offering a joint production. In what sense was this collective dynamic important?
Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud and Thomas Teurlai The From & To project was based on the idea of a collaborative exchange between young French and Italian artists. The three of us already knew each other. We got along well and lived in more or less the same area. Each of us having been separately involved in several collaborations, we were aware that this presented an advantage in terms of energy, labour power and letting go.

G.M. Beyond the spirit of intellectual competition, one senses that this collective logic is also efficient when it comes to production.  At the work-creation stage, a distinctive organisational logic can already be discerned…
D.B, V.R., T.T. This is something that creeps into our practices and into those of quite a few artists of our generation. Primarily out of pure pragmatism: how can something be created with few resources? By inventing our tools, by making do with whatever we have at our disposal. When it’s finished, the work might appear to “take a stand against traditional principles”, but more than anything else this is because we have no choice! It’s a flaw that becomes a quality. 

G.M. What is the meaning of the title Jambe de botte?
D.B, V.R., T.T. It’s the literal translation of “bootleg”, an English term that designates pirate recordings of concerts or studio albums. The term also designates the art of “turntablism”, which consists in constructing a single piece of music out of several others. Jambe de botte served as a shapeless title, like melted plastic.

G.M. For the creation of this piece, you tested several types of material, ultimately choosing plastic from melted garden chairs. There’s a certain irony in the fact that plastic chairs are turned into a kind of “missile sculpture”. Why did this material stand out?
D.B, V.R., T.T. This brings us back to production circuits and pragmatism. How a combination of gestures can produce an image. We very empirically tested hundreds of combinations. Then we took a deckchair, burned it with a flamethrower, and the result was perfect. We work on the French Riviera, where the dumps are full of this kind of furniture. We were conscious of reflecting the dystopian faults of this strange place that, when you remove the glamour of the sun and palm trees, smells of cheap suntan lotion, melted poodles and social violence.

G.M. How were the forms of the different sculptures created?
D.B, V.R., T.T. We aligned casts found in an abandoned train parts foundry, in such a way that we were able to create cylinders that could be spun like record players. We poured the plastic and suddenly we had Scud missiles.

G.M. Could you explain the “archaeo-acoustic” notion behind your project?
D.B, V.R., T.T. It’s a fairly vague discipline situated between acoustics, archaeology and charlatanism, and its aim is to find pre-Edison sound recordings through sound imprints accidentally recorded on different types of object. Since sound is a vibration, in principle it can be inscribed on the media it comes into contact with.

G.M. The forms of the various sculptures evoke something of a warlike world. Added to these forms is a sound that gives the space a stressful atmosphere. How is this sound produced?
D.B, V.R., T.T. From the outset we planned to create forms that could be “played” in the space. Then everything developed very spontaneously. The day before the exhibition opened, we had to make up our minds to bring the sculptures into the exhibition venue. Once they were set up, we took a playback head and placed it on one of the rotating Scuds and it was Fallujah in the centre dart. The perfect tautology.

G.M. Although object and device diversion and DIY are found in your respective works, I get the impression that the question of sculpture is fairly new. In fact, in your piece one finds “historical” questions liked to sculpture: materiology, volume, casting techniques, a plinth…  Does Jambe de botte enable you to tackle new fields of investigation?
D.B, V.R., T.T. We considered simple questions that are not at all historical. A plinth is practical. It keeps the work at a distance and prevents a Scud from falling on someone. Plastic is more solid than margarine, etc.  Above all, this project confirmed that in the middle of personal practices and trajectories, it’s essential to regularly make time for collective periods and keep making use of resourcefulness.

March 2015

Protagonists: Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud, Thomas Teurlai
Project: From & To

Une sculpture dystopique

Guillaume Mansart C’est la première fois que vous travailliez ensemble. Ici, vous faites une proposition de production partagée. En quoi cette dynamique collective a-t-elle été importante ?
Diane Blondeau, Vivien Roubaud et Thomas Teurlai L’idée à la base du projet From & To, c’était un échange collaboratif entre des jeunes artistes français et italiens. Tous les trois, nous nous connaissions déjà, nous nous entendions bien et nous vivions plus ou moins au même endroit. Après plusieurs collaborations chacun de notre coté, nous étions conscients de l’intérêt que cela représentait en matière d’énergies, de force de travail et de lâcher prise.

G.M. Au-delà de l’émulation intellectuelle, on sent que cette logique collective trouve aussi une efficience dans la question de la production. Dans l’étape de réalisation de l’œuvre on peut déjà lire une logique d’organisation propre…
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est quelque chose qui traine dans nos pratiques comme dans celles de pas mal d’artistes de notre génération. D’abord par pur pragmatisme : comment réalise-t-on quelque chose avec peu de moyen ? En inventant nos outils, en faisant avec ce que l’on a sous la main. À l’arrivée, peut-être que le travail semble « s’affirmer contre les logiques traditionnelles », mais c’est plus par défaut qu’autre chose ! C’est un défaut qui devient une qualité. 

G.M. Que signifie le titre Jambe de botte ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est la traduction littérale de « bootleg », un terme anglais qui désigne les enregistrements pirates de concerts ou de studio. Le terme désigne aussi l’art du « turntablisme » qui consiste à construire un seul morceau de musique à partir de plusieurs. Jambe de botte faisait un titre informe, comme du plastique fondu.

G.M. Pour la réalisation de cette pièce, vous avez testé plusieurs types de matériaux, pour au final vous arrêter sur du plastique provenant de chaises de jardin fondues. Il y a une forme d’ironie dans le fait de transformer des chaises en plastique en sorte « sculpture missile ». Pourquoi ce matériau s’est-il imposé ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. On en revient aux circuits de productions et au pragmatisme. Comment une combinaison de gestes simples peut « faire image ». Nous avons testé de manière très empirique des centaines de combinaisons. Puis nous avons pris un transat, nous l’avons brûlé au lance-flammes, et le résultat était parfait. Nous travaillions sur la Côte d’Azur, les décharges sont pleines de ce type de mobilier. Nous avions conscience de renvoyer les travers dystopiques de cet étrange endroit qui, dégagé du côté glamour du soleil et des palmiers, sent la crème solaire bon marché, le caniche fondu et la violence sociale.

G.M. Comment les formes des différentes sculptures ont-elles été créées ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. Nous avons aligné des moules trouvés dans une fonderie de pièces de trains abandonnées, de manière à pouvoir créer des cylindres que l’on pourrait faire tourner comme des phonographes. Nous avons coulé le plastique et d’un coup nous avions des missiles Scud.

G.M. Pourriez vous expliciter la notion d’ « archéo-acoustique » qui est à l’origine de votre projet ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. C’est une discipline assez obscure qui se situe entre l’acoustique, l’archéologie et le charlatanisme, et qui entend retrouver des enregistrements sonores pré-Edison à travers des empreintes sonores qui auraient été enregistrées accidentellement sur différents types d’objets. Puisque le son est une vibration, il peut censément s’inscrire sur les supports avec lesquels il entre en contact.

G.M. Les formes des différentes sculptures évoquent un univers plutôt guerrier, à ces formes s’ajoute un son qui installe dans l’espace d’exposition une atmosphère anxiogène. Comment se son est-il produit ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. Dès le début nous envisagions de créer des formes que l’on pourrait « jouer » dans l’espace. Ensuite, tout s’est enchainé de manière très spontanée. Nous avons dû nous résoudre, la veille du vernissage, à amener les sculptures dans le lieu d’exposition. Une fois qu’elles étaient installées, nous avons pris une tête de lecture que nous avons posé sur un des SCUD rotatifs et c’était Fallujah dans le centre d’art. Tautologique à souhait.

G.M. Si le détournement d’objets ou de dispositifs et le DIY sont présents dans vos travaux respectifs, j’ai l’impression que la question de la sculpture est assez nouvelle. En effet, on retrouve dans votre pièce des questions « historiques » liées à sculpture : matériologie, volume, techniques de moulage, socle, … Jambe de botte vous permet-elle d’engager de nouveaux champs d’investigation ?
D.B, V.R., T.T. On s’est posé des questions simples qui ne sont en rien historiques. Un socle c’est pratique, ça tient à distance et ça évite qu’un SCUD tombe sur quelqu’un. Le plastique c’est plus solide que la margarine, etc. Ce projet nous a surtout confirmé qu’il était indispensable au sein de pratiques et de trajectoires personnelles d’aménager régulièrement ces temps collectifs et de continuer à jouer de débrouille.

Mars 2015

Image:
1. Diane Blondeau / Vivien Roubaud / Thomas Teurlai, Jambes de bottes, 2014, mixed media. Photo: Villa Arson / Jean Brasille

close
en

MATT MULLICAN

Born 1951, Santa Monica, CA, USA
Lives and works in New York, NY, USA

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en

Martine Michard

Martine Michard has been Director of the Maison des Arts Georges Pompidou since February 2004. She is in charge of both programs for the contemporary art center in Cajarc and for the international artists’ residencies in Saint-Cirq Lapopie. She writes for MAGP’s publications and cultural media in the region. She always has in mind Octavio Paz’s words “Each artwork is a permanent possibility of metamorphosis offered to all men.”

Project: Piano – alto!
Space: Maison des Arts Georges Pompidou CAC

close
en - it

Walter Pichler

Prozession mit Tragbarem Schrein, 1970

Prozession mit Tragbarem Schrein, 1970

Born 1936, Nova Ponente, Italy
† 2012, Vienna, Austria

Together with Hans Hollein and Raimund Abraham, Walter Pichler was one of the leading exponents of radical architecture in the 1960s. His projects combat the formal coldness and monotonous surfaces of modern architecture, using unusual materials to create buildings that tell a story. Pichler often associates his interest in places of worship with the creation of his sculptures and the places that host them, forging a consummate union between landscape, sculpture, and architecture.
In 1995 he was invited by the Turin City Council to present a public art project for the underground railway link. Walter Pichler’s project consists of a door that connects the city with the railway area. The structure is composed of a series of prefabricated elements in cement and is entitled Passage, given that its only function is to connect two different areas. Inside Passage, light plays a key role, and the work is indeed subtitled Lichtkäfig (Light Cage). This public project was not actually constructed but it reveals a distinctive trait of the artist’s aesthetic, namely the creation of a modular system for sculpture and architecture. Indeed for the Gutmann private collection Pichler designed a room to present this project and a version of it for the space outside. Tragbarer Schrein (Portable Shrine) is another example of how Pichler enjoys using different materials, and it also reveals the mystic element that accompanies his sculptures and installations. The piece is a portable sculpture comprising a central component in zinc, a base in dried grass, and a wooden structure to transport it, as the photos of the artist’s family show. The main section is a reliquary containing a mirror from St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice. This objet trouvé can be seen through a small hole: when viewers move closer to take a look inside, they come face to face with their own reflection. The exhibition also presents a selection of drawings devoted to the Passage project that express the artist’s more intimate, spiritual side.

Nato a Nova Ponente, Italia, nel 1936
† 2012, Vienna, Austria

Walter Pichler, insieme a Hans Hollein e Raimund Abraham, è uno degli esponenti di spicco dell’architettura radicale degli anni ‘60. I suoi progetti avversano la freddezza formale e la monotonia materica dell’architettura moderna, prediligendo materiali insoliti e lasciando gli edifici liberi di raccontare delle storie. Pichler associa spesso il suo interesse per i luoghi di culto alla realizzazione delle sue sculture, e delle dimore dove esse sono ospitate, dando così vita a una perfetta comunione tra paesaggio, scultura e architettura.
Nel 1995 l’architetto è stato invitato dalla città di Torino a presentare un progetto di arte pubblica per il Passante Ferroviario. La proposta di Walter Pichler consiste in una porta, che mette idealmente in collegamento la città e l’area del Passante. La struttura è composta da una successione di elementi prefabbricati in cemento ed è intitolata Passage, dato che si tratta di uno spazio senza destinazione d’uso, se non quella di collegare due luoghi diversi. All’interno di Passage la luce ha un ruolo importante, e infatti l’opera è sottotitolata Lichtkäfig (Gabbia di luce). Il progetto per lo spazio pubblico non è stato realizzato, ma testimonia un tratto distintivo del pensiero dell’artista, ovvero lo sviluppo di un sistema modulare per scultura e architettura. Infatti lo stesso Pichler ha progettato una stanza dedicata alla presentazione di questo progetto e una sua realizzazione per lo spazio esterno per la collezione privata Gutmann. Tragbarer Schrein (Scrigno portatile) è un secondo esempio di come Pichler ami utilizzare diversi materiali, ma rivela anche l’aspetto più mistico che accompagna la realizzazione delle sue sculture e installazioni. Si tratta di una scultura portatile, costituita da una parte centrale in zinco, una base di erba essiccata e una struttura in legno per il trasporto, come documentano le foto della famiglia dell’artista. Lo scrigno centrale è concepito come un reliquiario. Al suo interno è contenuto uno specchio proveniente dalla basilica di San Marco, a Venezia. L’objet trouvé è visibile da un piccola fessura: avvicinandosi e sbirciando all’interno, l’osservatore si trova faccia a faccia con il proprio volto.
In mostra è presente anche una selezione di disegni dedicati al progetto Passage, in cui si esprime anche il lato più intimo e spirituale dell’artista.

Image:
Prozession mit Tragbarem Schrein, 1970 (Walter Pichler and Werner Stupka). Photo: Marina Faust

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

ILARIA BONACOSSA

Ilaria_Bonacossa

Ilaria Bonacossa is art director of Villa Croce Museo d’Arte Contemporanea in Genoa after working seven years at Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo in Turin. Founder of Art@Work, a collective that commissions and develops profit and non-profit contemporary art projects, she has curated numerous solo exhibitions of international and Italian artists like Nick Devereaux, Ian Kiaer, Zhang Enli, Tony Conrad, Julieta Aranda, Massimo Grimaldi, Alberto Tadiello, Katrin Sigurdardottir and Thomas Grunfeld and group shows such as Subcontingent. Art from the Indian Subcontinent and Greenwashing. Art Perils and Proposals. She has published monographs on the work of Cristof Yvoré, Kees Goudswaard, Marlene Dumas and Tomas Saraceno. Since February 2014 she is a member of the curatorial Commitee of PAC Padiglione Arte Contemporanea in Milano. She is a permanent member of the Technical Committee for Acquistions of FRAC Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur of Marseille. In 2007 she was a member of the jury for the Golden Lions of the 52nd Venice Biennale and in 2013 International Jury member of the Inamori Foundation Prize, Kyoto. She holds a Degree in Contemporary Art History at Università Statale di Milano and a Master in Curatorial Studies from Bard College, New York.

Project: La démocratie est illusion
Space:  Villa Croce Museo d’Arte Contemporanea

 

Ilaria Bonacossa è direttrice artistica del Museo Villa Croce a Genova, dopo aver lavorato sette anni come senior curator alla Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo di Torino. Fondatrice di Art@Work, un collettivo attivo nel settore profit e no profit per la produzione di progetti d’arte contemporanea, ha curato numerose mostre collettive e personali in Italia e all’estero lavorando con artisti come Nick Devereux, Ian Kiaer, Zhang Enli, Tony Conrad, Julieta Aranda, Massimo Grimaldi, Alberto Tadiello, Gintaras Didziapetris e Thomas Grunfeld; le piu importanti collettive da lei curate sono Subcontinent. Art from Indian Subcontinent e Greenwashing. Arte Pericoli e Promesse. Ha curato alcune monografie di artisti come Cristof Yvoré, Kees Gouddswaard, Marlene Dumas e Tomas Saraceno. È membro del Comitato Tecnico per gli Acquisti del FRAC Provence-Alpes-Côtes-d’Azur di Marsiglia. Nel 2007 è stata una dei cinque membri della giuria per i leoni d’oro della 52a Biennale Internazionale di Arte Contemporanea di Venezia e nel 2013 membro della giuria del Premio della Inamori Foundation a Kyoto. Ha co-curato il padiglione Islandese di Katrin Sigurdardottir alla Biennale di Venezia.

 

Ilaria Bonacossa est directrice artistique du Museo Villa Croce a Gênes après avoir travaillé sept ans a la Fondation Sandretto Re Rebaudengo a Turin. Fondatrice d’Art@Work, collectif qui produit et accompagne des projets d’artistes, elle a été commissaire d’expositions personnelles d’artistes italiens ou internationaux comme Nick Devereux, Ian Kiaer, Zhang Enli, Tony Conrad, Julieta Aranda, Massimo Grimaldi, Alberto Tadiello, Katrin Sigurdardottir ou Thomas Grunfeld et d’expositions collectives comme Subcontinent. Art from Indian Subcontinent et Greenwashing. Art Perils and Proposals. Elle a édité des monographies de Cristof Yvoré, Kees Gouddswaard, Marlene Dumas et Tomas Saraceno. Elle est également membre du comité technique du FRAC Provence-Alpes-Côtes-d’Azur à Marseille. En 2007, elle a fait partie du jury de la 52ème Biennale Internationale d’Art Contemporain de Venise et en 2013 du jury du Inamori Foundation Prize a Kyoto.

close
en - it - fr

VIRGINIE BOBIN

Virginie Bobin is a curator and writer, with a specific interest for performance, experimental forms of artistic research, the role of art, artists and art institutions in the public sphere, and formats that go beyond exhibition-making. Prior to joining the team of Bétonsalon – Centre for Art and Research in Paris as Associate Curator and Head of education, she has worked at Witte de With Center for Contemporary Art in Rotterdam (2013-14); Les Laboratoires d’Aubervilliers (2010-13); and Performa, the New York Biennial of Performing Arts (2009). She has curated several long-term, collective projects across Europe and the United States including, most recently, Composing Differences, a program of workshops, talks and events at MoMA PS1, MoMA Recording Studios and e-flux space in New York. She has been Associate Editor of Manifesta Journal from 2011 to 2014.

Virginie Bobin è curatrice e critica, con un interesse specifico per la performance, le forme sperimentali di ricerca artistica, il ruolo dell’arte, degli artisti e delle istituzioni nella sfera pubblica e per i formati che vanno al di là dell’exhibition-making. Prima di unirsi al Bétonsalon – Centre for art and research di Parigi come curatrice associata e direttrice del dipartimento educativo, ha lavorato presso il Witte de With Center for Contemporary Art a Rotterdam (2013-14); Les Laboratoires d’Aubervilliers (2010-13); e Performa, the New York Biennial of Performing Arts (2009). Ha curato numerosi progetti collettivi e a lungo termine in Europa e negli Stati Uniti, che includono, tra i più recenti, Composing Differences, un programma di workshop, presentazioni ed eventi al MoMa PS1, MoMa Recording Studios e e-flux space a New York. È stata editor associata del Manifesta Journal tra il 2011 e il 2014.

Virginie Bobin est curatrice et critique, avec un intérêt particulier pour la performance, les formes expérimentales de recherche artistique, le rôle de l’art, des artistes et des institutions artistiques dans la sphère publique, et les formats qui excèdent celui de l’exposition. Avant de rejoindre Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche comme Commissaire associée, en charge du projet des publics, elle a travaillé au Witte de With Center for Contemporary Art à Rotterdam (2013-14); aux Laboratoires d’Aubervilliers (2010-13); et à Performa, la Biennale de Performances de New York (2009). Elle a réalisé plusieurs projets curatoriaux et de recherche collaboratifs en Europe et aux Etats-Unis, dont récemment Composing Differences, à MoMA PS1, au MoMA Recording Studio et à e-flux space à New York. Entre 2011 et 2014, elle a été Associate Editor de Manifesta Journal.

Project: Exercizing Doubt: Exhibition as Research
Space: Bétonsalon

close
en - it

Roman Ondák

Born 1966, Žilina, Slovakia
Lives and works in Bratislava, Slovakia

Roman Ondák takes a particular interest in the less obvious details of everyday life, which he homes in on and transfers into an artistic context. Using sculpture, installation, video, and performance, the artist disorients the public, deploying subtle tricks (or devices) to attract attention to something or someone that would otherwise go unnoticed. He also utilizes the same mechanism to tackle the exhibition spaces themselves, exploring the venue and altering both its architectural logic and habitual dynamics.
In Tickets, Please, the artist uses repetition to subvert a common experience. The photos, taken during a performance, show the table at the entrance to the museum where visitors normally pay for admission. Yet sitting behind the table is a young boy who asks for only half the ticket price. On the upper floor, the artist reconstructs the situation but with the ticket desk manned by the boy’s grandfather, generating not only a spatial shift but also a generation gap. Given the time it takes to get from one part of the venue to the other, visitors also experience a time lapse between the two payments.
The same temporal disorientation characterizes the work Silence, Please, which dates to a few years previously. In this performance, a museum guard, when in the room, wears a uniform based on the models used in the year the wearer was born. This piece tackles the paradoxical coexistence of presence and absence: the physical presence or otherwise of the performer and the metaphorical quality of the time differences evoked.

Nato a Žilina, Slovacchia, nel 1966
Vive e lavora a Bratislava, Slovacchia

Roman Ondák s’interessa in particolare ai dettagli meno appariscenti agli aspetti più ordinari della vita quotidiana, che trasferisce poi in un contesto artistico. Con sculture, installazioni, video e performance, l’artista disorienta il pubblico, attuando dei sottili inganni (o artifici), che permettono di attirare l’attenzione su qualcosa o qualcuno che altrimenti non verrebbe notato. Questo meccanismo è utilizzato anche negli spazi espositivi, dove Ondák esplora, modificandole, sia le logiche architettoniche sia le dinamiche abituali dell’istituzione museale.
In Tickets, Please (Biglietti, prego) l’artista cambia la prospettiva tradizionale, grazie all’espediente della ripetizione. Le foto sono state scattate durante una performance. Dietro un tavolo, posizionato all’entrata del museo, dove normalmente si paga l’ingresso alla mostra, è seduto un ragazzino che chiede metà del costo del biglietto. Al piano superiore del museo, l’artista ricostruisce esattamente la stessa situazione, ma a chiedere l’importo mancante del biglietto è il nonno del ragazzino, ciò che crea uno scarto non solo spaziale, ma anche generazionale. Il visitatore percepisce inoltre un disorientamento temporale, poiché impiega del tempo per spostarsi nello spazio espositivo.
Il medesimo disorientamento temporale caratterizza anche Silence, Please (Silenzio, prego), un’opera di qualche anno prima. Questa performance prevede che un sorvegliante del museo, quando è presente in sala, indossi un’uniforme fatta come i modelli che si usavano nell’anno di nascita del sorvegliante che la indossa. La performance affronta inoltre la coesistenza paradossale di presenza e assenza: quella fisica del performer e quella metaforica, data dalla lontananza temporale.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - fr

MARIE COZETTE

3_portraitDirector since 2007 of La Synagogue de Delme, an art centre located in a rural area in Eastern France, she co-founded and co-curated the art center Bétonsalon in 2004, with Mélanie Bouteloup. She has been freelance curator between 2004 and 2006.
At La Synagogue de Delme she has curated numerous solo exhibitions (Susan Hiller, Peter Friedl, Marie Cool Fabio Balducci, Louise Hervé and Chloé Maillet, Erick Beltran, Eric Baudelaire, Edith Dekyndt, Yona Friedman, Julien Prévieux, Katinka Bock…) and collaborated with guest curators or artists (Mathieu Copeland, Anna Colin, Sam Thorne, Mathieu Kleyebe Abonnenc…) to conceive group exhibitions on themes like identity, migration, the politics of sound and ethnomusicology. She also teaches exhibitions’ history at the Metz Art School.
Between 2012 and 2015 she has been a board member of d.c.a – french association for the development of centers d’art.

Marie Cozette dirige La Synagogue de Delme depuis 2007, centre d’art situé en zone rurale dans l’est de la France. En 2004, elle a co-fondé le centre d’art et de recherche Bétonsalon à Paris avec Mélanie Bouteloup, puis a été commissaire indépendante jusqu’en 2006.
A la synagogue de Delme, Marie Cozette a été commissaire de nombreuses expositions personnelles d’artistes français et internationaux (Susan Hiller, Peter Friedl, Marie Cool Fabio Balducci, Louise Hervé et Chloé Maillet, Erick Beltran, Eric Baudelaire, Edith Dekyndt, Yona Friedman, Julien Prévieux, Katinka Bock…). Elle a également collaboré avec divers commissaires ou artistes (Mathieu Copeland, Anna Colin, Sam Thorne, Mathieu Kleyebe Abonnenc…) pour des expositions collectives sur des thèmes liés à l’identité, la migration ou encore l’ethnomusicologie.
Elle enseigne ponctuellement à l’école des beaux arts de Metz. De 2012 à 2015, elle a été membre du bureau de d.c.a – association de développement des centres d’art dont elle assuré la présidence en 2014 et 2015.

close
en - fr

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH MARIE COZETTE, CAC LA SYNAGOGUE DE DELME, DELME

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH MARIE COZETTE, CAC LA SYNAGOGUE DE DELME, DELME

Vincent HonoréThe Synagogue de Delme is a centre d’art in a particular context. First in terms of its history, and then its architecture, and especially its location in a rural area. In your view, what are the strengths and weaknesses of this context?
Marie Cozette The centre d’art gets its strength precisely from this aspect of being atypical, unexpected and off the beaten path.
The weakness could be its isolation in a rural area within a village of 1000 residents, 35 km from the towns of Metz and Nancy. But this isolation is relative: Delme is three hours by car from Brussels, Basel and Frankfurt, and Paris is only one-and-a-half hours from Metz or Nancy by train. This region of eastern France has strong connections with other art scenes (in Belgium, Holland, Luxemburg, Germany, Switzerland and other countries).
Making the trip to Delme and finding yourself in this landscape – with fields as far as the eye can see – is part of the experience you get from the visit. It turns this visit into a special moment. The context itself forces attention onto the artists’ work. Therefore, in addition to being relative, this isolation is also highly productive, not just for the artists but also for the public and the staff of the centre d’art. As for the place itself, its history and architecture have a magnetic power. It’s a former synagogue that was built in the 19th century, partially destroyed by the Nazis during the Second World War and rebuilt after the war; in the 1970s the synagogue ceased operation because of a lack of followers, and it was turned into a centre d’art in 1993.
This historical depth is what makes it so complex and interesting. Artists can’t come with a turnkey project, they must get an understanding of the specificities of the place. The architectural quality of the space makes it a magnificent showcase for artists’ work, and it sometimes backs them into unexpected corners, raising new questions. Unlike the white cube and its supposed neutrality, a place like the Synagogue de Delme conceals infinite resources and questions, and this is what makes it so fascinating.

2. Berdaguer & Péjus, Gue(ho)st House

2. Berdaguer & Péjus, Gue(ho)st House

V.H.Where does Delme sit in the context of the overall French art policy?
M.C. In a context of fiscal austerity, culture is jeopardised. It’s the first area to pay for economic cuts. But there’s too much of a tendency to emphasise these economic issues, which often hide deeper questions of an ideological nature. Delme is a very small cog in a very large chain of cultural institutions that are going through major upheavals in terms of cultural policy. The gradual withdrawal of the state in favour of regional authorities in the financing and support of these places often works to the institutions’ detriment.
Delme is a micro-institution in terms of its budget, staff and resources, and yet the centre d’art is widely influential. It’s known all over the world, and it works with artists of all kinds, both emerging and established. It’s a highly referenced institution in the field of contemporary art in France; for over twenty years this place has kept up a very ambitious artistic vision. Moreover, the centre d’art isn’t in its own world but is solidly anchored in its region, keeping close links with different sectors of the public and local associations. The mediation side is extremely substantial considering the resources allocated to it, and it’s put into practice with total commitment day-to-day. I’m proud that the Synagogue de Delme is able to exist right where it would be least expected, in a region that’s more disadvantaged than others. In contexts like this, these ambitions should be supported all the more: they make sense in that they make it possible to demolish the ideas of those who imagine the world in terms of centre and periphery, shadow and light, high and low, common and elite. The reality is more subtle and nuanced. Just by existing, the Synagogue de Delme shows that it’s possible to get past these harmful oppositions, and in this sense it’s a precious place.

3. Exhibition view, Latifa Echakhch, Schizofonia

3. Exhibition view, Latifa Echakhch, Schizofonia

V.H. Does a centre d’art like the Synagogue de Delme still have a role to play in a context in which it seems like contemporary art is being replaced by the contemporary art industry? What are the responsibilities of the director of a centre d’art in 2015?
M.C. The Synagogue de Delme is part of this broader constellation of centres d’art, which makes up an essential network of researchers. They’re laboratories exploring creativity and finding ways of transmitting to all sectors of the public. They’re spaces of freedom, which absolutely must be preserved and defended, public agoras that aren’t there just to do good business; they’re spaces where quality takes precedence, as does attention to others. They’re places of learning where one can build a perspective and a critical mind. In short, they’re places of liberation and citizenship. Sometimes it’s hard to get the message heard in the current context, which is more conducive to withdrawal and fears of every kind.

4. Exhibition view, Michel Blazy. La marge d'erreur

4. Exhibition view, Michel Blazy. La marge d’erreur

V.H. PIANO wishes to create a forum for exchange and dialogue between Italian and French art centres. Why did you want to participate and what programme are you proposing?
M.C. I think it’s essential for the centre d’art to be involved in the projects of the d.c.a network. Working collectively and as a network has always been an essential aspect of my way of conceiving my work as a curator and organisation director. I very naturally wanted to take part in PIANO because this platform further develops this spirit of collaboration and networking.
Moreover, the meeting with Peep-Hole in Milan was decisive. It’s a place I feel very close to artistically, and we share a lot of elective affinities, a common sensibility. Thanks to this meeting, I was able to reach a whole scene I still didn’t know much about, and today we’re continuing our exchanges well beyond the project.
In the context of PIANO, the centre d’art is presenting a monographic exhibition of the duo Rometti Costales. At the same time we’re working on a book that will be a kind of extension of the exhibition space. This question of books as places of experimentation and research was also explored at Peep-Hole this summer with the second instalment of their project The Book Society.

Vincent Honoré La Synagogue de Delme est un centre d’art qui s’inscrit dans un contexte particulier. D’abord son histoire, puis son architecture et surtout son inscription dans un territoire rural. Selon vous, quelles sont les forces et les faiblesses de ce contexte ?
Marie Cozette Ce qui fait la force du centre d’art, c’est justement sa dimension atypique, inattendue, et hors des sentiers battus.
La faiblesse ce pourrait être son isolement, en zone rurale, dans un village de 1 000 habitants, à 35 km des villes que sont Metz et Nancy. Mais cet isolement est relatif : Delme est à 3 heures de route de Bruxelles, Bâle ou Francfort, Paris n’est qu’à 1h30 en train de Metz ou Nancy. Cette région de l’Est de la France est fortement connectée à d’autres scènes artistiques (belge, hollandaise, luxembourgeoise, allemande et suisse entre autres).
Faire le déplacement jusqu’à Delme et se retrouver dans ce paysage de champs à perte de vue participe aussi de l’expérience que la visite procure. Cela fait de cette visite un moment privilégié, le contexte en lui-même force l’attention portée au travail des artistes. En plus d’être relatif, cet isolement est donc éminemment productif, tant pour les artistes que pour le public ou l’équipe du centre d’art.
Quant au lieu lui-même, son histoire et son architecture dégagent une force magnétique. Il s’agit d’une ancienne synagogue, construite au XIXème siècle, partiellement détruite par les Nazis pendant la seconde guerre mondiale et reconstruite après guerre ; la synagogue s’est arrêtée de fonctionner, faute de pratiquants, à la fin des années 70 et a été transformée en centre d’art en 1993.
Cette épaisseur historique en fait toute la complexité et l’intérêt. Les artistes ne peuvent venir avec un projet clef en main mais doivent se saisir des spécificités du lieu. La qualité architecturale de l’espace en fait un magnifique écrin pour le travail des artistes et le pousse parfois dans des retranchements inattendus, soulève des questions nouvelles ; à la différence du white cube et de sa neutralité supposée, un lieu comme la synagogue de Delme recèle des ressources et des questions ad infinitum, ce qui en fait un lieu passionnant.

V.H. Comment situer Delme dans le contexte de politique artistique général français ?
M.C. Dans un contexte d’austérité budgétaire, la culture est mise à mal, elle est la première à faire les frais des resserrements économiques. Mais on a trop tendance à mettre en avant ces questions économiques, qui cachent bien souvent des questions plus profondes, d’ordre idéologique. Delme est un tout petit maillon dans une chaine très vaste d’institutions culturelles qui subit des bouleversements majeurs en termes de politique culturelle. Le retrait progressif de l’Etat au profit des collectivités territoriales dans le financement et l’accompagnement des lieux se fait souvent au détriment de ces derniers.
Delme est une micro-institution en termes de budget, d’équipe, de moyens, et pourtant le centre d’art rayonne très largement, il est connu dans le monde entier, travaille avec des artistes de tous horizons, à la fois émergents et confirmés, c’est un lieu de référence en France dans le champ de l’art contemporain ; depuis plus de vingt ans ce lieu maintient une grande ambition de projet artistique. Qui plus est, le centre d’art n’est pas hors-sol mais très ancré dans son territoire, en lien étroit avec les publics et les associations locales. Le volet médiation est extrêmement conséquent au vu des moyens alloués et il est pratiqué avec un engagement total au quotidien. Je suis fière qu’un centre d’art comme la synagogue de Delme puisse exister justement là où on l’attend le moins, dans un territoire moins favorisé que les autres. C’est a fortiori dans de tels contextes qu’il faut porter ces ambitions : elles font d’autant plus sens qu’elles permettent de déconstruire les imaginaires qui pensent le monde en termes de centre et de périphérie, d’ombre et de lumière, de haut et de bas, de populaire et d’élitisme. La réalité est plus délicate et nuancée. Par son existence même, la synagogue de Delme montre qu’il est possible de dépasser ces oppositions néfastes, et en ce sens c’est un lieu précieux.

V.H. Est-ce qu’un centre d’art comme la synagogue de Delme a encore un rôle à jouer dans un contexte où l’art contemporain tend à être remplacé par l’industrie de l’art contemporain ?
Quelles sont les responsabilités d’un directeur de centre d’art en 2015 ?
M.C. La synagogue de Delme participe de ce maillage plus large de centres d’art, qui constitue un réseau indispensable de têtes chercheuses. Ce sont des laboratoires, tant de la création que des modes de transmission à tous types de publics. Ce sont des espaces de liberté, qu’il faut absolument préserver et défendre, des agoras publiques qui ne sont pas là pour « faire du chiffre », mais des espaces où c’est la qualité qui prime avant tout, de même que l’attention portée à l’autre ; ce sont des lieux d’apprentissage et de construction du regard mais aussi d’un esprit critique, bref des lieux d’émancipation et de citoyenneté. Le message est parfois difficile à faire entendre dans le contexte actuel, qui prête davantage au repli sur soi et aux peurs de tous ordres.

V.H. PIANO veut créer un espace d’échange et de dialogue entre des lieux d’art italiens et français. Pourquoi avez-vous souhaité participer et quel programme proposez-vous ?
M.C. Il me semble absolument indispensable que le centre d’art s’inscrive dans les projets du réseau d.c.a : la dimension de travail collectif et en réseau a toujours été primordiale dans ma manière de concevoir le métier de commissaire et de directeur de structure, c’est tout naturellement que j’ai souhaité participer à PIANO parce que cette plateforme amplifie d’autant plus l’esprit de collaboration et de réseau.
Par ailleurs, la rencontre avec Peep-Hole à Milan a été déterminante. C’est un lieu dont je me sens très proche artistiquement et avec qui je partage de grandes affinités électives, une sensibilité commune. Grâce à cette rencontre, j’ai pu accéder à toute une scène que je connaissais encore mal et aujourd’hui nous continuons nos échanges bien au-delà du projet.
Dans le cadre de PIANO le centre d’art présente une monographie du duo Rometti Costales. En parallèle, nous travaillons sur un livre qui sera une sorte de prolongement de l’espace d’exposition. Cette question du livre comme lieu d’expérimentation et de recherche a également été abordée à Peep-Hole cet été avec la seconde occurrence de leur projet The Book Society.

Images:
1. Centre d’art contemporain – la synagogue de Delme.
2. Berdaguer & Péjus, Gue(ho)st House, Centre d’art contemporain – la synagogue de Delme, 2012. © Adagp Paris 2012.
3. Exhibition view, Schizophonia, work by Latifa Echakhch, Resolutions, Centre d’art contemporain – la synagogue de Delme, 2013
4. Exhibition view, La marge d’erreur, work by Michel Blazy, Centre d’art contemporain – la synagogue de Delme, 2008
Photos: © OHDancy

Space: CAC La Synagogue de Delme
Project: The Book Society #02
Protagonists: Marie Cozette, Rometti Costales

close
en - it - fr

Mauricio Guillén

Born 1971, Mexico City, Mexico
Lives and works in Frankfurt, Germany

The work of Mauricio Guillén combines film, photography, text, and objects. His works explore the role played by aesthetics in the organization of social space, deploying notions of identity construction, exclusion and inclusion, migration, communication, and translation.
Guillén combines his personal experience with conceptual strategies, using a poetic language in which he analyzes our understanding of culture and history by means of verbal and visual communication.
Avenida Progreso is a black-and- white 16mm film shot in Mexico City, where the artist spent his childhood and adolescence. The film depicts a philosophy and aesthetics teacher collecting papers after an end-of- year exam, before taking a taxi back to his home on the Avenue of Progress. Like a history book that traces classical culture and the progress of the humanities, the streets carry the names of European intellectuals and writers such as Goethe, Byron, Marx, Tolstoy, and Aristotle. At the same time, allusions are made to the Museo Soumaya, which, because it is housed in a spectacular building, reveals the internal contradictions of “progress” and the buildings of a “new culture.” The film thus explores the processes of change at work in Mexican society, which nevertheless remains under the influence of European colonization. By calling into question figures of authority in the education system, Avenida Progreso also raises the question of the transmission of knowledge and the perpetuation of inequalities.
Originally conceived for the Barbican Art Gallery in London, Security Measures comprises a series of tweed uniforms tailor-made for the art center security guards. The work aims to expose the underlying power relations in contemporary society and its institutions. On a political level, the work draws attention to what is normally minimized and concealed in a cultural context: instances of control. From a sociological standpoint, Security Measures restores individuality to those institutional agents whose presence is depersonalized and ignored. Rather than privilege an analytical and discursive mode, the artist has chosen an approach that literally incorporates sociological, economical, and political questions, redefining the relationship between artists and art institutions.

Nato a Città del Messico, Messico, nel 1971
Vive e lavora a Francoforte, Germania

Il lavoro di Mauricio Guillén si situa al crocevia tra film, fotografia, testo e oggetto. Le sue opere esaminano il ruolo assunto dall’estetica nell’organizzazione dello spazio sociale, e mettono in gioco le nozioni di costruzione identitaria, di esclusione e inclusione, di migrazione, di comunicazione e di traduzione. Guillén unisce la sua esperienza personale a strategie concettuali, in un linguaggio poetico con cui analizza la nostra comprensione della cultura e della storia, tramite la comunicazione verbale e visiva.
Avenida Progreso è un cortometraggio in bianco e nero in 16mm girato a Città del Messico, dove l’artista ha trascorso l’infanzia e l’adolescenza. Un professore di filosofia raccoglie le copie di un esame di fine anno, prima di prendere un taxi per tornare a casa, in Viale del Progresso. Seguiamo il suo punto di vista attraverso il finestrino dell’automobile. Come in un libro di storia che ripercorre la cultura classica e il progresso delle scienze umane, le vie attraversate portano i nomi di pensatori o scrittori europei, tra i quali Goethe, Byron, Marx, Tolstòj e Aristotele. Indirettamente è evocato il Museo Soumaya, architettura spettacolare che sottolinea le contraddizioni interne al “progresso” e agli edifici della “nuova cultura” messicana. Il film indaga i processi di cambiamento in atto nella società messicana, che resta comunque segnata dall’influsso della colonizzazione europea. Attraverso la messa in questione delle figure di potere del sistema educativo, Avenida Progreso esplora inoltre i temi della trasmissione del sapere e della perpetuazione delle disuguaglianze. Inizialmente pensata per la Barbican Art Gallery di Londra, Security Measures (Misure di sicurezza) consiste in una serie di uniformi in tweed, tagliate su misura per i custodi di uno spazio espositivo. L’opera vuole evidenziare i rapporti di potere insiti nella società contemporanea e nelle sue istituzioni. Su un piano politico, attira l’attenzione su ciò che solitamente è sottovalutato o nascosto in un contesto culturale, cioè le autorità di controllo. Da un punto di vista sociologico, restituisce un’individualità agli agenti istituzionali, la cui presenza è spersonalizzata e negata. Piuttosto che privilegiare un modello analitico o discorsivo, Guillén sceglie un approccio che incorpora, letteralmente, le questioni di ordine sociologico, economico e politico, ridefinendo la natura dei rapporti degli artisti con le strutture del sistema dell’arte.

Né à Mexico City, Mexique, en 1971
Vit et travaille à Francfort, Allemagne

Le travail de Mauricio Guillén se situe à la croisée du film, de la photographie, du texte et de l’objet. Ses œuvres explorent le rôle joué par l’esthétique dans l’organisation de l’espace social et mettent en jeu les notions de construction identitaire, d’exclusion et inclusion, de migration, de communication et de traduction. Guillén combine son expérience personnelle avec des stratégies conceptuelles, dans un langage poétique à travers lequel il analyse notre compréhension de la culture et de l’histoire par l’intermédiaire de la communication verbale et visuelle.
Avenida Progreso est un film noir et blanc 16mm tourné à Mexico City, ville où l’artiste a passé son enfance et adolescence. Un professeur de philosophie et d’esthétique récolte les copies d’un examen de fin d’année, avant de prendre un taxi pour se rendre à son domicile, Avenue du Progrès. On suit son point de vue à travers la vitre de la voiture. Comme dans un livre d’histoire retraçant la culture classique et le progrès des sciences humaines, les rues traversées portent les noms de penseurs ou écrivains européens, dont Goethe, Byron, Marx, Tolstoï et Aristote. En filigrane est évoqué le Museo Soumaya, architecture spectaculaire qui souligne les contradictions internes du « progrès » et des édifices de la « nouvelle culture ». Le film explore ainsi les processus de changement à l’œuvre dans la société mexicaine, qui reste néanmoins empreinte de l’influence de la colonisation européenne. Par la remise en cause des figures d’autorité du système éducatif, Avenida Progreso est aussi traversé par la question de la transmission du savoir et de la perpétuation des inégalités.
À l’origine pensée pour la Barbican Art Gallery à Londres, Security Measures est une série d’uniformes en tweed taillés sur mesure pour les gardiens des espaces du lieu d’art. L’œuvre vise à exposer les rapports de pouvoir sous-jacents dans la société contemporaine et ses institutions. Sur un plan politique, elle attire l’attention sur ce qui est habituellement minoré ou maquillé dans un contexte culturel, soit les instances de contrôle. Sur un versant sociologique, les Measures redonnent une individualité à ceux des agents institutionnels dont la présence est dépersonnalisée et niée. Plutôt que de privilégier un modèle analytique ou discursif, l’artiste choisit une approche qui incorpore littéralement les questions d’ordre sociologique, économique et politique, redéfinissant la nature des rapports des artistes avec les structures d’art.

 Project: Soleil politique

close
en

ENRICO BOCCIOLETTI

Enrico Boccioletti is an artist and musician active under multiple names – Death in Plains, 4SICSX, spcnvdr and Enrico B – in the fields of post-conceptual, new vernacular, performance and sound, interested in incompleteness and circularity, duplication and accumulation, waste, layering, forgery, faux-real. He also works for Mousse Magazine and Vdrome. http://www.spcnvdr.org/

Focus: Prepared Piano – Model for a New Institutionalism
Partner: Mousse

close
en - it

RAIMUND ABRAHAM

Born 1933, Linz, Austria
† 2010, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Between the late 1950s and the early 1970s, architects like Raimund Abraham, Walter Pichler, and Hans Hollein revisited the conventions of modernism, giving rise to what is commonly known as Austrian avant- garde architecture. Abraham’s creations are grounded in the basic notion of horizon, the point where sky and earth meet: his buildings embody this encounter. His work draws on utopian visions, narratives, and poetry, and his youthful imaginary architecture – drawings and models of which are shown here – ­is accompanied by brief poetic compositions that explain his architectural ideas. After working on the design for a house in 1963 with Walter Pichler, a project called House for Two Friends, Raimund Abraham began to create a series of models for houses. He saw the home as an architectural paradigm springing from the encounter between abstract forms and the landscape. The Austrian architect presented a series of houses based on archetypal shapes and solids (the square, cube, circle, sphere, dot, line, and surface) and devoted to his closest friends, most of whom were artists or architects. The designs were not constructed but represent original interpretations of human dwellings in the post-modern era. In Haus mit permanentem Schatten (House with Permanent Shade), the shade forms a protective shelter. In Haus mit Blumenwänden (House with Flower Walls), the flowers that make up the walls of the house wilt and fall to the ground, creating a connection between the lifespan of the building and the processes of disintegration that characterize the world of nature. Drawing inspiration from the billowing drapery in Botticelli’s Birth of Venus, the project Haus mit Vorhängen (House with Curtains) is devoted to the artist’s partner: Abraham imagines a house in which volumes and spaces, light and shade are constantly changing, and the wind seems to blow from inside the building. In all of these projects the distinctive elements of each design merge with the building itself.

 

Nato a Linz, Austria, nel 1933
† 2010, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Tra la fine degli anni ’50 e la prima metà degli anni ’70, architetti quali Raimund Abraham, Walter Pichler e Hans Hollein rivedono le convenzioni del modernismo per dare vita a quella che è comunemente nota come la (neo)avan-guardia architettonica austriaca.
Le creazioni di Abraham si sviluppano a partire dall’idea fondamentale di orizzonte, il punto in cui terra e cielo si incontrano e dove gli edifici danno corpo a questo incontro. L’opera dell’architetto si nutre di utopie, narrazioni e poesia. L’architettura immaginaria, elaborata da Abraham negli anni giovanili, e qui illustrata da disegni e modelli, è accompagnata da brevi componimenti poetici che spiegano la visione architettonica del loro ideatore. Stimolato dal progetto per la realizzazione di una casa, pensato nel 1963 insieme a Walter Pichler e intitolato House for Two Friends (Casa per due amici), Raimund Abraham lavora a una serie di modelli abitativi. La casa diventa così per lui un paradigma architettonico, nato dalla collisione tra forme astratte e paesaggio. L’architetto austriaco propone una serie di case basate su figure e volumi archetipici (quadrato, cubo, cerchio, sfera, punto, linea e superficie), e dedicate ai suoi amici più stretti, per lo più artisti e architetti. I progetti non vengono realizzati, ma rimangono considerazioni originarie sull’abitare umano in un’epoca postmoderna. In Haus mit permanentem Schatten (Casa con ombra permanente), l’ombra proiettata dalla parete diviene una pelle trasparente, che forma un rifugio protettivo sul terreno. In Haus mit Blumenwänden (Casa con pareti di fiori) i fiori che costituiscono i muri dell’abitazione appassiscono e cadono al suolo, legando la vita della casa al processo di disintegrazione del mondo vegetale. Ispirata ai movimenti dei panneggi del dipinto botticelliano La Nascita di Venere, Haus mit Vorhängen (Casa con tende) è dedicata alla compagna dell’artista: Abraham immagina una casa in cui pieni e vuoti, luce e ombra si alternano costantemente, e dove il vento sembra provenire dall’interno dell’edificio. In tutti questi esempi, gli elementi che caratterizzano ogni proposta diventano l’edificio stesso.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it

Deimantas NARKEVIČIUS

Born 1964, Utena, Lithuania
Lives and works in Vilnius, Lithuania

A classical sculptor by training, Deimantas Narkevičius works mainly with video and film. In his exploration of collective experiences of history, above all in Eastern Europe, story-telling is both the subject of his work and his modus operandi. The artist describes White Revenge as “an act of violence on a phony revolutionary object.” He tracked down a copy of a desk designed by El Lissitzky in 1923 and mass produced at the end of the 1970s by the German company Tecta (Model M61). Lissitzky’s design expressed Russia’s aesthetic revolution, the bourgeoisie overthrown by the urban and rural proletariat. Narkevičius had four bullets shot at the desk by a Mauser C96, a gun used during the civil war that followed the October Revolution of 1917. The title of the work references the reversal of the situation: many of the then Communists (the “Reds”) are now business men (“Whites”). Shooting a work of art is a way of remembering the human drama that accompanied the transformation of society and aesthetics in the Soviet Union of that era. This work hence commemorates a historic event without producing a traditional monument.

Nato a Utena, Lituania, nel 1964
Vive e lavora a Vilnius, Lituania

Diplomato in scultura classica, Deimantas Narkevičius lavora essenzialmente sullo storytelling, utilizzando video e film. Le tematiche principali, intorno alle quali si sviluppa la sua pratica artistica, riguardano le esperienze storiche collettive, soprattutto dei paesi dell’est europeo. La storia stessa è per l’artista sia oggetto della sua ricerca, sia metodo di lavoro. White Revenge (Vendetta bianca) è stata definita da Narkevičius “un atto violento su un falso oggetto rivoluzionario”. L’artista recupera una copia della scrivania disegnata da El Lissitzky nel 1923 e prodotta poi in serie alla fine degli anni ’70 dall’azienda tedesca di design Tecta (si tratta del modello M61). Il design di Lissitzky era espressione della rivoluzione estetica sovietica, del dominio della classe operaia e contadina su quella borghese. Narkevičius colpisce il tavolo in quattro punti con dei proiettili sparati da una Mauser C96, una pistola usata durante la guerra civile che seguì alla Rivoluzione di Ottobre nel 1917. Il titolo dell’opera ricorda come la situazione sia ora rovesciata e molti comunisti di allora (i “Rossi”) siano oggi uomini d’affari (“Bianchi). Inoltre sparare a un’opera d’arte è un modo per commemorare il dramma umano, che accompagnò la riforma della società e del linguaggio estetico dell’Unione Sovietica in quegli anni. In questo modo l’artista celebra l’evento storico, senza dover ricorrere alla realizzazione di un monumento tradizionale.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

Daniele Pezzi

Daniele Pezzi, Tutulma, 2010-2013

Daniele Pezzi, Tutulma, 2010-2013

Born 1977, Ravenna, Italy
Lives and works in Ravenna, Italy
His work is mainly constituted of videos, while photos, sculptures, and paintings are often the result of the film’s production process. The themes that he is working on are linked to nomadism (as the dangerous alternative to belligerent stillness), to archeology and anthropology (as the disciplines that study the hidden past, and perhaps contribute to a re-writing of history itself), and to environmental psychology (of both the fictional characters as well as the spectators themselves). The screenplays are more similar to lists of ideas, instructions and short tales, and are discussed together with actors and further adapted to the surrounding landscapes and architectures. The finished work is the result of an open process of mediation in which the author considers himself as a catalyzing agent.

Project: Piano – alto!

 

(1977, vive e lavora a Ravenna) La sua produzione è costituita prevalentemente da lavori video, mentre le foto, le sculture e le pitture sono spesso il risultato del processo di produzione filmico. I temi su cui lavora costantemente sono connessi ai concetti di nomadismo (in quanto alternativa pericolosa alla stanzialità belligerante), all’archeologia e antropologia (in quanto discipline di comprensione del passato remoto, e che contribuiscono alla riscrittura della storia), e alla psicologia dello spazio (sia dei personaggi che popolano i lavori, sia degli spettatori che li vedranno). Le sceneggiature sono in realtà elenchi di idee, istruzioni e racconti brevi che vengono discusse con gli attori e rielaborate anche in relazione all’architettura o al paesaggio che li circonda. Il lavoro concluso è quindi il risultato di un processo aperto di mediazione in cui l’autore si considera come catalizzatore.

 

Né en 1977, vit et travaille à Ravenna. Sa production est constituée principalement de vidéos, les photographies, les sculptures et les peintures étant le résultat du procédé de production filmique. Les thèmes qui animent sa recherche touchent au nomadisme (comme alternative dangereuse à la sédentarité belligérante), à l’archéologie et l’anthropologie (disciplines de la compréhension du passé lointain, qui contribuent à la réécriture de l’histoire) et à la psychologie de l’espace (celle des personnages qui peuplent ses travaux ainsi que des spectateurs qui les regardent). Les scénarios sont en fait des listes d’idées, instructions ou brèves narrations qui font l’objet d’une discussion avec les acteurs et sont ensuite adaptées en fonction de l’architecture et du paysage qui les entourent. Le travail achevé est donc le résultat d’un processus ouvert de médiation dans lequel l’auteur incarne le rôle de catalyseur.

Daniele Pezzi raconte des histoires inspirées par la vision d’un nomadisme absolu : il est partout ailleurs et chez lui à la fois. Les personnages de ses films sont joués par des gens rencontrés sur place et qui l’introduisent aux usages et aux mythologies des lieux. Construite dans un processus de dialogues avec les protagonistes, la narration s’installe et erre dans les paysages et les architectures perçus comme des espaces mentaux et philosophiques.

Martine Michard
décembre 2014

Image:
Daniele Pezzi, Tutulma, 2010-2013, video still HD. Courtesy of the artist

close
en - it - fr

ANDREA BRUCIATI IN CONVERSATION WITH DANIELE PEZZI

ANDREA BRUCIATI IN CONVERSATION WITH DANIELE PEZZI

Andrea Bruciati Hi Daniele, could you tell me about the spirit with which you are going about this experience?
Daniele Pezzi First, the residence I was selected for is somewhat atypical: I will spend 45 days staying at three art centers located in the region of Midi-Pyrénées. In each of these (in order of time: Maison des Arts Georges Pompidou in Cajarc, Chapelle St Jacques in Saint-Gaudens, and BBB in Toulouse), I will spend 15 days. The residence theme focuses on movement and utopia, both from a practical point of view (the experience of the artist who has to bring together within the project the various art centers involved, which are physically distant from each other), and from the point of  view of theory (hence the choice of selecting my work method for this residence). These characteristics and associated limitations represent the challenge that I have to face and the stimulus to imagine possible solutions.

ALPEGGIO

A.B. What process/project do you intend to develop?
D.P. In the project, I want to continue to study unexpected solutions for the fusion between reality and fiction: I shall follow a process that I have been developing in the last few years, through a series of videos designed and produced while constantly on the move. A variable condition in which it is impossible to work according to a screenplay or a rigid schedule; it is not possible to predict the weather, the difficulties of accessibility of a given location, the physical limitations etc. Unlike previous projects, which unfolded gradually during the course of the work, this time I was forced to define in advance a range of possibilities and potentialities from which to draw to make the most of the short time available. If I were to give a title to the shapeless mass of ideas, techniques and scenes that make up the project at this time, it could be “The Unmasking”.

ROADS-ENDING1

A.B. Specifically, what is it about?
D.P. In every location of the residence I will select one or more volunteering actors (professional and amateur) with whom to activate a process of definition of the character that they will interpret. I am interested in a fully collaborative approach in which I put aside the control ravings typical of the ‘dictauthor’. The result of these meetings will be characters sprouting naturally from a compromise between my idea, the personality of the interpreter and the limitations of the context in which we will take action. For several years, I’ve been working on a wandering figure who observes the contexts it goes through, and at the same time struggles with having to adapt to the changing environmental conditions.

ROADS-ENDING2

A.B. A sort of almost plastic metamorphosis on the one hand, and a Zelig-style changing character on the other.
D.P. As the scenery, the temperature, the architecture change, so does the character, psychologically (varying its mood and dramatics) but also physically (because played by different actors). The character becomes a flexible and pliable being that each time becomes other than itself; while retaining a few elements of resemblance, such as clothes style, physical aspect, etc., depending on the situation his/her attitude can be aggressive, or collapse under the weight of a constraint, thus becoming fragile. If this character had a model, he/she would look like the protagonist of Pasolini’s Petrolio, who alternatively switches between being a man and a woman, as a result of a trauma that would otherwise be impossible to recount.

St_cirq-lapopie-mini

A.B. What result would you ultimately like to reach from this relentless transformation flow?
D.P. The film that will result from this process will be divided in areas: natural or manmade places where one will see the characters act and mature, go through and look at the situations that they face. The backdrop to this staging will be reality, the one that I will find in that region of France, expressed in a documentary fashion. The way in which the real and unexpected event will inevitably influence the project, will form the backbone, will determine the urge. We will start logistically from the peaks of the Pyrenees, in search of the routes of smugglers and illegal immigrants to arrive at Saint-Gaudens, overcoming mountains that have always represented natural boundaries and limits. We will cross the countryside and forests of Cajarc, trying to uncover the signs of the influence of today’s political propaganda and media, to close at a library at the University of Toulouse, where we will attend a debate between a group of people trying to find an agreement on the perfect model of democracy to pursue. Toulouse was in fact the city where the Veneto-born Silvio Trentin opened the library which soon became the reference point of the anti-fascist movements in Europe: the place where people met to discuss utopias and resistance.

St-Gaudens-mini

A.B. A sort of documentary, or you are looking for a different film language?
D.P. The film is certainly not intended to come to an end in the classic sense – quite the opposite. The result of the construction, which I will work on in the months after my coming back, will be the most effective arrangement of a wealth of material collected in a period of intense work and discovery, with a number of concerns and questions that will guide the entire process. From a technical point of view I will use a different shooting style for each residence location; although there will never be a more overtly “documentary” part, in the sense of improvised aesthetic. The goal, in fact, is to manage to build a solid narrative and emotional experience in which the character and its alterations can be reflected deeply in the viewer.

Andrea Bruciati Ciao Daniele, puoi raccontarmi lo spirito con cui ti accingi ad intraprendere questa esperienza?
Daniele Pezzi Per prima cosa la residenza per cui sono stato selezionato è in qualche modo atipica: trascorrerò 45 giorni spostandomi tra tre centri d’arte situati nella regione del Midi-Pyrénées. In ognuno di questi (in ordine di successione: Maison des Arts Georges Pompidou di Cajarc, Chapelle St Jacques di Saint-Gaudens e BBB di Toulouse) trascorrerò un periodo di tempo di 15 giorni. Il tema della residenza verte sullo spostamento e l’utopia, sia da un punto di vista pratico (l’esperienza dell’artista che deve unire nel suo progetto i vari centri d’arte che sono fisicamente distanti tra loro) sia da un punto di vista teorico (da cui la scelta di selezionare il mio metodo di lavoro per questa residenza). Queste caratteristiche e le limitazioni che ne derivano rappresentano la sfida che mi trovo di fronte e la propulsione a immaginare possibili soluzioni.

A.B. Quale processo/progetto intendi sviluppare?
D.P. Nel progetto voglio continuare a studiare le soluzioni inaspettate della fusione tra reale e fiction: seguirò un processo che ho sviluppato negli ultimi anni, attraverso una serie di video concepiti e realizzati in continuo spostamento. Uno stato variabile in cui è impossibile lavorare basandosi su una sceneggiatura o uno schema rigido di progetto; non è infatti possibile prevedere le condizioni meteo, le difficoltà di accessibilità di un determinato luogo, i limiti fisici ecc. A differenza dei precedenti, che si svelavano completamente solo in corso d’opera, questa volta sono stato obbligato a definire anticipatamente un ventaglio di possibilità e potenzialità da cui attingere per sfruttare al massimo il breve periodo di tempo a disposizione. Se dovessi dare un titolo alla massa informe di idee, tecniche e scene che formano il progetto in questo momento, potrebbe essere “Lo Smascheramento”.

A.B. Nello specifico di cosa si tratta?
D.P. In ogni luogo della residenza selezionerò uno o più attori volontari (professionisti e non) con cui attivare un processo di definizione del personaggio che andranno a interpretare. Sono interessato a un approccio totalmente collaborativo in cui metto da parte le smanie di controllo tipiche del ‘dittautore’. Il risultato di questi incontri saranno personaggi che germoglieranno naturalmente dal compromesso tra la mia idea, la personalità dell’interprete e i limiti del contesto in cui ci troveremo ad agire. Da diversi anni, infatti, lavoro su una figura errabonda che è osservatore del contesto che attraversa, e allo stesso tempo alle prese con l’adattamento a condizioni ambientali variabili.

A.B. Una sorta di metamorfosi quasi plastica da un lato e un personaggio cangiante alla Zelig dall’altro.
D.P. Come cambiano il paesaggio, la temperatura, l’architettura, allo stesso tempo muta il personaggio, psicologicamente (variando stato d’animo e drammaturgia) ma anche fisicamente (essendo interpretato da attori diversi). Il personaggio diventa quindi un essere elastico e malleabile che diventa di volta in volta altro da sé; pur mantenendo alcuni elementi di somiglianza, come lo stile degli abiti, la costituzione fisica, ecc., a seconda delle situazioni  il suo atteggiamento può essere aggressivo, o crollare sotto il peso di una costrizione, e diventare fragile. Se questo personaggio dovesse trovare un modello assomiglierebbe al protagonista di Petrolio di Pasolini, che si ritrova a essere alternativamente uomo o donna, come effetto di un trauma che sarebbe impossibile raccontare diversamente.

A.B. Quale risultato ultimativo vuoi perseguire da questo incessante flusso in trasformazione?
D.P. Il film che risulterà da questo processo sarà suddiviso per ambienti: luoghi naturali o antropizzati in cui si vedranno i personaggi agire e maturare, attraversare e osservare, le situazioni che si troveranno di fronte. L’orizzonte di questa messa in scena sarà la realtà, quella che troverò nella Francia di quella regione, espressa con una prassi affine al documentario. Il modo in cui l’evento reale e inaspettato influenzerà inesorabilmente il progetto ne formerà l’ossatura, ne determinerà l’urgenza. Si partirà logisticamente dalle cime dei Pirenei, cercando i tragitti dei contrabbandieri e dei clandestini per arrivare a Saint-Gaudens, superando montagne che da sempre sono confini e limiti naturali. Si attraverseranno le campagne e i boschi di Cajarc cercando di svelare i segni dell’influenza della propaganda politica e mediatica di oggi, fino a chiudere in una biblioteca dell’università di Tolosa, dove assisteremo a un dibattito tra un gruppo di persone che cercherà di trovare un accordo sul modello perfetto di Democrazia da perseguire. Tolosa è stata infatti la città dove il veneto Silvio Trentin aprì la libreria che diventò presto il punto di riferimento dei movimenti anti-fascisti europei: il luogo dove si ritrovavano per discutere di utopie e di resistenza.

A.B. Una sorta di documentario o sei alla ricerca di un linguaggio cinematografico differente?
D.P. Il film non sarà sicuramente inteso per essere concluso in senso classico, al contrario. Il risultato del montaggio, che seguirò nei mesi successivi al mio ritorno, sarà la configurazione più efficace di un bagaglio di materiali costruiti in un periodo di intenso lavoro e scoperta, con una serie di preoccupazioni e di punti interrogativi che guideranno l’intero processo. Da un punto di vista tecnico utilizzerò uno stile di ripresa diverso per ogni luogo di residenza; non ci sarà mai però una parte più dichiaratamente “documentaristica”, intesa come estetica improvvisata. L’obiettivo, infatti, è riuscire a costruire una solida esperienza narrativa ed emozionale in cui il personaggio e le sue alterazioni possano riflettersi profondamente nello spettatore.

Images:
cover. Daniele Pezzi, Tutulma, 2010-2013, video still HD. Courtesy of the artist
other pictures: video stills and reasearch images

Project: Piano – alto!
Spaces: Maison des Arts Georges Pompidou CAC, CAC Chapelle St Jacques, BBB centre d’art
Protagonists: Daniele Pezzi

close
en - it

Alberto Garutti

02_Museion_SoleilPolitique_Garutti

Alberto Garutti, Madonna, 2007

Born 1948, Galbiate, Italy
Lives and works in Milan, Italy

For Alberto Garutti, works of art only exist in the eyes of the beholder. The first person to behold any work is of course the artist himself, who observes reality and imparts different attributes to objects. It is then up to the viewer to complete the work by supplying meaning. Many of Garutti’s works are designed for public space, where the confrontation between artwork and viewer is direct, not mediated by a museum or artistic venue that houses and presents it.
In his work Alberto Garutti investigates various aspects of the human experience, including spirituality. Madonna, a ceramic statue of the Virgin Mary, originated as a commission for the Nuova Chiesa (New Church) in the parish of Trezzano sul Naviglio (Milan). Deliberately embracing the artistic tradition of religious representation, Garutti reproduces the Virgin Mary in a way that adds an element of personal experience to the relationship between the statue and the believer. Garutti achieves this by creating a white ceramic copy of a nineteenth century statue of the Madonna, but deliberately changing the way it is perceived. He takes his inspiration from time-honoured rituals that see believers flocking to touch sacred statues, but in this case, the material is not cold to the touch, but warm: an electrical system inside the sculpture heats the ceramic structure to the same temperature as the human body. This warmth adds an unexpected dimension to the believer’s physical experience, creating an element of affinity with the sculpture.

Nato a Galbiate, Italia, nel 1948
Vive e lavora a Milano, Italia

Per Alberto Garutti l’opera d’arte esiste solo nello sguardo di chi la osserva. Il primo a effettuare questa operazione è l’artista stesso, che, guardando la realtà, conferisce alle cose un aspetto diverso. Successivamente, è lo spettatore a portare l’opera a compimento, attribuendole un senso. Molti degli interventi di Garutti sono pensati per lo spazio pubblico, dove il confronto tra opera e spettatore è diretto, perché non mediato da un contesto museale o artistico che accoglie e presenta l’opera. L’artista indaga vari aspetti dell’esperienza umana, tra cui la spiritualità. Madonna è una statua in ceramica raffigurante la Vergine Maria. L’opera nasce come progetto commissionato nell’ambito del programma iconografico della Nuova Chiesa sussidiaria della parrocchia di Trezzano sul Naviglio (MI). Inserendosi nella tradizione artistica delle rappresentazioni religiose, Alberto Garutti raffigura la Vergine introducendo un elemento esperienziale tra la statua e il fedele. Realizza una copia in ceramica bianca di una statua ottocentesca della Madonna, modificandone però la percezione. Poiché nel rito spontaneo i fedeli toccano le statue sacre, l’artista ha voluto che il materiale della sua scultura al tatto non fosse freddo, bensì tiepido. Il tepore fa sembrare la statua viva e, quindi, vicina al fedele anche nell’esperienza corporea. In una sezione cava all’interno della scultura vi è infatti un sistema di riscaldamento elettrico, che permette alla ceramica di raggiungere la temperatura del corpo umano.

Image:
Alberto Garutti, Madonna, 2007, courtesy of the artist, Soleil Politique, Museion 2014. Photo: Luca Meneghel

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - fr

CLÉMENCE SEILLES

Born 1984, Besançon, France
Lives and works between Paris, France and Amsterdam, Netherlands 

Her work has been exhibited internationally: Moucharabieh, Triangle, Marseille (2015); 100 ans plus tard, Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2014); Universal Studio, galerie Torri, Paris (2014); What do you write when men are puking into plastic bags,Chert gallery, Berlin (2014); La vie est un songe, Parc Saint Leger, Pougues-les-eaux (2013) ; La chute, Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2013); Hotel Abisso,Centre d’art contemporain de Genève, Geneva (2013); The day after, Van Horbourg and Le foyer, Zurich (2012).

Née à Besançon, France, en 1984
Vit et travaille entre Paris, France et Amsterdam, Pays Bas

Son travail a été exposé internationalement: Moucharabieh,Triangle, Marseille (2015) ; 100 ans plus tard, Palais de Tokyo, Paris(2014), Universal Studio, galerie Torri, Paris (2014) ; What do you write when men are puking into plastic bags,Chert gallery, Berlin (2014) ; La vie est un songe, Parc Saint Léger, Pougues-les-eaux (2013) ; La chute, Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2013) ; Hotel Abisso,Centre d’art contemporain de Genève, Genève (2013) ; The day after, Van Horbourg et Le foyer, Zurich (2012).

Project: Exercizing Doubt: On Exhibition as Research

close
en - fr

DOROTHÉE DUPUIS IN CONVERSATION WITH CLÉMENCE SEILLES

DOROTHÉE DUPUIS IN CONVERSATION WITH CLÉMENCE SEILLES

Dorothée Dupuis Could you talk about your formal influences? What do you look at? How do you think? How has your training as a designer informed how you produce forms in the exhibition sphere? It seems that the language of abstraction is still important for you. In what sense do you think you’re tackling it in a new way?
Clémence Seilles I regularly go back and see images by my classical masters: Tatlin, Sottsass, Sonia, as well as Robert Delaunay, Superstudio, Hélio Oiticica, the Gelatin collective… to mention only a handful of “dirty artists” who have navigated or are navigating, casually and doubtfully, between applied arts and fine arts. Primordial shapes like circles, triangles, squares… enable me to concentrate more on narratives, circumstances and processes. I proceed from what societies tangibly produce to build themselves. I visit companies dealing in supplies or construction equipment, and go to rendering plants and product assembly factories. I idly drive through industrial estates in Italy, France, Germany and Holland. On YouTube I watch guitar swirling in garages and industrial plastic machining. In China, Russia, Morocco, Jamaica and Mexico, I study wire mesh houses, terracotta vehicles, simple and exuberant displays, custom cars, street amenities for chance meetings… I’m fascinated by amusements, even the most modest: a subwoofer in a pot with holes, a fish-shaped gun barrel in the bar of a deck chair… I adore permissive societies. The work Bassin ouvert (Open Basin) at ar/ge kunst in Bolzano, which first appeared at Triangle in Marseille, is a desire to create a social space within that of art, where people are invited to create a critical product. In this context, the work is at once an everyday object and something fantastical: a fountain, a long swimming pool, in which shapes and materials follow directly from the research I mentioned a moment ago. Although my training as a designer informs manipulations of conventions (much more than manipulations of shapes), the exhibition sphere, which is not very familiar with functional services and devices, opens up a fertile field of experiments that are more complicated to develop in the commercial sphere.

Cl+®mence Seilles - argekunst web 11

2. Exhibition view, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert

D.D. You do a lot of collaborative projects with your “gang”. You’re invited to organise birthdays (Triangle, ar/ge kunst); your friends cross Europe to work with you; you share the fee money; you sell cocktails and t-shirts; you teach; you occupy squats and villas. Are you more of a Fassbinder, Wako or Beverly Hills 90210?
C.S. I’m from Montboucons. It’s the Beverly Hills of Besançon in Franche-Comté. A gang can be Philip K. Dick (Ubik) and Kerouac (The Dharma Bums) living in the City of Quartz (Mike Davis), flirting on Less Than Zero (Bret Easton Ellis) with the risk of ending up like in The Postman Always Rings Twice (James M. Cain), alone and condemned. I try to combine sustainable economic efficiency with the risk of alienation. The gang – made up of artists, designers, composers, curators and architects who are all fanatical about hard beats – lives between Berlin, Amsterdam and Paris, and is heterogeneous and multifarious. There’s no unifying manifesto, exclusive dogma, or even a name. The action hierarchies are healthy, made of individuals who do their singular research and can take turns implementing or supporting a project. Drama is part of this game that we haven’t really found rules for, but experience has shown us that the virtues of fraternity bring tangible added value to our critical ambitions and to the wellbeing of our respective lives. To name a few of these creations that I’m surrounded by: the Krux, a giant, well-equipped collective studio for periods of production, big parties and ‘afters coalitions’. PostNorma, a fabulous squat conquered and dissolved in one year, which generated workshops and various events. The Dirty Art department, an institutional bouillabaisse that made lots of meetings and journeys possible. SANKS, a design company among friends. Cicciolinas, unifying techno parties. Secret Castles, a contemporary art festival/summer camp hybrid…

Cl+®mence Seilles - argekunst web 01

3. Exhibition view, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert

D.D. How do you reconcile the “post-hippie” aspect of your methodology with the need for rigour linked to the idea of artistic commitment? What is you position in all of this relative to institutions and the art market?
C.S. I see the “hippie” position, this sort of non-conformist, as a necessary step, even if it’s only temporary, time enough to identify our views and strengthen them while freeing ourselves from commodities as much as possible. I don’t want to marginalise myself on a desert island and live my life with my group, I simply want to avoid getting sucked up by the art market, so I have time to create. I believe in a market that’s integrated into society, and it is precisely by being active in different spheres and markets (art, design, performance) that one can build a new kind of expert position. My artistic commitment is romantic. It is to create an optimal climate for creativity, establishing circumstances that produce autonomous strengths and attitudes without excluding myself from society – quite the opposite. I practice lateral thinking and oblique strategies. Oblique Strategies is a set of cards invented by Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt in 1974. Each card contains a cryptic phrase or comment to meditate on, one that can be used to overcome a creative block or dilemma. Lateral thinking is the opposite of vertical or conventional thinking, which rejects an idea if its application hasn’t been validated. It is based on imagination and on putting forward impossible, absurd, unrealistic theories in order to create springboards towards other ideas that are themselves achievable. Embodied in my practice, this means that I go off into fairly diverse application areas and development structures, working with people who are also very different and sometimes have polar opposite ways of thinking. This makes it more tiring and difficult to exist in different markets instead of only one, since people still have a strong tendency (less in English-speaking countries) to recognise only a single profession for each person. This is why I tirelessly dodge having to justify myself as an artist or a designer and explain why I created the “dirty artist” designation, which symbolises that universal position of the creator before the historical split between applied arts and fine arts.

Cl+®mence Seilles - argekunst web 18

4. Exhibition view, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert

Project: Exercizing Doubt. Exhibition as Research
Space: ar/ge kunst Galerie Museum 
Protagonist: Clémence Seilles

Dorothée Dupuis Peux-tu me parler de tes influences formelles ? Qu’est-ce que tu regardes, comment tu penses ? Comment ta formation de designer informe-t-elle ta production de formes dans le domaine de l’exposition ? Le langage de l’abstraction reste, semble-t-il, important pour toi, en quoi penses-tu t’y confronter de façon nouvelle ?
Clémence Seilles Je vais régulièrement revoir des images de mes maîtres classiques : Tatlin, Sottsass, Sonia comme Robert Delaunay, Superstudio, Hélio Oiticica, le collectif Gelatin… pour ne citer qu’une poignée de ‘dirty artists’ ayant navigué ou navigant avec désinvolture et doute entre les arts appliqués et les beaux-arts. Les formes primordiales telles cercles, triangles, carrés… me permettent de me concentrer davantage sur les narrations, les circonstances et les procédés. Je pars de ce que les sociétés produisent de tangible pour se construire. Je visite les compagnies de fournitures, d’équipement de chantiers, des usines de transformations de matériaux, d’assemblage de produits, je conduis désœuvrée dans les zones industrielles d’Italie, de France, d’Allemagne et de Hollande, je visionne sur YouTube du swirling de guitare en garage et de la chaudronnerie plastique industrielle. En Chine, Russie, Maroc, Jamaïque et Mexique, j’étudie les maisons en grillages, les véhicules en terre cuite, les étalages sommaires comme exubérants, les customs de voitures, les aménagements de rue pour réunions fortuites… je suis passionnée par le détournement, même les plus modestes : caisson de basse dans marmite trouée, canon de fusil à poisson dans barre de chaise longue… J’adore les sociétés permissives. L’œuvre Bassin ouvert à ar/ge kunst à Bolzano, et avant dans sa première apparition à Triangle à Marseille, est un désir de créer un espace social dans celui de l’art où des acteurs sont invités à réaliser une production critique. L’œuvre, dans ce contexte, est à la fois objet d’usage et de fantasme : une fontaine, un bassin de nage, dont formes et matériaux découlent directement des recherches évoquées plus hauts. Si ma formation de designer informe des manipulations d’usages (bien plus que de formes), le domaine de l’exposition, peu familier aux services et dispositifs fonctionnels, m’ouvre un champ fertile d’expérimentations, plus compliquées à développer dans le domaine commercial.

D.D. Tu fais beaucoup de projets collaboratifs avec ta “bande”, on t’invite pour organiser des anniversaires (Triangle, ar/ge kunst), tes amis traversent l’Europe pour travailler avec toi, vous partagez l’argent des cachets, vous vendez des cocktails, des t-shirts, vous enseignez, vous occupez des squats et des villas, tu es plutôt Fassbinder, Wako ou Beverly Hills 90210 ?
C.S. Je viens des Montboucons, c’est le Beverly Hills de Besançon en Franche-Comté. Une bande, ça peut être Philip K. Dick (Ubik) et Kerouac (les clochards célestes) qui vivent dans City of quartz (Mike Davis), flirtent sur Less than zero (Bret Easton Ellis) avec le risque de finir comme dans Le facteur sonne toujours deux fois (James M. Cain), seul et condamné. J’essaye de combiner efficacité économique durable et risque d’aliénation. La bande, constituée d’artistes, designers, composeurs, commissaires, architectes, tous boulimiques de rythmes durs, vit entre Berlin, Amsterdam et Paris, et est hétérogène et multiple. Il n’y a pas de manifeste fédérateur, de dogme excluant, de nom même. Les hiérarchies d’actions sont saines, faites d’individus qui entreprennent leurs recherches singulières et peuvent à tour de rôle porter ou appuyer un projet. Le drame fait partie de ce jeu auquel nous n’avons pas vraiment trouvé de règles, mais l’expérience nous a montré que les vertus de la fraternité apportent tout de même une plus-value tangible à nos ambitions critiques et au bien-être de nos vies respectives. Quelques unes de ces réalisations qui m’entourent : le Krux, atelier collectif géant très équipé, pour moments de production, de fêtes géantes et ‘afters coalitions’. PostNorma, un squat fabuleux conquis et dissout en une année, qui généra workshops et évènements divers. Le département Dirty Art, bouillabaisse institutionnelle qui permit beaucoup de rencontres et de voyages. SANKS, une compagnie de design entre amis. Les Cicciolinas, fêtes technos fédératrices. Châteaux secrets, hybride entre festival d’art contemporain et campement d’été…

D.D. Comment concilies-tu l’aspect “post-hippie” de ta méthodologie au besoin nécessaire de rigueur lié à l’idée d’engagement artistique ? Quelle est alors ta position par rapport au marché de l’art et à l’institution dans tout ça ?
C.S. Je vois la posture du “hippie”, cette sorte de marginal, comme une étape nécessaire, même si seulement temporaire, le temps d’identifier le discours et le fortifier en se libérant au maximum des commodités. Je ne souhaite pas m’exclure sur une île déserte et vivre ma vie avec mon groupe, je souhaite simplement que le marché de l’art ne m’aspire pas pour me donner le temps de créer. Je crois en un marché intégré à la société, et c’est justement en agissant dans des domaines et marchés différents (l’art, le design et le spectacle) qu’on peut construire une posture d’expert d’une nature nouvelle. Mon engagement artistique est romantique, il est de créer un climat optimum pour la création, réunir les circonstances qui accouchent de forces et d’attitudes autonomes sans me disqualifier de la société, au contraire. Je pratique pensées latérales et stratégies obliques. Les stratégies obliques est un set de cartes inventées par Brian Eno et Peter Schmidt en 1974. Chaque carte contient une phrase ou une remarque cryptique sur laquelle méditer, qui peut être utilisée pour se sortir d’un blocage créatif ou d’une situation de dilemme. La pensée latérale s’oppose à la pensée verticale, ou classique, selon laquelle une idée est rejetée quand son application n’est pas validée. Elle repose sur l’imagination et l’émission d’hypothèses impossibles, absurdes, irréalistes pour créer des tremplins vers d’autres idées elles-mêmes réalisables. Incarné dans ma pratique, cela veut dire que je pars dans des domaines d’application et structures de développement assez éparses, travaillant avec des acteurs aussi très différents dans des logiques parfois aux antipodes. Cela rend plus fatiguant et difficile d’exister sur différents marchés plutôt qu’un seul, puisque nous avons tout de même une forte tendance (moins dans les pays anglo-saxons) à ne reconnaitre qu’une seule profession à une personne. C’est donc inlassablement que j’esquive de devoir me justifier d’être une artiste ou une designer, et d’avoir créé la dénomination ‘dirty artist’, symbolisant cette position universelle de créateur avant le schisme historique entre arts appliqués et beaux-arts.

Images:
1-4. Exhibition views, Clémence Seilles, Bassin ouvert. Photo: aneres. Courtesy the artist and ar/ge kunst

close
en

Jean-Luc Moulène

Born 1955, Reims, France
Lives and works in Paris, France

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

LEONARDO BIGAZZI

Leonardo Bigazzi is a curator based in Florence, Italy. He recently started working at the Museo Marino Marini where he co-curated the exhibition 30/60 Opere dalla collezione del FRAC Champagne-Ardenne with a selection of over 40 works from the collection of the French institution.
Since its first edition in 2008 he collaborates with Lo Schermo dell’Arte Film Festival in Florence, Italy. For the Festival he curates VISIO – European Workshop on Artists’ Cinema, the VISIO Residency Program, and Notti di Mezza Estate, a summer program of artists’ films and documentaries from the archives of the Festival. Beside collaborating to the selection of films for the main program, in the past edition of the Festival he has been responsible for special projects with the artists Omer Fast, Melik Ohanian and Hiroshi Sugimoto. He is also the co-director of Feature Expanded, a training program developed together with HOME (Cornerhouse) in Manchester.
He recently started an on-going collaboration with the artist Petrit Halilaj and he has worked for the research and production of his exhibitions at the Galerie Kamel Mennour (Paris), Bundeskunsthalle (Bonn), Kölnischer Kunstverein (Koln) and Palazzo Grassi/Punta della Dogana (Venice).
Since 2012 he works at the Gucci Museum in Florence as a consultant for the contemporary art exhibitions organized in collaboration with the François Pinault Collection.

Leonardo Bigazzi lavora come curatore al Museo Marino Marini di Firenze dove ha co-curato nel 2014 la mostra 30/60 Opere dalla collezione del FRAC Champagne-Ardenne.
Sin dalla sua prima edizione nel 2008 collabora con Lo schermo dell’arte Film Festival, progetto internazionale dedicato alle relazioni tra cinema e arte contemporanea. Nel contesto del Festival è il curatore di VISIO European Workshop on Artists’ Moving Images, del VISIO Residency Program e del programme estivo Notti di Mezza Estate. Oltre a collaborare alla selezione dei film e degli incontri del programma, ha seguito nelle passate edizioni la produzione di progetti speciali con gli artisti Omer Fast, Melik Ohanian e Hiroshi Sugimoto. È inoltre il co-direttore del progetto internazionale Feature Expanded, un programma di training sviluppato insieme a HOME (Cornerhouse) a Manchester.
Recentemente ha iniziato uno stretto rapporto di collaborazione e di ricerca con l’artista kosovaro Petrit Halilaj per le sue mostre alla Galleria Kamel Mennour (Parigi), Bundeskunsthalle (Bonn), Kölnischer Kunstverein (Colonia) e Palazzo Grassi/Punta della Dogana (Venezia).
In qualità di consulente collabora dal 2012 con il Gucci Museo a Firenze per le mostre di arte contemporanea organizzate in collaborazione con la François Pinault Collection.

Leonardo Bigazzi est commissaire d’exposition basé à Florence.
Il travaille depuis peu au Museo Marino Marini où il a été co-commissaire de l’exposition 30/60 Œuvres de la collection du FRAC Champagne-Ardenne.
Il collabore avec le festival de cinéma Lo Schermo dell’Arte à Florence depuis sa première édition en 2008 : il y est commissaire des programmes VISIO (ateliers, résidences) et de Notti di Mezza Estate, un programme estival de films d’artistes et de documentaires. Il collabore régulièrement à la sélection des films et a été responsable lors de la précédente édition des projets spéciaux avec les artistes Omer Fast, Melik Ohanian et Hiroshi Sugimoto. Il est également co-directeur de Feature Expanded, un programme de formation développé avec HOME (Cornerhouse) à Manchester.
Il travaille avec l’artiste Petrit Halilaj pour la recherche et la production de ses expositions (Galerie Kamel Mennour, Paris ; Bundeskunsthalle, Bonn ; Kölnischer Kunstverein, Cologne ; Palazzo Grassi / Punta della Dogana, Venise).
Depuis 2012, il est conseiller au musée Gucci à Florence pour les expositions d’art contemporain organisées en collaboration avec la collection François Pinault.

Space: Museo Marino Marini
Project: Alfred Jarry Archipelago

close
en - fr

JACOPO MILIANI

Born 1979, Florence, Italy
Lives and works in Milan, Italy

Jacopo Miliani develops his work mostly through installations, photography and performance. His research examines the role of clean representation systems to cognitive and empirical process. In some of his works, it reuses and modifies old photos or images from the world of art and cinema. His use these images to question a specific distortion and the disenchantment with the practices of the viewer. Yet before we get to these images Miliani questions the mental condition that causes a person to reach them. For him, the issues are more important than answers.

Né à Florence, Italie, en 1979
Vit et travaille à Milan, Italie

Le travail de Jacopo Miliani se développe principalement à travers des installations, photographies et performances. Sa recherche questionne le rôle des systèmes de représentation propres aux processus cognitif et empirique. Dans certaines de ses œuvres, il réutilise et modifie de vieilles photos ou images du monde de l’art et du cinéma. Son utilisation des images pointe une distorsion spécifique et le désenchantement à l’égard des pratiques du spectateur. Mais avant d’arriver à ces images, Miliani s’interroge l’état mental qui amène une personne à ces dernières. Pour lui, les questions sont plus importantes que les réponses.

Project: Double Cross, From Both Sides of a Mountain

close
en - fr

JACOPO MILIANI IN CONVERSATION WITH ALESSANDRO DI PIETRO

JACOPO MILIANI IN CONVERSATION WITH ALESSANDRO DI PIETRO

Jacopo Miliani Let’s start with a reflection on our collaboration for the Double Cross project. We have been working independently on the spaces and on the exhibition project; later, during preparation, there was dialogue and listening between the two projects. I would define our collaboration as a mutual influence on narrative fiction. What is your opinion on this?
Alessandro di Pietro I would say that our cooperation has had, from the outset, a predisposition not to be explicit. The placement on two different floors of the CAB [Centre d’Art Bastille] made it impossible for a direct visual relationship between the various elements of our installations, but intensified the dialogue between two different methods of semantic re-elaboration in space.
Both projects are based on the appropriation of pre-existing narrative structures: yours on Howard Fast’s short story Not with a Bang, and mine on the end scene of Peter Greenaway’s film A Zed and Two Noughts.
The floor separating us seems to have worked as a filter that has allowed us to meet the expectations of our work. At the same time it must have produced some information that created a connection between us on a sign level: for example the use of the text and the circle shape.

2. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bag

2. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bang

3. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN - Props

3. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN – Props

A.D.P. As you told me, in Fast’s Not with a Bang a man sees a hand turning off the sun; he goes back home, and tells his wife and neighbors during an evening game of bridge. The rest of the group does not believe what the man saw, but that night was a particularly dark and cold one.
How do you expect people to orientate themselves between the textual information partially concealed inside what you call fictional carpets?
J.M. The story is divided into three phases, which are represented by (transparent and black) resin casts of hands. The hands are open in the act of picking up, and relate to round-shaped objects. These abstract signs, completely open, are placed on colored carpets that recall a domestic interior, and hide and reveal the three pages of the Fast’s story. The level of representation is thus opaque in the relationship between the clues on a narrative level and the shapes/actions that remain suspended. The viewer/reader/detective has a central role, although not being inside the scene.

4. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN - Props

4. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN – Props

5. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bag

5. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bang

J.M. The CAB is located in a defensive stronghold, on top of a mountain, mainly accessible through a strange spherical cableway. Do you think that the location of the CAB affected the narrative process? Could we define your ‘props’ as clues suspended in time?
A.D.P. When arranging the props in space I definitely tried to exploit the grotto-like space on the first floor of the CAB.
For this reason, all the props were exhibited on a modular display made with vertical concrete, steel and foam elements hanging from above like stalactites, exploiting the various heights of the vault of the ceiling. The arrangement does not follow a hierarchy of importance or a real narrative chronology, and the props are not the remains of an action which has already taken place, but are prospectively active. They are raw elements of a story that will take place soon and that will be a re-enactment of the last part of A Zed and Two Noughts.

6. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bag

6. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bang

7. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN - Props

7. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN – Props

A.D.P. Until recently, I had the feeling that working on cinema or literature could create a misunderstanding as regards the intention of creating a tribute or a monument to the director or to the wonderful story. Now I view that concern as very generic, and I recognize that the fiction reacts to its perception so naturally that it can be mistaken for a landscape. What do you think about this? How do you move among the signs that a story offers you? What is the distance you put between yourself, your practice and the story object?
J.M. I like the idea of landscape, and in the case of the CAB we could talk of a view. In the days I was working, I observed how individuals or the groups of tourists that stroll around the summit to observe Grenoble from above are comparable with the relationship we have with images, language and representation. I wonder how in front of this vastness of relationships one could define a common gaze. The signs of history are hence countless like the facets of a view. For this reason I chose this story by Howard Fast that highlights how the main character feels different in front of a vision which he perceives as a common experience. The killing of the Sun by a hand remains an image on hold from where I started and cyclically return to.

8. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN - Props

8. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN – Props

9. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bag

9. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bang

J.M./A.D.P. As regards the constant fruition within the imaginative process, we could say that this was also the central theme of two workshops, which we conducted in parallel, with a few young Grenoble artists. With their imagination, we worked starting from two strong images from the stories we had taken as a reference: the hand that turns the sun off in Fast’s story and the figures of the twins in Greenaway’s film.

10. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bag

10. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bang

11. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN - Props

11. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN – Props

Jacopo Miliani Iniziamo con una riflessione sulla nostra collaborazione all’interno del progetto Double Cross. Abbiamo lavorato indipendentemente sullo spazio e sul progetto espositivo; in seguito, in fase di allestimento, c’è stato dialogo e ascolto tra i due progetti. Definirei la nostra collaborazione come un’influenza reciproca sulla narrazione fittizia. Cosa ne pensi a proposito?
Alessandro di Pietro Direi che la nostra collaborazione ha avuto, sin dall’inizio, una predisposizione a non essere esplicita. La disposizione su due piani del CAB [Centre d’art Bastille] ha reso impossibile una diretta correlazione visiva tra i vari elementi delle nostre installazioni, ma ha accentuato il dialogo tra due diverse metodologie di rielaborazione semantica nello spazio.
Entrambi i progetti si fondano su appropriazioni di strutture narrative pre-esistenti: il tuo sul racconto breve Not with a Bang di Howard Fast, mentre il mio sulla scena finale di A Zed and Two Noughts di Peter Greenaway.
Il piano che ci ha diviso sembra aver funzionato come un filtro che ci ha permesso di rispettare le aspettative sul nostro lavoro. Allo stesso tempo deve aver rilasciato delle informazioni che ci hanno messo in connessione a livello segnico: per esempio l’uso del testo e la figura del cerchio. 

A.D.P. Come mi hai raccontato, in Not with a Bang di Howard Fast un uomo vede una mano che spegne il sole; torna a casa, ne parla con la moglie e i vicini durante una partita serale di bridge. Il resto del gruppo non crede alla visione dell’uomo, ma quella sera è particolarmente oscura e fredda.
Come ti aspetti che le persone si orientino tra le informazioni testuali parzialmente occultate all’interno di quelli che tu chiami ‘fictional carpets’?
J.M. La storia è divisa in tre momenti che sono raffigurati da calchi di mani in resina (trasparenti e neri). Le mani sono aperte nell’atto di prendere e si relazionano a oggetti dalla forma circolare. Questi segni astratti, del tutto aperti, sono posti su moquette colorate che richiamano l’interno domestico e nascondono e rivelano le tre pagine del racconto di Fast. Il piano della rappresentazione risulta opaco nella relazione tra gli elementi indiziari a livello narrativo e le forme/azioni che rimangono sospese. Lo spettatore/lettore/detective ha un ruolo centrale, pur non trovandosi all’interno della scena.

J.M. Il CAB si trova dentro una roccaforte difensiva, sulla cima di una montagna per lo più accessibile grazie a una strana teleferica dalla forma sferica. Pensi che il luogo del CAB abbia influito sul processo narrativo? Possiamo definire i tuoi ‘props’ come indizi sospesi nel tempo?
A.D.P. Sicuramente nella configurazione spaziale dei ‘props’ ho cercato di lavorare sullo “spazio grottoso” del primo piano del CAB.
Per questo motivo, tutti i ‘props’ sono stati esposti su un display modulare formato da elementi verticali di cemento acciaio e gommapiuma che scendono dall’alto come stalattiti sfruttando le varie altezze della volta del soffitto. L’allestimento non segue una gerarchia di importanza o una reale cronologia narrativa e i ‘props’ non sono residui di un’azione già accaduta, ma sono ancora in potenza. Sono elementi crudi di una narrazione che avverrà prossimamente e che consisterà in un re-enactment dell’ultimo capitolo di A Zed and Two Noughts.

A.D.P. Fino a poco tempo fa, avevo la sensazione che lavorare sul cinema o sulla letteratura potesse generare un misunderstanding riguardo l’intenzione di creare un tributo o un monumento al regista o alla grande storia. Di recente, questa mi sembra un’idea molto generalista e riconosco che la finzione reagisce alla propria percezione in maniera così naturale da poterla scambiare per un paesaggio. Cosa ne pensi? Come ti muovi tra i segni che una storia ti propone? Qual è la distanza che interponi tra te, la tua pratica e l’oggetto narrativo?
J.M. Mi piace l’idea di paesaggio, nel caso del CAB potremo parlare di panorama. Durante i giorni di lavoro, ho osservato come le singole persone o i gruppi di turisti che si muovono sulla vetta per osservare Grenoble dall’alto siano paragonabili al rapporto che abbiamo con le immagini, il linguaggio e la rappresentazione. Mi chiedo come davanti a tale vastità di relazioni sia possibile definire lo sguardo comune. I segni di una storia sono quindi infiniti come le sfaccettature di un panorama. Per questo motivo ho scelto questo racconto di Howard Fast che mette in luce come il protagonista si senta diverso davanti a una visione da lui percepita come esperienza comune. L’uccisione del sole da parte di una mano resta un’immagine sospesa da cui sono partito per poi ritornarci ciclicamente.

J.M./A.D.P. A proposito della fruizione costante nel processo immaginativo, potremmo dire che questo è stato anche il tema centrale di due workshops, da noi condotti in modo parallelo, con alcuni giovani artisti di Grenoble. Con la loro immaginazione abbiamo lavorato a partire da due immagini forti provenienti dalle narrazioni da noi prese come riferimento: la mano che spegne il sole del racconto di Fast e le figure dei due gemelli nel film di Greenaway.

Images:
1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10. Jacopo Miliani, Not with a bang. Courtesy the artist, CAB Grenoble, Frutta, Rome and Studio Dabbeni, Lugano
3, 4, 7, 8, 11. Alessandro di Pietro, AZATN – Props, Courtesy the artist and CAB Grenoble

Protagonists: Jacopo Miliani, Alessandro di Pietro
Project: Double Cross. From Both Sides of a Mountain
Space: Centre d’art Bastille

close
en

RETO PULFER

Born 1981, Bern, Switzerland
Lives and works in Berlin, Germany

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

Émilie Parendeau/BERNHARD RÜDIGER

Born 1980, Ambilly, France/Born 1964, Rome, Italy
Live and work in Paris, France

Émilie Parendeau chooses to recreate the works of others, not so much as a means of expressing her own concerns, but rather to renew the original works’ conditions of emergence. Bernard Rüdiger’s work with space, sound, and the body’s physical and perceptual experience is enriched by a theoretical reflection on the reality of the artwork and historical responsibility. varda sora – città – derlickln consists in a protocol which requires all of the blinds on Museion’s glass façades to be closed, with the exception of certain blinds on the top floor, which the curator will use to create a panoramic viewpoint. After visiting the exhibition on the ground floor, the encounter with the remaining openings on both sides of the building highlights the visitor experience: arriving on the fourth floor and seeing the city and surrounding area with fresh eyes. This intervention does two things: it creates a visual device that directs the gaze and raises our consciousness, and it forms two apertures that look like eyes on the walls of the museum, underlining the active role it plays in the city. The form and duration of the installation may be limited by other museum activities requiring the opening of some of the blinds.

Nata ad Ambilly, Francia, nel 1980
Nato a Roma, Italia, nel 1964
Vivono e lavorano a Parigi, Francia

Émilie Parendeau è interessata a interpretare le opere di altri artisti, non tanto per introdurvi le sue preoccupazioni, quanto piuttosto con l’intenzione di renderle attuali in funzione delle loro condizioni di visione. Il lavoro di Bernhard Rüdiger sullo spazio, il suono, l’esperienza fisica e percettiva del corpo si nutre di una riflessione teorica sul reale del- l’opera e della sua responsabilità storica. varda sora – città – derlickln consiste in un protocollo che richiede la chiusura della totalità delle lamelle mobili delle facciate di Museion, ad eccezione di alcune lamelle dell’ultimo piano trasformato in belvedere dal curatore della mostra. In seguito alla visita della mostra al pian terreno, le aperture restanti da un lato e dall’altro dell’edificio sottolineano l’azione dello spettatore che, arrivato al quarto piano, scopre la città e il suo ambiente con uno sguardo nuovo. Quest’unico intervento vuole produrre due effetti: la costruzione di uno strumento di visione per attivare uno sguardo diretto e cosciente, e l’apparizione sulle due facciate dell’edificio di due occhi che riaffermano la posizione attiva del museo nel tessuto cittadino. La realizzazione di questa installazione, nella sua forma e nella sua durata, potrà essere limitata dalle altre attività del museo qualora richiedessero l’apertura delle lamelle mobili.

Née à Ambilly, France, en 1980. Vit et travaille à Paris, France
Né à Rome, Italie, en 1964. Vit et travaille à Paris, France

Émilie Parendeau s’attache à interpréter les œuvres d’autres artistes, moins pour y introduire ses propres préoccupations que dans l’intention de les actualiser en fonction de leurs conditions d’apparition. En prenant en charge le processus qui accompagne leur matérialisation, elle introduit des variations qui ont pour objet de rendre ces œuvres actives dans le présent. Elle a réalisé la plupart de ces activations dans le cadre d’un projet intitulé A LOUER.
Le travail de Bernhard Rüdiger sur l’espace, le son, l’expérience physique et perceptive du corps se nourrit d’une réflexion théorique sur le réel de l’œuvre et de sa responsabilité historique. Bernhard Rüdiger questionne, à travers un parallèle entre l’enseignement, ses écrits et ses productions plastiques, les fondements de la notion de forme, et, plus largement, son rapport à la société et à l’histoire contemporaine. Ses pièces invitent le spectateur à faire l’expérience d’une perception active et personnelle. Elles le placent dans un flux, au centre d’un espace et d’une temporalité qui lui sont étrangères.
L’exposition Soleil politique est l’occasion pour ces deux artistes de poursuivre à Bolzano les discussions qu’ils mènent ensemble depuis plusieurs années et de faire se rejoindre leur travail respectif dans un projet à quatre mains conçu pour l’exposition.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

ÉMILE OUROUMOV IN CONVERSATION WITH ÉMILIE PARENDEAU AND BERNHARD RÜDIGER

ÉMILE OUROUMOV IN CONVERSATION WITH ÉMILIE PARENDEAU AND BERNHARD RÜDIGER

varda sora – città – derlickln

Émile Ouroumov Could you describe your intervention for Soleil politique at Museion in Bolzano?
Émilie Parendeau The work’s protocol is the following: varda sora – città – derlickln consists in closing all of Museion’s shutters, with the exception of a few on the top floor. The realisation of this arrangement, in its form and duration, can be limited by other museum activities requiring that the shutters be opened.

Parendeau_Rudiger_02bis

2. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

É.O. The work and the exhibition have a specific relation to the Bolzano context. Do you know this region, the city and the buildings emphasized by Pierre Bal-Blanc’s exhibition?
Bernhard Rüdiger I spend a lot of time in that region, and I was aware of various aspects of the context of history shared between Austria and Italy. There’s an interesting link between Bolzano and the inland region with regard to the question of power. The land in these Tyrolean valleys was feudal, whereas the peasants in the mountains were independent. Looking at the valley from the mountaintops, you see something completely different from what you see from the opposite direction. The view from the 4th floor of Museion offered a symbolic top-down point of view.

É.O. Is it also a question of Museion’s location in the middle of the city, between the historic Austrian city and the new Italianised city?
B.R. The museum is built on the boundary that is the river. One side faces the Austrian valley, the other side the Italian valley, but I’d never drawn the parallel that Pierre Bal-Blanc drew with Monumento alla Vittoria, the monumental fascist gate that towers on the site of an earlier monumental Austrian gate. This already emphasised that kind of point of passage, but from the opposite point of view.

3. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

3. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

É.O. This reversal of perspective leads us to the one carried out at Museion.
B.R. The exhibition highlights the fact that the museum builds this same passage from Italy to Austria and vice versa. When Émilie was invited to contribute to the exhibition, the guiding lines of the project were at an advanced stage; it’s a detail that was very important.
É.P. The invitation was probably linked to the fact that my work is often built on a context, in this case the museum and its layout. Since the exhibition had a strong link to the city, I felt that my proposal would be weak if it only addressed institutional aspects. By extending the invitation to Bernhard and his work linked to the notion of space, the point was to enrich the project through the historical and topographical perspectives it could provide.

4. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

4. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

É.O. How did these questions of passage and perspective-reversal affect your proposal?
É.P. The exhibition offered a reversal of the function of the museum spaces; the viewer had to enter the exhibition directly on the ground floor, which is normally a passage, and then view the city from the 4th floor, which had been turned into a belvedere, in order to finally go back downstairs and follow the suggested route through the city. Our proposal found its place in that belvedere. We were unsure if when viewers reached a practically empty room on the top floor, facing large windows, they would intuitively be able to experience looking at the city.
B.R. The gesture of opening the museum onto that broad landscape could seem romantic: the mountains, the city roofs… you’re gripped by the sublime immensity. It seemed to us that this impression is the opposite of political awareness of what’s going on in the city at the viewer’s feet.

Parendeau_Rudiger_05bis

5. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

É.O. Whereas visiting the exhibition on the ground floor was preparation for looking at the city from the belvedere?
B.R. It was a matter of constructing a determined perspective instead of a passive contemplation, as well as introducing the question of the body and the notion of unstable balance: at what moment do you start consciously looking at what you see? The final proposal was to close some of the shutters on either side of the building (and therefore either side of the city) to create a specific field of vision that involved a movement dynamic and spatialized the bodies in the space.
É.P. It’s a shift from the theoretical proposition to the notion of experience. We did a trial during the exhibition in progress and as soon as the shutters were closed, people stopped looking at the works to approach the windows.

É.O. What role did the model play?
É.P. In the exhibition, there was a model of the building that reproduced our intervention, and two Newton’s cradles were placed in it. It’s a metaphor for what seemed to be happening in the city.
B.R. This metaphor in the state of language becomes a physical act as soon as you experiment with it. When you release the first bead, the one at the end moves, whereas the beads in the middle stay still; yet there’s a transmission of energy. The beads at the centre are an experience of the violent stability that conveys the region’s historical and social specificities. It’s something to be felt physically, like the bodies that pass from one side of the belvedere and the city to the other.

6. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

6. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano

É.O. The exhibition brought forward the notion of architectural filter. I’m thinking for example of Gianni Pettena and his intervention linked to the fascist arcades of the Piazza della Vittoria. There is a certain equivalence of preoccupations and ways of filtering the gaze.
B.R. The two works operate in opposite ways, but actually express something very similar.

É.O. Another work in the exhibition, that of Marcus Geiger, consisted in extracting one of the apartments from a housing project, an empty space that ultimately offers a transversal perspective, enabling reflection upon architecture and town planning. Here there’s a similar act that causes the perspective to pass through the structure. It’s interesting in relation to the notion of transparency, which this building wishes to assert.
É.P. It’s a matter of withdrawing some of what’s visible in order to provide a better view. The gesture of closing some of the shutters to create openings also produced “eyes” on the building and gave it a solid body, even though it’s meant to be a point of passage, of transparency.
B.R. It sports these two eyes that look outside, a two-faced gaze in the shape of a Janus head, something that is very characteristics of the local culture.

É.O. Speaking of local culture, can we discuss the title?
B.R. It’s written in three languages spoken in the region. The Ladin expression Varda sora means “to look upon” and expresses the idea of paying attention and keeping everything right under your eyes, something that interested us in relation to these highland cultures.

É.O. Thinking again of the belvedere, is the title therefore a clue about how to use the work?
B.R. Yes, it’s an imperative form: “take a good look, look upon the thing”. Città, in Italian, means “city”. The third word is in the Tyrolean dialect and expresses the idea of looking past appearances to understand reality. So it’s kind of an instruction relating to developing a conscious perspective on the city. At the same time, people only understand a third of the title, since each of these languages is only spoken by some of the population.

É.O. It’s a collaboration that seems to go beyond individual practices.
É.P. It’s the result of both of our practices, a territory built on our shared experience. It reconsiders questions about the activation of perspective, which are important for Bernhard, through my own methods, including the production of a condition of incisiveness when regarding what is already present on-site, without adding objects.

É.O. The desire not to add objects seems to me to be very apt – since the museum itself is already an object, and not a transparent, neutral tool.

Paris, May 2015

varda sora – città – derlickln

Émile Ouroumov Pourriez-vous me décrire votre intervention pour Soleil politique au Museion de Bolzano ?
Émilie Parendeau Le protocole de l’œuvre est le suivant : varda sora – città – derlickln consiste en la fermeture de la totalité des volets du Museion, à l’exception de certains au dernier étage. La réalisation de ce dispositif, dans sa forme et dans sa durée, peut être limitée par les autres activités du musée qui imposeraient que des volets soient ouverts.

É.O. L’œuvre et l’exposition ont un rapport spécifique avec le contexte de Bolzano. Vous connaissiez cette région, la ville et les édifices mis en exergue par le projet de Pierre Bal-Blanc ?
Bernhard Rüdiger Je passe beaucoup de temps dans cette région, et j’étais conscient de divers aspects du contexte d’histoire partagée entre l’Autriche et l’Italie. Il y a un lien intéressant entre Bolzano et l’arrière-pays par rapport à la question du pouvoir. Les terres dans ces vallées du Tyrol étaient féodales, alors que dans les hauteurs les paysans étaient indépendants. Quand on regarde la vallée du haut des montagnes, on voit tout autre chose qu’à partir de la direction inverse. Le fait d’être au 4e étage du Museion proposait un point de vue symbolique du haut vers le bas.

É.O. Il est aussi question de la situation du Museion au milieu de la ville, entre la ville historique autrichienne et la ville nouvelle italianisée ?
B.R. Le musée est construit sur la limite qu’est la rivière. Il donne d’un côté sur la vallée autrichienne et de l’autre côté sur la vallée italienne, mais je n’avais jamais fait le parallèle que Pierre Bal-Blanc a fait avec le Monumento alla Vittoria, la porte monumentale fasciste qui surgit sur l’emplacement d’une précédente porte monumentale autrichienne. Cette dernière soulignait déjà un tel point de passage mais avec le point de vue inverse.

É.O. Cette inversion du regard nous conduit vers celle opérée au Museion.
B.R. L’exposition pointe le fait que le musée construit ce même passage de l’Italie à l’Autriche et inversement. Lors de l’invitation adressée à Émilie, les lignes directrices du projet étaient dans un stade avancé ; c’est une donnée qui a été importante.
É.P. L’invitation était probablement liée au fait que mon travail se construit souvent à partir d’un contexte, ici le musée et son organisation. L’exposition ayant un lien fort avec la ville, je sentais que ma proposition serait faible si elle ne visait que des aspects institutionnels. Par le fait d’associer Bernhard et son travail lié à la notion d’espace, il s’agissait d’enrichir le projet par les aspects historiques et topographiques qu’il pouvait apporter.

É.O. Quelles étaient les implications de ces questions de passage et d’inversion du regard pour votre proposition ?
É.P. L’exposition proposait une inversion de la fonctionnalité des espaces muséaux ; le spectateur devait entrer dans l’exposition directement au rez-de-chaussée qui normalement est un passage, et ensuite voir la ville depuis le 4e étage transformé en belvédère, pour qu’à la fin il redescende et fasse le parcours proposé dans la ville. Notre proposition prenait place dans ce belvédère. Nous avions un doute qu’en arrivant au dernier étage dans une salle pratiquement vide, face à de grandes vitres, le spectateur puisse intuitivement faire l’expérience de regarder la ville.
B.R. Le geste d’ouvrir le musée sur ce vaste paysage peut paraître comme romantique : les montagnes, les toits de la ville… on est happé par l’immensité sublime. Il nous a semblé que cette impression est le contraire de la prise de conscience politique de ce qui se passe au pied du spectateur dans la ville.

É.O. Alors que la visite de l’exposition au rez-de-chaussée préparait à regarder la ville depuis le belvédère ?
B.R. Il s’agissait de construire un regard déterminé plutôt qu’une contemplation passive, mais aussi d’introduire la question du corps et la notion d’équilibre instable : à partir de quel moment on commence à regarder consciemment ce qu’on voit ? La proposition finale était de fermer une partie des volets de part et d’autre du bâtiment (et donc de la ville) pour créer un champ de vision spécifique qui implique une dynamique des mouvements et spatialise les corps dans l’espace.
É.P. C’est un passage de la proposition théorique à la notion d’expérience. Nous avions fait un essai pendant l’exposition en cours et dès que les volets ont été fermés, les personnes ont cessé de regarder les œuvres pour s’approcher des fenêtres.

É.O. Quel est le rôle de la maquette ?
É.P. Dans l’exposition, il y avait une maquette du bâtiment qui reprenait notre intervention et dans laquelle étaient placés deux pendules de Newton. C’est une métaphore de ce qui semblait se passer dans la ville.
B.R. Cette métaphore à l’état du langage devient un acte physique dès qu’on l’expérimente. Quand on fait tomber la première bille, celle du fond bouge, alors que les billes du milieu sont immobiles ; pourtant il y a transmission d’énergie. Les billes au centre sont une expérience de cette stabilité violente qui traduit les spécificités historiques et sociales de la région. C’est à éprouver physiquement, comme le font les corps qui passent d’un côté à l’autre du belvédère et de la ville.

É.O. Dans l’exposition, il était question de filtre architectural. Je pense par exemple à Gianni Pettena et à son intervention liée aux arcades fascistes de la Piazza della Vittoria. Il y a une certaine équivalence des préoccupations et de la manière de filtrer le regard.
B.R. Les deux propositions opèrent d’une façon contraire, mais effectivement disent une chose très proche.

É.O. Une autre œuvre de l’exposition, celle de Marcus Geiger, consistait à retirer l’un des appartements d’un projet d’habitation, un vide qui finalement ouvre un regard transversal permettant de réfléchir sur l’architecture et l’urbanisme. Il y a ici un acte similaire qui fait traverser la structure par le regard. C’est intéressant par rapport à la notion de transparence, de laquelle ce bâtiment se revendique.
É.P. Il s’agit de retirer une partie de ce qui est visible pour mieux donner à voir. Le geste de fermer une partie des volets pour créer des ouvertures produisait aussi des « yeux » sur ce bâtiment et lui donnait un corps solide, alors même qu’il se veut un lieu de passage, de transparence.
B.R. Il est affublé de ces deux yeux qui regardent l’extérieur, un regard biface en forme de tête de Janus, ce qui est très propre à la culture locale.

É.O. En parlant de la culture locale, peut-on évoquer le titre ?
B.R. Il est rédigé dans trois langues pratiquées dans la région. L’expression ladine Varda sora veut dire « regarder par-dessus » et exprime l’idée de prêter attention et de garder tout sous les yeux, ce qui nous intéressait par rapport à ces cultures des hauts-plateaux.

É.O. En repensant au belvédère, le titre est donc un indice sur le mode d’utilisation de la pièce ?
B.R. Oui, c’est une forme impérative : « regarde bien, regarde sur la chose ». Città, en italien, c’est la ville. Le troisième mot est en dialecte tyrolien et exprime l’idée de regarder à travers les apparences pour saisir la vérité. C’est donc une forme d’instruction quant au développement d’un regard conscient sur la ville. En même temps, on ne comprend qu’un tiers du titre, chacune de ces langues n’étant pratiquée que par une partie de la population.

É.O. C’est une collaboration qui semble excéder les pratiques individuelles.
É.P. Elle est le résultat de nos deux pratiques, un territoire construit à partir de notre expérience commune. Sont reprises des questions de l’ordre de l’activation du regard, importantes pour Bernhard, à travers des manières de faire qui me sont propres, dont la production d’une condition d’acuité en regard de ce qui est déjà présent sur place, sans ajouter d’objets.

É.O. Le souhait de ne pas ajouter d’objets me semble très juste – le musée étant déjà un objet lui-même, et non pas un outil transparent et neutre.

Paris, mai 2015

Images:
1-6. Émilie Parendeau & Bernhard Rüdiger, varda sora – città – derlickln, 2015, Museion, Bolzano
Photos: (1, 3, 4, 5, 6) Émilie Parendeau, Bernhard Rüdiger / (2) Luca Meneghel

close
en - it - fr

Nina Fiocco

Nina Fiocco, The Salgari Method - Santa Inés Ahuetempan, 2013

Nina Fiocco, The Salgari Method – Santa Inés Ahuetempan, 2013

Born 1985, Italy
Lives and works in Puebla, Mexico and Feltre, Italy
At the centre of Nina Fiocco’s work there is the idea of distance, meant as a deforming lens, which oppositely to experience, is a tool of dominion and control in the communication society. Looking for strategies to evade this knowledge mirage, Nina Fiocco works with different media, focusing on the intersection between narration, common work, experience and image, in its broader meaning from photography and internet to architecture and geography.

2015
- Public Privacy, a cura di Alice Pedroletti, Studio 6, festival “Studi”, Milano
- The Wall, a cura di Stanislaw Ruksza, Careof DOCVA, Milano
- Ciudad Expandida, a cura di Laalvaca, installazione site specific(Tlaxco Puebla, Messico)

2014
- The Salgari Method-Milan, workshop e installazione collettiva, a cura di O’, Milano
- Civico/Hurbano, a cura di NoAutomatico, Tong Proyectos, Puebla (Messico)
- On/Off entre el recuerdo y el oblio, Alianza Francesa, Puebla (Messico)

Project: Piano – alto!

 

(1985, vive e lavora tra Puebla, Messico, e Feltre)
Al centro del lavoro di Nina Fiocco si trova l’idea di distanza, intesa come una lente deformante che, all’opposto dell’esperienza, si converte in uno strumento di dominio e controllo nella società della comunicazione. Cercando strategie per evadere questo miraggio della conoscenza, Nina Fiocco lavora con media diversi, interessandosi all’intersezione tra narrazione, lavoro comune, esperienza e immagine, intesa nel suo spettro più ampio dalla fotografia e l’architettura a Internet e la geografia.

 

Née en 1985, vit et travaille entre Puebla, Mexique, et Feltre, Italie. Au cœur du travail de Nina Fiocco se trouve l’idée de distance, entendue comme un verre déformant qui, contrairement à l’expérience, se transforme en un instrument de domination et de contrôle dans la société de la communication. A la recherche d’une stratégie pour s’évader de ce mirage de la connaissance, Nina Fiocco travaille avec différents médias. Elle s’intéresse à l’intersection entre narration, travail collectif, expérience et image. Elle appréhende l’image au sens large : de la photographie à l’architecture, d’Internet à la géographie.

Nina Fiocco interroge les questions de standardisation, d’identité. Elle étudie l’accent particulier de cette région du sud de la France et archive des voix qui lui serviront de base pour mettre en forme une interprétation performative et plastique. Elle mesure la portée de ces voix à l’échelle de l’espace, en une performance jouée avec des habitants, à la nuit tombée. Elle participe au rituel de l’affût, dès l’aube, avec les chasseurs… Elle entraîne et se laisse happer dans des aventures inédites pour mieux appréhender le territoire et ses limites.

Martine Michard
décembre 2014

Image:
Nina Fiocco, The Salgari Method – Santa Inés Ahuetempan, 2013, action and installation documentation image. Courtesy of the artist and Metodo Salgari

close
en - it - fr

STEFANIA MEAZZA IN CONVERSATION WITH NINA FIOCCO

STEFANIA MEAZZA IN CONVERSATION WITH NINA FIOCCO

NINA FIOCCO, THE DEEP ESSENCE OF LAND

Nina Fiocco was an artist in residency at Maisons Daura in Saint-Cirq Lapopie, at Chapelle Saint-Jacques in Saint-Gaudens and at BBB centre d’art in Toulouse between September and November 2014.
Nina Fiocco penetrates the reality of daily life and unveils its most hidden and meaningful aspects. By researching on site, she questions the local aspect of the context to widen the perspective and make it universal.

Interview by Stefania Meazza

Stefania Meazza Tell me about the project you developed during the Piano – alto! residencies.
Nina Fiocco To me coming to France was a way to come closer to home, without actually coming home. I was somewhere in the middle: a country which I don’t belong to but which is part of the same political and social system I live in. I live on another continent. There I was identified for the first time, and with great surprise on my behalf, as a European. I was included in a macro-system which I never thought I belonged to which is seen from the outside as consistent and well defined, not diverse.
I arrived shortly after reading Monolingualism of the Other by Jacques Derrida, so I was interested in language as a threshold, as a thin line which can despotically divide who is part of a community from who isn’t, who has the appropriate vocabulary and accent to talk about certain themes from who hasn’t. This is why, through my research, I tried to explore language as a sort of utopia, where the speaker can’t use their native language to communicate with the “other” and so invents their own language. This language doesn’t give an agreed sound a certain meaning, but it reinvents it, it experiments with it and it makes it personal.

S.M. The project carried out in Midi-Pyrénées, and in general all of your research, has an immediate connection with the context you are working in. To quote the French critic Paul Ardenne, we could call your work ‘contextual art’. How did the three different contexts you stayed in influenced your work? How did you respond to these contexts (Saint Cirq-Lapopie: medieval town and tourist attraction/Saint Gaudens: industrial town at the feet of the Pyrenees/Toulouse: a dynamic regional capital with an industrial heritage and strong student life)?
N.F. During this period, I organised my work around practice-based research. Starting from the ideas we were talking about before (the foreigner, language, threshold, utopia/dystopia of an invented language), I tried to create work in relation to the context, the people and the territory. In Saint-Cirq Lapopie I had the opportunity to collaborate with a choir. We drew inspiration from a quote of Aristotle’s Politics1 to develop a series of actions imagining a way to map out the space we lived in intangibly. In Saint-Gaudens, thanks to another accidental encounter, I worked on a video in which I explored the forms of verbal communication invented by man to establish a relationship with animals. I recorded a lot of material about these entirely personal ways to create a new language, which are sometimes successful and sometimes not. I hope I will continue this project in Italy and Mexico. Lastly, in Toulouse I tried to come to a conclusion on language. I actually left the city and started working with an artisan workshop which has been making cowbells since the 17th century. I started planning the installation for the final exhibition with them.

S.M. What do you believe your role as an artist to be in contextual art? Are you a catalyst? A researcher?
N.F. I often quote an essay by Walter Benjamin on this point, which largely influenced my work. Benjamin recognises two types of people who in the past could be considered ‘storytellers’. On one side there is the sedentary and home-based peasant, who lives in the same place as his ancestors for all of his life and thus reaches the deepest level of knowledge of time. On the other side there is the itinerant and travelling merchant, who having travelled far and wide is fully aware of space. I’ve always been interested in how understanding distance, either in time or space, can be linked to the ability of telling the truth, but also – as Benjamin adds – of finding a breakthrough towards what is ‘wonderful’, allowed by the public to the storyteller. This is what I aim to do in my artistic practice: to tell the truth so I can then allow myself to offer a wonderful abstraction from truth itself.

S.M. You often approach work through collaboration between different people. You saw the context in Midi-Pyrénées mainly as a human one. How did you establish a relationship with the locals?
N.F. In fact I always try to lay as foundation of my work the process of listening, storytelling and creating a deep connection with the local context. To use an anthropological metaphor, field work is often defined by informers, who then actually lead the following processes.

S.M. One of Piano – alto!’s distinctive traits is that it’s a research residency. Even though there various ways to elaborate and return work to the public were planned for the following months, the main aim of these weeks was to immerse yourself in a different context and stimulate your reflection. Was this the first time you took part in a research residency? What was it like?
N.F. Actually, I had been in residence at the Fondazione Bevilacqua La Masa. There I had started researching from a more theoretical point of view distance and storytelling. This first step led all of my recent research and practice, from the Monte Grappa project in Mexico to the Salgari Method. When I arrived at Piano – alto!, I had the intention to explore the area, look for paths to follow, experiment with new techniques, read and observe to come back with a baggage of new material to transform.

S.M. A residency is also a life experience. What does living in a place for a limited period of time mean to you? What were your expectations when you got to Midi-Pyrénées and what do you go back to Italy with?
N.F. An opportunity to take a break, a deep breath, do something else. I left to explore a territory I didn’t know, to understand something, however small. I come back with plenty of material, encounters, conversations, landscapes. And some doubts, which to me are a good way to come close to knowledge.

1 “(…) To the size of states there is a limit, as there is to other things, plants, animals, implements; for none of these retain their natural power when they are too large or too small, but they either wholly lose their nature, or are spoiled. For example, a ship which is only a span long will not be a ship at all, nor a ship a quarter of a mile long; yet there may be a ship of a certain size, either too large or too small, which will still be a ship, but bad for sailing. In like manner a state when composed of too few is not, as a state ought to be, self-sufficing; when of too many, though self-sufficing in all mere necessaries, as a nation may be, it is not a state, being almost incapable of constitutional government. For who can be the general of such a vast multitude, or who the herald, unless he have the voice of a Stentor? A state, then, only begins to exist when it has attained a population sufficient for a good life in the political community: it may indeed, if it somewhat exceed this number, be a greater state. But, as I was saying, there must be a limit. What should be the limit will be easily ascertained by experience. For both governors and governed have duties to perform; the special functions of a governor to command and to judge. But if the citizens of a state are to judge and to distribute offices according to merit, then they must know each other’s characters; where they do not possess this knowledge, both the election to offices and the decision of lawsuits will go wrong. When the population is very large they are manifestly settled at haphazard, which clearly ought not to be. Besides, in an over-populous state foreigners and metics will readily acquire the rights of citizens, for who will find them out? Clearly then the best limit of the population of a state is the largest number which suffices for the purposes of life, and can be taken in at a single view. Enough concerning the size of a state.” Aristotle, Politics, Book Seven, translated by Benjamin Jowett.

November 2014
Translation: thanks to Marta Sanders

NINA FIOCCO, L’INTIMA ESSENZA DEL TERRITORIO

Nina Fiocco è stata accolta in residenza alle Maisons Daura a Saint-Cirq Lapopie, alla Chapelle Saint-Jacques a Saint-Gaudens et al BBB centre d’art a Tolosa tra settembre e novembre 2014.
Nina Fiocco si insinua nei meandri della realtà comune e ne svela gli aspetti più reconditi e significativi. Come una ricercatrice sul terreno, interroga la dimensione locale del contesto per aprirla a una prospettiva universale.

A cura di Stefania Meazza

Stefania Meazza Qual è il progetto che hai sviluppato durante le residenze Piano – alto!?
Nina Fiocco Venire in Francia era per me una maniera di avvicinarmi a casa, anche se, in effetti, a casa non ero. Piuttosto mi trovavo in bilico, in un paese cui non appartengo, ma che fa comunque parte di un sistema politico-sociale del quale faccio parte anch’io. Vivendo in un altro continente, sono stata definita, per la prima volta e con grande sorpresa, europea. Sono stata inclusa in un macrosistema che non avevo mai pensato come mio e che è d’altra parte assolutamente contrario alla diversità, poiché appare dall’esterno coeso e ben definito. Al mio arrivo, dopo la recente lettura de Il monolinguismo degli altri di Jacques Derrida, ero interessata ad avvicinarmi all’idea di lingua come soglia, come una membrana che può dispoticamente scegliere tra chi è dentro e chi è fuori da una comunità, tra chi possiede strumenti lessicali e cadenza adeguati a parlare di certi temi e chi no. Per questa ragione con la mia ricerca ho cercato di investigare una dimensione in un certo senso utopica del linguaggio, in cui un soggetto, che non può valersi della propria lingua madre per entrare in contatto con “l’altro”, inventa un linguaggio proprio, che esclude un senso dato a un suono prestabilito, bensì lo reinventa, lo sperimenta, lo personalizza.

S.M. Il progetto svolto in Midi-Pyrénées, e in generale la tua ricerca, è in assonanza diretta con il contesto. Usando un’espressione coniata dal critico francese Paul Ardenne, si potrebbe definire una forma d’arte “contestuale”. Che ruolo hanno svolto i tre tipi di contesti incontrati durante la tua residenza (Saint-Cirq Lapopie: villaggio medievale destinazione turistica/Saint-Gaudens: cittadina industriale ai piedi dei Pirenei/Tolosa: capoluogo di regione, città dinamica, dall’identità industriale e studentesca)? Come hai reagito a questi contesti?
N.F. Il lavoro di questo periodo si è organizzato intorno a ricerche in practice: in base alle idee di cui abbiamo parlato prima (lo straniero, la lingua, la soglia, l’utopia/distopia di una lingua inventata) ho cercato di lavorare contestualmente agli incontri e al territorio. A Saint- Cirq-Lapopie ho avuto modo di collaborare con un coro e, insieme, partendo da una citazione sulla città ideale tratta dalla Politica di Aristotele1, abbiamo lavorato a una serie di azioni, immaginando una maniera di mappare immaterialmente gli spazi. A Saint-Gaudens, sempre a causa di un incontro fortuito, ho lavorato a un video indagando quelle forme verbali di comunicazione inventate dall’uomo per stabilire un contatto con l’animale. Ho registrato una lunga documentazione video di queste maniere del tutto personali di elaborare un linguaggio nuovo, talvolta riuscite talvolta fallimentari. L’idea è quella di proseguire questo lavoro anche tra in Italia e in Messico. Tolosa, infine, è stato il luogo in cui ho cercato di elaborare e di trovare una forma di conclusione sul linguaggio: in realtà, allontanandomi dalla città, sono entrata in contatto con un laboratorio artigianale di campane per animali in attività dal XVII secolo, con cui ho iniziato a progettare l’installazione per la mostra di restituzione finale.

S.M. Come concepisci il tuo ruolo nel processo di creazione contestuale? L’artista come catalizzatore? Come ricercatore?
N.F. In uno dei suoi saggi, che cito spesso perché ha influenzato fortemente il mio lavoro, Walter Benjamin distingue tra due tipologie di persone che in passato si potevano considerare “narratori”. Da una parte si trova il contadino sedentario che, vivendo in un luogo per tutta la sua vita come i suoi antenati, raggiunge la massima profondità temporale di conoscenza; dall’altro vi è il mercante viaggiatore che, avendo lungamente percorso il globo, possiede la piena consapevolezza di uno spazio. Mi è sempre interessato come alla conoscenza di una distanza, spaziale o temporale che sia, si possa associare la capacità non solo di raccontare la verità ma anche, come aggiunge Benjamin, di trovare un’evasione (che il pubblico complice concede al narratore) verso il “meraviglioso”. Nella mia pratica ambisco a questo, a raccontare la realtà per concedermi il lusso di proporre un’astrazione fantastica della stessa.

S.M. Il tuo modo di concepire un lavoro si basa spesso su modalità di collaborazione tra persone diverse. Anche in Midi-Pyrénées, il contesto è stato inteso come realtà eminentemente umana. Come hai impostato in questo caso il rapporto con i tuoi interlocutori?
N.F. Effettivamente alla base del mio lavoro cerco sempre di partire dall’ascolto, dalla narrazione, da un incontro intimo con una realtà locale. Se mi permetti una metafora con l’antropologia, il lavoro di campo è spesso determinato dagli informatori che sono, in realtà, coloro che orientano i processi a seguire.

S.M. La particolarità di Piano – alto! è, tra le altre, di essere una residenza di ricerca. Nonostante diverse forme di restituzione previste per i mesi a venire, lo scopo di queste settimane di residenza non era di produrre un lavoro, ma di immergersi in una realtà altra e nutrire la tua riflessione. È la prima volta che ti trovi a partecipare a una residenza di ricerca? Come hai affrontato questa esperienza?
N.F. In realtà anche in precedenza ero stata in residenza alla Fondazione Bevilacqua La Masa, dove avevo cominciato un percorso di ricerca più che altro teorico, legato alla distanza e alla narrazione, che ha condotto poi tutta la mia ricerca e pratica più recente: dal progetto Monte Grappa in Messico alla costituzione del Metodo Salgari. Sono quindi arrivata alla residenza Piano – alto! con l’idea d’esplorare un luogo e di cercare piste da seguire, sperimentare nuove tecniche, leggere e osservare con l’idea di tornare con un serbatoio rinnovato di materiale da trasformare.

S.M. Una residenza è anche un’esperienza di vita. Che cosa significa per te risiedere in un luogo durante un periodo di tempo limitato? Quali erano le tue attese arrivando in Midi-Pyrénées e con quale bagaglio riparti in Italia?
N.F. Una pausa, un respiro, un’opportunità per fare altro. Partivo con l’idea di esplorare un territorio che non conoscevo, di capire anche qualcosa di piccolo da quest’esperienza. Torno con molto materiale, tanti incontri, conversazioni e paesaggi. E pure qualche dubbio che è per me una bella maniera di avvicinarsi a sapere.

1 “(…) Ma c’è senza dubbio una misura di grandezza anche per lo stato, come per ogni altra cosa, animali, piante, strumenti: ognuno di questi, se troppo piccolo o troppo eccedente in grandezza, non conserverà la propria capacità, ma talvolta rimarrà assolutamente privo della propria natura, talvolta si troverà in cattive condizioni: ad esempio un’imbarcazione di una spanna non sarà affatto imbarcazione, e neppure una di due stadi, che, raggiunta una determinata dimensione, talvolta per la piccolezza, talvolta per la dismisura, pregiudicherà la navigazione. Ugualmente uno stato, quando ha troppo pochi abitanti, non è autosufficiente (e lo stato è qualcosa di autosufficiente), quando ne ha troppi, sarà autosufficiente nelle esigenze indispensabili, come una nazione, ma non sarà uno stato, perché non è facile che abbia una costituzione: chi sarà, infatti, lo stratego di una massa di gente troppo smisurata? o chi l’araldo se non ha la voce di Stentore? Quindi condizione indispensabile per l’esistenza dello stato è che abbia un numero tale di abitanti che sia il minimo indispensabile in vista dell’autosufficienza per un’esistenza agiata in conformità alle esigenze d’una comunità civile. È possibile, certo, che uno stato superiore a questo per massa di abitanti sia più grande, ma tale possibilità d’incremento, come s’è già detto, non è illimitata: quale poi sia il limite dell’incremento, si vede facilmente dall’esame dei fatti. Le attività dello stato sono talune di chi comanda, altre di chi è comandato: è funzione di chi comanda impartire ordini e giudicare i processi: ma per decidere questioni di giustizia e per distribuire le cariche secondo il merito, è necessario che i cittadini si conoscano a vicenda nelle loro qualità, poiché, ove ciò non si avvera, di necessità le faccende riguardanti le cariche e le sentenze giudiziarie vanno male, e né nell’una né nell’altra è giusto affidarsi all’improvvisazione, come invece apertamente si pratica dove c’è troppa popolazione. Inoltre stranieri e meteci potranno più facilmente partecipare ai diritti della cittadinanza giacché, dato l’eccessivo numero della popolazione, non è difficile passare inosservati. È chiaro, quindi, che il limite migliore della popolazione d’uno stato è il seguente: deve avere l’incremento massimo al fine di vivere una vita autosufficiente e deve essere facilmente abbracciata in un unico sguardo. Siano, dunque, queste le precisazioni per quanto riguarda la grandezza dello stato”. Aristotele, Politica, libro primo.

novembre 2014

Image:
Nina Fiocco, Sans titre, Saint-Gaudens, 2014. © Nina Fiocco

Project: Piano – alto!
Protagonists: Nina Fiocco, Stefania Meazza
Spaces: Maison des Arts Georges Pompidou CAC, CAC Chapelle St Jacques, BBB centre d’art

close
en - it - fr

GIANNI PETTENA

Born 1940, Bolzano, Italy
Lives and works in Fiesole, Italy

An artist, architect, designer, critic, architectural historian, curator, and teacher, Gianni Pettena is one of the central figures of Italian radical architecture alongside Archizoom, Superstudio, and UFO. His book L’Anarchitetto, published in 1972, has influenced several generations of artists and architects: in it, the author refuses to acknowledge the boundaries between different disciplines and defines himself as an “anarchitect,” one for whom speaking about architecture is a means of communicating a creative condition destined to become architecture, yet one that culminates in an art of living. Among the tools and subjects that can be found in his work are the use of language, a relationship to nature and context, and the parallel between reality and reproduction. Gianni Pettena’s first realized public project, for the town hall in Canazei (Trentino-Alto Adige), stems from his interest in the restoration and conservation of historical buildings. The town hall was built in 1930s by senior Ettore Sottsass, a major figure in pre-war Italian architecture. Threatened with demolition, the building was saved in part due to Gianni Pettena’s intervention. He proposed extending the building—a necessity given the rise in tourism—in the form of a mirror construction that establishes a dialog with the original building. The same architectural phrase is thus written in the styles of two different periods. The facing façades of the two buildings are similar in appearance and are united by a glass structure that transforms the space between them as a convivial public meeting place.

Nato a Bolzano, Italia, nel 1940
Vive e lavora a Fiesole, Italia

Artista, architetto, designer, critico e storico dell’architettura, curatore di mostre e insegnante, Gianni Pettena fa parte del nucleo iniziale dell’Architettura Radicale Italiana, a fianco di Archizoom, Superstudio e UFO. La sua opera L’Anarchitetto, pubblicata nel 1972, segnerà molte generazioni di artisti e di architetti: l’autore rifiuta le frontiere tra le discipline e si definisce un “anarchitetto”, per il quale parlare di architettura è un modo per parlare di una condizione creatrice destinata sì a produrre delle architetture, ma anche rappresentativa di un’arte del vivere. Tra gli strumenti e i temi del suo lavoro vanno ricordati l’uso del linguaggio, il rapporto con la natura e con il contesto, i collegamenti tra realtà e riproduzione.
Il progetto per il primo edificio pubblico realizzato da Pettena deriva dal suo interesse per il restauro e la conservazione degli edifici storici. Nel caso specifico, il comune di Canazei (Trentino Alto Adige) era stato costruito negli anni ’30 da Ettore Sottsass padre, figura importante dell’architettura italiana anteguerra. A rischio di demolizione, ha potuto essere in parte conservato grazie all’intervento di Gianni Pettena. Egli ha proposto un’espansione, resa necessaria dalla crescita del turismo, sotto forma di una costruzione speculare che installa un dialogo aperto con l’edificio esistente: una stessa frase architettonica, scritta nei linguaggi formali di due epoche distinte. Le facciate laterali dei due edifici hanno un aspetto simile e sono unite da una struttura in vetro, che riqualifica l’interstizio in uno spazio pubblico di incontro.

Né à Bolzano, Italie, en 1940
Vit et travaille à Fiesole, Italie

Artiste, architecte, designer, critique et historien de l’architecture, commissaire et enseignant, Gianni Pettena fait partie du noyau d’origine de l’Architecture radicale italienne, aux côtés d’Archizoom, Superstudio et UFO. Son ouvrage L’Anarchitetto, publié en 1972, marquera plusieurs générations d’artistes et d’architectes : l’auteur y refuse les frontières entre les disciplines et se définit comme un « anarchitecte », celui pour qui parler d’architecture est un mode pour parler d’une condition créatrice destinée à faire de l’architecture, mais qui aboutit à un art de vivre. Parmi les outils et les sujets présents dans son travail, on peut mentionner l’utilisation du langage, le rapport à la nature et au contexte, les jonctions entre réalité et reproduction.

Nuovo Municipio di Canazei, Trento (1990-97)
Avec Oswald Zoeggeler
Le projet pour le premier bâtiment public réalisé par Pettena découle de son intérêt pour la restauration et la conservation des bâtiments historiques. Dans ce cas particulier, la mairie de Canazei (Trentin-Haut-Adige) avait été construite dans les années 1930 par Ettore Sottsass père, figure majeure de l’architecture italienne d’avant-guerre. Menacée d’une démolition, elle a pu être conservée en partie grâce à l’intervention de Gianni Pettena. Il a proposé une extension, rendue nécessaire par l’essor du tourisme, sous la forme d’une construction en miroir qui établit un dialogue ouvert avec le bâtiment existant : une même phrase architecturale écrite dans les langages formels de deux époques distinctes. Les façades latérales des deux édifices ont une apparence similaire et sont unies par une structure vitrée qui requalifie l’interstice en un espace public de rencontre.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

Mattin

Born 1977, Spain
Lives and works in Sweden and the Spanish Basque Country

Mattin is a Basque artist whose work responds to the social and economic conditions of experimental music production, through live performance, recordings, and writings. He investigates the parameters of improvisation, notably the notion of freedom and constant innovation dictated by its conventions and which distinguish it as a genre. For Mattin, improvisation does not merely entail an interaction between musicians and their instruments, but also all the other elements that make a concert. He reveals the stereotypical relations between the active player and the passive audience, which he aims to disrupt by provoking experiences of alienation. The Audience is Not the Mother of Self-Invention, presented here as a video recording, is a performance that took place in 2012 at Index (an independent art space in Stockholm) during a week-long performance series titled The Audience is the Mother of Self-Invention. The performance began with a video camera equipped with a light projector aimed at Mattin, who stood in the middle of a circle spontaneously formed by members of the audience. During one hour the camera slowly revolved 360 degrees, moving away from the performer and steadily filming the audience. During the traveling shot, Mattin uttered a series of almost inaudible phrases. The performance ended when the camera came full circle to once again frame him.

Nato in Spagna nel 1977
Vive e lavora in Svezia e nei Paesi Baschi spagnoli

Mattin è un artista basco il cui lavoro si inserisce nelle strutture sociali ed economiche della produzione musicale cosiddetta sperimentale, attraverso performance dal vivo, registrazioni e l’esercizio della scrittura. L’artista si interroga sui parametri dell’improvvisazione, in particolar modo sulla relazione tra l’idea di libertà e l’innovazione costante che essa richiede, all’interno di convenzioni stabilite che ne fanno un genere. Secondo Mattin, non si tratta soltanto di un’interazione tra musicisti e strumenti, ma di una situazione che ingloba l’insieme degli elementi facenti parte di un concerto. L’artista mostra la relazione stereotipata tra l’interprete (attivo) e il pubblico (passivo), producendo un senso di alienazione che ha lo scopo di disturbare questa relazione.
The Audience is Not the Mother of Self-Invention (Il pubblico non è la madre dell’auto-invenzione), qui presentata in forma di registrazione video, è una performance svoltasi nel 2012 alla Index Foundation (uno spazio d’arte contemporanea di Stoccolma), all’interno della programmazione The Audience is the Mother of Self-Invention. Una videocamera, munita di proiettore, è puntata su Mattin, che si trova al centro del cerchio formatosi spontaneamente tra gli spettatori. In seguito, e per un’ora, la videocamera compie un lento movimento di 360°, staccandosi dal campo visivo dell’artista e filmando progressivamente tutto il pubblico. Durante questa carrellata, Mattin pronuncia delle frasi quasi incomprensibili. La performance si chiude con la videocamera che torna a inquadrare Mattin.

Né en Espagne en 1977
Vit et travaille en Suède et au Pays basque espagnol

Mattin est un artiste basque dont le travail répond aux structures sociales et économiques de la production musicale dite expérimentale, grâce à la performance live, les enregistrements et l’écriture. Il interroge les paramètres de l’improvisation, en particulier la relation entre l’idée de liberté et l’innovation constante qu’elle implique dans les conventions établies qui en font un genre. Selon Mattin, elle n’est pas seulement une interaction entre les musiciens et les instruments, mais une situation impliquant l’ensemble des éléments qui constituent un concert. Il expose la relation stéréotypée entre l’interprète actif et l’audience passive, produisant un sentiment d’aliénation qui vise à perturber cette relation.
The Audience is Not the Mother of Self-Invention, ici présentée sous la forme d’enregistrement vidéo, est une performance qui a eu lieu en 2012 à Index (espace d’art à Stockholm), dans le cadre de la programmation The Audience is the Mother of Self-Invention. Une caméra vidéo, équipée d’un projecteur de lumière, est braquée sur Mattin, lui-même installé au milieu du cercle spontanément formé par les spectateurs. Ensuite, durant une heure, la caméra effectue une lente révolution sur 360°, quittant ainsi le champ du performeur pour progressivement filmer toute l’audience. Pendant ce travelling, l’artiste prononce des phrases à la limite de l’audible. La performance prend fin avec le retour du champ de la caméra sur Mattin.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en

PETER BUGGENHOUT

5_FG_Buggenhout_Gorgo-#33_3

Peter Buggenhout, Gorgo #33, 2013

Born 1963, Dendermonde, Belgium
Lives and works in Ghent, Belgium
His work has been internationally exhibited in both institutional and commercial venues. He had solo exhibitions at the Palais de Tokyo, Paris (2013), at the Ludwig Forum, Aachen (2012) and at the Museum Dhont-Dhaenens, Deurle Belgium (2009). He is represented by Gladstone Gallery in New York and Galerie Laurent Godin in Paris.

Image:
Peter Buggenhout, Gorgo #33, 2013, mixed media: wax, plastic, blood, horse hair, cardboard, PU6foam, polyester; work: h 48 x 72 x 49 cm + glassbox & pedestal: h 147 x 80 x 60 cm

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en - it - fr

MARIA ALICATA

Maria Alicata is a curator and art historian based in Rome. From September 2011 to December 2013 she was the curator at MACRO Museo d’arte contemporanea Roma for young artists and its residency program, for which she curated solo and group shows.
She runs the public art program Nuovi Committenti for the Adriano Olivetti Foundation in Rome, and also curates art commissions for private companies and public institutions.
Since 2006, she is a founding member of the non-profit curatorial platform 1:1projects.

Project: Red Swan Hotel

 

Curatrice e storica dell’arte, vive a Roma. Dal 2011 al 2013 ha curato per il MACRO il programma e le residenze per giovani artisti. È responsabile del programma di arte pubblica Nuovi Committenti per la Fondazione Adriano Olivetti. Maria Alicata cura inoltre committenze d’arte per aziende private e istituzioni pubbliche. È tra i fondatori della piattaforma curatoriale no profit 1:1projects, che realizza varie attività tra cui talks con artisti e curatori, screening, mostre, presentazioni di libri e workshop

 

Maria Alicata est commissaire d’expositions et historienne de l’art à Rome. Jusqu’a décembre 2013, elle a été commissaire au MACRO d’expositions de jeunes artistes (solo et group show) et de résidences. Elle est membre fondateur de l’association de commissaires 1:1projects et elle dirige le programme Nuovi Committenti pour la Fondation Adriano Olivetti à Rome, et à la charge du commissariat d’expositions pour des entreprises privées et des institutions publiques.

close
en - it - fr

Goldschmied & Chiari

CAP-Goldshmied Chiari-009

Goldschmied & Chiari, La démocratie est illusion, 2014

Sara Goldschmied born 1975, Vicenza, Italy and Eleonora Chiari born 1971 Rome, Italy
Live and work in Rome and Milan, Italy
Goldschmied & Chiari (formerly Goldiechiari) was founded in 2001 by Sara Goldschmied and Eleonora Chiari. Using installation, video and photography, they explore the concepts of history and memory in terms of the division between amnesia and deletion/reconstruction and reflection. Analyzing specific moments in recent political history, they demonstrate the opacity of memory, together with the strategies employed to wipe out truths or create new ones. They focus too on sexuality and female identity interpreted as the products of real and imaginary experiences imposed by society and the ambient culture.
They have had solo exhibitions at MACRO in Rome, Museion in Bolzano and Centro d’Arti Visive Pescheria in Pesaro, Italy. The duo has also taken part in numerous group shows in venues like Castello di Rivoli, Torino (2012), the MoCA Shanghai (2010), Museo de Arte Contemporaneo in Córdoba (2007), the Musée de Grenoble (2007) and Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo (2007). Their work has been presented at the biennials in Venice (2009), Tel Aviv (2010) and Dublin (2011).

Image:
Goldschmied & Chiari, La démocratie est illusion / La democrazia è illusione. Photo: Aurélien Mole, 2014

Project: La démocratie est illusion
Focus: For secret eyes only. Marcella Beccaria in conversation with Goldschmied & Chari

 

Goldschmied & Chiari è un duo di artiste fondato nel 2001. Le loro opere esplorano i concetti di storia e di memoria al confine tra amnesia e cancellazione, tra ricostruzione e rimosso. Analizzando specifici momenti della storia recente, dimostrano l’opacità della memoria e le strategie impiegate per insabbiare la verità e costruirne altre narrazioni. Ugualmente nella loro ricerca concentrano il proprio sguardo sulla sessualità e l’identità femminili, interpretate come il prodotto di esperienze reali e immaginarie imposte dalla società e dalla cultura. Le loro opere sono state esposte al MACRO di Roma, al Museion di Bolzano e al Centro d’arti visive Pescheria di Pesaro, al Museo di arte contemporanea di Cordoba, al MOCA di Shangai, al MAMbo di Bologna e al Castello di Rivoli di Torino. Hanno partecipato alla Biennale di Venezia (2009), Tel Aviv (2010) e Dublino (2011). Hanno vinto il Premio dei giovani artisti italiani del Castello di Rivoli nel 2012.

 

Goldschmied & Chiari est un duo d’artistes fondé en 2001 par Sara Goldschmied et Eleonora Chiari. Leurs œuvres proposent une recherche sur les concepts d’histoire et mémoire, clivées entre amnésie et effacement, reconstruction et réflexion. Elles ont analysé des moments spécifiques de l’histoire politique récente, en montrant visuellement l’opacité du souvenir et les stratégies utilisées pour effacer des vérités ou en créer des autres. Elles touchent également aux thèmes liés à la sexualité et à l’identité féminine, interprétées comme le produit d’expériences réelles et imaginaires imposées par la société et la culture. Leur travail a fait l’objet d’expositions au MACRO (Rome), Museion (Bolzano), au Centro d’Arti Visive Peschiera (Pesaro), au Museo de Arte Contemporaneo (Cordoue), au MOCA (Shanghai), au MAMbo (Bologne) et au Castello di Rivoli (Turin). Elles ont participé aux Biennales de Venise (2009), Tel Aviv (2010) et Dublin (2011). Elles sont lauréates du Prix des Jeunes Artistes Italiens du Castello di Rivoli en 2012.

close
en - it - fr

Marcella Beccaria in conversation with Goldschmied & Chiari

 FOR SECRET EYES ONLY

With great coherence, Goldschmied & Chiari have been investigating the role of women artists born in Italy, a country where contradictions seem endless and belonging to a specific historical time in which events, spread around through the web sometimes even before they take place, relentlessly shake off the concreteness of reality, redrawing the concept of truth. In recent years, Goldschmied & Chiari have also investigated the idea of the nation, and, focusing on facts which Italians seem to prefer to forget, produced Genealogia di damnatio memoriae. The series consists of tall trees on which the artists carved lists of dates and places to represent the sequence of tragic events that run in Italian history. I meet the artists in the gardens of the Castle of Rivoli, where the three trees, which they worked on for the exhibition La storia che non ho vissuto [History I did not live through] in 2012, are planted.

rivoli

1. Genealogia di damnatio memoriae Torino 1965-1982, 2012

Marcella Beccaria I often find myself watching how visitors behave when facing these works. The connection with the tragic reality that each tree tells – from the terrible events occurred in Italy from 1969 up to the killing of Pasolini, and then the series of murders at the hands of the Red Brigades in Italy – often happens gradually, as if history revealed itself slowly, and only to those who really care for it.

gen_5

2. Genealogia di Damnatio Memoriae 1965-1981, 2009

Goldschmied & Chiari Genealogie di damnatio memoriae are a series of works we worked on for four years, from 2009 to 2013. They consist of trees which have been carved but are living, hence still enduring seasonal changes and the normal growth and life of trees, suggesting a relationship with history in constant evolution and change. It is this relationship that we address and which involves, as you noted, the development of a certain kind of relationship with the people who come into contact with the works – something that entails a gradual unveiling.M.B. Last year there was a further evolution, I would say. New works that expand to investigate the history of Europe and a new type of relationship with the visitor, whom I think you aim to “captivate” in an almost etymological sense of the term and with many references to the performances of early century illusionists.

G.&C. Research on Italian history of the seventies led us to explore the countless international geopolitical connections related to the Western bloc strategies during the Cold War. Following these connections, we often came across the strong influence and the role of intelligence agencies in defending the State and interfering with the domestic politics and the agenda of countries belonging in the Atlantic Pact. This way of acting behind the scenes of democracy – bypassing the eyes of citizens with cunning cover-up tricks and manipulating information – has many similarities with the way illusionists, through their stage machines, speed of action and clever talk enact their trickeries.

M.B. So the result of your interest for the two activities is the large installation Hiding the Elephant, which you presented in Brest?

G.&C. Yes, with the title intended in the literal sense. The work refers to the extraordinary performance which the illusionist Harry Houdini held in 1918 at the Hippodrome in New York, where he made an elephant disappear in front of a crowd of thousands. Our work consists of 160 two-dimensional head silhouettes suspended in midair. Each has its twin, carrying on one side a digital portrait and on the other a mirror surface. All the characters portrayed are presidents, politicians, poets and journalists who “mysteriously” disappeared, were exiled or persecuted for political reasons during the cold war, and victims of international actions by Western intelligence agencies. Like in a magic trick, these face silhouettes hang at different heights, and when moving produce different shadow and light effects on the walls.

2013-goldiechiari-WORKS-web-16

3. Dispositivo di rimozione #5, 2010

M.B. One has to stop in the exhibition room for a while to make contact with this work.

G.&C. Once in a while, the area around the work is filled with dense smoke which conceals the faces, making them hazy and unrecognizable. Then the smoke gradually vanishes, revealing the faces clearly. In this installation, the metaphor of Houdini’s trick is staged via the smoke, the light, and the reflections of the mirrors, reproducing the disappearance/removal of the history of the characters portrayed and the covert actions in which they were involved.

M.B. In this exhibition the idea of illusion also includes the way in which the different works engage with each other. There are “magic boxes” that reflect in large mirrors, with smoke appearing to seep out of the boxes themselves and entering the reflected world, and there are “tricks” that seem to hark back to the dawn of the history of cinema.

G.&C. Yes, it’s as if the works were in constant interaction with each other, and changed with time and the viewers. Using mirror as the material of choice for many of the works makes the show relational and open to the constant change of context. La démocratie is always changing depending on weather and daylight. The face silhouettes of Hiding the Elephant revolve on themselves, and lit by direct light they cast shadows and send reflections all over the room, sometimes blinding visitors for a few seconds, creating an effect of movement and life in the installation itself. The reflections also find their way into the other room, casting shadows on the Fragments (2014) video and on the Medusa Mirrors (2014). The Boîtes Magiques [Magic Boxes] (2014) are in turn reflected in the smoke-stained mirrors, creating the illusion that the colored smoke is seeping through the boxes while it is instead actually smeared on the surface of the Medusa Mirrors.

M.B. In Brest the exhibition route begins with a strong statement, La démocratie est illusion, written with large reflecting letters in an almost gothic typeface. Where does the quote come from?

G.&C. This is the first work of the series, and was born as a watercolor, to be then transformed into an installation, and finally into the title of the Brest and Genoa exhibitions. La démocratie est illusion [Democracy is an illusion] (2014), located at the entrance of the exhibition, challenges the visitor and introduces the installation Hiding the Elephant. The reflecting surface of the letters produces an optical effect, making them appear like windows into another dimension, as if there were a twin room on the other side of the wall, forcing the viewer to look carefully and not to be deceived by appearances. What we like to explore is the similarity in the practice of deception and illusion in representing reality between stage magic and intelligence agency procedures. By making his trick realistic, the magician deceives the spectator and makes him blind to the stage, producing a sense of childlike wonder and disbelief. The relationship between stage magic and intelligence agency procedures is that the public wants to be other-directed, it does not want to find out about the trick. The question lies in the “the difference between believing and seeing, between believing one sees and seeing between, catching a glimpse – or not” (Jacques Derrida).

Project: La démocratie est illusion
Protagonists: Goldschmied & Chiari
Spaces: Passerelle Centre d’art contemporain, Villa Croce Museo d’Arte Contemporanea

 

Con grande coerenza, da anni Goldschmied & Chiari indagano il loro ruolo di artiste donne, figlie di un Paese come l’Italia, nel quale le contraddizioni sembrano inesauribili e di un preciso tempo storico nel quale gli eventi, diffusi attraverso il web talvolta ancora prima di accadere, si scrollano con insistenza dalla concretezza del reale, ridisegnando il concetto di verità. In anni recenti, Goldschmied & Chiari si sono interrogate sull’idea di nazione, e soffermandosi su fatti che gli italiani sembrano preferire dimenticare, hanno realizzato Genealogia di damnatio memoriae. La serie consiste in alberi di alto fusto sui quali le artiste incidono nella forma di elenchi di date e luoghi la tragica sequenza di sangue che corre nella storia italiana. Incontro le artiste nel giardino del Castello di Rivoli, dove sono piantati i tre alberi che hanno sviluppato nel 2012, in occasione della mostra La storia che non ho vissuto.

Marcella Beccaria Spesso mi ritrovo ad osservare come i visitatori si comportano davanti a queste opere. L’incontro con la tragica realtà che ciascun albero racconta – dalla sequenza di stragi accadute in Italia dal 1969 fino all’assassinio di Pasolini e poi la serie di omicidi ad opera delle Brigate Rosse a Torino – è spesso graduale, è come se la storia si svelasse lentamente, e solo per coloro che davvero la cercano.

Goldschmied & Chiari Le Genealogie di damnatio memoriae sono il ciclo di opere alle quali abbiamo dedicato gli ultimi quattro anni di ricerca, dal 2009 al 2013. Sono alberi viventi intagliati, come tali sono suscettibili alla trasformazione data dal ciclo delle stagioni e dalla crescita e dalla vita dell’albero, suggerendo un rapporto con la Storia in continua evoluzione e cambiamento. È questa relazione che ci interessa e che include, come dici, lo sviluppo di un certo tipo di relazione con chi incontra l’opera, pensando proprio a uno svelamento graduale. 

M.B. Lo scorso anno c’è stata un’evoluzione ulteriore direi. Nuove opere che si allargano a indagare la storia europea e un nuovo tipo di relazione con gli spettatori, che mi sembra vogliate “accattivare”, nel senso quasi etimologico del termine e con molteplici riferimenti alle pratiche degli illusionisti di inizio secolo.

G.&C. La ricerca sulla storia italiana degli anni Settanta ci ha portato a esaminare la molteplicità di connessioni geopolitiche internazionali connesse alle strategie del blocco occidentale durante la guerra fredda. Seguendo queste connessioni ci siamo imbattute più volte nella forte influenza e nel ruolo dei servizi segreti nella difesa dello Stato e nelle ingerenze nel determinare la politica interna e l’agenda degli Stati appartenenti al patto atlantico. Questo modo di agire dietro le quinte della democrazia – aggirando lo sguardo della cittadinanza con abili trucchi di insabbiamento e manipolazione dell’informazione – ha molte similitudini con la pratica e il modo di operare degli illusionisti che attraverso macchine sceniche, velocità d’azione e affabulazione mettono in scena i propri prestigi.

M.B. Quindi il risultato dell’interesse per le due pratiche è la grande installazione Hiding the Elephant che avete presentato a Brest?

G.&C. Si, con il titolo inteso in senso letterale: occultando l’elefante. L’opera si riferisce alla spettacolare performance del mago Harry Houdini che nel 1918 all’ippodromo di New York fece scomparire un elefante di fronte a migliaia di spettatori. L’opera consiste di 160 sagome di teste bidimensionali, sospese nello spazio espositivo. Ognuna di esse ha la sua gemella, composta su un lato da un ritratto fotografico digitale e sull’altro da una superficie specchiante. Tutti i personaggi ritratti sono presidenti, politici, poeti e giornalisti “misteriosamente” scomparsi, esiliati o perseguitati durante la guerra fredda per motivi politici e vittime di operazioni internazionali dei servizi segreti occidentali. Come in un trucco magico, queste silhouettes di volti sono sospese a diverse altezze e si muovono producendo differenti effetti di proiezione di ombre e luci sulle pareti.

M.B. Bisogna sostare per un po’ nella sala espositiva per entrare in contatto con questo lavoro.

G.&C. Ciclicamente lo spazio dell’opera è invaso da un fumo denso che nasconde i volti e li rende confusi e irriconoscibili. Il disvelamento avviene dopo pochi minuti di attesa, nei quali pian piano il fumo si dirada, mostrando chiaramente i visi. Nell’installazione la metafora dell’illusione di Houdini viene messa in scena grazie al fumo, alla luce e alle riflessioni degli specchi, riproducendo la sparizione/rimozione della storia dei personaggi ritratti e delle operazioni segrete nelle quali erano coinvolti.

M.B. In questa mostra l’idea di illusione include anche il modo in cui le diverse opere entrano in relazione le une con le altre. Ci sono “scatole magiche” che si riflettono in grandi specchi, con l’illusione che del fumo esca dalle stesse scatole ed entri nel mondo riflesso, ci sono “trucchi” che sembrano guardare anche agli albori della storia del cinema.

G.&C. Si, è come se le opere fossero in continuo dialogo fra loro e cambiassero con il passare degli spettatori e del tempo. La scelta di utilizzare lo specchio come materiale di molti dei lavori rende la mostra relazionale e suscettibile al continuo cambiamento del contesto. La démocratie si modifica continuamente a seconda delle condizioni atmosferiche e della luce del giorno. Le silhouettes dei visi di Hiding the Elephant ruotano su sé stesse, illuminate da una luce diretta producono ombre e riflessioni in tutta la sala accecando a volte per pochi secondi lo spettatore, producendo un effetto di movimento e vita dell’installazione stessa. Le riflessioni invadono l’altra sala e proiettano le loro ombre sul video Fragments (2014) e sugli specchi Medusa Mirrors (2014). Le scatole magiche (Boîtes Magiques, 2014) si riflettono a loro volta negli specchi stampati con fumo, creando l’illusione nella riflessione che siano le scatole stesse a produrre il fumo colorato stampato sulla superficie dei Medusa Mirrors.

M.B. A Brest il percorso della mostra inizia con una dichiarazione forte, La démocratie est illusion, che avete sviluppato con grandi lettere specchianti, in grafia quasi gotica. Da dove viene la citazione?

G.&C. Si tratta del primo lavoro della serie e nasce come acquerello, successivamente viene trasformato in una installazione e nel titolo della mostra di Brest e Genova. La démocratie est illusion (2014), che si trova all’ingresso del percorso espositivo, provoca lo spettatore e lo introduce all’installazione Hiding the elephant. La superficie specchiante produce un effetto ottico, nel quale le lettere sembrano l’ingresso per un’altra dimensione, come se ci fosse una sala gemella al di là del muro. Sfida lo spettatore a guardare attentamente e a non farsi ingannare dalle apparenze.
Ciò che ci interessa è la similitudine nella pratica dell’inganno e  dell’illusione nella rappresentazione della realtà da parte della magia scenica e della politica dei servizi segreti. Rendendo il trucco realistico, il mago inganna lo spettatore e lo rende cieco di fronte al palco, restituendo una sensazione di stupore infantile e incredulità. La relazione tra la magia e le pratiche dei servizi segreti sta nel fatto che il pubblico vuole essere etero-diretto, non vuole scoprire il trucco. La questione si gioca nella “differenza tra credere e vedere, tra credere di vedere e intravedere o meno” (Jacques Derrida).

Images:
1. Goldschmied & Chari, Genealogia di damnatio memoriae Torino 1965-1982, 2012. Courtesy Catsello di Rivoli
2. Goldschmied & Chari, Genealogia di Damnatio Memoriae 1965-1981, 2009
3. Goldschmied & Chari, Dispositivo di rimozione #5, 2010

close
en

LORENZO BENEDETTI

Lorenzo_Benedetti

Lorenzo Benedetti (1972, Rome, Italy) lives and works in the Netherlands and Paris.
He will become the new director of de Appel arts centre, succeeding Ann Demeester. He has been director of De Vleeshal in Middelburg since 2008, and acquired national prominence as curator of the Netherlands Pavilion at the 2013 Venice Biennale. He will assume his new role at de Appel as of 1 June, 2014.
He studied art history at La Sapienza in Rome and attended the Curatorial Program at de Appel arts centre in Amsterdam. In 2005 he founded the Sound Art Museum in Rome, a space dedicated to sound in visual art. He has been the director of the art center Volume! in Rome and a curator at the Museum Marta Herford, in Herford, Germany. He was guest curator at La Kunsthalle in Mulhouse, France. He is tutor at the Jan van Eyck Academy in Maastricht and writes regularly for exhibition catalogues and art magazines.
At De Vleeshal he realized exhibitions with Nedko Solakov, Jimmie Durham, Yona Friedman and Jean-Baptiste Decavèle, Falke Pisano, Rossella Biscotti, Olaf Nicolai, Katinka Bock, Bojan Sarcevic, Marinus Boezem, Mandla Reuter, Koenraad Dedobbeleer, Benoît Maire, Francesco Arena, Nina Beier and Marie Lund, Dove Allouche, Fernando Sanchez Castillo.
The exhibition series Autumn of Modernism, The Moon Has a Complicated Geography is a survey on the contemporary Dutch art scene. At La Kunsthalle in Mulhouse, France he curated the exhibitions La Notte, The Garden of the Forking Paths and Les sculptures meurent aussi. Cabinet of Imagination was a collaborative effort with Netwerk, Aalst, Belgium, as was The Third Tiger (with Rossella Biscotti, Mark Manders and Olaf Nicolai) with Camere, RAM, Rome.
Many publications he realized for De Vleeshal are published by Roma Publications, Amsterdam. For the magazine CURA. he writes the column Portraits in the Exhibition Space, including articles about Alexander Dorner, Lucy R. Lippard, Seth Siegelaub, Alfred H. Barr, Willem Sandberg, Arnold Bode and Pontus Hultén.

Project: The Registry of Promise
Space: De Vleeshal

close
en

FRANCISCO TROPA

2. Francisco Tropa, Lantern, 2012

Born 1968, Lisbon, Portugal
Lives and works in Lisbon, Portugal

Image:
Francisco Tropa, Lantern (drop), 2012, lantern (brass, wood, stone, projector),
limestone cylinder, glass, liquid, screen, mixed media, variable dimensions.
© Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger (Courtesy: galerie Jocelyn Wolff)

Project: The Registry of Promise

close
en

Sandra Patron

SONY DSC

Sandra Patron dirige depuis 2007 le Parc Saint Léger, Centre d’art contemporain où elle a curaté entre autre les expositions personnelles de Lili Reynaud-Dewar, Oscar Tuazon, Simon Starling, Alain Bublex ou encore Gabriel Kuri. Depuis son arrivée, elle a structuré le pôle résidences du centre d’art avec la mise en place de La Grande Ourse et des Résidences Secondaires, placé la production des artistes au cœur du projet hors-les-murs, et développé l’ancrage international du lieu notamment par l’invitation faite chaque année à des commissaires étrangers.
De 1998 à 2007 Sandra Patron a dirigé triangle france à Marseille, artist run space intégrée au Triangle Art Trust, où elle développa notamment un festival bisannuel de performances (action-man-œuvres), des résidences croisées à Hambourg et Barcelone et des expositions de la jeune scène française à l’étranger, à Los Angeles, New York et Vilnius.
Elle est actuellement Présidente de d.c.a / association de développement des centres d’art, vice-présidente de triangle France et membre du comité d’acquisition du cnap (Centre national des arts plastiques).

Project: The Registry of Promise
Space: Parc Saint Léger

close
en

Vincent Honoré in conversation with Sandra Patron, Parc Saint Léger, Pougues-les-Eaux

VINCENT HONORE IN CONVERSATION WITH SANDRA PATRON, PARC SAINT LEGER, POUGUES-LES-EAUX

Vincent Honoré What was behind the creation of the art centre in 1998?

Sandra Patron There are two factors behind the creation of the art centre: first of all one man’s passion for contemporary creation, Bernard Bardin, then chairman of the General Council of Nièvre. He wanted this rural area to be rooted, in no ordinary dated nostalgia, but in the times and the questioning that it generates. Then as this region has been hit hard by de-industrialisation and an exodus towards cities, leaving entire sections of its heritage empty. This was notably the case with Pougues-les-Eaux, a spa resort that has been abandoned since the end of the ’70s. Local councillors were hoping to breathe new life into these sites without knowing exactly how to tackle the problem. In any case, chances are that a contemporary art centre had not been envisaged by most of them. Many had their reservations, and the discussions were heated, only Bernard Bardin’s pugnacity enabled the project to come to fruition. 

7_Wilfrid Almendra

2. Wilfrid Almendra, Le Splendid, 2013

V.H. How would you describe the art centre’s unique DNA in relation to other similar structures?

S.P. I think it is the characterful site that prompted me from the outset to consider the artistic project a time to offer artists rather than as a space to be invested. Residencies enable that, in addition to the off-site programme, insofar as we can at certain moments encourage long production processes, at other times react very quickly to requests that require technical expertise made possible by the scope of our local partners.
Paradoxically, the isolation of the site – or in any case its isolation from the art scene – is in my view a constituent part of the project, its strength and originality, this isolation enables a quite unique quality of concentration, for the team as well as for the artists. It also often enables often strong and sometimes friendly links to be formed between us. There is a lovely text by Giorgio Agamben on this matter of friendship and complicity acting as a powerful driving force to create a space for sharing and production, I have great faith in this idea, and there again, our setting is conducive to this type of approach.
Regarding projects that could characterise the way in which we envisage production processes, two examples come to mind: Lili Reynaud-Dewar came here to develop a project around the Black Maria, this first movie production studio conceived by Edison. For several months, the PSL was transformed into a film factory, a loyal troop rallied around his project, costume designers, actors, make-up artists and musicians, the films were shot on site, they were put together on site, the exhibition made this production process perceptible. Likewise Alain Bublex spent over a year on and off at the art centre in 2011 to produce a motorbike prototype in partnership with a local engineering school specialising in the car industry. In the global context in which we work, forging ahead, I realise that this way of working is a real luxury, for myself as well as my team of course, but also and above all for the artists. 

Parc Saint Léger

3. Parc Saint Léger

V.H. You started managing the art centre in 2007. Have you modified the programme or changed the focus of the centre, or quite the opposite do you want to anchor a heritage?

S.P. When I started, I kept the constituent parts of the project: the residency, the scheduling in situ as well as off-site but yes, there have been many changes. I wholeheartedly wanted the place to be anchored on a European level not only through the programme choices but also by inviting foreign curators every year. The residencies were reviewed: one, Les Résidences Secondaires, devoted to emerging artists, the other, La Grande Ourse, is a research residency at the crossroads of disciplines (theory, practical, graphic design) that I organise every year with art schools in Bourges, Cergy, Dijon and the graphic design centre in Chaumont. The off-site programme was reviewed, probably because, at the start, I was quite unsettled by this project and the sociocultural deviations that could result. Not really knowing how to address the question, I simply decided that we were going to do what we knew how to do: to produce artworks with artists. The person in charge of off-site programme was previously a cultural mediator, I decided to recruit an exhibition curator, and this simple decision completely changed the direction.

V.H. Parc Saint Léger is a complex structure that regroups a set of cultural facilities: exhibition space, residencies, publications, off-site actions. How do you combine all these activities into one coherent programme? 

Gabriel Kuri, bottled water branded water. Installation view

4. Gabriel Kuri, bottled water branded water. Installation view

S.P. I do not aspire to combine our different activities at all costs, but I actually worked to make synergy possible, and at the same time – and this is essential for me, for it to be possible for there to be no synergy. For our Résidences Secondaires for example, three month residences devoted to the emerging European scene), we select the artists one year in advance, we initiate discussions with them well ahead, we discuss the off-site programme with them, and very often there is a specific context that stimulates them, so we make this link between the residency and the off-site programme. But sometimes, the artists just need time for a break, for research, to bathe in the Loire and to smoke a cigarette by the fire, and that is fine with us too.

V.H. The location is rural. What bearing does its location have on your programme?

S.P. In concrete terms its rural location means that there is no power struggle with anyone: not in the art world as geographically you are not treading on anyone’s toes, nor locally as up against performing arts centres that are more easily identifiable, art centres are still as strange as UFOs. This lack of any threat to anyone brings great freedom on a daily basis. I am not sure for example that a project like Breathing House by Jean-Pascal Flavien would have been so simple to organise in an urban setting, with the numerous rules involved and the representatives to meet and to convince.

V.H. PIANO wants to create a space for exchange and dialogue between Italian and French art venues. Why did you want to participate and what programme are you proposing?  

S.P. Four years ago, I wished to become involved in the d.c.a office (that initiated PIANO) alongside Claire Le Restif, director of the Crédac, to encourage art centre networking on a European level. The reasons are pragmatic, strategic and artistic at the same time: pragmatic as there is less and less funding, and networking enables us to raise funds to produce our projects; strategic as in the cultural arena in France, we have been isolated for too long from the international scene and its players and there is a need for us, in terms of visibility, impact and symbolic power, to bridge this gap; artistic of course as directing an art centre sometimes means a certain amount of solitude and discussions with colleagues, a fortiori those with other thought processes, are vital. I am for example delighted about the discussions that I have at the moment with Chris Sharp, the curator of our exhibition for PIANO, The Registry of Promise, an exhibition with a literary construction in four chapters. His relationship with art, his approach, the way in which he works with artists, the way in which he perceives this very strange profession known as exhibition curator, is all very refreshing and a source of inspiration for me.

Simon Starling, THEREHERETHENTHERE (la Source). Installation view

5. Simon Starling, THEREHERETHENTHERE (la Source). Installation view

Space: Parc Saint Léger
Protagonists: Sandra Patron
Project: The Registry of Promise

 

Vincent Honoré Quelles sont les raisons qui ont présidé à la creation du centre d’art en 1998 ?

Sandra Patron La création du centre d’art résulte de deux facteurs : tout d’abord la passion d’un homme, Bernard Bardin, alors président du Conseil Général de la Nièvre, pour la création contemporaine. Il souhaitait ancrer ce territoire rural, non dans une quelconque nostalgie passéiste, mais bien dans son époque et les questionnements qu’elle suscite. Ensuite, parce que cette région a subi de plein fouet la désindustrialisation et l’exode vers les grandes villes, laissant des pans entiers de son patrimoine vacant. C’était notamment le cas de la station thermale de Pougues-les-Eaux, en déshérence depuis la fin des années ’70. Les élus locaux étaient à la recherche d’une nouvelle vie pour ces lieux sans savoir exactement comment envisager le problème, en tout cas, il est fort à parier que créer un centre d’art contemporain n’était pas, pour la majorité d’entre eux, une solution envisagée. Les réticences furent nombreuses, et les débats passionnés, seule la pugnacité de Bernard Bardin a permis au projet de voir le jour. 

V.H. Comment définir l’A.D.N. du centre d’art, ce qui le singularise par rapport à d’autres structures similaires ?

S.P. Je crois que c’est le lieu, avec ses caractéristiques, qui m’a amené dès le départ à envisager le projet artistique comme un temps à offrir aux artistes plus que comme un espace à investir. Les résidences permettent cela, ainsi que la programmation hors les murs, dans la mesure où nous pouvons à certains moments impulser des processus de production longs, à d’autres moments réagir très vite à des demandes qui supposent de mobiliser des compétences techniques qui sont rendues possibles par l’étendue de nos partenaires à l’échelle locale.
Paradoxalement, l’isolement du lieu – ou en tout cas son isolement de la scène artistique – me semble constitutif du projet, il en fait sa force et sa singularité, cet isolement crée une qualité de concentration dans le travail assez unique, tant pour l’équipe que pour les artistes. Il permet également de créer entre nous des liens souvent forts, parfois amicaux. Il y a un très joli texte de Giorgio Agamben sur cette question de l’amitié et de la complicité comme un puissant moteur pour créer un espace de partage et de production, je crois beaucoup à cette idée, et là encore, notre contexte favorise ce type d’approche.
Concernant des projets qui pourraient caractériser la façon dont nous envisageons les processus de production, deux exemples me viennent à l’esprit : Lili Reynaud-Dewar est venue développer un projet autour de la Black Maria, ce premier studio de cinéma imaginé par Edison. Pendant plusieurs mois, le PSL s’est alors transformé en usine à film, une troupe fidèle s’est retrouvée autour de son projet, costumiers, acteurs, maquilleurs, musiciens, on a tourné les films sur place, on les a monté sur place, l’exposition matérialisait ce processus de production. Idem avec Alain Bublex qui, en 2011, a passé plus d’un an par intermittence au centre d’art pour produire un prototype de moto en partenariat avec une école d’ingénieur locale spécialisée dans l’industrie automobile. Dans le contexte global qui est le nôtre, celui d’une fuite en avant généralisée, je mesure à quel point cette façon de travailler est un luxe, pour moi et mon équipe bien sûr, mais aussi et surtout pour les artistes. 

V.H. Vous avez pris la direction du centre d’art en 2007. Avez vous infléchi la programmation ou changé les missions du centre, ou au contraire avez-vous souhaité ancrer un héritage ?

S.P. À mon arrivée, j’ai conservé les éléments constitutifs du projet : la résidence, la programmation in situ et la programmation hors les murs mais oui, les évolutions ont été nombreuses. J’ai voulu résolument ancrer le lieu à l’échelle européenne non seulement par les choix de programmation mais également par l’invitation faite tous les ans à des commissaires étrangers. Les résidences ont été remaniées : l’une, Les Résidences Secondaires, dédiée aux artistes émergents, l’autre, La Grande Ourse, est une résidence de recherche à la croisée des disciplines (théorie, pratique, design graphique) que je produis tous les ans avec les Écoles d’art de Bourges, Cergy, Dijon et le pôle graphisme de Chaumont. La programmation hors les murs a été repensée, sans doute parce que, au départ, j’étais assez déstabilisée par ce projet et les dérives socio-culturelles qu’elle pouvait entraîner. Ne sachant pas vraiment comment aborder la question, j’ai simplement décidé que nous allions faire ce que nous savions faire : produire des œuvres avec des artistes. La chargée de programmation hors les murs était auparavant une médiatrice culturelle, j’ai décidé de recruter une commissaire d’exposition, et cette simple décision a complètement changé le curseur.

V.H. Le Parc Saint Léger est une structure complexe qui regroupe un certain nombre d’équipements culturels : espace d’expositions, résidences, publications, actions hors les murs. Comment unifier toutes ces activités dans un programme cohérent ? 

S.P. Mon souhait n’est pas d’unifier les différents pôles de notre activité à tout prix mais j’ai effectivement travaillé à rendre possibles les synergies, et en même temps – et c’est un point essentiel pour moi, à rendre possible le fait qu’il puisse ne pas y avoir de synergie. Pour nos Résidences Secondaires par exemple (résidences de trois mois dédiées à la scène émergente européenne), nous choisissons les artistes un an avant leur venue, nous entamons le dialogue avec eux bien en amont, nous leur parlons de la programmation hors les murs, et bien souvent il y a un contexte de travail qui les stimule, nous faisons alors ce lien entre la résidence et la programmation hors les murs. Mais parfois, les artistes ont juste besoin d’un temps de pause, de recherche, de baignade dans la Loire et de cigarette fumées au coin du feu, et cela nous va très bien aussi.

V.H. Le lieu est situé en territoire rural. En quoi sa situation informe votre programmation ?

S.P. Etre installé dans un territoire rural, concrètement, cela signifie que vous n’êtes un enjeu de pouvoir pour personne : ni pour le milieu de l’art car géographiquement vous ne marchez sur les plates-bandes de personne, ni localement car face aux structures de spectacle vivant, plus facilement repérables dans les formes qu’elles manipulent, les centres d’art font encore figure d’ovni. N’être un enjeu de pouvoir pour personne confère au quotidien une grande liberté d’action. Je ne suis pas sûre par exemple qu’un projet comme la Breathing House de Jean-Pascal Flavien aurait été si simple à monter dans un terrain urbain, avec sa multiplicité de réglementation et d’interlocuteurs à rencontrer et à convaincre.

V.H. PIANO veut créer un espace d’échange et de dialogues entre des lieux d’art italiens et français. Pourquoi avez vous souhaité participer et quel programme proposez-vous ?  

S.P. Il y a quatre ans, j’ai souhaité m’investir dans le bureau de d.c.a (qui est à l’initiative de PIANO) au côté de Claire Le Restif, directrice du Crédac, précisément pour cette question de mise en réseau des centres d’art à l’échelle européenne. Les raisons sont tout à la fois pragmatiques, stratégiques et artistiques : pragmatiques car les financements se raréfient, et le travail en réseau nous permet de bailler des fonds pour produire nos projets ; stratégiques car en France, culturellement, nous nous sommes trop longtemps isolés de la scène internationale et de ses acteurs et qu’il y a nécessité pour nous, en terme de visibilité, d’impact et de pouvoir symbolique, à combler ce retard ; artistiques bien sûr car diriger un centre d’art engendre parfois de grands moments de solitude et que les échanges avec des collègues, à fortiori ceux qui ont d’autres logiciels de pensés, sont vitaux. Je suis par exemple ravie des échanges que j’ai en ce moment avec Chris Sharp, le commissaire de notre exposition pour PIANO, The Registry of Promise, une exposition de facture littéraire en quatre chapitres. Son rapport à l’art, sa démarche, la façon dont il travaille avec les artistes, la façon dont il conçoit ce métier très étrange qu’on appelle commissaire d’exposition, tout cela est source d’oxygénation et d’inspiration pour moi.

Images:
1. Oscar Tuazon & Eli Hansen, IT WAS ONE OF MY BEST COMES, exhibition view, 2010. © Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger
2. Wilfrid Almendra, Le Splendid, 2013. © Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger
3. Parc Saint Léger. © Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger
4. Gabriel Kuri, bottled water branded water, exhibition view, 2013. © Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger
5. Simon Starling, THEREHERETHENTHERE (la Source), exhibition view, 2009. © Aurélien Mole / Parc Saint Léger

 

close
en - it

Isa Genzken

Born 1948, Bad Oldesloe, Germany
Lives and works in Berlin, Germany

Isa Genzken uses a wide range of materials, media, and technology to create works that express a strong connection with reality. Her pieces, which take many different forms (columns, paintings, sculptures, and installations), can be viewed as “molds” that trace the relationship between the artist and the objects, spaces, and architectural structures that surround her. Zwei Frauen im Gefecht (Two Women in Combat) is one of Genzken’s first videos, produced while the artist was at the Düsseldorf Academy of Art. It might seem strange to choose a video, given that the artist is better known for her sculptures, yet in the 1970s many artists and performers used their bodies and the medium of video installation to expose the sexism and patriarchal set-up of the art establishment. In her practice Genzken often adopts a cinematographic approach, for example in her works devoted to the architecture of cities like New York and Chicago, not to mention her numerous photographic projects. The video on show in the exhibition dates to 1974 and documents a performance in which Isa Genzken and fellow artist Susanne Grayson repeatedly exchange clothes, leaving one naked and the other dressed and then vice versa, highlighting the marked differences in their body shapes. The two friends pass a bra, shirt, skirt, and shoes back and forth, making amused attempts to fit the clothes to their bodies. The video was filmed by the German art historian Benjamin H. D. Buchloh, anticipating Genzken’s practice of including other artists and people from the art world in her works.

Nata a Bad Oldesloe, Germania, nel 1948
Vive e lavora a Berlino, Germania

Utilizzando i più svariati materiali, media e tecnologie, Isa Genzken crea opere che esprimono un forte legame con la realtà. I suoi lavori, che assumono le forme più disparate (colonne, dipinti, sculture o installazioni), possono essere considerati come dei “calchi”, raffiguranti la relazione che intercorre tra l’artista e gli oggetti, gli spazi e le architetture che la circondano. Zwei Frauen im Gefecht (Due donne in competizione) è uno dei primi video di Genzken, realizzati quando l’artista studiava all’Accademia di Düsseldorf. Selezionare un video di Isa Genzken per una mostra è una scelta insolita, dato che l’artista è più conosciuta per le sue opere scultoree. Tuttavia, negli anni ’70 molte artiste e performer hanno utilizzato il proprio corpo e il mezzo della videoinstallazione per denunciare il sessismo e la gestione patriarcale del sistema dell’arte. Nella sua pratica artistica Genzken adotta spesso uno sguardo cinematografico, come emerge dai suoi lavori dedicati alle architetture di città quali New York o Chicago, o da numerosi progetti fotografici. Il video citato, del 1974, documenta una performance in cui Isa Genzken e l’amica e artista Susanne Grayson si scambiano più volte gli abiti che indossano, risultando a turno una nuda e l’altra vestita, ciò che evidenzia diverse corporature delle due donne. Le amiche si passano il reggiseno, la camicia, la gonna e le scarpe, e cercano di volta in volta di adattare i capi ai loro corpi, sorridendo. Le riprese sono effettuate dallo storico dell’arte tedesco Benjamin H. D. Buchloh e, in questo senso, il video anticipa la pratica di Genzken di coinvolgere nei propri lavori altri artisti e persone che operano nel mondo dell’arte.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it

Pier Paolo Pasolini

Born 1922, Bologna, Italy
† 1975, Lido di Ostia, Italy

The short film Pasolini e… la forma della città, produced by RAI in the autumn of 1973 and broadcast the following year, was directed by Paolo Brunatto and not, as could have been expected, by its subject— the Italian poet, writer, director, screenwriter, playwright, and journalist Pier Paolo Pasolini. Yet it is so redolent of Pasolini’s personality and aesthetic that it looks like his own work. The documentary features a series of interviews with personalities from the Italian cultural scene, who are asked to talk about a specific work of art.
Pasolini has chosen Orte and Sabaudia, two towns that played an important role in his life. Filmed mostly by Pasolini himself, this short piece comes across as a harmonious interweave of words and pictures. He films the area around Orte, approaches the town center, and then moves to Sabaudia, where on a windswept beach he himself appears, lamenting the environmental, urban, and cultural degeneration of Italy. The conclusion sums up some of his impassioned arguments against standardization, which were published in the newspaper “Corriere della Sera.” Throughout the film, Pasolini does not address a generic audience of viewers but engages with a specific “you,” his actor friend Ninetto Davoli. Pasolini himself went on to use part of the footage in the short film Le mura di Sana’a, devoted to the capital of North Yemen, an ancient city whose history and culture were threatened by the advance of modern progress.

Nato a Bologna, Italia, nel 1922
† 1975, Lido di Ostia, Italia

La regia del cortometraggio Pasolini e… la forma della città, prodotto dalla RAI nell’autunno del 1973 e trasmesso l’anno seguente, non è del poeta, scrittore, regista, sceneggiatore, drammaturgo e giornalista italiano Pier Paolo Pasolini, bensì di Paolo Brunatto. Tuttavia, la personalità di Pasolini e gli aspetti salienti della sua poetica permeano a tal punto l’opera che egli sembra esserne l’autore. Il documentario si compone di una serie di interviste, intitolata Io e …, a personalità della cultura italiana, a cui viene chiesto di parlare di una determinata opera d’arte.
Pasolini sceglie di parlare di Orte e Sabaudia, due città che avevano un ruolo importante nella sua vita. Pasolini, che per buona parte del film tiene in mano la telecamera ed è dunque autore delle riprese, imposta La forma della città come un intreccio armonico di immagini e parole. Riprende i dintorni di Orte, si avvicina al centro della città, e, infine, arriva a Sabaudia, dove, su una spiaggia ventosa, è ritratto mentre denuncia la degenerazione ambientale, urbanistica e, quindi, culturale dell’Italia. La conclusione del cortometraggio sintetizza alcuni degli argomenti della polemica pasoliniana contro l’omologazione, come si esprimeva in quel periodo sulle pagine del “Corriere della sera”. Per tutto il film, Pasolini non si rivolge mai al generico telespettatore, ma colloquia con un “tu” specifico, ossia l’attore e amico Ninetto Davoli. Pasolini utilizzerà in seguito parte delle riprese per Le mura di Sana’a, un cortometraggio sulla capitale dello Yemen del nord, città antichissima che la modernità minaccia di distruggere.

Project: Soleil politique

close
en - it - fr

MÉLANIE BOUTELOUP

Mélanie Bouteloup is a co-founder and the current director of Bétonsalon – Centre for art and research. Over the last ten years, she has curated numerous projects in various forms that anchor research in society on process-based, collaborative and discursive levels, following different time spans, in cooperation with various local, national and international organizations. In 2012, Mélanie Bouteloup is associate curator with artistic director Okwui Enwezor of the Paris Triennale – an event organised on the initiative of the Ministry of Culture and Communication/DGCA, the Centre National des Arts Plastiques and the Palais de Tokyo.

Mélanie Bouteloup è cofondatrice e direttrice del Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche. Nel corso degli ultimi dieci anni ha curato numerosi progetti in varie forme che ancorano la ricerca nella società attraverso livelli discorsivi, collaborativi e processuali, che seguono differenti temporalità; progetti che sono stati realizzati in cooperazione con varie organizzazioni locali, nazionali e internazionali. Nel 2012 Mélanie Bouteloup è stata curatrice associata del direttore artistico Okwi Enwezor alla Triennale di Parigi, un evento organizzato su iniziativa del Ministero della cultura e Comunicazione/DGCA, Centro Nazionale delle Arti Plastiche e del Palais de Tokyo.

Mélanie Bouteloup est co-fondatrice et directrice du centre d’art et de recherche Bétonsalon. Au cours des dix dernières années, elle a dirigé de nombreux projets visant à ancrer l’art en société, en partenariat avec de nombreuses organisations locales, nationales et internationales. En 2012, Mélanie Bouteloup est commissaire associée auprès du directeur artistique Okwui Enwezor de La Triennale – manifestation organisée à l’initiative du ministère de la Culture et de la Communication/DGCA, par le Centre national des arts plastiques et le Palais de Tokyo. En 2014, Mélanie Bouteloup est nommée Chevalier dans l’Ordre des Arts et des Lettres par le Gouvernement français.

Project: Exercizing Doubt: Exhibition as Research
Space: Bétonsalon

close
en - it - fr

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH MÉLANIE BOUTELOUP, BÉTONSALON - CENTRE D'ART ET DE RECHERCHE, PARIS

VINCENT HONORÉ IN CONVERSATION WITH MÉLANIE BOUTELOUP, BÉTONSALON - CENTRE D'ART ET DE RECHERCHE, PARIS

Vincent Honoré What prefigured the creation of Bétonsalon in Paris? Is there a precedent or theoretical model for the space?
Mélanie Bouteloup Bétonsalon was born in 2003 from the assembling of a group that included artists from the École des Beaux-Arts de Paris and art historians, especially from the École du Louvre. We came together around the shared view that Paris lacked places that were midway between art school and institution, places where it was possible to test ideas, make mistakes and show the work of unestablished artists, whether they were still students or were older but unrecognised. At that time, there was Public near the Centre Pompidou and this provided a model, and also the Paris Project Room, which was an important place for the École des Beaux-Arts de Paris.

V.H. How does Bétonsalon fit into its environment, and how is it different from other spaces in Paris?
M.B. Today the Bétonsalon Centre for Art and Research is located in the 13th arrondissement in Paris, on the ground floor of Paris 7 University. It is one of the few independent art centres located on a university campus in France. Because of this, we enjoy a special relationship with the Ministry of education and we are developing a programme that questions standardised forms of knowledge production, classification and distribution. I think art centres have a role to play, supporting art research and rearticulating the position of education, research and creativity in society.

SONY DSC

2. Bétonsalon façade

V.H. Has Bétonsalon’s mission evolved over the course of its 10-year existence?
M.B. As the years and meetings have passed, the organisation has become more professional and its ambitions have asserted themselves. The opening of the Centre for art and research in 2007 was a key moment. At that time we met many university researchers and students whom we gradually got to know well. Bétonsalon’s activities develop in a process-based, discursive way in collaboration with a variety of local, national and international organisations. Today the programming is conceived according to various formats and timeframes, and includes several annual exhibitions interspersed with associated events. Different seminars and workshops are also organised in collaboration with professors from Paris Diderot University.

J3888x2592-00599

3. Bétonsalon façade

V.H. How might one conceive of the possibility of spaces for independent programming in the face of accelerated globalisation, a ubiquitous art market and the hitting power of the largest institutions?
M.B. I think flexible, small-scale organisations like Bétonsalon are needed to preserve this possibility of experimenting with ways of working that involve direct dialogue, even joint construction, with other non-profit organisations. Faced with this crisis situation, there is an urgent need to reconsider how we do things. Cross-disciplinary navigation tactics need to be invented. This could be done as soon as renewed conception of the territory of art could be agreed: a conception of art that favours what’s happening instead of what’s seen, processes instead of objects. An art centre should make the social and cultural frictions of the present perceptible.

4. Exhibition view, Le jour d'après, Bétonsalon - Centre d'art et de recherche

4. Exhibition view, Maryam Jafri. Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche

V.H. Under these conditions, what are the responsibilities of the director of an art centre?
M.B. The responsibility of the whole staff of an art centre is therefore enormous. We have to challenge ourselves, working as closely as possible with the region by maintaining a network of relationships that should be broadened day by day to increase the number of collaborations. To me, an art centre is a contact zone (in Mary Louise Pratt’s sense) in which heterogeneous positions are brought together with the goal of producing new ways of conceiving and influencing a globalised world in crisis.

V.H. PIANO wants to create a network of Italian and French art centres, an exchange zone. Why did you want to join this project and what will you be presenting?
M.B. I wanted to join this project because it fits perfectly with our ambition to be a member of a network of contacts from a variety of backgrounds extending beyond France’s borders. I had a fascinating discussion with Emanuele Guidi, director of ar/ge kunst in Bolzano, about the desire for a research-exhibition, that is to say an exhibition format that makes it possible to work with a diverse group of artists and researchers who all contribute to reflecting on a problem or question. Emanuele Guidi joined forces with Clémence Seilles, I worked with Maryam Jafri. And we built our exhibition with Virginie Bobin, associate curator in charge of the visitors’ project at Bétonsalon. Le jour d’après takes as its point of departure a collection of photographs that show the independence ceremonies of around twenty countries in Asia and Africa, collected by the artist over the past few years with the help of a constellation of researchers. It is a reflection on how history is written. Therefore it is crucial to be able to hear voices other than the official ones, hence the invitation extended to the Italian collective Invernomuto to come and contribute to the exhibition.

1. Exhibition view, Le jour d'après, Bétonsalon - Centre d'art et de recherche

5. Exhibition view, Maryam Jafri. Le jour d’après, Bétonsalon – Centre d’art et de recherche

Vincent Honoré Qu’est-ce qui a préfiguré la création de Bétonsalon à Paris ? L’espace a-t-il un précédent ou un modèle théorique ?
Mélanie Bouteloup Bétonsalon est né en 2003 du rassemblement d’un groupe d’artistes de l’Ecole des Beaux-Arts de Paris et d’historiens de l’art notamment issus de l’Ecole du Louvre. Nous nous sommes réunis autour du constat qu’il manquait à Paris des lieux intermédiaires entre l’école d’art et l’institution, des lieux où tester des idées, faire des erreurs et montrer le travail d’artistes non établis, qu’ils soient encore étudiants ou plus âgés mais méconnus. A l’époque, il y avait Public près du Centre Pompidou qui a constitué un modèle, mais aussi Paris Project Room, qui a été un lieu important pour l’école des Beaux-Arts de Paris.

V.H. Comment Bétonsalon s’inscrit dans l’environnement qui est le sien, et quelle est sa différence par rapport aux autres espaces parisiens ?
M.B. Le centre d’art et de recherche Bétonsalon est aujourd’hui situé dans le 13ème arrondissement de Paris, au rez-de-chaussée de l’Université Paris 7. Il est un des rares centres d’art indépendants implantés dans un campus universitaire en France. De ce fait, nous bénéficions de relations privilégiées avec l’Education nationale et développons un programme qui questionne les formes normalisées de production, de classification et de distribution du savoir. Je pense que le centre d’art a un rôle à jouer pour accompagner la recherche en art et réarticuler la position de la pédagogie, de la recherche et de la création en société.

V.H. Est-ce que la mission de Bétonsalon a évolué au cours de ses 10 années d’existence ?
M.B. Au fur et à mesure des années et des rencontres, la structure s’est professionnalisée et les ambitions se sont affirmées. L’ouverture du centre d’art et de recherche en 2007 constitue un moment clé. Nous avons alors rencontré de nombreux chercheurs et étudiants du milieu universitaire avec lesquels nous nous sommes peu à peu familiarisés. Les activités de Bétonsalon se développent de manière processuelle et discursive, en collaboration avec une variété d’organisations locales, nationales et internationales. Conçue selon divers formats et temporalités, la programmation comprend aujourd’hui plusieurs expositions annuelles ponctuées d’événements associés. Différents séminaires et ateliers sont de plus organisés en collaboration avec des professeurs de l’Université Paris Diderot.

V.H. Comment concevoir la possibilité d’espaces de programmation indépendants face à une globalisation accélérée, à un marché de l’art omniprésent et à la puissance de frappe des plus grandes institutions ?
M.B. Je pense que des structures flexibles de petite échelle comme Bétonsalon sont nécessaires pour conserver cette possibilité d’expérimenter des manières de travailler en dialogue direct, voire en co-construction, avec d’autres acteurs associatifs. Face à cette situation de crise, il est urgent de repenser nos manières de faire. Des tactiques de navigation transversale doivent être inventées. Cela pourra se faire à partir du moment où une conception renouvelée du territoire de l’art pourra être entendue : une conception de l’art qui privilégie ce qui se passe plutôt que ce que l’on voit, les processus plutôt que les objets. Un centre d’art doit rendre sensible les frictions sociales et culturelles du présent.

V.H. Dans ces conditions, quelles responsabilités pour un directeur de centre d’art ?
M.B. La responsabilité pour toute l’équipe d’un centre d’art est donc énorme. Il s’agit de se remettre en question, travailler au plus près du territoire en entretenant un réseau de relations qu’il convient d’étendre au jour le jour pour multiplier les collaborations. Un centre d’art est pour moi une zone de contacts (au sens de Mary Louise Pratt) où des positions hétérogènes sont assemblées dans le but de produire de nouvelles façons de penser et d’agir sur un monde globalisé, en crise.

V.H. PIANO veut créer un réseau de centres d’art italiens et français, une zone d’échange. Pourquoi avez-vous souhaité rejoindre ce projet et qu’allez-vous présenter ?
M.B. J’ai souhaité rejoindre ce projet car il correspond parfaitement à notre ambition d’être partie prenante d’un réseau d’interlocuteurs issus d’horizons variés au-delà des frontières françaises. J’ai engagé une discussion passionnante avec Emanuele Guidi, directeur de ar/ge kunst à Bolzano, autour de l’envie de l’exposition-recherche, c’est-à-dire un format d’exposition qui permet de travailler avec un groupe d’artistes et de chercheurs à géométrie variable qui tous contribuent à réfléchir autour d’un problème ou d’une question. Emanuele Guidi s’est rapproché de Clémence Seilles et moi de Maryam Jafri. Et c’est avec Virginie Bobin, commissaire associée en charge du projet des publics à Bétonsalon, que nous avons construit notre exposition. Le jour d’après prend comme point de départ une collection de photographies représentant les cérémonies d’indépendance d’une vingtaine de pays en Asie et en Afrique, rassemblées par l’artiste au cours de ces dernières années grâce à une constellation de chercheurs. Il s’agit alors de réfléchir à comment l’Histoire s’écrit. Il est alors crucial de pouvoir entendre d’autres voix que celles officielles, d’où l’invitation faite au collectif italien I